Ghadiri M, Motaghi M. Homeopathy Impact on Physical Health Aspects of Quality of Life of Patients with Chronic Headache in Isfahan in 2015 . Biomed Pharmacol J 2016;9(1)
Manuscript received on :February 06, 2016
Manuscript accepted on :March 16, 2016
Published online on: 29-03-2016
How to Cite    |   Publication History
Views Views: (Visited 496 times, 1 visits today)   Downloads PDF Downloads: 450
Homeopathy Impact on Physical Health Aspects of Quality of Life of Patients with Chronic Headache in Isfahan in 2015

Mohsen Ghadiri1 and Minoo Motaghi2

1Graduate student, nursing education (public health orientation of Islamic Azad University of Isfahan (Khorasgan) 2Member of the Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Islamic Azad University of Isfahan (Khorasgan), Corresponding Author Email: m.motaghi912@gmail.com

DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.13005/bpj/935

Abstract:

Headache is the most common pain syndrome and more than 90 percent of people over the year have had an attack. Due to the high prevalence of headache in the world and Iran, and its impact on quality of life and because of side effects of chemical drugs and the high cost of current treatments,this study aimed to investigate the effect of homeopathy on physical health aspects of quality of life of patients with chronic headache and performed in Isfahan in 2015. This quasi-experimental is the kind of single group, and it is a before and after. The questionnaire consisted of demographic and quality of life (SF-36). Sampling is available, in which 51 patients with chronic headache in a way that met the inclusion criteria. Before making a homeopathic demographic questionnaire and the consent were completed by patients and quality of life questionnaire in two stages prior to undertaking homeopathy and the again three months later it was completed by patients. In order to analyze the data, SPSS20 software was used. In this study, homeopathic significantly improve the physical health aspects of quality of life of patients with chronic headache and the differences between pretest and post test scores was significant(p>(05/0 The results showed that homeopathy can be effective in improving physical health aspects of quality of life of patients with chronic headaches and be used as a useful method of treatment.

Keywords:

chronic headache; quality of life; Homeopathy

Download this article as: 
Copy the following to cite this article:

Ghadiri M, Motaghi M. Homeopathy Impact on Physical Health Aspects of Quality of Life of Patients with Chronic Headache in Isfahan in 2015 . Biomed Pharmacol J 2016;9(1)

Copy the following to cite this URL:

Ghadiri M, Motaghi M. Homeopathy Impact on Physical Health Aspects of Quality of Life of Patients with Chronic Headache in Isfahan in 2015. Biomed Pharmacol J 2015;9(1). Available from: http://biomedpharmajournal.org/?p=6662

Introduction

In fact one of the most common physical side effects are headache, headache is a symptom, not a disease. Headaches can be a symptom of organic disease, stress responses, dilation of cerebral blood vessels, skeletal muscle tension or set of factors listed. (1) Headache is the most common pain syndrome and more than 90 percent of people each year experience at least one headache. Annually, 240 million suffer from 4.1 billion headache attacks4.1, lifetime prevalence of headache in men 93% and in women 99% have been reported. Prevalence of headache in different societies is different, so that it is reported in Norway, Brazil, Turkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Yugoslavia and Kenya equal to 76.8% 82.9% 49.2%, 85%, 49.8%, 66%, and 88%. And in all cases, prevalence of headache in women is more than men.(2) In Iran, since about half of patients do not see a doctor, determine exact amount of the population is difficult. In various studies conducted in Iran, Migraine prevalence in Shiraz 7.4%, in Rasht 8.8% and in Shahrekord 13.3% have been reported.(3) the effects of chronic disability caused by migraine has been less studied. Compared to other chronic diseases such as diabetes, hypertension and coronary heart diseases, quality of life in people with migraine has been a lower degree. In patients with chronic daily headache not only in the field of public health and reduce physical exertion and the quality of life, but also in terms of mental health, there is also the loss of quality.(4) for the young people, chronic headaches cause missed school days, reduce their quality of life and athletic activities. (5) for the treatment of headache, various methods including conventional medicine, chemical drugs, and a variety of complementary medicine including acupuncture and homeopathy can be used.From the perspective of the World Health Organization, homeopathic medicine is one of the most holistic and complementary medicine, which has more than 200 years old, it is a comprehensive and independent treatment protocol and can be most effective.The word “homeopathy” is a combination of two words; the word “homeo” which means similar and the word “pathy” which means disease.(6). This means that the nature and extent of drug action plan is a condition or state of ill-health therapist must have the same symptoms.(7) One of complementary medicine therapies effective in chronic diseases(8) Since one of the primary goals in providing health care by nurses, is improving the quality of life of patients with headache, this study was conducted to evaluate the effects of homeopathy on physical health aspects of quality of life of patients with chronic headache in Isfahan in 2015.

Materials and Methods                                                                   

This quasi-experimental is the kind of single group, and it is a before and after. Which was carried out in early August 2015 to late October 2015 office visit two of the city homeopathic physicians. The study population included all patients with chronic headache who visited the homeopath doctor’s office the in Isfahan in 2015. With a sample size formula for the mean difference test, before and after the intervention, the formula was used:

formula1

 

Upon which to perform the two-sided test in significance level of 5% (α=0.05), with a test power of 90% (β=0.1) and for the difference in size of 5.0 standard deviation (σ5/0=ε), the required sample size was estimated at 36. (9). with the possibility of sample loss, 64 patients were selected who met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 13 patients withdrew and finally, this study was conducted with 51 people. Entry requirements include a signed consent form and willingness to participate in research and exclusion criteria from the study include failure to complete homeopathic remedy.

Assessment instrument was a demographic questionnaire and quality of life questionnaire (SF-36).The questionnaire included demographic information such as age, sex, marital status, education, income and occupation.SF-36 questionnaire that its validity and reliability have been proven in Iran, has 36 expressions and includes two subscales of mental and physical health (10).

Before the intervention, patients completed a demographic questionnaire and quality of life questionnaire SF-36. Then treated with homeopathic medicines within 3 months. After this period, they again completed the quality of life questionnaire 36-SF. After collecting the data entered into the computer, and then statistical tests were analyzed by software SPSS20, the data were both descriptive and analytic that the frequency, distribution, mean table was used in the descriptive level and paired t-test was used at the level of inference.

Result of paired t-test showed a significant difference between the mean scores of patients before and after treatment in terms of public health (p<0/05) and mean scores of quality of life in terms of public health after the intervention significantly higher than before intervention.

Table 1: Frequency distribution of research units based on demographic characteristics

Variable

Category Number Percent Average

Standard deviation

Sex Man 15 4/29
Female 36 6/70
Age Under 30 years 14 5/27
40-31 years 24 1/47 47/35 06/9
50-41 years 10 6/19
Over 50 years 3 9/5
Marital status Married 43 3/84
Single 7 7/13   –
Widow 1 0/2
Number of children 0 children 5 4/11
2-1 children 26 1/59 89/1 10/1
4-3 children 13 5/29
Education illiterate 1 0/2
Low literate 12 5/23
Diploma 20 2/39
Associate Degree 6 8/11
Bachelor’s Degree or higher 12 5/23
Job Employed 19 3/37
Unemployed 32 7/62
Income Less than one million 5 3/26
 1-1.5million 8 1/42 32/1 51/0
1.6million 6 6/31

 

Table 2: compares the physical health subscales of the quality of life of patients before and after the intervention.

  Before intervention   After intervention Mean difference t Test statistic Degrees of freedom

 

Significance level
average Standard deviation   average Standard deviation
Physical function 62.35 21.83 74.61 25.06 12.25 -3.901 50 <.001
Physical role 43.14 34.67 62.75 33.31 19.61 -3.388 50 .001
Bodily pain 48.43 21.71 61.32 24.91 12.89 -3.444 50 .001
Public health 52.94 17.12 59.83 16.44 6.89 -4.445 50 >.001

 

Discussion

The results showed that the average age of patients with chronic headache was 35.47 ± 9.06, which was in line with the results of Abdi et al (11) entitled “The impact of high-intensity eight weeks aerobic training on measures of migraine” and the average age of the study also was equal to 12.3± 34.1 and also is consistent with previous results of Taziki et al (12) entitled “personality characteristics of migraine and tension-type headache” in which the mean age of patients was equal to 11.92 ± 34.94. Of these, 29.4% were male and 70.6% were women, which is consistent with the results of Khosropour et al (13) and Fallah et al (14) and Yaqini et al (15) and all of these studies showed that women suffer the most from this disease. 84.3% of the patients were married, which is consistent with the results of Aghapour Zanganeh and et al (16). Based on the results, 62.7% were unemployed, which is consistent with results of Bahraini (17).The results showed that homeopathy has a significant effect on physical health of quality of life in patients with chronic headache. In terms of physical function, physical role, Paired t-test results showed a significant difference between the mean scores of patients before and after the intervention (05/0> p) and mean scores of quality of life after treatment was significantly higher than before the intervention.‌These results were in line with the findings of Bryan et al entitled “homeopathic clinical benefits for patients with rheumatoid arthritis”, which showed that homeopathy has a positive effect on physical function and physical role (18).The findings of the study on the impact of physical border homeopathic patients with chronic headache showed significant differences comparing planned paired t-test and post-test analysis confirms this difference.The mean score of quality of life after physical pain after treatment was significantly higher than before the intervention, which is consistent with a study of Claudia et al (19) called the effectiveness of the quality of life of breast cancer patients treated with a variety of complementary medicine, including homeopathy. It also is consistent with the results of Abraham and et al (20) entitled comparison with homeopathy and acupuncture treatment of knee osteoarthritis showed that acupuncture on pain in this case, however, the impact is more effective, but also homeopathy has an effect on pain.In terms of public health, the results of this study could prove homeopathy positive impact so that the result of paired t-test showed a significant difference between the mean scores of patients before and after the intervention (p<0/05) and the average score of quality of life after public health after intervention was significantly higher than before the intervention.These results are consistent with results of Dunn and et al (21) entitled “The effect of homeopathic remedies on outpatients with influenza and diseases of the ear, nose and throat”.

Conclusion                     

The results of this study showed that homeopathy as one of the top complementary medicine has a positive impact on physical health aspect of quality of life of patients with chronic headache. The benefits of this treatment for patients with chronic headache are no side effects of treatment with homeopathic remedies, easy and inexpensive treatment and strengthen the vitality of the individual and ultimately, improve the quality of life.

Ethical considerations

Adequate explanations about the object and purpose of the study were presented to the research units. It was explained that they can withdraw from the research at any time.  All stages of the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Medical Sciences and Ethics Code number: IR.MUI.REC.2015.4.59 is intended for this study.

Acknowledgments

The researcher are obliged to appreciate all persons who have worked in this study, especially patients with chronic headaches referred to homeopathic physicians

References

  1. Zolfaghari M, Asadinoghabi A, Nasiri R.[ Summary of nursing textbook lessons].1 sted.Tehran:Andisherafia ,2014: 704 pages .[ Persian]
  2. BehrouzB,AminiK,ShakeniaF,AbediA,GhasemiN.The epidemiology and clinical      Characteristics of migraine and tension headaches among the patientsreferred to farabi    Hospital in Kermanshah city in year 2011.Iranian journalof epidemiology2013,9(1):58-65. [Persian].
  3. NajafiM,GhorbaniA,SonbolestanA,Abdi R. The effect of topiramate in migraine improvement.2011.Pajouhesh darPezeshki (Journal of Research in Medical Sciences)35(3):141-149, [Persian].
  4. Shaygannejad V.[ Diagnosis and treatment of headache]. 1 st ed.Mashhad:Wagiran,2013,487Pages, [Persian].
  5. Galinski M, Sidhoum S, Cimerman P, Perrin O, Annequin D, Tourniaire B.2015. Early Diagnosis of Migraine Necessary in Children: 10-Year Follow-Up. PediatrNeurol 1-5
  6. Taban A.[An introduction to healing art by homeopathy] 1 sted.Tehran ,Babazadeh,2013,86 Pages, [Persian].
  7. Frass M, Friehs H, Thallinger C, Sohal N, Marosi C, MuchitschI,et al.2015. Influence of adjunctive classical homeopathy on global health status and subjective wellbeing in cancer, medicine patients —a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. . Complementary Therapies in 23: 309—317.
  8. Gaertner K, Müllner M, Friehs H, Schuster E, Marosi C, Muchitsch I, et al.2014. Additive homeopathy in cancer patients:Retrospective survival data from a homeopathic outpatient unit at the Medical University of Vienna. Complementary Therapies in Medicine 22, 320—332
  9. Chow,Shein-Chung. Sample size calculation in clinical research,2003. Journal of Researchin Medical Sciences.Available  from: http://dlib.sbmu.ac.ir/site/catalogue/99452
  10. Montazeri A, Goshtasebi A, Vahdaninia M, Gandek B. The short form health survey (SF-36): translation  and validation study of the iranian version. Qual Life Res. 2005; (14): 875-82
  11. AbdiA,PartoA,Azizi M.  Effect of Eight Weeks High Intensity Aerobic Training on Migrane Headache Quarterly of Horizon of Medical Sciences, 2014(Issue 3) [Persian].
  12. Taziki S, Saghafi S, Fathi D, Ramezannezhad A.2014. Personality characteristics in migraine and tension type headache. Journal of Psychiatry,17(5):14-9.
  13. KhosropourF,MokhtariM,EbrahiminegadG.The relationship of perfectionism dimensions  And personality type with migraine.Journal of Kerman University of Medical Sciences,2015, 22(4):424-432.[ Persian].
  14. Fallah R,DivanizadehM,KarimiM,Ordooei.Evaluation of efficacy and safety of propranolol For pediatric migraine prophylaxis.JshahidSadoughiUniv Med Sci 2013,21(1):94-100. [Persian].
  15. Yaghini O,MahmoudianT,BehfarS,AlaviradM,GhorbaniR,PooyaB.Prevalence of headacheIn 11 to 18-year-old students in Isfahan ,Iran.Journal of Isfahan Medical school ,2011,29(149): 1046-1054. .[ Persian].
  16. AghapourzangenehF,ChitsazA,NajafiM,NourouziR.Epidemiologic and clinical    Characteristics of migraine headaches:A descriptive study in Isfahan ,Iran.Journal of Isfahan  Medical school.2012,30(187):581-587. .[ Persian].
  17. BahrainiS.The effect of facial and head massage on the pain severity of sinus headache . Journal of Mashhad  Paramedical Sciences & Rehabilitation( jpsr.mums)3(1):68-73. .[In Persian].
  18. Brien M, Lachance L, Prescott P, McDermott C, Lewith G.2011. Homeopathy has clinical benefits in rheumatoid arthritis patients that are attributable to the consultation process but not the homeopathic remedy: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Rheumatology, 50:1070_1082.
  19. Claudia M, Außerer WO, Baier S, Heidegger H, Icke K, Mayr O, et al.2015. Effectiveness of an additional individualized multi-component complementary medicine treatment on health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: a pragmatic randomized trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 149:449–460.
  20. Ibrahim SE, Zohiery AKL, Mobasher SA, EldinAB, Mohamed MA, Abdalla A.2015 Acupuncture versus homeopathy as a complementary therapy in patients with knee  osteoarthritis. Int J Phys Med Rehabil, 3:2 .
  21. Danu K, Cognate Thevenard G, Dura G,Allaert FA,  Bordet MF.2013. Effectiveness of homeopathic medicine associated with allopathic medicine in the outpatient management of influenza-like illnesses or ear, nose, and throat disorders by pharmacists. J Manag Care Pharm, 19(8):631-41.
Share Button
(Visited 496 times, 1 visits today)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.