Sankari S. L, Masthan K. M. K, Babu N. A, Priyadharsini C. Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis - A Review. Biomed Pharmacol J 2013;6(1)
Manuscript received on :
Manuscript accepted on :
Published online on: 15-12-2015
Plagiarism Check: Yes
How to Cite    |   Publication History
Views Views: (Visited 1,261 times, 1 visits today)   Downloads PDF Downloads: 853

S. Leena Sankari, K. M. K. Masthan, N. Aravindha Babu  and C. Priyadharsini

Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Sree Balaji Dental College and Hospital, Bharath University, Chennai, India.

Abstract

Oral ulcers are diverse in number. Recurrent aphthous ulceration is the most common form of painful ulcerations in oral cavity. The diagnosis is well defined but the etiology and pathogenesis remains unclear. It is common condition affecting 20% of general population. This review article provides the exact etiology, diagnosis, criteria and treatment of RAS.

Keywords

Oral Ulcer; Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis

Download this article as: 
Copy the following to cite this article:

Sankari S. L, Masthan K. M. K, Babu N. A, Priyadharsini C. Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis - A Review. Biomed Pharmacol J 2013;6(1)

Copy the following to cite this URL:

Sankari S. L, Masthan K. M. K, Babu N. A, Priyadharsini C. Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis - A Review. Biomed Pharmacol J 2013;6(1). Available from: http://biomedpharmajournal.org/?p=2603

Introduction

Oral ulcers are diverse with a wide variety causes. Among the oral ulcers, Recurrent aphthous stomatitis(RAS)  is the most common form of ulceration .It is a disease characterized by episodic appearance of oral ulcers  in which etiology and pathophysiology remains unclear. The word aphthous  was originated   with  Hippocrates in 460-370BC in reference  to disorders of mouth (Terri.S.I. et al. 2002). It is a widespread disorder affecting at least 5% to 66% of examined adult patient groups. Frequently the affected groups find difficulty in eating and speaking (Srinivas Rao et.al 2010). The cause is multitude in number with many precipitating factors. There are three clinical presentations of RAS they are major, minor and herpetiform.

Etiology

The exact etiology of RAS is unidentified. On a survey, 10-20% of patients with RAS  had deficiencies of iron, folic acid or vitamin B12 . 2-3% of patients were related to celiac disease and haematinic deficiency. Numerous investigations and investigators, studies have been unsuccessful to find the exact etiology and pathophysiology of RAS. They are various systemic diseases which are associated with RAS such as cyclic neutropenia,  agranulocytosis, Behcet’s syndrome is related with RAS, which has been documentated.  RAS is also associated with other syndrome such as SWEET’s syndrome, MAGIC syndrome and PFPA syndrome. Some predictable factors which are accountable for recurrent aphthous  stomatitis  are heredity, immune dysregulation,certain foods, stress, hormonal disturbances, local trauma, infections, drugs, smoking habits, and poor oral hygiene.( Serap Koybasi et al 2006)

Role of Micro Organism in Aphthous Ulcer

Helicobacter Pylori

They are many micro organism studied in the pathogenesis of RAS. Helicobacter Pylori has been recently attracted the concentration of many investigators. In 1983, the germ was isolated for the first time from a human gastric biopsy specimen. The bacterium was isolated from dental plaque in 1989 (Mansour  et al 2005). H.pylori is a gram negative bacterium commonly found in gastric mucosa. It has been found in saliva, sub-gingival region and also detected in dental plaque. Many facts have suggested that oral cavity is a reservoir of the organism. Oral cavity is a possible route of transmission to other sites (Anak Iamaroon et al, 2003). So the secondary source of infection was considered as oral cavity.

Oral Streptococci

Streptococci are one of the microbial agents which are measured in the pathogenesis of RAS. It is recommended that L form of α- hemolytic streptococci were strongly implicated in RAS.The causative organism of the disease is Streptococcus sanguis.  Some studies have recommended that there is cross reactivity found between streptococcal 65-kDa heat shock protein and 60-k-Da human mitochondrial hsp. Accordingly, RAS could be a T-cell-mediated response to antigens of S. sanguis to facilitate cross-react with the mitochondrial hsp and provoke oral mucosal damage Streptococcus mitis was another causative agent of RAS which was later identified. (Lehner T et al, 1991).

Virus

There are been many suggestive factors for virus as an etiologic agent in RAS. But still there exist questionable evidence towards viral etiology. Epstein-Barr virus has been studied in patients with RAS. Thus virus was associated with epithelial cells of pre Ulcerative RAS (Sun A et al, 1998 )

Immunologic Factors

Much of the research, for the past 30 years focused on the cause of RAS on detecting the abnormality in the immunologic response. Deposition of immune complexes within the oral epithelium induces multiple immune reactions to cause damage. There is a strong association between abnormal propotions of CD4+ and CD8+ cells and RAS severity, elevated levels of interferon gamma, interleukin 2 and tumor necrosing factor α, and alteration of CD4+:CD8+ ratio in RAS lesions.

Biopsy tissues of RAS staining with immune histochemistry techniques revealed numerous inflammatory cells with unpredictable ratio of CD4+:CD8+: T lymphocytes. During pre-ulcerative and healing stages CD4+ cells were numerous, but during ulcerative state CD8+ cells tend to be numerous (Mahesh Chavan et al 2012)

Nutritional Deficiency

Loads of data advocate that nutritional deficiency as a cause for RAS. Patients with low serum levels of iron, folate, zinc, or vitamins B1, B2, B6, and B12 has been allied with a small subset of 5% to 10% of RAS patients (Nolan A et al 1991). Malabsorption syndrome and gluten sensitivity are associated with RAS. Calcium and vitamin C deficiency has been proposed in patients with RAS recently (Ogura M et al , 2001)

Precipitating Factors

Many factors have been proposed. They are

Local factors

Trauma is one of the major contributing agents for RAS. RAS is predisposed by trauma. It is predisposed by inducing edema, cellular inflammation. Generally not all trauma lead to RAS,.  But denture wearers who are usually three times more vulnerable to ulceration (Stone OJ et al 1991) 28. Compositions of saliva also play an essential role in RAS. Modification in salivary composition such as changes in Ph, affect the properties of saliva. Tumour necrosis factor-α, salivary nitric oxide are other salivary components that are positively associated with RAS (McCartan et al 1996)

Stress is one of another contributing factor for RAS. I t has been estimated that stress may induce trauma to soft tissue with many functional habits such as lip biting, thumb sucking. This trauma may prompt to ulceration (Preeti.L et al  2011)

Allergic factors

Allergy has been assumed as one of the cause for RAS. RAS is associated with several kinds of food stuffs. Foods stuffs such as chocolate, cheese and tomatoes can precipitate the attack of RAS are recognized in some patients (Wardhana, E.A. et al 2010)

Drugs

Many drugs such as, captopril,  angiotension converting enzyme inhibitor, , NSAIDS such as diclofenac sodium,  gold salts, propionic acid have been projected as causative agents for RAS (. Zain R.B. et al  1999)

Endocrine Conditions

For many years, it was recommended that a affiliation exist between development of aphthous ulcer and occurrence of menstrual period. Cyclic RAS is observed in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle for several women.

Systemic Diseases With Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis

Bechet’s syndrome

Behcet’s disease is well thought-out as a chronic inflammatory disease of unknown etiology. But now considered as a systemic vasculitis of uncertain aetiology. (Gabriel Riera Matute et al, 2011)

This syndrome is characterized by recurrent oral (aphthous) ulcers, genital ulcers, and skin lesions.  Experimental observations suggest that aphthous ulcers are seen in patients with Behcet’s syndrome. They emerge to be allied with increased tissue oedema and appear to have an extremely erythematous border. The aphthae in Bechet’s disease habitually occur in the soft palate and oropharynx.   Ulcers have also been seen on the hard palate, which is the most abnormal site for RAS in patients without Behcet’s disease (Kovacova E, et al 2005)

PFAPA syndrome

The PFAPA, or Marshall’s, syndrome was formerly reported in 1989. Several patients had a history of 3 to 6 days of fever, along with pharyngitis and aphthous stomatitis. In a percentage of patients acute episodes of fever are seen along with recurrent aphthous stomatitis. But children have uneven symptoms in free intervals. The oral lesions are described generally as small, shallow, round ulcerations. These ulcerations are present in the buccal mucosa or on the tongue surface which is bounded by erythema. The oral stomatitis in PFAPA syndrome prevalence was in the beginning reported to be as high as 70%. Recent follow-up, shows a predominance to less than 30%. (Andres Pinto, et al 2006)20

Cyclic neutropenia

It is a  uncommon hematological disorder. Cyclic neutropenia is characterized by recurrent fevers, mouth ulcers, and infections attributable to habitually recurring severe neutropenia. Generally, the child often less than 1 year of age, who presents with recurrent fever, pharyngitis, mouth ulcers, and lymphadenopathy,  recurrent cellulitis is assumed for diagnosis. Classically, the mouth ulcers are very deep which is very painful and which often last a week or more (David C. Dale et al 2002). Cyclic neutropenia (CN) is habitually characterized by a transient decrease in the neutrophil count, with a periodicity of around 21 days (range, 14 to 36 days) (Marcio A et al 2000)22.

C.Linical Presentation

Recurrent aphthous stomatitis have been classified in to three forms they are:

Minor Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis

It is the familiar presentation affecting about 80% of patients. The ulcers are oval or round, recurrent, clearly defined and usually <5mm in diameter. These ulcers are very small and very painful.   It is also Miculiz’sapthae. It constitutes for about 80% of RAS.  It is generally seen in the nonkeratinized mucosal surface like labial mucosa. Minor ulcers often heal within 10 to 14 days without scarring.

Major RAS

It is also known periadenitis mucosa necrotica   recurrens or Sutton disease. It is rare, form of RAS. Most frequently seen in lips, soft palate and fauces. These ulcers are larger usually greater than 5mm . The ulcer persists for six weeks in addition it  frequently scars and often heals.

Herpetiform Ulceration

Herpetiform ulceration is least common and third variety RAS.These ulcers present as multiple small clusters of pinpoint lesion. These ulcers coalesce to form large irregular ulcers.  Many ulcers may be present. Each measuring 2 to 3mm in diameter in size. It generally have a predisposition for women. These ulcers last for 7 to 10 days (Ship JA.et al 1996)

Table 1: Characteristic of different forms of recurrent aphthous stomatitis (Stephen R. Porter et al  2000 )

MINOR MAJOR HERPETIFORM HIV-ASSOCIATED30
Shape

Number

Size

Location

Oval

1-5

<0.5

Non keratinized

Mucosa

Oval or crateriform

>1-10

>0.5

Non keratinized

Mucosa

Oval

10-100

<0.5

At any site in oral cavity

1-5

>1cm

Non keratinized mucosa

 

Pathogenesis

The pathogenesis remains unknown. It has strong hereditary component and appears to be related to an immune reaction against the oral mucosa.The lesions of RAS are not caused by a single facto. But it occur in an environment that is permissive for development of lesions (. Kilic SS. Et al, 2004)19.

Immunologıcal Mechanism

Recurrent aphthous ulcerations involve immunopathological mechanisms that accounts for loss of adhesion between contiguous keratinocytes or to structure within the basal lamina. They have some immunopathological features that involve T-cell  mediated immunity. İt is suggested that RAS  is a delayed type hypersensitivity or it is cell mediated response to an antigen stimulus residing within the epithelium. (E. A. Field & R. B. Allan et al  2003)

Diagnosis

There is no particular diagnostic test. A complete and exact patient history is significant to the diagnostic process. Systemic diseases are existing with recurrent aphthous stomatitis. The diagnostic is based on clinical history and histopathology. Infrequently uses of cultures are desired to make a definitive diagnosis. Histopathology of RAS is not a diagnostic. The diagnosis is reliant upon clinical history (. C. Scully1 et al 2005)

A Sequence for the diagnostic process (V Vucicevic Boras et al  2007)

Scheme 1:

Scheme 1:

Click here to View Scheme

 

Differential diagnosis
Several medical disorders are associated which may resemble RAS.

They are bechet’s syndrome, MAGIC syndrome, Sweet’s syndrome, PFAPA syndrome, cyclic neutropenia, HIV, Crohn’s disease.( Andres Pinto, et al   2006)

Treatment

The treatment depends on frequency, size and number of ulcers. The treatment still remains non specific.( A. Altenburg, et al 2008)

The goals of the therapy include the functional impairment by suppressing inflammatory response, management of pain, reducing the frequency of recurrence and avoiding the onset of new aphthae. (Khoo.sp  et al 1999)

Physical therapy

1: Surgical removal

2: Laser ablation

3: Dietary and genual measures

4: Cauterization

Table 2: Topical therapy.

Category Effects
Anti microbial therapy &Antiinflammatory

Chlochexidene

Triclosan

Diclofinac

Dexpanthenol

Mildly inhibits inflammation

Anti-inflammatory,

Antiseptic analgesic effect

Topical sucralfate Soothing effect on lesion by adhering to mucous membrane tissue
Topical steroids

Triamcinolone acetonoid

Prednisocone

Combination therapy with a topical anesthetic is widely accepted as the optimal treatment regimen
Newer findings 1: To apply of 5-aminosalicylic acid 5% cream

2: A topical prostaglandin E2 gel

3: Raw egg white may partially soften oral pain

Systemic therapy (SB Woo et al 1996)

Table 3:

Colchicine To reduce the number and duration of lesions
Pentoxifylline Effective against orogenital aphthae
Corticosteroids Rescue treatment in patients with acute exacerbation and in those who inadequately responded to therapy with colchicine and pentoxifylline.
Dapsone Oral and genital aphthae
Thalidomide A dose-dependent effect against orogenital ulcerations emerges within 7-10 weeks following treatment
Antimetabolites

Azathioprine 

 

Methotrexate

 

 

Reduce the frequency and extent of severe orogenital aphthosis.

Effective in severe orogenital aphthosis.

 

Cyclosporine  A Effective in about 50% of  patients

 

Interferon-alpha Is shown to be effective within 1-4 months

 

Table 4: Adverse effects of drugs during RAS therapy (Crispian scully, et al 2003)

   Drugs Adverse effects
Colchicine It causes very painful gastrointestinal symptoms, fertility in male and diarrhea.

 

Dapsone It causes Mathemoglobinemia
Levamisole It effects decrease in white blood cells
Pentaxifylline It causes nausea
Thalidomide It causes polyneuropathy, tetrogenicity

Conclusion

The RAS is the common form of painful ulcerations of oral cavity. Although it is the common form of presentation the etiology and pathogenesis remains unclear. The diagnosis mainly depends on the clinical features and not on the histopathogy report. Management of RAS only provides symptomatic relief by reducing pain.

References

  1. Terri.S.I. Tilliss, John Mc Dowell, Differential Diagnosis: Is It Herpes or Aphthous?” Volume 3 Number 1 February 15, 2002
  2. Srinivas Rao Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis: A Review J Orofac Sci, 2(3)2010
  3. Serap Koybasi, Ali Haydar Parlak, Erdinc Serin, , Fahrettin Yilmaz, , Didem Serin, Recurrent aphthous stomatitis: investigation of possible etiologic factors American Journal of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery 27 (2006) 229– 232
  4. Mansour-Ghanaei F, Asmar M, Bagherzadeh AH, Ekbataninezhad S. Helicobacter pylori infection in oral lesions of patients with recurrent aphthous stomatitis 2005 Dec;11(12):CR576-9. Epub 2005 Nov 24.
  5. Anak Iamaroon§, Siriporn Chaimano§, Sukanya Linpisarn†, Surawut Pongsiriwet§ and Kannikar Phornphutkul Detection of Helicobacter pylori in recurrent aphthous ulceration by nested PCR Journal of Oral Science, Vol. 45, No. 2, 107-110, 2003
  6. Lehner T, Lavery E, Smith R, van der Zee R, Mizushima Y, Shinnick T. Association between the 65-kilodalton heat shock protein, Streptococcus sanguis, and the corresponding antibodies in Behget’s syndrome. Infect Immunol 1991; 59: 1434–41.
  7.  Sun A, Chang JG, Chu CT, Liu BY, Yuan JH, Chiang CP. Preliminary evidence for an association of Epstein-Barr virus with pre-ulcerative oral lesions in patients with recurrent aphthous ulcers or Behcet’s disease. J Oral Pathol Med 1998; 27: 168–75.
  8.  Mahesh Chavan1, Hansa Jain2, Nikhil Diwan1, Shivaji Khedkar3, Anagha Shete1, Sachin Durkar Recurrent aphthous stomatitis: . review 13 MAR 2012
  9. Nolan A, McIntosh WB, Allam BF, Lamey PJ. Recurrent aphthous ulceration: vitamin B1, B2 and B6 status and response to replacement therapy. J Oral Pathol Med 1991; 20: 389–91
  10. Stone OJ. Aphthous stomatitis (canker sores): a consequence of high oral submucosal viscosity (the role of extracellular matrix and the possible role of lectins). Med Hypotheses 1991; 36: 341–4.
  11. McCartan BE, Lamey PJ, Wallace AM. Salivary cortisol and anxiety in recurrent aphthous stomatitis. J Oral Pathol Med 1996; 25: 357–9.
  12. Preeti.L, Magesh.K.T, Rajkumar.K. Ragavendhar karthik. Recurrent aphthous stomatitis: a review Volume 15, Issue 3, Sep-Dec 2011
  13. Wardhana, E.A. Datau Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis Caused by Food Allergy Vol 42 • Number 4 • October 2010
  14. Zain R.B. Classification, epidemiology and aetiology of oral recurrent aphthous ulceration stomatitis, Annal Dent Univ Malaya 1999; 6: 34 – 37.
  15. Gabriel Riera Matute,a, Elena Riera Alonso Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis in Rheumatology Reumatol Clin. 2011;7(5):323–328
  16. Kovacova E, Salmas,J, Bedeova J, Duris I, Bechet’s syndrome Bratisl Lek Listy 2005; 106(12):386-389
  17. David C. Dale, Audrey Anna Bolyard, and Andrew Aprikyan Cyclic Neutropenia Seminars in Hematology, Vol 39, No 2 (April), 2002: pp 89-94
  18. Marcio A. da Fonseca, DDS, MS, Fernanda Fontes, DDS, MS Early tooth loss due to cyclic neutropenia: long-term follow-up of one patient Special Care In Dentistry, Vol20 No 5 2000
  19. Ship JA. Recurrent aphthous stomatitis. An update. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996 Feb;81(2):141
  20. Stephen R. Porter, Anne Hegarty, Fotini kaliakatsou,  Tim a. Hodgson,  Rcs mrcp (uk), Crispian Scully, Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis  Clinics in Dermatology Y 2000;18:569–578
  21. Kilic SS. Recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Recent Advances in Pediatrics, Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, New Delhi, ISBN 81-8061-297-X, pp 63-75 , 2004
  22. E. A. FIELD & R. B. ALLAN Review article: oral ulceration – aetiopathogenesis, clinical diagnosis and management in the gastrointestinal clinic Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003; 18: 949–962
  23. C. Scully1 and D. H. Felix2 Aphthous and other common ulcers British dental journal volume 199 no. 5 sept 10 2005
  24. V Vucicevic Boras,* NW Savage Recurrent aphthous ulcerative disease: presentation and Management Australian Dental Journal 2007;52:(1):10-15
  25.  Andres Pinto, Rochelle G. Lindemeyer, and Thomas P. Sollecito Philadelphia, Pennsylvania The PFAPA syndrome in oral medicine: Differential diagnosis and treatment Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;102:35-9)
  26. A. Altenburg, ; . C. Zouboulis, Current Concepts in the Treatment of Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis Volume 13 • Number 7 • September 2008
  27. Khoo.sp Management of oral recurrent aphthous stomatitis (oras) annals of dentist/y, university of malaya, vol 6 june 1999
  28. SB Woo and ST Sonis Recurrent aphthous ulcers: a review of diagnosis and treatment J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127;1202-1213
  29. Crispian scully, Francina Lozada nur, The diagnosis and management of Recurrent aphthous stomatitis, JADA volume 134 february 2003
Share Button
(Visited 1,261 times, 1 visits today)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.