Annadurai T, Venkateshan N, SenthilKumar S. R. Green Synthesis of Silver and Copper Nanoparticles: Methods, Properties, Applications, and Environmental. Biomed Pharmacol J 2026;19(2).
Manuscript received on :16-11-2025
Manuscript accepted on :26-02-2026
Published online on: 08-05-2026
Plagiarism Check: Yes
Reviewed by: Dr. Kasthuri NMK
Second Review by: Dr. Niharika Kondepudi
Final Approval by: Dr. Anton R Keslav

How to Cite    |   Publication History
Views  Views: 
Visited 3 times, 6 visit(s) today
 

Thenmozhi Annadurai 1*, Narayanan Venkateshan 2, Sudalaimuthu Ramachandran SenthilKumar 3

1Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Arulmigu Kalasalingam College of Pharmacy, Krishnankoil, Virudhunagar, Tamil Nadu, India

2Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Arulmigu Kalasalingam College of Pharmacy, Krishnankoil, Virudhunagar, Tamil Nadu, India.

3Department of Pharmaceutics, Sri K. Ramachandran Naidu  College of Pharmacy, Sankarankovil, Tenkasi, Tamil Nadu, India.

Corresponding Author: E-mail: Srimozhi2005@yahoo.co.in

Abstract

Silver and copper nanoparticles have attracted considerable research interest due to their diverse physicochemical properties and wide range of applications, particularly when synthesized using green approaches. This review summarizes literature published between 2000 and 2025 on the biosynthesis of silver and copper nanoparticles, with a focus on plant-mediated synthesis methods, synthesis mechanisms, physicochemical characteristics, applications, and environmental and toxicological considerations. Relevant studies were identified using keywords such as “green synthesis of nanoparticles,” “silver nanoparticles,” “copper nanoparticles,” “characterization,” and “environmental aspects.” Plant-based synthesis commonly produces nanoparticles with acceptable stability and biocompatibility while reducing the use of hazardous chemicals. Silver nanoparticles demonstrate notable antimicrobial activity against a broad spectrum of microorganisms, whereas copper nanoparticles show potential in catalysis, electronics, and antimicrobial applications. Both silver and copper nanoparticles have been investigated for use in drug delivery, wound healing, and water purification, with their functional performance influenced by parameters such as particle size, morphology, structure, and surface chemistry. Despite the advantages of green synthesis, concerns related to toxicity and environmental impact remain. Available studies indicate that nanoparticle behavior and biological effects depend on concentration, exposure duration, and environmental conditions. Overall, green synthesis of silver and copper nanoparticles using plant sources represents a promising alternative to conventional methods; however, further systematic studies are required to better understand long-term safety and environmental implications.

Keywords

Antimicrobial; Characterization techniques; Copper nanoparticles; Drug delivery; Green synthesis; Nanoparticles; Silver nanoparticles

Copy the following to cite this article:

Annadurai T, Venkateshan N, SenthilKumar S. R. Green Synthesis of Silver and Copper Nanoparticles: Methods, Properties, Applications, and Environmental. Biomed Pharmacol J 2026;19(2).

Copy the following to cite this URL:

Annadurai T, Venkateshan N, SenthilKumar S. R. Green Synthesis of Silver and Copper Nanoparticles: Methods, Properties, Applications, and Environmental. Biomed Pharmacol J 2026;19(2). Available from: https://bit.ly/42mSQM0

Introduction

Nanotechnology   is a fast-growing area sector of science that understanding with materials at an extremely small scale—between 1 and 100 nanometers. At this level, materials show special properties like increased surface area and unusual chemical behaviour, which make them useful in medicine, electronics, environmental solutions, and material science.1Green synthesis is the promising way for the production of NPs, which uses natural sources like plants and microorganisms instead of harmful chemicals. This approach follows the ideas ofsustainable chemistry, aiming to reduce pollution and make the process safer and more sustainable.2Now a days it is become more popular because traditional chemical methods often involve toxic substances and create harmful by-products.Among natural sources, plant extracts are mainly  useful for nanoparticle synthesis. It contains  phytocompounds that act as both reducing and stabilizing agents. Among all plant materials, Caesalpinia bonducellamost suitable for synthesis of Cu as well Ag NPs. Caesalpinia bonducellacommonly known as fever nut or nicker nut. It is well-known traditional medicine for its anti-Swelling, antidiabetic, as well as antimicrobial properties.3These medicinal effects come from bioactive compounds like bioflavonoids, alkaloids, and Isoprenoids, which also make the plant a strong candidate for nanoparticle production.Both types of nanoparticles have drawn interest because of their useful properties—silver for its antimicrobial strength and copper for its role in catalysis and electronics. By examining their synthesis, properties, and applications, this article highlights how green nanotechnology could offer eco-friendly solutions to current scientific and industrial challenges.4 In addition, we will discuss how these Silver and Copper nanoparticles are studied through various characterization techniques, explore their possible uses in medicine and industry, and consider the environmental safety of their production and use.5This sets the stage for understanding how green nanotechnology can move forward responsibly while addressing real-world problems.

Green Synthesis of Copper And Silver Nanoparticles

Green Synthesis or Biosynthesis is a safer approach for making Silver NPs and copper NPs. 6 The green way of synthesis gained significant attention as scientists look for safer ways to create nanomaterials without harming the environment.7 Many biological materials applicable for green approach synthesis of copper NPs as well as silver NPs, including plant derived compound extracts, together serve as a reducing as well as Stabilizing agents. This helps in generating a stable nanoparticle along with simplifies the production process. 2 It lowers the environmental impact. Since it relies on renewable and biodegradable resources, It reduces waste and pollution compared to chemical methods.5-7 It also lowers the cost of waste disposal and can be more budget-friendly overall, as it uses easily available natural materials and requires less energy.8 Because of all these above benefits, biosynthesis is becoming a preferred choice in the sector of nano-technology. Another key benefit is its low energy requirement. Most green approach of synthesis of silver NPs and copper NPs methods work at ambient condition or use low-energy tools like microwaves or ultrasound, which use much less energy than the high heat and pressure needed in traditional methods. These eco-friendly techniques also aim to reduce waste by adjusting reaction settings and making use of leftover materials whenever possible.11 Various biological materials have been carried out successfully used in biosynthesis of Cu and Ag NPs due to their natural reducing and stabilizing capacity. Table 1 summarizes the major biological sources—including plants, microbes, algae, and biomolecules—commonly used for synthesizing nanoparticles, along with relevant examples and their key bioactive components. Several eco-friendly synthesis methods have been developed to replace energy-intensive and hazardous chemical techniques. Table 2 provides an overview of commonly used green synthesis methods, including aqueous, room temperature, microwave-assisted, sonochemical, and photocatalytic approaches, highlighting their advantages and applications.

Table 1: Biological Sources for Green Synthesis of Nanoparticles

Source Type Example Key Compounds & Benefits
Leaf extracts Azadirachta indica, Ocimum sanctum, Camellia sinensis Rich in bioflavonoids, isoterpenoids, and antioxidant compounds; act as reducing andstabilizing agents.12
Fruit extracts Lemon, orange, pomegranate, grapes High in vitamin C and polyphenols; effective for silver and gold nanoparticle production.13
Root and stem extracts Ginger root, Aloe vera stem Contain unique phytochemicals; used for synthesizing gold and silver nanoparticles.14
Bacteria Pseudomonas stutzeri, Bacillus subtilis Produce nanoparticles either intracellularly or extracellularly; scalable and consistent.15
Fungi Fusarium oxysporum, Aspergillus fumigatus Tolerant to metals; produce stable nanoparticles with good size and shape control.16
Algae Chlorella vulgaris (microalga), Sargassum wightii (macroalga) Fast-growing and abundant; suitable for eco-friendly nanoparticle synthesis.17
Proteins/Enzymes Bovine serum albumin (BSA), nitrate reductase Biocompatible coatings; promote safe nanoparticle formation.18
Polysaccharides Chitosan, starch, cellulose Natural stabilizers and reducers; increase stability and biocompatibility.19

Table 2: Green Synthesis Methods for Nanoparticles

Method Description Benefits
Aqueous medium synthesis Uses water as the main solvent with biological extracts added to metal salt solutions Simple, safe, and avoids harmful organic solvents.1
Room temperature synthesis Uses plant or microbial extracts at ambient temperature Energy-saving; suitable for heat-sensitive biomolecules.2
Microwave-assisted synthesis Applies microwave energy to speed up reactions Quick, uniform heating; reduces synthesis time.20
Sonochemical synthesis Uses ultrasound waves to create localized energy for reducing metal ions Produces nanoparticles with controlled size and shape.21
Photocatalytic synthesis Uses light energy and photosensitive biomolecules to form nanoparticles Environmentally friendly; allows solar-based synthesis.22

Characterization of Silver and Copper Nanoparticles

The characterization of AgNPs and CuNPs is crucial for understanding their physicochemical properties and potential applications.UV-visible spectroscopy is widelyimplemented tovalidate NPsconfiguration andevaluate their optical properties. AgNPs typically exhibit a SPRpeak between 400-450 nm, while CuNPs show a broader peak around 560-580 nm.23 Fourier transform infrared radiationspectroscopy helps identify the surface bond chemical groups present on the NPssurface, providing insights into the capping agents and potential interplay with biological systems.24 XRDanalysis is crucial foridentifying the crystallinestructure andphasehomogeneity of SilverNPs and Copper NPs. AgNPs generally exhibit FCC structure with characteristic peaks at 2θ values of 38.1°, 44.3°, 64.5°, and 77.5°, parallel  to the (111), (200), (220), and (311) planes, respectively.25CuNPs also display an FCC structure with peaks at 43.3°, 50.4°, and 74.1°, representing the (111), (200), and (220) planes. SEM and TEM facilitate to give a majorly valuable information on nanoparticle morphology, size distribution, and aggregation state. AgNPs are often spherical or quasi-spherical, while CuNPs can exhibit various structured, including circle, 3 D square form , and rod-like shape.26

DLS and Zetapotential analysis offer crucial insights into the fluid dynamic dimensions  and surfacecharge  of NPs , respectively. These parameters notably impact the stability along with biological activity of AgNPs and CuNPs. Generally, AgNPs exhibit smaller hydrodynamic sizes (10-50 nm) compared to CuNPs (20-100 nm), while both types of nanoparticles typically display negative zeta potentials (-20 to -40 mV) in aqueous dispersions.27 The morphological and optical characteristics of AgNPs and CuNPs act as avital role to identify  their biological activity, particularly in antimicrobial and anticancer applications. Decreased size ofNPs with higher SA : V ratio tend to indicate improved  antimicrobial efficacy due to maximized cellular absorption  and synthesis of ROS. Additionally, the SPR characterization of AgNPs and CuNPs contribute to their photothermal effects, which can be exploited for targeted cancer therapy.28 The table 3&4illustrates Studies example forcharacterization silvernanoparticle andcopper nanoparticle.The sequential steps involved in nanoparticle characterization are depicted in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Steps Involved in Characterization of Nanoparticles

Click here to view Figure

Table 3: Studies example for characterization of  silver nanoparticle

Author name Material used for Synthesis of AgNPs Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) Shape and Morphology Zeta potential Size Size Distribution Crystal Structure stability
Iwuji C et al29  Trisodium citrate Nil Spherical with consistent morphology Nil 58.3 nm Uniform size distribution Nil Nil.
Asif M et al30  Moringa olifera leaves 419 nm Spherical Nil 18 nm 10-25nm Nil Nil.
Liaqat N et al31  Eucalyptus camedulensis, Terminalia arjuna and their combination 410- 430 nm spherical -26 mV ± 4.61 mV; — 20 mV ± 5.09 mV; -27mv respectively 37,46,80 nm Nil Nil Strong stability for 30 days.
Baran MF et al32  Alium cepa  (yellowish peel) 438.90 nm Spherical – 13. 1 Mv 8.44-19.93 nm Nil cubic Nil.
Khane Y et al33 citrus limon zest extract 535.5 nm Spherical – 21.5 Mv 7-28 nm Nil FCC Nil.
Reddy NV et al34  perilla frutiscens leaf extract Nil Spherical, rhombic, triangle and rod – 25.83 Mv 20-50 nm Nil FCC Stable b/w 20 and 900 degree celsius by TG analysis.
Giri AK et al 35  Eugenia roxburghii DC 417 nm Spherical – 37.8 Mv 24nm FCC Nil.

Table 4 : Studies examples for Characterization of Copper NPs

Author name Material used for Synthesis of CuNPs Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) Shape and Morphology Zeta potential Size Size Distribution Crystal Structure stability
Nagar N et al36 Azadirachta indica 560 nm Cubical – 17.5 Mv 48 nm Nil FCC Stable for 2 months verified  by the contrasting   FITR spectrum of  herbal neem and biologically reduced synthesised CuNP.
Mali SC

et al37

Celastrus paniculatus bioactive leaf essence. Nil Spherical – 22.2 Mv 2-10 nm 290 nm Nil Stability of CuNPs is Confirmed by DLS.
Ismail MIM et al 38  Aqueous Rhus coriaria L. fruits 568 nm semi-spherical Nil 14-24 nm Nil FCC Nil.
Hasheminya et al 39 Eryngium caucasicum Trautv 580 nm Almost spherical Nil < 40 nm Nil FCC Nil.
Wu S et al40  C.  vitiginea 340 nm Spherical Nil 10-20 nm Nil Nil Nil.
Caroling GM et al41  Aqueous guava extract 570 nm spherical shape Nil Nil Nil FCC Cu NPs that are moderately  stable for fifteen  days at ambient  temperature with no evidence of  precipitation.
Amer MW et al 42  Citrus limon fruits separate 579 nm spherical Nil 18 nm 5-28 nm Nil Nil.

FCC – Face centred cubic, CuNPs – copper nanoparticles

Opportunistic Bioactivities of Copper and Silver Nanoparticles

Silver and copper nanoparticles’ broad-spectrum bioactivities imply that they have the ability to alleviate various disorder. It mainly used for cancer management, Infectious disease management, cardiac disorder and various genetic disorder.Both NPs play anvital role in therapeutical sector. Studies are going for enhancing the both copper and silver nanoparticle for the application of therapeutical sector. The following table 5&6 illustrate the studies examples  bioactivity studies of both silver and copper nanoparticle.43,44The diverse biological applications of nanoparticles are summarized in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Biological Application of Nanoparticle

Click here to view Figure

Table 5: Studies examples for bioactivities of  copper nanoparticles

Author Name Material used of synthesis of CuNPs Bio-activity
Raffi M et al 45 Inert gas Condensation process Cu NPs show full cytotoxicity against E. coli.
Zhao H et al46  Allium eriophyllum Boiss Anti-bacteria Anti-fungi, and cutaneous wound healing action.
Das Jana I et al 47 Transparent coating of Cu-Gr Cu-Gr nano Shows familiar Viricidal action in the solid state.
Ahmadi M et al 48 Juglans regia green husk marine essence Docking studies indicated that the synthesized CuNPs may bind with the Herbie simplex virus-1 glycoproteins and disturb with viral entry.
Al-zharani M et al 49 Electroless Deposition Process Exposing breast and colon cancer cell lines to cu NPs caused cytotoxicity and apoptosis.
Ramyadevi J50 Polyol process  Mosquito larvicidal agent.
Mali SC et al37 Celastrus paniculatus leaves extract.  Antifungal efficacy against F. oxysporum.
Hasheminya SM et al 39  Eryngium caucasicum Trautv Antioxidant and Antibacterial characteristic.
Wu S et al 40   Cissus vitiginea Enhanced bacteriostatic and ROS quenching agent  against UTI germ and 2,2- diphenylpicrylhydrazyl   reactive species.
Caroling G et al 41   Aqueous guava isolate Copper nanoparticles disturbing the cell membrane of bacteria by releasing Cu ions.

Table 6: Studies example for Bioactivity of Silver Nanoparticle

Author Name Material used of synthesis of Ag NPs Bio-activity
Sundar JS et al 51 Caesalpinia bonducella seed  Good bactericidal activity against both gram negative strain bacteria and   gram-positive strain bacteria.
Sundar JS et al 51 Caesalpinia bonducella seeds  Inhibition of breast malignant Hca 7 cells. AgNPs may be a bioactive contender for breast malignant therapy.
Singh P et al 52  Prunus serrulate  Anti- edematus  activity in RAW264.7 cell lines through in vitro tests.
Zhang P et al 53 Teucrium stocksianum and moringa oleifera  Anti-leishmanial activity and Anti- malaria.
Rai M et al .54 Biological synthesis Biologically produced AgNPs show potent acaricidal, larvicidal activities and preventing the expand of vector-borne diseases.
Khane Y et al 29  Trisodium citrate  Ag NPs shows bactericidal agents in the treatment of hospital-acquired illnesses.
Iwuji C et al 30 moringa olifera leaf Ag NPs were found to be potent  active against  E. coli, which is tolerance  to most marketly   available antibiotics.
Asif M, et al 33 citrus limon zest extract  strong bacteriostatic action against E. coli and S. aureus, along with fungicidal efficacy opposed C. albicans and Strong antioxidant action.
Reddy N et al 34  perilla frutiscens leaf extract  Antibacterial, antioxidative, and anticancer properties.
Giri AK et al35  Eugenia roxburghii DC AgNPs against bacterial biofilm development.

Antimicrobial Activities of the Nanoparticles

The rise of  multidrug resistant microbes has prompted the exploration of alternative anti-microbial agents, with nanoparticles emerging as a promising solution. NPs contain specific physiochemical characteristic , includingvery less  and controllable size, large SA : M , and high activity , which can be leveraged to prevail overcome the limitations of conventional antimicrobial therapies.55,56These properties enable nanoparticles to promote the delivery of antimicrobial therapeutic agent, so it enhancing their effectiveness against a broad spectrum of bacteria.57The antimicrobial properties of NPs penetrate biological membrane of bacteria, manipulate cellular processes, and produceROS  that lead to cellular damage and its apoptosis.55,58The  World wide emergence of muti drug resistant microbes has made the traditional  treatment of infectious diseases increasingly challenging, underscoring the urgent need for another anti-microbial strategies.58

Silver nanoparticle have garnered notable attention as potent antimicrobial substances due to their broad range of effectiveAnti-bacterial, Anti-fungal, and Anti-viral activity.59Ag NPs can  crossing the bacterial cell wall penetrate bacterial cell walls, alter cell membrane structure, and interfere with cellular mechanism,finallyresults to cell apoptosis. The potential  of Ag NPs  is attributed not only to their nano measurement  size butaddition  to their Increased  SA : V  which improves  their capability to react  with disrupt the microbes.60 The antimicrobial mechanism of both silver and copper nanoparticles is illustrated in Figure 3. Table 7& 8 depicted the studies examples for Anti-microbial activities of Silver and copper nanoparticles.

Figure 3: A schematic representation antimicrobial activity of Both Silver and copper nanoparticles.

Click here to view Figure

Table 7: Studies example for Anti-microbial activity of silver nanoparticles

Author Name Material Used for synthesis of AgNPs Test organism Results
Rahman H et al61 Rhazya stricta Decne Extract. Bacterial agents: S.aureus, and Salmonella typhi, E. coli. Fungal agents: C. albican, Trichophyton longifusis, F. solani. Good anti-bacterial and anti-fungal activity.
Yu Z, et al 62 Black rice (O. sativa) S. aureus, E. coli Good bactericidal activity.
Avilala J et al 63 Marine actinomycetes Bacterial agents: P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, E.coli, Klebsiella pneumonia and B.subtilis Viral Agents: Lasota strain of Newcastle Disease Virus Good bacteriostatic along with  anti-viral activity.
Ullah I et al 64 Peganum harmala L. extract Bacterial agents: Staphylococcus aureus Pseudomonas aeroginosa, Salmonella typhi, and Escherichia coli Fungal agents: candida albicans and Aspergillus Niger Good ant-bacterial and anti-fungal activity.
Amara YT et al 65 Mentha aquatica E.coli, S. Aureus, P.aeruginosa Good bactericidal against based on its concentration.
Vijapur LS et al66 Cinnamomum tamala. Gram – ve microbes: E. coli along Klebsiella pneumonia Gram+ve microbes: S. mutans and Enterococcus faecalis Highest antimicrobial activity against E. coli. Among all microbes.
Samad M et al67 Dicliptera bupleuroides Nees gram +ve pathogens B.subtilis, Enterococcus faecalis and S.aureus and gram -ve  stain such as K. pneumonia and E. coli Highest microbicidal activity against B. subtilis and minimum against E. coli.
Kemala P et al68 Calotropis gigantea leaves and flowers Bacterial pathogen: E. coli and S. aureus,

Fungal pathogen: C. albicans,

Flower extract produces good anti-microbial activity compare to leaf extract. Because the flower contains flavonoids.
Khane Y et al 33 Aqueous Citrus limon Zest extract Gram – ve microbes E. coli, Gram + ve  microbes S. aureus, and fungal stain C. albicans. Anti-bacterial activity. Gram – ve  pathogens were more susceptible than Gram +ve strains.
Keshari AK et al .69 Cestrum nocturnum Citrobacter, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas vulgaris, Salmonella. typhi along with Vibrio cholerae Anti-bacterial against Enterococcus. faecalis and Vibrio cholerae.

Table 8: Studies example for Anti-microbial activity of copper nanoparticles

Author Name Material used for synthesis of CuNPs Test Organism Results
Prakash MD et al 70  Tinospora cordifolia leaves Bacterial Pathogen: Lactobacillus Species, S.aureus, and Streptococcus mutans,

Fungal pathogen: C.albicans

Good Anti-bacterial action and good anti-fungal activity
Jahan I et al71  Citrus sinensis aqueous fruit extract in microwave mediated S. aureus, Escherichia coli Strong Anti-bacterial action against gram +ve  bacterial microbes compare to gram -ve microbes.
Ha T et al 72  High energy electron beam process H1N1 influenza virus. Good anti-Viral activity
Punniyakotti P et al . 73 Cardiospermum halicacabum Psudomonus aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and S. aureus, Good bacteriostatic and anti-biofilm suppressive agent formation activity in both gram + ve and gram -ve bacteria.
Prasad R et al 74 Musa acuminata and Citrus sinensis Peel Extracts Bacterial agent: Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus

Fungal agent: Aspergillus Niger

Dry orange peel extract had better antimicrobial activity than the fresh orange peel, dried banana peel, fresh banana peel.
Jothiramalingam R et al75 Lemon flower extract Salmonella typhi, Streptococcus mutants, E.coil, Staphylococcus aureus and Psudo monus aurugenosa.  Higher anti-bacterial activity at very low concentration.
Jayarambabu N et al 76  Curcuma longa extract Gram positive and Gram-negative microbes Good anti bacterial activity opposed to  action against both gram +ve and Gram -ve  bacteria.
Hamad AM et al 77  strawberry leaves. S. aureus and P. aeruginosa,  obtained from corona Virus affected Patients Gram- +ve strain  bacterial microbes  were more responsive  to copper nanoparticles than Gram -ve strain  bacterial microbes. Due to difference chemical composition present in bacterial cell wall.
Ramasubbu K et al 78  Sesbania grandiflora Leaf Extract Escherichia coli , Psudomonas . aeruginosa, S. Aureus Better anti-bacterial activity compared to streptomycin
Wu S, et al 40  Cissus vitiginea UTI  microbes  such as E.coli, Enterococcus sp., Proteus species. and Klebsiella species. Good Anti-bacterial activity against UTI Pathogens.

Environmental and Its Toxicological Aspects of Green Synthesis of Copper and Silver Nanoparticles

Green synthesisNanoparticle have a variety of uses. But it have some environmental  restrictions. And the majority of studies showed that green nanoparticles have several advantages in medicine over other nanoparticles, but the facts are that green nanoparticles have toxicity just like other nanoparticles, but the toxicity is limited in comparison to other nanoparticles, and few studies show that there are no well-studied papers on green nanoparticle toxicity.37

Environmental Aspects of Green Nanoparticle

Green nanoparticles have various purpose environmentally. The major purpose are water treatment, Agriculture fertilizer, Soil remediation and Oily sewage remediating agent. Although it is safer for disposal because of no harmful chemicals are used.

Water Treatment and Purification

Nowadays it is essential to purify drinking water because water from various sources may include hazardous amounts of organic compounds, heavy metals, and bacteria. Water for domestic use is purified using techniques like coagulation, filtration, settling, chlorination, and other chemical methods. Inorganic anions, heavy metals, organic contaminants, and bacteria have all been successfully removed from water using AgNPs  and CuNPs that are more stable, economical, and have a controlled release rate. These AgNPs have demonstrated encouraging promise for use in the treatment of water and wastewater. The extreme toxicity to microbes has led to an increase in their use for water disinfection in recent years. However, direct application of AgNPs may cause them to aggregate in aqueous conditions, which would gradually lower their effectiveness over time. According to several research, AgNPs affixed to filter materials may be a preferable option in this situation to reduce the aggregation issue and be economical with effective antibacterial potential. Significant antibacterial capabilities against E. coli have been demonstrated by the sheets where AgNPs are placed on the cellulose fibers.Furthermore, the standard range of Ag+ in drinking water (0.1 ppm) established by the WHO and environmental protection agency is not exceeded by the loss of Ag+ from such sheets.Furthermore, over the past 20 years, there has been an increase in the efficient use of Ag NPs implanted on ceramic materials or membranes for the disinfection and treatment of domestic water at the point of use. Preventing membrane filter fouling in water treatment systems is yet another application for AgNPs. A study performed by  Das and colleagues . discovered that Copper oxide NPs isolated from the extract of Madhuca longifolia plant had good photocatalytic activity for dissolving methylene blue dye. As a result, itoffers excellent photocatalytic potential for wastewater treatment.79-81Another work employed Jatropha curcas L. extracts to make TiO2NPs. That study discovered theTitanium dioxide Nanoparticles are effective in the potential photocatalytic treatment of wastewater. The NP eliminated 82.26% of COD and 76.48% ofCr from contaminated water.82

Nano-Fertilizer

Bio- and nano-fertilizers are sustainable materials that may provide plants with essential nutrients, promote plant development, and boost agricultural yields. Biofertilizers, often known as bacterial fertilizers, use living or inactive microorganisms to promote plantdevelopment.83Nanofertilizers are classified into three types: (i) NPs, which include nanoparticles such as Tio2, silica compounds , and Nanotube form of Copper and promote plant development; (ii) essential nutrients in the micro form , which include Cu, Zn, Fe, Mo, Ni, and Mn; and (iii) essential nutrients in the form of macro, which combine Po4, Ca, N2, and K. Several, studies  shows that phosphatic fertilizers in nano form  increased soybean growth by 32% and seed output by 20% when compared to traditional fertilizers.84De Franca Bettencourt and colleagues. used green-synthesized AgNPs from onions as a nano form of Biofertilizer for brinjal and tomatoes. Silver nanoparticles were sprayed on the green plants at doses ranging between 5 to 15 mL/L. Raising the nano-fertilizer concentration to 15 mL/litre increased the plant’s effectivity and strength. This outcome can be attributed to onions’ richness of proteins, phosphorus, carbs, and potassium, all of which can help plants development.85 Nanofertilizers can not only assist plants survive with numerous stressors including parched condition, infection, and parasites, but they can also cause a variety of biological oriented chemical responses in the body including increasing the plant’s immunological capability as well as promoting the synthesis of auxin. Furthermore, the usage of nanofertilizers helps to boost nutrient solubility in the soil, which improves soil natures and production while also encouraging healthy strong plant development. These ecologically friendly fertilizing agents are created using simple as well as quick procedures. A variety of strategies can be used to stimulate plant growth.86

Soil Remediation

The problem of severe soil pollution became worse over time, with increasingly negative consequences for both environmental and human biological origin. Several strategies are used to remediate soil contamination, such asdecontamination recovery.But those methods are time-spending, expensive, and extremely hazardous.It leads to, in situ treatment methods, including the introduction of NPs into the soil, have profitable appeal. Particular green NPs have proven extraordinary success in the recovery of soil impurities such as Strain materials and heavy metals. This is related to their increased mobility, extraordinary responsiveness, less amount of lethal effect, and enough amount of large surface areas.87 Zaki et al.89used biogenic NPs synthesisZno from Trichoderma harzianum as an fungicidal opposed to soil microbesincluding Macrophomina phaseolina, Rhizoctonia solani, and Fusarium sp. in different cotton cultivars. Zno  antifungal impact varied by cotton cultivar, with Giza90 showing better plant life, length, and weight. This suggests that zinc oxide at 200 μg/mL is highly effective in disease prevention. Using 200 μg/mL of zinc oxide increased plant survival in the Giza94 cultivar, however disease control did not improve survival rates. Nonetheless, zinc oxide demonstrated superior improvements in the strength and length of the Giza94 cultivar.88 Furthermore, Kalaba and the colleagues  employed biologically prepared ZnO derived from S. plicatus to suppress plant microorganisms. The demonstrated findings showed that Meloidogyne incognita had a good mortality rate of 96.7% within 3 days. ZnOincreased Vicia faba seed development at concentrations ranging from 12.5-50 μg/mL. biosynthesis NPs  have shown extraordinary success in soil recovery, notably in reduce the  heavy metals including Cd, Ni, Ar, and Cr from polluted soils. Furthermore, these NPs have strong antibacterial effects on many plant diseases, altering plant weight, length, and overall life.89

Oily Sewage Remediating Agent

Silver and copper  nanoparticles are important components in oily sewage cleanup solutions because of their antibacterial, catalytic, and antifouling capabilities. They improve treatment efficiency by disturbing oil-water emulsions and limiting bacterial development, which causes fouling in wastewater systems. Silver nanoparticles in nanocomposite membranes prevent membrane fouling during oily wastewater filtration, thus enhancing oil particle removal.Silver nanoparticles added into remediation agents target oily sewage by boosting photocatalytic destruction of organic contaminants and stabilizing emulsions to facilitate separation. Biogenic silver nanoparticles derived from plant extracts promote the breakdown of oily pollutants in industrial effluents. They also have a great capability for adsorbing heavy metals and oils found in sewage.90,91FeNPs produced from Vaccinium floribundum were used to measure the elimination of  TPHs from H2O . This leads to demonstrated that the reducing condition produced by iron nanoparticles resulted in improved TPH elimination (88.34%).92

Toxicological Aspects of Green Syntesis of Copper and Silver Nanoparticles

Bio synthesis of CuNPs and AgNPs have been beneficial in a variety of a usage due to their size, shape, and catalytic behaviour. However, these features may be unfavourable because their action as an antibacterial agent is not selective to microbes, resulting in a high likelihood of lethal action on human body . This is because of the fact that biosynthesis of cu and AgNPs  have the same size as biological compounds such as group of amino acids, Deoxy Ribo nucleic acids, and enzymes, allowing for easy entrance into live cells and the circulation, from whence they can spread to other body parts.93The tiny green 865 particles may induce cell membrane destruction, oxidative Deoxy Ribo Nucleic Acid destruction, and disrupt the ETCsince they have permeability potential to cell materials and leads to harm when present over a certain threshold. But, the exact inhibitory action has yet to be determined due to a lack of evidence on green nanoparticles’ biological related Response, transport, metabolic process, and organ-specific toxicity mechanism.94

Based on Size, Morphology and Surface Charge

Less Size particles  have discovered a clear correlation together with their oxidativeeffectiveness, genetic cell having destruction capacity, and biological behaviour. Particles <50nm are harmful to almost all kinds of cells.95These green NPs can remain suspended in the marine and air environments for extended periods of time, exposing live creatures for prolonged periods of time and increasing toxicity.96The form of nanoparticles (circular, triangular, star, and tubular) has been shown to alter endocytosis and phagocytosis.97 Circular-NPs were discovered to be simply endocytosed.98The particle’s surface energy has a strong impact on its aggregation response, which in turn influences toxicity. Furthermore, the surface coat of an organic chemical on a green synthesis of copper and SilverNPs may modify its reactivity, surface energy, surface toughness, and pore shape, either eliminating or inducing toxic properties based on the kind of covering.97

Based on Composition of Nanoparticle

Certain aspects of NPs, such as their solubility, surface features, and dosage, might cause lethal effect. These characteristic  may promote (i) oxidization depression through the generation of reactive oxidative sp , which affect the group of  involved in damage restore, cell wall damage, exduation of cellular compounds, and swellingaction, or (ii) genetic toxicity.99The vigorous  effects of these Bio NPs on organisms may be assessed using cell culture and  whole organism studies in toxic to cells  experiments. Cytotoxic processes in tumour therapy and drug delivery such as  the formation of Reactive oxygen species , the action of cell death effector enzymes , the deactive of enzymes, and the dose-related  suppression of Adenosine triphosphate synthesis, all of which lead to cell death.100Particularly, Copper nanoparticles are generally more harmful than silver nanoparticles across a variety of biological systems, owing to increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and metal ion leaching, which are regulated by their composition and surface stabilizers. Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) exhibit lesser human cell toxicity but robust antibacterial activity, whereas copper nanoparticles (CuNPs) produce more ROS in both mammalian and bacterial cells, with PVP-stabilized CuNPs being particularly harmful.101

Future Perspectives

The future of green nanotechnology, particularly in the synthesis of AgNPs and CuNPs with opportunities for innovation and development. Key areas for future exploration include:

Optimization of Synthesis Protocols: Refining green synthesis of copper and silver nanoparticle techniques to target precise monitoring over nanoparticle size, structure, and composition. This may involve experimenting with combinations of plant extracts or optimizing reaction conditions for higher yield and reproducibility.

Mechanistic Insights: Investigating the underlying mechanisms of nanoparticle formation, including the role of specific phytochemicals in reduction and stabilization, to develop more efficient synthesis strategies.

Scalability and Industrial Applications: Addressing challenges related to scaling up green synthesis methods for industrial production, including cost-efficiency, quality control, and consistency.

Advanced Functionalization: Exploring methods to functionalize green-synthesized nanoparticles with biomolecules or synthetic compounds to broaden their applications, particularly in targeted drug release and biosensing.

Combination Therapies: Studying the enhanced combined  effects of NPs with conventional therapies, such as antibiotics or anticancer drugs, to enhance treatment efficacy.

Ecological  Recovery : Expanding the use of green-synthesized NPs for cleaning up pollutants, including bioaccumulate  metals and organic contaminants, in water and soil.

Nanosensors &Diagnostics: Developing highly sensitive and specific diagnostic tools and environmental sensors using green-synthesized nanoparticles for early disease detection and monitoring.

Artificial Intelligence Integration: Leveraging AI and machine learning to optimize nanoparticle design and synthesis, accelerating the discovery of materials with enhanced properties.

Standardization and Regulation: Establishing clear guidelines and regulatory frameworks for the properties , testing, and application of biosynthesized NPs  to ensure safety and consistency.

Long-term Toxicity Studies: Conducting expensive research studies on the long-period impacts of Nano particle  on human along with ecosystems to promote responsible development.

Biodegradable Nanoparticles: Developing biodegradable nanoparticles through green synthesis to address environmental concerns and enhance their suitability for biomedical applications.

Agricultural Applications: Exploring the uses  of biosynthesized NPs in Farming , such as nanoscale fertilizers and nano formulated pesticide , to promote sustainable farming practices and improve food security.

Conclusion

Bio-nanotechnology, particularly the green synthesis of silver and copper nanoparticles, represents a viable and increasingly explored approach for addressing challenges across biomedical and environmental applications. The analysis presented in this review highlights the potential of Ag and Cu nanoparticles in areas such as antimicrobial activity, drug delivery, wound healing, and water purification, while emphasizing advantages associated with green synthesis, including improved biocompatibility, reduced use of hazardous chemicals, and cost-effectiveness. Advanced characterization techniques have played an important role in understanding the physicochemical properties of these nanoparticles, including size, morphology, surface chemistry, and stability. Such insights are essential for optimizing synthesis protocols and tailoring nanoparticles for specific applications. Green-synthesized Ag and Cu nanoparticles show promising antimicrobial properties, particularly against drug-resistant microorganisms, and demonstrate applicability in healthcare and environmental remediation contexts.

At the same time, environmental and toxicological concerns related to nanoparticle exposure and long-term accumulation remain important considerations. Although green synthesis approaches may reduce some associated risks, further systematic studies are required to fully evaluate long-term safety, environmental fate, and biological interactions.

In summary, the biosynthesis of silver and copper nanoparticles using plant-based sources offers a sustainable alternative to conventional synthesis methods. Continued research focused on safety evaluation, standardized synthesis, and application-specific optimization will be essential for responsible development and practical implementation of green-synthesized nanoparticles.

Acknowledgement

The author would like to thank Arulmigu Kalasalingam College of Pharmacy.This review forms a part of the Ph.D. work of Thenmozhi A, carried out under The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University

Funding Sources

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of Interest

The author(s) do not have any conflict of interest.

Data Availability Statement

This statement does not apply to this article.

Ethics Statement

This research did not involve human participants, animal subjects, or any material that requires ethical approval.

Informed Consent Statement

This study did not involve human participants, and therefore, informed consent was not required.

Clinical Trial Registration

This research does not involve any clinical trials.

Permission to reproduce material from other sources

Not applicable.

Author Contributions

  • Thenmozhi Annadurai: Methodology, Visualization, Supervision, Project Administration Writing – Review & Editing;
  • N Venkateshan: Data Collection, Analysis;
  • S R Senthilkumar: Review & Editing.

References

  1. Iravani S. Green synthesis of metal nanoparticles using plants. Green Chem. 2011;13(10):2638-2650.
    CrossRef
  2. Mittal AK, Chisti Y, Banerjee UC. Synthesis of metallic nanoparticles using plant extracts. Biotechnol Adv. 2013;31(2):346-356.
    CrossRef
  3. Kakade NR, Pingale SS, Chaskar MG. Phytochemical and pharmacological review of Caesalpinia bonducella. Int Res J Pharm. 2017;7(12):12-17.
    CrossRef
  4. Rai M, Yadav A, Gade A. Silver nanoparticles as a new generation of antimicrobials. Biotechnol Adv. 2009;27:76-83.
    CrossRef
  5. Sharma VK, Yngard RA, Lin Y. Silver nanoparticles: Green synthesis and their antimicrobial activities. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2009;145(1-2):83-96.
    CrossRef
  6. Iravani S, Korbekandi H, Mirmohammadi S V, Zolfaghari B. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles: chemical, physical and biological methods. Res Pharm Sci. 2014;9:1-16.
  7. Thakkar KN, Mhatre SS, Parikh RY. Biological synthesis of metallic nanoparticles. 2010;6(2):257-262.
    CrossRef
  8. Makarov V V, Love AJ, Sinitsyna O V, Makarova SS, Yaminsky I V, Taliansky ME, et al. “Green” nanotechnologies: synthesis of metal nanoparticles using plants.acta naturae. 2014;6:1-15.
    CrossRef
  9. Raveendran P, Fu J, Wallen SL. Completely “green” synthesis and stabilization of metal nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125(46):13940-13941.
    CrossRef
  10. Kharissova O V, Dias HVR, Kharisov BI, Pérez BO, Pérez VMJ. The greener synthesis of nanoparticles. Trends Biotechnol. 2013;31(4):240-248.
    CrossRef
  11. Duan H, Wang D, Li Y. Green chemistry for nanoparticle synthesis. Chem Soc Rev. 2015;44(16):5778-5792.
    CrossRef
  12. Ahmed S, Ahmad M, Swami BL, Ikram S. A review on plants extract mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles for antimicrobial applications: a green expertise. J Adv Res. 2016;7(1):17-28.
    CrossRef
  13. Sujitha M V, Kannan S. Green synthesis of gold nanoparticles using Citrus fruits aqueous extract and its characterization. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2013;102:15-23.
    CrossRef
  14. Vijayakumar M, Priya K, Nancy FT, Noorlidah A, Ahmed ABA. Biosynthesis, characterisation and anti-bacterial effect of plant-mediated silver nanoparticles using Artemisia nilagirica. Ind Crops Prod. 2013;41:235-240.
    CrossRef
  15. Hulkoti NI, Taranath TC. Biosynthesis of nanoparticles using microbes—A review. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2014;121:474-483.
    CrossRef
  16. Gade A, Ingle A, Whiteley C, Rai M. Mycogenic metal nanoparticles: progress and applications. Biotechnol Lett. 2010;32(5):593-600.
    CrossRef
  17. Sharma D, Kanchi S, Bisetty K. Biogenic synthesis of nanoparticles: a review. Arab J Chem. 2019;12(8):3576-3600.
    CrossRef
  18. Durán N, Marcato PD, Durán M, Yadav A, Gade A, Rai M. Mechanistic aspects in the biogenic synthesis of extracellular metal nanoparticles by peptides, bacteria, fungi, and plants. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;90(5):1609-1624.
    CrossRef
  19. Virkutyte J, Varma RS. Green synthesis of metal nanoparticles: biodegradable polymers and enzymes in stabilization and surface functionalization. Chem Sci. 2011;2(5):837-846.
    CrossRef
  20. Lal S, Jana U, Manna PK, Mohanta GP, Manavalan R, Pal SL. Nanoparticle: An overview of preparation and characterization. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2011;1(06):228-234.
  21. Bang JH, Suslick KS. Applications of ultrasound to the synthesis of nanostructured materials. Adv Mater. 2010;22(10):1039-1059.
    CrossRef
  22. Sahu N, Soni D, Chandrashekhar B, Satpute DB, Saravanadevi S, Sarangi BK, et al. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles using flavonoids: hesperidin, naringin and diosmin, and their antibacterial effects and cytotoxicity. Int Nano Lett. 2016;6(3):173-181.
    CrossRef
  23. Chawla P, Kumar N, Bains A, Dhull SB, Kumar M, Kaushik R, et al. Gum arabic capped copper nanoparticles: Synthesis, characterization, and applications. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;146:232-242.
    CrossRef
  24. Singh P, Garg A, Pandit S, Mokkapati VRSS, Mijakovic I. Antimicrobial effects of biogenic nanoparticles. 2018;8(12):1009.
    CrossRef
  25. Arya A, Gupta K, Chundawat TS, Vaya D. Biogenic synthesis of copper and silver nanoparticles using green alga Botryococcus braunii and its antimicrobial activity. Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications. 2018;2018(1):7879403.
    CrossRef
  26. Ashokkumar M, Palanisamy K, Ganesh Kumar A, Muthusamy C, Senthil Kumar KJ. Green synthesis of silver and copper nanoparticles and their composites using Ocimum sanctum leaf extract displayed enhanced antibacterial, antioxidant and anticancer potentials. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2024;52(1):438-448.
    CrossRef
  27. Khan Z, Al-Zahrani SA, AlSulami QA, Al-Thabaiti SA, Al-Arjan WS. Effects of shape-controlling cationic and anionic surfactants on the morphology and surface resonance plasmon intensity of silver@copper bimetallic nanoparticles. J Mol Liq. 2019;275:354-363.
    CrossRef
  28. Al Tamimi S, Ashraf S, Abdulrehman T, Parray A, Mansour SA, Haik Y, Qadri S. Synthesis and analysis of silver–copper alloy nanoparticles of different ratios manifest anticancer activity in breast cancer cells. Cancer Nanotechnology. 2020 Dec;11(1):13.
    CrossRef
  29. Iwuji C, Saha H, Ghann W, Dotson D, Bhuiya MdAK, Parvez MdS, et al. Synthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticles and their promising antimicrobial effects. Chem Phys Impact. 2024;9:100758.
    CrossRef
  30. Asif M, Yasmin R, Asif R, Ambreen A, Mustafa M, Umbreen S. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), structural characterization, and their antibacterial potential. Dose-Response. 2022;20(2):1-10.
    CrossRef
  31. Liaqat N, Jahan N, Anwar T, Qureshi H. Green synthesized silver nanoparticles: Optimization, characterization, antimicrobial activity, and cytotoxicity study by hemolysis assay. Frontiers in chemistry. 2022 Aug 29;10:952006.
    CrossRef
  32. Baran MF, Keskin C, Baran A, Hatipoğlu A, Yildiztekin M, Küçükaydin S, Kurt K, Hoşgören H, Sarker MM, Sufianov A, Beylerli O. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles from Allium cepa L. Peel extract, their antioxidant, antipathogenic, and anticholinesterase activity. Molecules. 2023 Mar 2;28(5):2310.
    CrossRef
  33. Khane Y, Benouis K, Albukhaty S, Sulaiman GM, Abomughaid MM, Al Ali A, Aouf D, Fenniche F, Khane S, Chaibi W, Henni A. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using aqueous Citrus limon zest extract: Characterization and evaluation of their antioxidant and antimicrobial properties. Nanomaterials. 2022 Jun 10;12(12):2013.
    CrossRef
  34. Reddy NV, Li H, Hou T, Bethu MS, Ren Z, Zhang Z. Phytosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using Perilla frutescens leaf extract: characterization and evaluation of antibacterial, antioxidant, and anticancer activities. International journal of nanomedicine. 2021 Jan 6:15-29.
    CrossRef
  35. Giri AK, Jena B, Biswal B, Pradhan AK, Arakha M, Acharya S, Acharya L. Green synthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticles using Eugenia roxburghii DC. extract and activity against biofilm-producing bacteria. Scientific Reports. 2022 May 19;12(1):8383.
    CrossRef
  36. Nagar N, Devra V. Green synthesis and characterization of copper nanoparticles using Azadirachta indica Mater Chem Phys. 2018;213:44-51.
    CrossRef
  37. Mali SC, Dhaka A, Githala CK, Trivedi R. Green synthesis of copper nanoparticles using Celastrus paniculatus leaf extract and their photocatalytic and antifungal properties. Biotechnol Rep. 2020;27:e00518.
    CrossRef
  38. Ismail MIM. Green synthesis and characterizations of copper nanoparticles. Mater Chem Phys. 2020;240:122283.
    CrossRef
  39. Hasheminya SM, Dehghannya J. Green synthesis and characterization of copper nanoparticles using Eryngium caucasicum Trautv aqueous extracts and their antioxidant and antimicrobial properties. Part Sci Technol. 2020;38(8):1019-1026.
    CrossRef
  40. Wu S, Rajeshkumar S, Madasamy M, Mahendran V. Green synthesis of copper nanoparticles using Cissus vitiginea and its antioxidant and antibacterial activity against urinary tract infection pathogens. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2020;48(1):1153-1158.
    CrossRef
  41. Caroling GM, Priyadharshini MN, Vinodhini E, Ranjitham AM, Shanthi P. Biosynthesis of copper nanoparticles using aqueous guava extract: characterisation and study of antibacterial effects. Int J Pharm Biol Sci. 2015;5(2):25-43.
  42. Amer MW, Awwad AM. Green synthesis of copper nanoparticles by Citrus limon fruit extract: characterization and antibacterial activity. Chem Int. 2021;7(1):1-8.
  43. Sánchez-Sanhueza G, Fuentes-Rodríguez D, Bello-Toledo H. Copper nanoparticles as potential antimicrobial agent in disinfecting root canals: a systematic review. Int J Odontostomatol. 2016;10(3):547-554.
    CrossRef
  44. Mikhailova EO. Silver nanoparticles: mechanism of action and probable bio-application. J Funct Biomater. 2020;11(4):84.
    CrossRef
  45. Raffi M, Mehrwan S, Bhatti TM, et al. Investigations into the antibacterial behavior of copper nanoparticles against Escherichia coli. Ann Microbiol. 2010;60(1):75-80.
    CrossRef
  46. Zhao H, Su H, Ahmeda A, Sun Y, Li Z, Zangeneh MM, Nowrozi M, Zangeneh A, Moradi R. Biosynthesis of copper nanoparticles using Allium eriophyllum Boiss leaf aqueous extract; characterization and analysis of their antimicrobial and cutaneous wound‐healing potentials. Applied Organometallic Chemistry. 2022 Dec;36(12):e5587.
    CrossRef
  47. Das Jana I, Kumbhakar P, Banerjee S, Gowda CC, Kedia N, Kuila SK, Banerjee S, Das NC, Das AK, Manna I, Tiwary CS. Development of a copper-graphene nanocomposite-based transparent coating with antiviral activity against influenza virus. BioRxiv. 2020 Sep 2:2020-09.
    CrossRef
  48. Ahmadi M, Elikaei A, Ghadam P. Antiviral activity of biosynthesized copper nanoparticle by Juglans regia green husk aqueous extract and Iron nanoparticle: molecular docking and in-vitro studies. Iranian Journal of Microbiology. 2023 Feb;15(1):138.
    CrossRef
  49. Al-zharani M, Qurtam AA, Daoush WM, et al. Antitumor effect of copper nanoparticles on human breast and colon malignancies. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021;28(2):1587-1595.
    CrossRef
  50. Ramyadevi J, Jeyasubramanian K, Marikani A, et al. Copper nanoparticles synthesized by polyol process used to control hematophagous parasites. Parasitol Res. 2011;109(5):1403-1415.
    CrossRef
  51. Sundar JS, Gloria R, Christobel J, et al. Efficient green synthesis of silver nanoparticles from Caesalpinia bonducella seeds and its antibacterial and cytotoxic effects: an in vitro study. Pharma Innov J. 2018;7(11):95-102.
  52. Singh P, Ahn S, Kang JP, Veronika S, Huo Y, Singh H, Chokkaligam M, El-Agamy Farh M, Aceituno VC, Kim YJ, Yang DC. In vitro anti-inflammatory activity of spherical silver nanoparticles and monodisperse hexagonal gold nanoparticles by fruit extract of Prunus serrulata: a green synthetic approach. Artificial cells, nanomedicine, and biotechnology. 2018 Nov 17;46(8):2022-32.
    CrossRef
  53. Zhang P, Gong J, Jiang Y, et al. Application of silver nanoparticles in parasite treatment. 2023;15(7):1783.
    CrossRef
  54. Rai M, Kon K, Ingle A, et al. Broad-spectrum bioactivities of silver nanoparticles: emerging trends and future prospects. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98(5):1951-1961.
    CrossRef
  55. Shimanovich U, Gedanken A. Nanotechnology solutions to restore antibiotic activity. J Mater Chem B. 2016;4(5):824-833.
    CrossRef
  56. Yaqoob AA, Umar K, Ibrahim MNM. Silver nanoparticles: various methods of synthesis, size affecting factors and potential applications—a review. Appl Nanosci. 2020;10(5):1369-1378.
    CrossRef
  57. Yah CS, Simate GS. Nanoparticles as potential new generation broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents. DARU J Pharm Sci. 2015;23(1):43.
    CrossRef
  58. Rudramurthy G, Swamy M, Sinniah U, Ghasemzadeh A. Nanoparticles: alternatives against drug-resistant pathogenic microbes. Molecules. 2016;21(7):836.
    CrossRef
  59. Prabhu S, Poulose EK. Silver nanoparticles: mechanism of antimicrobial action, synthesis, medical applications, and toxicity effects. Int Nano Lett. 2012;2(1):32.
    CrossRef
  60. Yin IX, Zhang J, Zhao IS, Mei ML, Li Q, Chu CH. The antibacterial mechanism of silver nanoparticles and its application in dentistry. Int J Nanomedicine. 2020;15:2555-2562.
    CrossRef
  61. Rahman H, Rauf A, Khan SA, et al. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Rhazya stricta Decne extracts and their antimicrobial and antioxidant activities. 2023;13(3):398.
    CrossRef
  62. Yu Z, Liu J, He H, et al. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles with black rice (Oryza sativa) extract endowing carboxymethyl chitosan–modified cotton with high antimicrobial and durable properties. Cellulose. 2021;28(3):1827-1842.
    CrossRef
  63. Avilala J, Golla N. Antibacterial and antiviral properties of silver nanoparticles synthesized by marine actinomycetes. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2019;10(3).
  64. Ullah I, Rauf A, Khalil AA, et al. Peganum harmala extract-based gold and silver nanoparticles: green synthesis, characterization, and antibacterial and antifungal assessment. Food Sci Nutr. 2024;12(6):4459-4472.
    CrossRef
  65. Amara YT, Beldjilali M, Kermezli FZ, et al. Mentha aquatica leaf extract–mediated phytosynthesis of silver nanoparticles: antioxidant, catalytic, and antimicrobial activity. New J Chem. 2023;47(29):13841-13854.
    CrossRef
  66. Vijapur LS, Srinivas Y, Desai AR, et al. Development of biosynthesized silver nanoparticles from Cinnamomum tamala for antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anticancer activity. J Res Pharm. 2023;27(2):769-782.
    CrossRef
  67. Samad M, Akhtar W, Muneer A, et al. Characterization, antimicrobial, antioxidant, and growth-promoting effects of biogenically synthesized silver nanoparticles derived from Dicliptera bupleuroides Microsc Res Tech. 2024;87(11):2580-2589.
    CrossRef
  68. Kemala P, Idroes R, Khairan K, et al. Green synthesis and antimicrobial activities of silver nanoparticles using Calotropis gigantea from Ie Seu-Um geothermal area, Aceh Province, Indonesia. Molecules. 2022;27(16):5310.
    CrossRef
  69. Keshari AK, Srivastava R, Singh P, Yadav VB, Nath G. Antioxidant and antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles synthesized by Cestrum nocturnum. J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2020;11(1):37-44.
    CrossRef
  70. Prakash MD, Sampath S, Amudha K, Nadeem A, Lopes BS, Durga B, Muthupandian S. Eco-friendly green synthesis of copper nanoparticles from Tinospora cordifolia leaves: optical properties with biological evaluation of anti-microbial, anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant applications. Materials Technology. 2023 Dec 31;38(1):2247908.
    CrossRef
  71. Jahan I, Erci F, Isildak I. Facile microwave-mediated green synthesis of non-toxic copper nanoparticles using Citrus sinensis aqueous fruit extract and their antibacterial potentials. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2021;61:102172.
    CrossRef
  72. Ha T, Pham TTM, Kim M, et al. Antiviral activities of high-energy E-beam–induced copper nanoparticles against H1N1 influenza virus. 2022;12(2):268.
    CrossRef
  73. Punniyakotti P, Panneerselvam P, Perumal D, Aruliah R, Angaiah S. Anti-bacterial and anti-biofilm properties of green synthesized copper nanoparticles from Cardiospermum halicacabum leaf extract. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2020;43(9):1649-1657.
    CrossRef
  74. Prasad R, Banu A, Nair SS, Tomar S. Antimicrobial and free-radical scavenging activities of green-synthesized copper nanoparticles from Musa acuminata and Citrus sinensis peel extracts. Kristu Jayanti J Core Appl Biol. 2022:37-41.
    CrossRef
  75. Jothiramalingam R, Devasanan S, Lohedan HA, Muthumareeswaran MR, Alqahtani HM, Abdalnaser K. Green chemistry–prepared copper nanoparticles using lemon flower extract and their antimicrobial activity. Dig J Nanomater Biostruct. 2022;17(1):145-151.
    CrossRef
  76. Jayarambabu N, Akshaykranth A, Venkatappa Rao T, Venkateswara Rao K, Rakesh Kumar R. Green synthesis of copper nanoparticles using Curcuma longa extract and their antimicrobial application. Mater Lett. 2020;259:126813.
    CrossRef
  77. Hamad AM, Atiyea QM, Hameed DN, Dalaf AH. Green synthesis of copper nanoparticles using strawberry leaves and study of properties, anti-cancer action, and activity against bacteria isolated from Covid-19 patients. Karbala International Journal of Modern Science. 2023;9(1):12.
    CrossRef
  78. Ramasubbu K, Padmanabhan S, Al-Ghanim KA, et al. Green synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles using Sesbania grandiflora leaf extract and evaluation of antidiabetic, cytotoxic, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory properties. 2023;9(4):332.
    CrossRef
  79. Ahmed SF, Mofijur M, Nuzhat S, et al. Recent developments in techniques for removing emerging contaminants from wastewater: physical, biological, chemical, and hybrid methods. J Hazard Mater. 2021;416:125912.
    CrossRef
  80. Zahoor M, Nazir N, Iftikhar M, Naz S, Zekker I, Burlakovs J, Uddin F, Kamran AW, Kallistova A, Pimenov N, Ali Khan F. A review on silver nanoparticles: Classification, various methods of synthesis, and their potential roles in biomedical applications and water treatment. Water. 2021 Jan;13(16):2216.
    CrossRef
  81. Nkosi NC, Basson AK, Ntombela ZG, Dlamini NG, Pullabhotla RV. A review on bioflocculant-synthesized copper nanoparticles: characterization and application in wastewater treatment. Bioengineering. 2024 Oct 10;11(10):1007.
    CrossRef
  82. Das P, Ghosh S, Ghosh R, Dam S, Baskey M. Madhuca longifolia plant mediated green synthesis of cupric oxide nanoparticles: A promising environmentally sustainable material for wastewater treatment and efficient antibacterial agent. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2018;189:66-73.
    CrossRef
  83. Goutam SP, Saxena G, Singh V, Yadav AK, Bharagava RN, Thapa KB. Green synthesis of TiO₂ nanoparticles using leaf extract of Jatropha curcas for photocatalytic degradation of tannery wastewater. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2018;336:386-396.
    CrossRef
  84. El-Ramady H, El-Ghamry A, Mosa A, Alshaal T. Nanofertilizers vs biofertilizers: New insights. Environment, Biodiversity and Soil Security. 2018;2(1):40-50.
    CrossRef
  85. Liu R, Lal R. Synthetic apatite nanoparticles as a phosphorus fertilizer for soybean (Glycine max). Sci Rep. 2014;4:5686.
    CrossRef
  86. de França Bettencourt GM, Degenhardt J, Zevallos Torres LA, de Andrade Tanobe VO, Soccol CR. Green biosynthesis of single and bimetallic nanoparticles of iron and manganese using bacterial auxin complex to act as plant biofertilizer. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2020;30:101822.
    CrossRef
  87. Osman AI, Zhang Y, Farghali M, Rashwan AK, Eltaweil AS, Abd El-Monaem EM, et al. Synthesis of green nanoparticles for energy, biomedical, environmental, agricultural, and food applications: A review. Environ Chem Lett. 2024;22(2):841-887.
    CrossRef
  88. Wang Y, O’Connor D, Shen Z, Lo IMC, Tsang DCW, Pehkonen S, et al. Green synthesis of nanoparticles for the remediation of contaminated waters and soils: Constituents, synthesizing methods, and influencing factors. J Clean Prod. 2019;226:540-549.
    CrossRef
  89. Zaki SA, Ouf SA, Albarakaty FM, Habeb MM, Aly AA, Abd-Elsalam KA. Trichoderma harzianum-mediated ZnO nanoparticles: A green tool for controlling soil-borne pathogens in cotton. J Fungi. 2021;7(11):952.
    CrossRef
  90. Chauke NM, Munonde TS, Mketo N. A critical review of the anti-biofouling properties of biogenic-based silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) embedded on polymer membranes for wastewater treatment. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 2025 Feb 6.
    CrossRef
  91. Dlamini NG, Basson AK, Pullabhotla VS. Optimization and application of bioflocculant passivated copper nanoparticles in the wastewater treatment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019 Jun;16(12):2185.
    CrossRef
  92. Murgueitio E, Cumbal L, Abril M, Izquierdo A, Debut A, Tinoco O. Green synthesis of iron nanoparticles: Application on the removal of petroleum oil from contaminated water and soils. J Nanotechnol. 2018;2018:1-8.
    CrossRef
  93. Roy N, Gaur A, Jain A, Bhattacharya S, Rani V. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles: An approach to overcome toxicity. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2013;36(3):807-812.
    CrossRef
  94. Gopinath V, Priyadarshini S, Loke MF, Arunkumar J, Marsili E, MubarakAli D, et al. Biogenic synthesis and characterization of antibacterial silver nanoparticles and their cell cytotoxicity. Arab J Chem. 2017;10(8):1107-1117.
    CrossRef
  95. Turan NB, Erkan HS, Engin GO, Bilgili MS. Nanoparticles in the aquatic environment: Usage, properties, transformation, and toxicity—a review. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2019;130:238-249.
    CrossRef
  96. Donaldson K, Stone V. Current hypotheses on the mechanisms of toxicity of ultrafine particles. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2003;39:405-410.
  97. Gatoo MA, Naseem S, Arfat MY, Mahmood Dar A, Qasim K, Zubair S. Physicochemical properties of nanomaterials: Implication in associated toxic manifestations. Biomed ResInt. 2014;2014:1-8.
    CrossRef
  98. Lee MK, Lim SJ, Kim CK. Preparation, characterization and in vitro cytotoxicity of paclitaxel-loaded sterically stabilized solid lipid nanoparticles. Biomaterials. 2007;28(12):2137-2146.
    CrossRef
  99. Ribeiro APC, Anbu S, Alegria ECBA, Fernandes AR, Baptista PV, Mendes R, et al. Evaluation of cell toxicity and DNA and protein binding of green synthesized silver nanoparticles. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;101:137-144.
    CrossRef
  100. Weir E, Lawlor A, Whelan A, Regan F. The use of nanoparticles in antimicrobial materials and their characterization. Analyst. 2008;133(7):835-845.
    CrossRef
  101. Ameh T, Gibb M, Stevens D, Pradhan SH, Braswell E, Sayes CM. Silver and copper nanoparticles induce oxidative stress in bacteria and mammalian cells. 2022 Jan;12(14):2402.
    CrossRef

Abbreviations

Ag NPs Silver Nanoparticle
Cu NPs Copper Nanoparticle
FCC Face Centered Cubic
SPR Surface Plasmon Resonance
TEM Transmission Electron Microscope
DLS Dynamic Light Scattering
XRD X Ray Diffraction
ROS Reactive Oxygen Species
TIO2 Titanium Dioxide
COD Chemical Oxygen Demand
Cr Chromium
SEM Scanning Electron Microscope
FTIR Fourier Transform Infrared Microscope
AWDM Agar Well Diffusion Method
CuO NPs Copper Oxide  Nanoparticles
CNT Carbon NanoTubes
Cu, Zn, Fe, Mn, Ni, As, Mo Copper, Zinc, Iron, Manganese, Nickel, Arsenic, Molybdenum
P,Ca,K,Cd Phosphorus, Calcium, Potassium, cadmium
Cu- Gr Copper- graphene
DDM Disk Diffusion Method
TPHs Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Fe NPs Iron NanoParticle
MS Melamine Sponge
SA : V Surface Area to Volume
SA : M Surface Area to Mass
ECT Electron Transport Chain
EDX Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy
BET Brunauer-Emmett-Teller
Share Button
Visited 3 times, 6 visit(s) today

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.