Bhattacharya K, Bhattacharya S, Sengupta P, Dutta S, Choudhuri G. R, Mukhopadhyay L. D. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Pregnancy. Biomed Pharmacol J 2021;14(3).

---

Manuscript received on :27-04-2021
Manuscript accepted on :25-08-2021
Published online on: 27-09-2021

---

Plagiarism Check: Yes
Reviewed by: Dr. Tahmineh Mokhtari  
Second Review by: Dr. Florin Muselin
Final Approval by: Dr Anton R Kiselev

---

How to Citeclose    |   Publication History close

 Views: (Visited 326 times, 1 visits today)    PDF Downloads: 294

Koushik Bhattacharya¹ , Soumita Bhattacharya², Pallav Sengupta^3* , Sulagna Dutta⁴, Gargi Ray Choudhuri⁵  and Lipika Das Mukhopadhyay⁶

¹Department of Physiology, Rungta College of Dental Sciences and Research, Bhilai, Chhattisgarh, India

²Formar Guest Faculty, Department of Physiology, Bijoygarh Jyotish Ray College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

³Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Bioscience and Nursing, MAHSA University, Malaysia

⁴Department of Oral Biology and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, MAHSA University, Malaysia

⁵Department of Physiotherapy, Nopany Institute of Health Care Studies, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

⁶Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, KPC Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, India

Corresponding Author E-mail: pallav_cu@yahoo.com

DOI : https://dx.doi.org/10.13005/bpj/2219

Abstract

Women perhaps are more exposed to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the novel coronavirus (CoV) called as the severe acute respiratory syndrome-CoV-2 (SARS-CoV-2), as compared to men, due to their greater contribution in healthcare and social services. Globally, around 70% of health and social service providers constitute of female. The pandemic is also poising serious threat to female sexual and reproductive health. Particularly, pregnant women are at risk and need special antenatal care besides routine health services. SARS-CoV-2 infection leads to the path of an exaggerated immune reaction in an infected individual. This leads to ‘cytokine storm’ causing massive tissue damage, systemic inflammation, increased body temperature, and in turn, these may lead to multiple organ failure. The gonads are also susceptible to damage and impairment in reproductive functions. Thus, it is vital to acquire  information on the impact of this virus on gestational changes and pregnancy outcome.  Given the limitation of data on COVID-19 mediated changes in pregnant women, this article also reviews the effects of two previous coronavirus infections - severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) caused by SARS-CoV and the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) caused by MERS-CoV to predict the possible impact of the novel SARS-CoV-2 on pregnancy outcomes. Analysis of available literature reveals that unlike coronavirus infections of pregnant women caused by SARS and MERS, COVID-19 seems less likely to cause maternal death. Importantly, alike SARS and MERS, there were no confirmed cases of intrauterine transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from mothers with COVID-19 to their fetuses. Further broad-spectrum research is necessary to reach a consensus regarding the vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and whether it adopts any other mechanisms to affect pregnancy outcomes.

Keywords

COVID-19; Inflammation; Miscarriage; Pregnancy; SARS-CoV-2

Introduction

The appearance of novel coronavirus (CoV) infection that originated in Wuhan, China in December 2019, has emanated in an infestation that has rapidly tumefied to become one of the most noteworthy public health impendences of current century ^1-4. This novel CoV is termed as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), and the disease it produces has been named coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID‑19) ⁵. It has become a global pandemic as declared by the World Health Organization (WHO) on March 11, 2020 ⁶. It causes respiratory infection which often leads to major pneumonia and can even turn fatal ⁷.

Genetic, virologic, epidemiologic and clinical aspects of SARS-CoV2 are being intervened to recognize its exact mechanism of human transmission and propagation ⁸. It has been reported that SARS-Cov-2, alike human pathogenic coronavirus SARS-CoV, binds with angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) receptor located on the target cells in host body. The expression of ACE2 have been shown in epithelial cells of the lung, intestine, kidney, and endothelial cells ⁹ as well in the placental cells ¹⁰.

The etiopathology of fetal COVID-19 and vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from mother to fetus have sparsely been documented, but mostly remain opaque ^{9, 11}. Since COVID-19 is a prominent public health issue, adequate understanding about pathology of this disease in pregnant women is very essential which will serve to provide better obstetrical management to these patients. Contemporarily, few case histories of the Zika, Ebola and Marburg virus along with the other agents clearly showed the vertical maternal-fetal transmission which can be an intimidation about the health and constancy of an affected mother and fetus ^{12, 13}.

Transmission of SARS-CoV-2

SARS-CoV-2 is believed to be transmitted from bats to human via intermediate animal at the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market of Wuhan ^{14, 15}. Since then, the virus soon spread all over the globe through human to human transmission. Individuals without symptoms of COVID-19 (asymptomatic or silent carrier) can also be a possible source for the spread of novel Coronavirus. Thus, social isolation is proposed to control this contamination due to communication ¹⁶.

Unlike the other respiratory pathogens (e.g. common flu or rhinovirus), the emerged nascent novel coronavirus can also be transmitted by the dispersion of infected droplets from symptomatic COVID-19 patients ¹⁷. Other possibility is airborne transmission, which can also be elevated by the prolonged exposure in a suffocated or non-airy space ¹⁷. This viral contamination is prominent among the hospital staffs and professionals, and high within the hospitals or nursing homes, as well as via relatives and other nearest contacts ¹⁸.

Pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection

The nascent emerged novel SARS-CoV-2 virus has embraced structures with nucleocapsid whose genetic material consists of a single-stranded RNA that is positive (or sense) strand which encodes mRNA (messenger RNA) and protein ¹⁹.  The genomic and viral structure with the disease-causing mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 should be contemplated  ¹⁹. The viral single‐stranded positive‐sense RNA (~30 kb) has a 5′‐cap structure and 3′‐poly‐A tail. The viral RNA serves as template for translation of polyprotein 1a/1ab (pp1a/pp1ab) and these polyproteins encode nonstructural proteins (nsps) forming the replication‐transcription complex (RTC) ²⁰. The RTC synthesizes subgenomic RNAs (sgRNAs) ²¹ with common 5′‐leader and 3′‐terminal sequences, located between open reading frames (ORFs). The sgRNAs are used to produce the subgenomic mRNAs  ²². Minimum of six ORFs can be observed in the CoV genome. Except the ORF1a and ORF1b, the other open reading frames encodes for various structural proteins (like spike protein, proteins of membrane envelope, nucleocapsid and accessory protein chains) ²². Various CoVs represent significantly specially structured accessory proteins which are been enormously translated by the specific sub-genomic RNAs ²³.

The functions of structural and non-structural proteins are intricately related to the pathophysiology and virulence mechanism of CoVs. It is been explained that nsps can directly hinder the innate immunity response of the infected individual ²⁴. Structural proteins are not only crucial for the envelope, but also may promote the virus assembly and their release. Nevertheless, maximum of these subsequent observations has not been elaborated yet such in those of nsp-2 and -11 ²⁵. The spikes on viral surface are made up of homotrimers of S-proteins also known as spike glycoproteins, composed of S1 and S2 subunits ²⁶. Of note, in SARS-CoV-2, the S2 subunit  contains a fusion peptide, a transmembrane domain, whereas cytoplasmic domain is highly conserved ¹⁹. Thus, it could be a target for antiviral (anti-S2) compounds. Though SARS-CoV-2 shares 79.0% nucleotide identity to SARS-CoV [27], many structural features are different to some extent, for example, the spike receptor binding domain has only 40% amino acid identity with other SARS-CoV, ORF-3b and ORF-8 encoded proteins are not identical with SARS-CoV ²⁸. Following the comparison of the gene sequences between SARS-CoV-2 with that of SARS-CoV, Angelette et al. have reported that the transmembrane helical segments encoded nsp2 and nsp3 in ORF-1ab which denotes that, the position of 723 has glycine residue in place of serine and 1010 position is engaged by proline instead of the isoleucine ²⁹. The SARS-CoV-2 gene sequences were published by the researchers in several International Gene Banks for instance Gen Bank, helped researchers to find the evolutionary tree of the CoV-2 virus and to specify the strains which differed due to mutations. Few recent studies have mentioned about ‘spike mutation’ which had already emerged in late November 2019, is being multiplicated in a jumping manner among the human beings ^{30, 31}. It is suggested that mutation is the key for potential disease relapse.Due to the shortage of extensive clinical data it is not feasible to produce concrete information about the symptoms and clinical manifestations of CoV-2. However, it is quite evident that the viral infection leads to the path of exaggerated immune reaction in an infected individual. This leads to ‘cytokine storm’ causing massive tissue damage. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is one of major cytokines contributing significantly to elicit an uncontrolled immune response in COVID-19 patients. It is produced by the activated leucocytes primarily at the site of inflammation. IL-6 contributes to host defense through the stimulation of acute phase protein responses, induces the differentiation of B-lymphocytes, capable of crossing the blood brain barrier and initiates the synthesis of other inflammatory mediators, such as prostaglandins in hypothalamus which is one of the major factors that attribute to elevated body temperature ³². Thus, induction of high levels of IL-6 release along with other cytokines like interferon gamma (IFNγ) leads to pathogenicity related with systemic inflammatory responses. This results in a feedback circuit to induce surge of various pro-inflammatory cytokines and may cause cytokine release syndrome (CRS) ³³. CRS is been characterized by fever and multiple organ dysfunction connected with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapy, therapeutic antibodies and haploidentical allogenic transplantation ³⁴.

COVID-19 and pregnancy: Current scenario and previous experience

The outbreak of COVID-19 has put the public health sector and medical infrastructure in a state of urgency to provide care to the patients as well as to adapt to fast evolving treatment regime ³⁵. During the previous outbreaks of SARS and MERS, clinicians took time to treat or invent vaccine for pregnant women to cover the fetal safety ³⁶. A constraining reason is important to remove the pregnant women from consideration, possibly in this hefty contagious hazard ³⁷. The mediations for the mother and fetus during the treatment of pregnancy, the merits should be carefully administered as well as the possible risks. Following the close observation of COVID-19 cases during the treatment which are fully set up is mandatory to ensure and report the proper information on the status of pregnancy with the inclusion of maternal and fetus outcome. In a case control study, between pregnant and non-pregnant women with SARS‐CoV, it has been reported that the pregnant women did not show any unusual clinical symptoms ³⁸. Ramifications and unpropitious situations including the staying duration in hospital, kidney failure, septicemia and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC) in conceived women were statistically and considerably expanded ^{39, 40}. Need of ventilation had increased death rate among the pregnant women as compared with non-pregnant women has been reported ³⁸. Moreover, some studies also reported the same that, the pregnant women were observed more frequently with ventilation and hemodialysis as treatment tool because of renal failure, and positive cerebrospinal fluid for SARS-CoV ^{41, 42} without any reporting case of stillbirth from the affected pregnant women. The mothers were seen with exaltation for their recovery and the neonates were also reported as negative for SARS-CoV RNA test ⁴³. According to Maxwell et al., out of seven pregnant mothers who were admitted with SARS-CoV in designated SARS unit, two of them were passed away and four mothers were recommended for intensive care unit (ICU) supervision and ventilation.  Two vitiated pregnant women had come out from that unpropitious condition but had neonates with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) without clinical evidence of SARS-CoV infection among the live newborns ⁴⁴. According to Ng et al., placental pathological examination among seven infected pregnant women inferred that two of  them who were recovering from SARS-CoV during the early gestational period, the placentas were found to be normal. Besides that, elaboration of expanded sub-chorionic and intervillous fibrin were reported in three women may be due to impaired maternal to placental blood flow ⁴⁵.

COVID-19 and pregnancy complications: Susceptibility and severity

In lieu of current researches and evidences, it can be suggested that during COVID-19 pandemic, men are more susceptible to the infection than women ^{3, 46-49}. According to the studies, regarding SARS or MERS, a concrete inference cannot be drawn about the tendency of infestation among the conceived women. So far, this novel coronavirus is not at all gender bias, the above-mentioned information about the infestation of COVID-19 on the basis of gender difference is based only on some following subsequent situations like susceptibility, subjection and detection of contamination. No references or studies has given the proven data about the expansion of infestation of COVID-19 among these would be mothers. According to the preceding studies, related to SARS and MERS, a quite abnormal clinical observation had been noticed in conceived women that may lead from severity to death without any foregoing symptoms (Table 1) ^{9, 37, 50-62}. Agitation or high temperature with acute respiratory tract distress observed among 80% of the hospitalized patients[3]. Few clinical observations were suggested by Chen et al. [9], about few pregnant women whose symptoms has somewhat similarities with non-pregnant adult women also in some aspect. Out of nine pregnant women subsequent observations are being followed: (a) high temperature in seven of them, (b) respiratory distress in four, (c) three of them observations were suggested by Chen et al. [9], about few pregnant women whose symptoms has somewhat similarities with non-pregnant adult women also in some aspect. Out of nine pregnant women subsequent observations are being followed: (a) high temperature in seven of them, (b) respiratory distress in four, (c) three of them were suffering from myalgia, (d) pain or irritation in the throat with some sorts of discomfort in each of the two women, (e) reduced lymphocyte count or lymphocytopenia was observed among five of them, (f) each of them had pneumonia but by god’s grace no death reports has been confirmed yet. Everybody was placed for surgical or c-section delivery, followed by, the observed Apgar scores were 9-10 at 5 minutes and 8-9 at one minute.

Table 1: Studies on the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection and its impact on pregnancy outcomes.

According to a study conducted by Zhu et al. ⁵⁴, another series of nine pregnant women along with 10 infants into which one set of twins were observed following symptoms: out of nine pregnant women prior 1 to 6 days of delivery, four of them were confirmed, two cases were observed at the day of parturition exactly and three cases were confirmed after delivery. No differences administered in the perspective of COVID-19 symptoms when compared with infected and non-infected individuals. Few more complications observed within those nine pregnant patients, such as six of them was observed with development of intrauterine fetal distress, seven of them had to be considered with C-Section or surgical delivery, and out of those ten infants, six were found with premature delivery. So far, these information and reports has been concerned, confirm or exact conclusion about the severity among pregnant women in the perseverance related with COVID-19, is still under scrutiny.

Besides the other physiological changes, the pregnant women undergo cardio-respiratory and immunological changes leads to become more susceptible for the development of severe health issues after infection with any respiratory virus. It has been observed that, 1% of pregnant women infected with influenza-A subtype H1N1 virus, but 5% of all H1N1‐related deaths were also accounted for them ⁶³.

Moreover, SARS‐CoV and MERS‐CoV both are responsible for onset of such multiple complications during pregnancy provoking urgent use of endotracheal intubation and intensive care unit (ICU), even causing renal failure and death[45, 64]. But surprisingly, COVID-19 causes less severe infection than SARS‐CoV and MERS‐CoV to the pregnant women. The study described earlier conducted by Chen et al. [9], observed only fever and coughing as primary signs of laboratory‐confirmed COVID‐19 women with positive third trimester of pregnancy. Symptoms like muscular pain, sore throat, diarrhea and shortness of breath were also included later.  Within those nine affected pregnant COVID-19 patients, most of them were reported with abnormally lesser count of lymphocytes with higher C‐reactive protein, besides the presence of multiple patchy ground‐glass shadows in the lungs observed on chest CT scan. Due to COVID-19 infection, 22.22% of nine affected patients were observed with fetal distress and separately 22.22% of nine affected patients were again were found with premature rupture of feto-placental membrane although all nine patients were staying alive without developing the severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Lei et al., ⁶⁵ also conducted a study among nine pregnant women (pregnancy of mid‐trimester onwards or during the postpartum period) with confirm COVID-19 showing similar report as previous study but only one woman was kept under the ICU care and ventilation for the sudden appearance of acute respiratory distress syndrome, as the viral infection was diagnosed two days after the delivery. Both the studies also described that the clinical characteristics of COVID‐19 pneumonia are similar for both the group of patients pregnant and non-pregnant ^{2, 66}. Thus, the healthcare professionals who are pregnant, have to aware and must use personal protective equipment (PPE) and follow the infection control guidelines prior exposure to the patients with COVID-19. Simultaneously, prevention and control practices against the infection are also important part to protect all the healthcare professionals in clinical settings [67].

COVID-19 and pregnancy: Measures, diagnostic testing and vaccination

The indications and manifestations of COVID-19 like respiratory distress, cough and high body temperature ⁵⁵, should not be neglected, thus, must be diagnosed in a proper way not only in normal adults but also in pregnant individuals. Before taking the pregnant women inside the delivery unit or prenatal care unit the diagnosis procedure is to be presented usually. An individual with the symptoms has appointment, should be instructed all the does and don’ts and if prior the next call the patients feeling any severity, should immediately be provided with proper face musk by health personnel and must be isolated from the gathering.

The patient should be isolated in an isolation room to prevent from the cross-contamination from one room to the other rooms. This isolation room includes a ventilation system that releases a ‘negative pressure’ (a pressure lower than the surrounding pressure). The patient should be kept inside the isolation room till the proper testing of the appropriate prototypes are not been received. Simultaneously, notifications must be sent to the infection control departments governed by the local or state or national health departments in a serious content. The urgent samples required are the swab of upper and lower respiratory tract specimens and plasma, but stool and urine testing can be done later.

Till date COVID-19 vaccine is not been invented yet. Different organizations that also refer the “National Institute of Health” with their efficient warriors are doing their best jobs to discover, depending on that SARS-CoV-2 virus genetic sequence published online on 28^th April 2020 ⁶⁸. Scientists and researchers may correlate research outcomes with that of invention related to SARS and MERS vaccines ⁶⁹. The real-life saver saints those who have sacrificed their valuable life for the nation as well as whole world and are trying to reach the unknown fact where they can relief the mankind from this unknown deadly disease.

Management of COVID-19 during pregnancy

The COVID-19 outbreak is really a crucial time for each and every human being, but it is a more challenging time for the conceived women who need special care and close observations. A maximum level of equipment and facilities are recommended which must incorporate a close observation and prior detection of an emergency situation and proper monitoring of the worst clinical conditions for example premature delivery or still birth is most important. Other clinical complications like respiratory abnormality detected in mother, can be cause of irregular heart rate pattern in fetus. Not only those previous studies related with SARS and MERS has explained that in extreme conditions when uncontrollable respiratory troubles occur in the patient, sometimes artificial ventilation might not enough tackle that situation. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is the one and only way out at that crucial moment to be managed by the trained experts only ⁷⁰. Some event of relief is gained by the affected mother after delivery or not, it is still not known but before taking any steps related to delivery, should be consulted with the professional who is in the supervision ⁷¹.

Research works are on their own way but still no medications against COVID-19 has been invented and stamped by the US food and drug administration ⁶⁹. Regarding previous researchers related to the invention of medicine applied on animal models of MERS has been examined for the sake of SARS-CoV-2 ⁶⁹. Pneumonia developed as a foremost sign and symptom in COVID-19 patients were not advised to take corticosteroid-based medicines until and unless the accessory symptoms are not being prominent. The main reason to avoid this corticosteroid was confirmed by previous researchers related to MERS which unworthy as it can proceed to detain MERS-CoV approval ⁷². Any conclusion regarding the lung maturation of fetus by applying corticosteroids must be taken under the advice of the in-charged professionals or neonatologists in addition with the infectious disease specialists. These information are subjected to be improvised time to time on the basis of further data on pregnant women available in relation with COVID-19.

Care of infants born to mothers with COVID-19

According to the previous studies related to SARS and MERS no cases had been found related to infection in neonates after delivery. In contrary, according to recent published media report, a chance of maternal to fetal transmission in a 30hours neonate was found which was supposed due to intrauterine contamination with COVID-19 after detection [73]. The studies flashed by Chen et al. [9] and Zhu et al 3^rd trimester) with SARS-CoV-2, but not laboratory detection of contamination from mother to baby during the period immediately before or after the birth. Trial of amniotic fluid, . [54], out of 18 women (19 neonates) were contaminated during the gestational period (probably blood from umbilical cord and samples from infant’s throat became negative for SARS-CoV-2, analyzed on six patients confirmed by the study of Chen et al.[9], Zhu et al. [54], suggested that other than the intrauterine transmission, other possibilities could be there after analyzing the complications based on the following symptoms: (a) abnormally breathing in six of them, (b) dyspnea or cyanosis among three of them, (c) intestinal bleeding in two of them, and (d) death of one among them due to multi-organ failure. However, throat swab testing of all infants was found to be negative for SARS-CoV-2.

So, it is not clear that whether SARS-CoV-2 is been communicated from mother to baby or not. Besides that, it can be stated that, the infestation of an infant with COVID-19 can be a contamination either in uterus or during the period around the birth (perinatally) is not confirmed because of the insufficient information till now. An early discussed study, conducted by Chen et al. [9], imposes a close observation regarding newborn death and fetal death or any kind of neonatal respiratory discomfort has not been confirmed caused by COVID-19 yet amidst three months pregnant mothers if also they had experienced C-section delivery.   Besides those, among the nine pregnant patients, four women were observed with premature delivery but those were not subjected to COVID‐19 infection; although the study calculated an Apgar score≥ 9 at 5 min for all the newborns. The study also observed the negative result for COVID-19 tested in amniotic fluid sample, umbilical cord blood sample collected from six pregnant women and throat swab samples from the six neonates which may confirm the not only the absence of vertical transmission from the COVID-19 positive patients to the newborn during the late pregnancy via the intrauterine environment but also via the breastfeeding as virus free colostrum of was detected from the COVID‐19‐infected women. But, as the transmission of virus happens through close contact, thus firstly the newborns were allowed to be separated from the affected mothers, at least for 14 days as incubation period of the virus, to confirm the effect of virus appearance among the newborns and mothers were allowed for the breastfeeding until they were tested negative. It has been stated earlier that all nine COVID-19 positive women attained Cesarean delivery, although the time interval between symptomatic diagnosis of the viral infection and Cesarean delivery was found to be lesser which rising a question for any risk of vertical transmission if mentioned interval will be greater. However another study by Shek et al. demonstrated that there is no relation of SARS‐CoV with inheritance i.e. this infection is not inherited [74] although currently no evidences were found regarding pregnancy linked with any unfortunate incidences like miscarriage, restricted fetal growth, spontaneous preterm birth and congenital anomalies during the COVID-19 pneumonia infection also. In early human placenta (first trimester), a mass level of ACE2 expression had been found in four main cell types, such as decidual stromal cells, decidual perivascular cells in deciduas and villous cytotrophoblast, and syncytiotrophoblast in placenta; on the contrary, the expression of ACE2 has been observed with very low level in extravillous trophoblast at first trimester and found to be elevated at the 24^th week of gestational period as per the recent study [10, 75]. From the above studies, it might be inferred that due to high levels of ACE2 expression in placental cells, these cells are highly susceptible in SARS-CoV-2 infection. The possible rout of transmission from mother fetus is the mother-fetus interface which is known as syncytiotrophoblast which is the ectoenvelope of the placental villi creating the straight way to the maternal blood flow [10, 76]. So, it is still unknown that, whether from mother to fetus transmission of this deadly COVID-19 infection is possible or not. For this reason, isolation of the infected mothers from their respective infants, as suggested at the time of H1N1, is really a judicious decision [77].

The transmission of SARS-CoV-2 through mother’s breastmilk is not been confirmed yet from a mother who has already recovered from COVID-19; although, on the same perspective, another study was conducted by collecting the breastmilk specimen from a mother with her recovery period of 130 days after the manifestation of infestation, which showed the presence of antibody against SARS-CoV in that breastmilk [41]. On the contrary, an infected mother at her 7^th week of gestation showed the absence of antibody at 12^th and 30^th day after delivery [78]. Randomly, six pregnant mothers were tasted for the presence of COVID-19 in breastmilk but all test reports were appeared to be negative in a study conducted by Chen et al.[9]; thus all those mothers were motivated for breastfeeding.  No data or information has been confirmed yet about the duration of isolation and will be marked by close observation on the basis of future cases among the neonatologists and the persons of infection control board. On the basis of the proven data will concise the confusion about this deadly, incourigeous COVID-19 infection in pregnant mothers.

Conclusion

At present, data are limited pertaining to the impact of COVID-19 upon the pregnant women based on which pregnancy-specific care can be recommended. However, experiences gained from previous pandemics owing to SARS, MERS, and other respiratory infections, risks associated with pregnant COVID-29 patients can be presumed. It is essential to include the records of COVID-19 mediated changes (if any) on gestation and/or the maternal and fetal outcomes, in the recorded database of COVID-19. As the pandemic COVID-19 reaches every ‘nook and corner’ of the communities across the globe, it is necessary to be more attentive for prevention of further spreading by providing some rapid implementations of management measures for outbreak control. Standard rigorous team-based actions are to be taken to care, manage as well as to improve any case of acute respiratory tract infection to any pregnant woman infected with COVID-19.

References

1.  Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. New Eng J Med. 2020.
   CrossRef
2.  Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020; 395(10223):497-506.
   CrossRef
3.  Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, Qu J, Gong F, Han Y, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):507-513.
   CrossRef
4.  She J, Jiang J, Ye L, Hu L, Bai C, Song Y. 2019 novel coronavirus of pneumonia in Wuhan, China: emerging attack and management strategies. Clin Trans Med. 2020;9(1):1-7.
   CrossRef
5.  World Health Organization. Naming the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and the virus that causes it. 2020. [URL:https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technical-guidance/naming-the-coronavirus-disease-(covid-2019)-and-the-virus-that-causes-it. 2020] (Last accessed on August 27, 2020)
6.  World Health Organization. WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19-11 March 2020. Geneva, Switzerland. 2020.
7.  Gao J, Tian Z, Yang X. Breakthrough: Chloroquine phosphate has shown apparent efficacy in treatment of COVID-19 associated pneumonia in clinical studies. Biosci Trends. 2020.
   CrossRef
8.  Schwatz D, Grahan A. Potential Maternal and Infant Outcomes from Coronavirus 2019-nCoV (SARS-CoV-2) Infecting Pregnant Women: Lessons from SARS, MERS, and Other Human Coronavirus Infections. Viruses. 2020;12(2):194.
   CrossRef
9.  Chen H, Guo J, Wang C, Luo F, Yu X, Zhang W, et al. Clinical characteristics and intrauterine vertical transmission potential of COVID-19 infection in nine pregnant women: a retrospective review of medical records. Lancet. 2020;395(10226):809-815.
   CrossRef
10.  Li M, Chen L, Zhang J, Xiong C, Li X. The SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 expression of maternal-fetal interface and fetal organs by single-cell transcriptome study. PLoS One. 2020;15(4):e0230295.
    CrossRef
11.  Qiao J. What are the risks of COVID-19 infection in pregnant women? Lancet. 2020;395(10226):760-762.
    CrossRef
12.  Alvarado MG, Schwartz DA. Zika virus infection in pregnancy, microcephaly, and maternal and fetal health: what we think, what we know, and what we think we know. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017;141(1):26-32.
    CrossRef
13.  Schwartz DA. Maternal and Infant Death and the rVSV-ZEBOV Vaccine Through Three Recent Ebola Virus Epidemics-West Africa, DRC Équateur and DRC Kivu: 4 Years of Excluding Pregnant and Lactating Women and Their Infants from Immunization. Curr Trop Med Rep. 2019;6(4):213-22.
    CrossRef
14.  Pozzilli P, Lenzi A. Testosterone, a key hormone in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. Metab Clin Exp. 2020.
    CrossRef
15.  Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, Niu P, Yang B, Wu H, et al. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet. 2020;395(10224):565-574.
    CrossRef
16.  Hellewell J, Abbott S, Gimma A, Bosse NI, Jarvis CI, Russell TW, et al. Feasibility of controlling COVID-19 outbreaks by isolation of cases and contacts. Lancet Glob Health. 2020.
    CrossRef
17.  Bahl P, Doolan C, de Silva C, Chughtai AA, Bourouiba L, MacIntyre CR. Airborne or droplet precautions for health workers treating COVID-19? J Infect Dis. 2020.
    CrossRef
18.  Dexter F, Parra MC, Brown JR, Loftus RW. Perioperative COVID-19 defense: an evidence-based approach for optimization of infection control and operating room management. Anesth Analges. 2020.
    CrossRef
19.  Gao Y, Yan L, Huang Y, Liu F, Zhao Y, Cao L, et al. Structure of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase from COVID-19 virus. Science. 2020;368(6492):779-782.
    CrossRef
20.  Snijder EJ, Van Der Meer Y, Zevenhoven-Dobbe J, Onderwater JJ, Van Der Meulen J, Koerten HK, et al. Ultrastructure and origin of membrane vesicles associated with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus replication complex. J Virol. 2006;80(12):5927-40.
    CrossRef
21.  Hussain S, Chen Y, Yang Y, Xu J, Peng Y, Wu Y, et al. Identification of novel subgenomic RNAs and noncanonical transcription initiation signals of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J Virol. 2005;79(9):5288-95.
    CrossRef
22.  Perlman S, Netland J. Coronaviruses post-SARS: update on replication and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7(6):439-50.
    CrossRef
23.  Liu K, Fang YY, Deng Y, Liu W, Wang MF, Ma JP, et al. Clinical characteristics of novel coronavirus cases in tertiary hospitals in Hubei Province. Chin Med J. 2020.
    CrossRef
24.  Lei J, Kusov Y, Hilgenfeld R. Nsp3 of coronaviruses: Structures and functions of a large multi-domain protein. Antiviral Res. 2018;149:58-74.
    CrossRef
25.  Kirchdoerfer RN. Halting coronavirus polymerase. J Biol Chem. 2020;295(15):4780-4781.
    CrossRef
26.  Song W, Gui M, Wang X, Xiang Y. Cryo-EM structure of the SARS coronavirus spike glycoprotein in complex with its host cell receptor ACE2. PLoS Path. 2018;14(8):e1007236.
    CrossRef
27.  Ren LL, Wang YM, Wu ZQ, Xiang ZC, Guo L, Xu T, et al. Identification of a novel coronavirus causing severe pneumonia in human: a descriptive study. Chin Med J. 2020.
28.  Yue Y, Nabar NR, Shi C-S, Kamenyeva O, Xiao X, Hwang I-Y, et al. SARS-Coronavirus Open Reading Frame-3a drives multimodal necrotic cell death. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(9):1-15.
    CrossRef
29.  Angeletti S, Benvenuto D, Bianchi M, Giovanetti M, Pascarella S, Ciccozzi M. COVID‐2019: the role of the nsp2 and nsp3 in its pathogenesis. J Med Virol. 2020.
    CrossRef
30.  Sangl L, Felten S, Matiasek K, Dörfelt S, Bergmann M, Balzer H-J, et al. Detection of feline coronavirus RNA, spike gene mutations, and feline coronavirus antigen in macrophages in aqueous humor of cats in the diagnosis of feline infectious peritonitis. J Vet Diag Invest. 2020:1040638720927362.
    CrossRef
31.  Kim Y-S, Aigerim A, Park U, Kim Y, Rhee J-Y, Choi J-P, et al. Sequential emergence and wide spread of neutralization escape Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus mutants, South Korea, 2015. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019;25(6):1161.
    CrossRef
32.  Veltmeijer MT, Veeneman D, Bongers CC, Netea MG, van der Meer JW, Eijsvogels TM, et al. The impact of central and peripheral cyclooxygenase enzyme inhibition on exercise-induced elevations in core body temperature. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12(5):662-667.
    CrossRef
33.  Shimabukuro-Vornhagen A, Gödel P, Subklewe M, Stemmler HJ, Schlößer HA, Schlaak M, et al. Cytokine release syndrome. J Immunother Cancer. 2018;6(1):56.
    CrossRef
34.  June CH, O’Connor RS, Kawalekar OU, Ghassemi S, Milone MC. CAR T cell immunotherapy for human cancer. Science. 2018;359(6382):1361-1365.
    CrossRef
35.  Adams JG, Walls RM. Supporting the health care workforce during the COVID-19 global epidemic. JAMA. 2020;323(15):1439-1440.
    CrossRef
36.  Haddad LB, Jamieson DJ, Rasmussen SA. Pregnant women and the Ebola crisis. New Eng J Med. 2018;379(26):2492-3.
    CrossRef
37.  Breslin N, Baptiste C, Miller R, Fuchs K, Goffman D, Gyamfi-Bannerman C, et al. COVID-19 in pregnancy: early lessons. Am J Obs Gynecol. 2020:100111.
    CrossRef
38.  Lam CM, Wong SF, Leung TN, Chow KM, Yu WC, Wong TY, et al. A case‐controlled study comparing clinical course and outcomes of pregnant and non‐pregnant women with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;111(8):771-774.
    CrossRef
39.  Terpos E, Ntanasis‐Stathopoulos I, Elalamy I, Kastritis E, Sergentanis TN, Politou M, et al. Hematological findings and complications of COVID‐19. Am J Hematol. 2020.
    CrossRef
40.  Cheng Y, Luo R, Wang K, Zhang M, Wang Z, Dong L, et al. Kidney disease is associated with in-hospital death of patients with COVID-19. Kidney Int. 2020.
    CrossRef
41.  Robertson CA, Lowther SA, Birch T, Tan C, Sorhage F, Stockman L, et al. SARS and pregnancy: a case report. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10(2):345.
    CrossRef
42.  Yudin MH, Steele DM, Sgro MD, Read SE, Kopplin P, Gough KA. Severe acute respiratory syndrome in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(1):124-7.
    CrossRef
43.   Liu W, Wang J, Li W, Zhou Z, Liu S, Rong Z. Clinical characteristics of 19 neonates born to mothers with COVID-19. Front Med. 2020:1-6.
    CrossRef
44.  Maxwell C, McGeer A, Tai KFY, Sermer M, Farine D, Basso M, et al. Management guidelines for obstetric patients and neonates born to mothers with suspected or probable severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS): No. 225, April 2009. Elsevier; 2009.
45.  Wong SF, Chow KM, Leung TN, Ng WF, Ng TK, Shek CC, et al. Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes of women with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(1):292-297.
    CrossRef
46.  Sengupta P, Dutta S. COVID-19 and hypogonadism: Secondary immune responses rule-over endocrine mechanisms. Hum Fertil. 2020; http://www.doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2020.1867902.
    CrossRef
47. Sengupta P, Dutta S. Does SARS-CoV-2 infection cause sperm DNA fragmentation? Possible link with oxidative stress. Eur J Contracep Reprod Health Care. 2020; http://www.doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2020.1787376.
    CrossRef
48. Dutta S, Sengupta P. SARS-CoV-2 and male infertility: possible multifaceted pathology. Reprod Sci. 2020; 1 http://www.doi.org/0.1007/s43032-020-00261-z.
    CrossRef
49. Dutta S, Sengupta P. SARS-CoV-2 infection, oxidative stress and male reproductive hormones: can testicular-adrenal crosstalk be ruled-out? J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2020.
    CrossRef
50. Wang X, Zhou Z, Zhang J, Zhu F, Tang Y, Shen X. A case of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in a pregnant woman with preterm delivery. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;10.
    CrossRef
51. Liu W, Wang Q, Zhang Q, Chen L, Chen J, Zhang B, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during pregnancy: a case series. 2020.
52. Du Y, Wang L, Wu G, Lei X, Li W, Lv J. Anesthesia and protection in an emergency cesarean section for pregnant woman infected with a novel coronavirus: case report and literature review. J Anesth. 2020:1.
    CrossRef
53. Li Y, Zhao R, Zheng S, Chen X, Wang J, Sheng X, et al. Lack of vertical transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, China. 2020.
    CrossRef
54. Zhu H, Wang L, Fang C, Peng S, Zhang L, Chang G, et al. Clinical analysis of 10 neonates born to mothers with 2019-nCoV pneumonia. Transl Pediat. 2020;9(1):51.
    CrossRef
55. Liu Y, Chen H, Tang K, Guo Y. Clinical manifestations and outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy. J Infect. 2020.
    CrossRef
56. Yu N, Li W, Kang Q, Xiong Z, Wang S, Lin X, et al. Clinical features and obstetric and neonatal outcomes of pregnant patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective, single-centre, descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020.
    CrossRef
57. Yan J, Guo J, Fan C, Juan J, Yu X, Li J, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in pregnant women: A report based on 116 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020.
    CrossRef
58. Chen S, Liao E, Cao D, Gao Y, Sun G, Shao Y. Clinical analysis of pregnant women with 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia. J Med Virol. 2020.
    CrossRef
59. Knight M, Bunch K, Vousden N, Morris E, Simpson N, Gale C, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of pregnant women admitted to hospital with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in UK: national population based cohort study. Brit Med J. 2020;369.
    CrossRef
60. Kayem G, Alessandrini V, Azria E, Blanc J, Bohec C, Bornes M, et al. A snapshot of the Covid-19 pandemic among pregnant women in France. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020:101826.
    CrossRef
61. Zhang L, Jiang Y, Wei M, Cheng B, Zhou X, Li J, et al. Analysis of the pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with COVID-19 in Hubei Province. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2020;55:E009-E015.
62. Cao D, Yin H, Chen J, Tang F, Peng M, Li R, et al. Clinical analysis of ten pregnant women with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A retrospective study. Int J Infect Dis. 2020.
    CrossRef
63. Siston AM, Rasmussen SA, Honein MA, Fry AM, Seib K, Callaghan WM, et al. Pandemic 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus illness among pregnant women in the United States. JAMA. 2010;303(15):1517-25.
    CrossRef
64. Alfaraj SH, Al-Tawfiq JA, Memish ZA. Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) infection during pregnancy: Report of two cases & review of the literature. 2019.
    CrossRef
65. Lei D, Li C, Fang C, Yang W, Cheng B, Wei M, et al. Clinical characteristics of pregnancy with the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) infection. Chin J Perinat Med. 2020;23(3).
66. Guan W, Ni Z, Hu Y, Liang W, Ou C, He J, et al. China Medical Treatment Expert Group for Covid-19. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020
67. Rasmussen SA, Smulian JC, Lednicky JA, Wen TS, Jamieson DJ. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Pregnancy: What obstetricians need to know. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020.
    CrossRef
68. Genebank, SRA. SARS-CoV-2 (Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) Sequences 2020 [Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/sars-cov-2-seqs/.] (Last accessed on August 27, 2020)
69. Paules CI, Marston HD, Fauci AS. Coronavirus infections—more than just the common cold. JAMA. 2020;323(8):707-708.
    CrossRef
70. Pacheco LD, Saade GR, Hankins GD, editors. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) during pregnancy and postpartum. Seminars in perinatology; 2018: Elsevier.
    CrossRef
71. Lapinsky SE, editor Management of acute respiratory failure in pregnancy. Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine; 2017: Thieme Medical Publishers.
    CrossRef
72. Arabi YM, Mandourah Y, Al-Hameed F, Sindi AA, Almekhlafi GA, Hussein MA, et al. Corticosteroid therapy for critically ill patients with Middle East respiratory syndrome. Am J Resp Crit Care Med. 2018;197(6):757-67.
    CrossRef
73. D’Amore R. Can coronavirus pass from mother to baby? Maybe, but experts need more research. Global News. 2020.
74. Shek CC, Ng PC, Fung GP, Cheng FW, Chan PK, Peiris MJ, et al. Infants born to mothers with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Pediatrics. 2003;112(4):e254-e257.
    CrossRef
75. Nelson DM, Myatt L. The Human Placenta in Health and Disease. Obstet Gynecol Clin. 2020;47(1):xv-xviii.
    CrossRef
76. Teasdale F, Jean-Jacques G. Morphometric evaluation of the microvillous surface enlargement factor in the human placenta from mid-gestation to term. Placenta. 1985;6(5):375-381.
    CrossRef
77. Rasmussen SA, Kissin DM, Yeung LF, MacFarlane K, Chu SY, Turcios-Ruiz RM, et al. Preparing for influenza after 2009 H1N1: special considerations for pregnant women and newborns. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(6):S13-S20.
    CrossRef
78. Stockman LJ, Lowther SA, Coy K, Saw J, Parashar UD. SARS during pregnancy, United States. 2004.
    CrossRef