Shazina Saeed¹, Shamimul Hasan², Kuldeep³ and Seema Singh Parmar⁴

¹Amity Institute of Public Health, Amity University, Noida, UP, India.

²Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology; Faculty of Dentistry; Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India.

³Department of Prosthodontics, Teerthankar Mahaveer Dental College and Research center, Teerthankar Mahaveer University, Moradabad.

⁴Department of Psychiatry, Teerthankar Mahaveer Medical College and Research center, Teerthankar Mahaveer University, Moradabad.

Corresponding Author E-mail: shamim0571@gmail.com

DOI : https://dx.doi.org/10.13005/bpj/1124

Abstract

Candidiasis refers to multiplicity of diseases caused by yeast like fungus candida. Candida is a normal commensal inhabitant of the oral cavity and gastrointestinal tract, and Candida albicans is the commonest species demonstrated in the oral cavity. C. tropicalis, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, C. krusei, C. dubliniensis are some other species isolated from oral cavity. Candida proliferates if there is a change in the local ecology or suppression of the immune system. As C. albicans exhibits a dimorphic pattern (yeast and mycelial phase), the physicians and dentists encounter diagnostic and treatment challenges for the disease. Diagnosis of candidal lesions is essentially based on clinical manifestations and supplemented by smear and culture.  Species differentiation can be done by morphological features such as germ tubes and chlamydospores and a variety of biochemical techniques. Immunological and genetic techniques are also employed for the diagnosis of candidal infections.

Keywords

Oral candidal infections; Diagnosis; hyphae; Germ tube; biochemical tests.

Download this article as: 

Copy the following to cite this article: Saeed S, Hasan S, Kuldeep K, Parmar S. S. Conventional and Recent Diagnostic Aids in oral Candidal Infections: A Brief overview. Biomed Pharmacol J 2017;10(1).

Copy the following to cite this URL: Saeed S, Hasan S, Kuldeep K, Parmar S. S. Conventional and Recent Diagnostic Aids in oral Candidal Infections: A Brief overview. Biomed Pharmacol J 2017;10(1). Available from: http://biomedpharmajournal.org/?p=13395

Introduction

A wide variety of organisms ranging from eubacteria, archaea, fungi, mycoplasmas and protozoa are the normal inhabitants of the oral cavity.[1]Fungi are eukaryotic organisms, and genus Candida is the most significant tooral cavity.[2]The term candida has a origin from a Latin word candid, meaning white.[3]Although around one hundred and fifty species of the genus candida have been isolated from the oral cavity, majority of the isolates (80%)were found to be candida albicans.[4]C. tropicalis, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, C. guillermondii, C. krusei and C. kyfer and, in recent times, C. dubliniensis are some other species isolated from human infections.[5,6]Candida species are considered normal microflora of oral and gastrointestinal tract and may be isolated  from up to one‑third of the oral cavity of healthy human being.[7] It has a dimorphic nature, and exist in both a yeast phase (blastospore) and a hyphal (mycelial) phase. This dimorphism poses diagnostic and treatment challengesfor the Candidal lesions.[8]An accurate and prompt diagnosis is essential for specific treatment of a fungal infection and may prove lifesaving or stave off the complications produce there in.[9]This paper provides an overview on the conventional and recent trends in the diagnosis of oral candidal infections.

Etiopathogenesis

The transformation of this commensal micro-organism to the pathogenic entity may be linked with factors other than the pathogenic attributes of the organism.This is a unique feature, in contrast to most of the other infections, where the virulence of the organism is considered as the principal cause in the pathogenesis. Candidiasis is an opportunistic infection, and an underlying pathology is essential for both the superficial and systemic forms of Candida infections.[10]

The etio-pathogenesis of candidiasis is attributable to three factors: host, fungus and oral microenvironment-modifying factors.

Table 1

HOST PREDISPOSING FACTORS	ORAL MICROENVIRONMENT-MODIFYING FACTORS
endocrine alterations (diabetes mellitus, pregnancy, renal failure and hyperthyroidism) [11,12]	Ill fitting prosthesis [24-27]
Immune suppression (patients on chemotherapy and organ transplants, agammaglobulinemia or cellular immune defects) [13-18] acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), hematological and immune disorders such as agranulocytosis (neutropenia).	loss of vertical dimension, prolonged antiseptic use, poor oral hygiene [26]
Other predisposing conditions-  malignancies (lymphomas or leukemias), aplastic anemia, drugtherapies (prolonged use of broad spectrum antibiotics, corticosteroids, antidepressants, antineoplastic drugs and immunosuppressants) [19,20,21] hyposialia (Sjögren’s disease, drugs or radiotherapy), terminal/end-stage systemic diseases. [20,22,23]	smoking and alcoholism [28]

 

Classification

Samaranayake [29]classified oral candidal lesions into two main groups:

Group I, or primary oral candidiasis (limited to oral cavity without skin /  other mucosal involvement)

Group II or secondary oral candidiasis (widespread involvement of oral cavity and other extraoral sites such as skin). [30][Table 2]

Table 2: Classification of Oral Candidiasis

1.Primary Oral candidosis (Group I) The “Primary triad”	2.Secondary Oral Candidiasis (Group II) condition
·         Pseudomembranous (mainly acute) ·         Erythematous (acute/chronic) ·         Hyperplastic (mainly chronic) 1.       Plaque-like 2.       Nodular/speckled ·         Candida associated lesions Denture stomatitis Angular cheilitis Median rhomboid glossitis Linear gingival erythema	·         Familial chronic mucocutaneous candidosis ·         Diffuse chronic mucocutaneous candidosis 1.       Candidosis endocrinopathy syndrome 2.       Familial mucocutaneous candidosis 3.       Severe combined immunodeficiency 4.       Di George syndrome 5.       Chronic granulomatous disease ·         Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

 

Diagnosis of Oral Candidiasis

The essential aspect in the diagnosis of oral candidiasis is based on the clinical identification of the lesions, and confirmatory diagnosis is made by the microscopic detection of Candida in the oral samples and/or isolation in culture. As candida is a normal commensal organism inhabiting the oral cavity, hence, candidal detection in the oral cavity is not indicative of infection.  However, tissue invasion by Candidal organisms is essential for a definitive diagnosis, thus, underscoring the significance of the clinical diagnosis of the disease. [11]

Candida may be isolated from the oral cavity by a variety of techniques such as the use of a smear, a plain swab, [31]an imprint culture, [32] collection of whole saliva, [33]the concentrated oral rinse, [34] and mucosal biopsy. A direct sample collection (use of a swab or an imprint) is more acceptable in cases of accessible and defined lesions.An indirect sampling (culturing saliva specimens or an oral rinse)  is given a preference for cases where the lesion is difficult to access or where there are no obviouslesions. [31]

Direct Microscopic Examination

Evaluation of various morphological characteristics of Candida speciesis essential for identification. [35]Differentiating between yeast and hyphal forms can be made by smear, although, it is less sensitive than cultural methods. [36]A representative sample from the infected site is usually taken by exfoliative cytology and transferred on glass slide for microscopic assessment. Ideally, it is treated with potassium hydroxide (KOH), Gram stain or periodic acid–Schiff (PAS) stain. [37] The most frequently used stain to identify fungi or yeast cells is Potassium hydroxide solution (10-20% KOH and 10% glycerine). KOH digests keratin and glycerine prevents yeast degradation. [38]The KOH clears organic material and imparts a clear blastoconidia, hyphae or pseudohyphae appearance to the fungi. [37]Nonpigmented septate hyphae with distinctive dichotomous branching (at an angle of approximately 45◦) is usually appreciated on Potassium hydroxide (KOH) preparation. [39]Fungal features such as hyphae, yeast cells, and other fungal elements will show fluorescence on KOH-Calcofluor fluorescent-staining. [40]

Gram’s staining  is a routine laboratory method as it is rapid and economic. Gram’s technique not only facilitate the identification of the morphologic forms of Candida species (hyphae and yeasts will appear dark blue), but also aid in the detection and the distinction of gram-positive and gramnegative bacteria in the sample. [41]Candidal species are inadequately stained by Hematoxylin and Eosin stain. The special stains generally used for demonstrating fungi in the tissues (fungi color strongly with these stains) are PAS stain, Gridley stains, and Grocott‑Gomori’s methenamine silver (GMS). [42]The PAS stain preferentially stains glycogen in the fungal cell wall and imparts a magenta appearance to the candidal organisms. [43]

Hyperplastic candididal lesions may mimic squamous cell carcinoma, hence, a biopsy is highly recommended for subsequent invasion by candida. Fungal elements within tissues may be identified by PAS or Grocott‑Gomori’s methenamine silver (GMS) stain. Candidal species may be identified by the demonstration of blastospores and hyphae or pseudohyphae, and accompanied with other histopathological features, a diagnosis of chronic hyperplastic candidosis can be arrived at. [44]

Macroscopic Examination                                                                  

Macroscopic inspection is  carried out on culture plates. Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) is the preferably used culture medium. Due to its low pH, it permits the growth of candida and suppresses the growth of many species of oral bacteria.Chloramphenicol 0.05 g/l or gentamycin 0.5 g/l is generally incorporated to this medium to hamper bacterial growth. It is also possible to add cycloheximide 0.05 g may also be incorporated as it will prevent the overgrowth of other associated fungi. [17,23] Candida forms cream, smooth, pasty convex colonies on SDA (after aerobic incubation at 37◦C for1-2 days), however, distinction between species is rarely possible.[39]

Morphological Criteria

Germ tube test is named as Reynolds-Braude Phenomenon afterReynolds and Braude who first reported it. This is a hallmark laboratory criteria for demonstration of C. albicans and C. dubliniensis by its capacity to produce short, slender, tube likestructures called germ tubes after incubation in serum at 37^°C for 2 hours. A positive germ tube test implies demonstrationof at leastfive germ tubes in the preparation. The test may be established as negative after examining a minimum of 10 high power fields for the demonstration of germ tubes. [45]Distinction of C. albicans and C. dubliniensis from other species can also be made on their capacity to produce morphological characteristics known as chlamydospores. Chlamydospores are retractile, round structures produced at the end of hyphae following culture of isolates on a nutritionally poor medium such as cornmeal agar. [31]Cornmeal Tween 80 highlights the lipolytic function of varied clinically important candidal species, and established that their temporal responses to Tween opacity is a useful method that complements the standard morphologic and physiologic tests employed for isolation of various species of candida. [46]

Biochemical Methods

Various biochemical techniques such as enzyme techniques, nutrient assimilation methods and mixed techniques (combination of enzymatic and nutrient assimilation tests) are employed for evaluation of other candidal species.

The enzyme techniques demonstrates the functioning of certain yeast enzymes through the specific hydrolysis of a chromogenic substrate in the presence of an enzyme indicator. [47] Pagano- Levin agar or commercially available chromogenic agars, namely, CHROMagar Candida, Albicans ID, Fluroplate, or Candichrom albicans are frequently used. [36]Pagano-Levin agar discriminates a variety of Candida species based on reduction of triphenyltetrazolium chloride. C. albicans forms pale-coloured colonies on this medium in contrast to other Candida species which produce pink colored colonies. Pagano-Levin agar has a comparable sensitivity to SDA but is superior for the demonstration of more than one species in the sample. [48]CHROMagar Candida identifies C. albicans, C. tropicalis, and C. krusei based on colour and appearance of colonies, [49] whilst Albicans ID and Fluroplate have proven valuable for the presumptive identification of C. Albicans. [50] The reported specificity of identification for CHROMagar Candidaand Albicans ID and Fluroplate agars is 95% for 98.6% respectively. [51]CHROMagar Candida facilitates distinction between the newly described C. dubliniensis⁶and C. albicans. C. dubliniensis produce slightly darker green colonies on this agar as compared to colonies of C. albicans. [52] However, after subsequent subculture and storage of isolates, the distinction between these two species using CHROMagar tend to decline. C. dubliniensis donot show growth at the incubation temperature of 45^◦C. [53]Staib agar test is  another test employed to delineate C. albicans and C. Dubliniensis.Grey-white shiny colonies with smooth entire edges are suggestive of C. albicans produces and C. Dubliniensisproduces rough, grey-white colonies with a fringe or hyphal halo. [54]

Nutrient assimilation tests assess fungal ability touse different sugars as exclusive carbon source. Media with all the elements necessary for growth (except a carbon source) are used. A certain sugar is subsequently added to the medium, and the growth of the fungus in the culture medium indicates the ability of the fungus to assimilate that sugar. [28]Candidal species possess the ability to metabolize carbohydrates both aerobically (assimilation) and anaerobically (fermentation). Yeasts capable of fermenting a given carbohydrate may also assimilate it, but not necessarily vice versa. [55]The assimilation and fermentation of carbohydrates is the basis for biochemical identification of Candida species. Simpler and rapid auxanographic methods have replaced the conventional assimilation tests of  Wickerham and Burton. [56]

The most convenient and popular methods for candida species identification include a variety of commercially accessible strips or plates for carbohydrate assimilation and/or enzyme detection. [57]API 20C AUX and API ID 32 tests are reasonably useful for demonstrating the commom germ tube negative candida species.   Disadvantages with API 20C system are- set up requires time, provide results after 72 hours of incubation and interpretation of test results is difficult. [58]ID32C strip system evaluates the assimilation of 30 carbon sources and the growth of yeasts in the presence of cycloheximide. Because of widespread database and precision, ID32C have been used as a reference method. However, the interpretation of test results is difficult and requires experience. [59]

Candifast identifies candida based on sugar fermentation reactions, urease production and resistance to actidione. It is simple to use and provides results after 24-48 hour incubation at 37⁰ C.Interpretation of color changes within test wells is subjective. Sensitivity of candida to seven antifungal agents is incorporated into the kit. [60]

Immunological and Genetic Methods

Diagnosis of invasive candidiasis and delineation between C. albicans and C. Dubliniensis may be made by various immunologic (ELISA) and genetic techniques(PCR).

Immunological Methods

Cell-mediated immunity to C. albicans antigens can be established both by the appearance of delayed skin hypersensitivity to Candida antigens (ID reaction) and by in vitro tests of cellular immunity such as inhibition of leukocyte migration or stimulationof lymphocyte transformation to Candida antigens. The important candidal antigens used for the serological tests include- whole nonviable yeast cells,cell wall polysaccharides or glycoproteins, Candida culture filtrates, and cytoplasmic antigens from mechanically disrupted yeast cells. Diagnosis of candidal infections is essentially based on clinical assessment and by smear or culture, and serological tests care not of much diagnostic value. [61]Serological methods donot provide a prompt diagnosis, the tests lack sensitivity and specificity, and produce a inconsistent antibody production in immunosuppresed individuals. [62]

Molecular Tests (Genetic Analysis)

Genotypic techniques have been widelyused for the demonstration and typing of candida strains but have been used less often for species differentiation. [63]For candidal  molecular diagnosis, a specific DNA probe has been developed which facilitate rapid mycelial identification. [64] Hybridization based detection method is a technique which uses a probe with sequence homology to the target DNA. The various hybridization based detection methods are Fluorescent in situ Hybridization (FISH), microtitre Hybridization Assay, Reverse Hybridization line probe assay and Hybridization on DNA chips. [65]

Use of peptide nucleic acid (PNA) oligonucleotides to identify target sequences in chromosomal DNA using fluorescent microscopy and analysis software is a new technique which targets highly conserved species-species sequences in the abundant rRNA of living C. albicans. [66]This technique achieves a sensitivity of 98.7-100%, and a 100% specificity allowing for accurate diagnosis of C. albicans which is  phenotypically similar C. dubliniensis. [67]For identification of yeast, multiplex PCRs are usually employed as they can directly identifiy yeast without the need for nucleic acid extraction.

Conclusion

Candida is a normal commensal inhabitant of the gastrointestinal tract and becomes opportunistic in immunocompromised states.  The existence of candida species in yeast and hyphael forms poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenge to the oral physicians. Early diagnosis and manangement is essential to combat the dreaded complications of this multisystemic disesase.

References

1. Samaranayake L. Essential microbiology for dentistry. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2006. p. 255, 62-64.
2. Arkell S, Shinnick A. Update on oral candidosis. Nurs Times 2003; 99:52-53.
3. S. L. Zunt. “Oral candidiasis: diagnosis and treatment.” The Journal of Practical Hygiene.2000; 9:31–36.
4. Coronado-Castellote L, Jime ´Nez-Soriano Y. Clinical and microbiological diagnosis of oral candidiasis. J ClinExp Dent. 2013; 5(5):279–286.
5. McCullough MJ, Ross BC, Reade PC. Candida albicans, a review of its history, taxonomy, virulence attributes, and methods of strain differentiation.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996; 25:136-144.
6. Sullivan J, Westerneng TJ, Haynes KA, Bennett DE, Coleman DC. Candida dubliniensis sp. nov.: Phenotypic and molecular characterization of a novel species associated with oral candidosis in HIV – infected individuals. Microbiol.1995; 141:1507-1521.
7. Anthony R, Midgley J, Sweet S, Howell S. Multiple strains of Candida albicans in the oral cavity of HIV Positive and HIV Negative Patients. Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease. North America.
8. Farah CS, Ashman RB, Challacombe SJ. Oral candidosis.ClinDermatol.2000; 18:553–562.
9. JagadishChander. Textbook of Medical Mycology.2^nd edition. Mehta Publishers 2002; 40-53.
10. N.S. Soysa, L.P. Samaranayake, A. N. B. Ellepola, “Antimicrobials as a contributory factor in oral candidosis—a brief overview.” Oral Diseases. 2008; 14(2): 138–143.
11. Aguirre-Urízar JM. Oral Candidiasis.Rev IberoamMicol. 2002;19:17-21.
12. Dorko E, Baranová Z, Jenca A, Kizek P, Pilipcinec E, Tkáciková L. Diabetes mellitus and candidiasis. Folia Microbiol.2002; 50: 255-261.
13. Bensadoun RJ, Patton LL, Lalla RV, Epstein JB. Oropharyngeal candidiasis in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiation: update 2011. Support Care Cancer. 2011;19:737-744.
14. Davies AN, Brailsford SR, Beighton D, Shorthose K, Stevens VC. Oral candidosis in community-based patients with advanced cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008;35:508-14. 15.
15. Delgado AC, de Jesus Pedro R, Aoki FH, Resende MR, Trabasso P, Colombo AL. Clinical and microbiological assessment of patients with a long-term diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus infection and Candida oral colonization. ClinMicrobiol Infect. 2009;15:364-371.
16. López-Pintor RM, Hernández G, de Arriba L, de Andrés A. Oral candidiasis in patients with renal transplants. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013;18(3):381-337.
17. Fernández-Feijoo J, Diz-Dios P, Otero-Cepeda XL, Limeres-Posse J, de la Fuente-Aquado J et al. Predictive value oral candidiasis as a marker of progression to AIDS. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2005;10: 36-40:32-36.
18. González Gravina H, González de Moran E, Zambrano O, Lozano Chouro M, Rodríguez de Valero S et al. Oral candidiasis in children and adolescents with cáncer. Identification of Candida sp. Med oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2007;12:419-423.
19. Rodrigues JA, Höfling JF, Tavares FC, Duarte KM, Gonçalves RB, Azevedo RA. Evaluation of biochemical and serological methods to identify and clustering yeast cells of oral Candida species by CHROMagar test, SDS-PAGE and ELISA.Braz Oral Biol. 2004;64:317-26.
20. Farah CS, Lynch N, McCullough MJ. Oral fungal infections: an update for the general practitioner. Aust Dent J. 2010;55:48-54.
21. GaitanCepeda LA, Ceballos Salobreña A, López Ortega K, Arzate Mora N, Jiménez Soriano Y. Oral lesions and immune reconstitution syndrome in HIV/AIDS patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy. Epidemiological evidence.Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal.2008.13:85-93.
22. Margaix-Muñoz M, Bagán JV, Poveda R, Jiménez Y, Sarrión G. Sjögren syndrome of the oral cavity. Review and update. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009;14:325-330.
23. Ergun S, Cekici A, Topcuoglu N, Migliari DA, Külekçi G et al. Oral status and Candida colonization in patients with Sjögren’s Syndrome. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010;15:310-315.
24. Maver-Biscanin M, Mravak-Stipetic M, Jerolimov V. Effect of low-level laser therapy on Candida albicans growth in patients with denture stomatitis. Photomed Laser Surg. 2005;23:328-332.
25. Perezous LF, Stevenson GC, Flaitz CM, Goldschmidt ME, Engelmeier RL, Nichols CM. The effect of complete dentures with a metal palate on candida species growth in HIV-infected patients.J Prosthodont. 2006;15:306-315.
26. Coco BJ, Bagg J, Cross LJ, Jose A, Cross J, Ramage G. Mixed Candida albicans and Candida glabrata populations associated with the pathogenesis of denture stomatitis. Oral MicrobiolImmunol. 2008;23:377-383.
27. Uludamar A, Ozkan YK, Kadir T, Ceyhan I. In vivo efficacy of alkaline peroxide tablets and mouthwashes on Candida albicans in patients with denture stomatitis.J Appl Oral Sci. 2010;18(3):291-296.
28. Lal S, Chussid S. Oral Candidiasis in pediatric HIV patients. New York State Dent J. 2005;71:28-31.
29. L. P. Samaranayake, “Superficial fungal infections,” in Current Opinions in Dentistry, C. Scully, Ed., pp. 415–422, Current Science, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 1991.
30. P. Holmstrup and M. Bessermann, “Clinical, therapeutic, and pathogenic aspects of chronic oral multifocal candidiasis.” Oral Surgery Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology. 1983;56(4): 388–395.
31. P. D. Marsh and M. Martin, “Oral fungal infections,” in Oral Microbiology, pp. 166–179, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, UK, 2009.
32. J. C. Davenport, “The oral distribution of Candida in denture stomatitis.” TheBritishDentalJournal. 1970; 129(4):151– 156.
33. D. E. Oliver and E. J. Shillitoe, “Effects of smoking on the prevalence and intraoral distribution of Candida albicans.” Journal of Oral Pathology 1984; 13(3): 265–270.
34. L. P. Samaranayake, T. W. MacFarlane, P.-J.Lamey, and M. M. Ferguson, “A comparison of oral rinse and imprint sampling techniques for the detection of yeast, coliform and Staphylococcus aureus carriage in the oral cavity.”Journal of Oral Pathology. 1986; 15(7): 386–388.
35. F. I. Okungbowa, A. P. O. Dede, and O. S. Isikhuemhen, “Cell morphology variations and budding patterns in Candida isolates.” Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences. 2009; 3(2):192–195.
36. D. W. Williams and M. A. O. Lewis, “Isolation and identification of Candida from the oral cavity.” Oral Diseases. 2000; 6(1): 3–11.
37. Muzyka BC, Epifanio RN. Update on oral fungal infections. Dent Clin N Am. 2013;57(4):561–81.
38. Aslanzadeh J, Roberts G.B. Direct microscopic examination of clinical specimens for the laboratory diagnosis of fungal infections. ClinMicrobiol. 1991; 13: 185-191.
39. C.Baveja. Medical mycology in TextBook of Microbiology for Dental Students, pp. 322–323, Arya Publications, Delhi, India, 3rd edition, 2010.
40. B. J. Harrington and G. J. Hageage, “Calcofluor white: tips for improving its use,” Clinical Microbiology Newsletter. 1991; 13(1): 3–5.
41. Padilha CML, Picciani BLS, BMD, Dias ED. Comparative analysis of Gram’s method and PAS for the identification of Candida spp. samples from the oral mucosa. J Bras Patol Med Lab. 2014;50(5): 352-358.
42. Silverman Jr S. Laboratory diagnosis of oral candidosis. In: Samaranayake LP, MacFarlane TW, editors. Oral Candidosis. 1st ed. Cambridge: Butterwort; 1990. p. 213-37.
43. Giannini PJ, Shetty KV.Diagnosis and management of oral candidiasis.OtolaryngolClin N Am. 2011;44:231-40.
44. A.Nassar,M.Zapata, J.V.Little, M.T.Siddiqui,“Utilityof reflex gomorimethenamine silver staining for Pneumocystis jirovecii on bronchoalveolar lavage cytologic specimens: a review.” DiagnosticCytopathology. 2006; 34(11): 719–723.
45. Deorukhkar, S., Saini, S., and Jadhav, P. Evaluation of different media for germ tubeproduction of Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis. International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research.2012; 3:704-707.
46. Malcolm Slifkin. Tween 80 opacity test responses of various candida species. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2000; 4626-4628.
47. Gabler IG, Barbosa AC, Velela RR, Lyon S, Rosa CA. Incidence and anatomic localization of oral candidiasis in patients with AIDS hospitalized in a public hospital in Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. J Appl Oral Sci. 2008;16:247-50.
48. L. P. Samaranayake, T. W. MacFarlane, and M. I. Williamson. “Comparison of Sabouraud dextrose and Pagano-Levin agarmedia for detection and isolation of yeasts from oral samples.”Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1987; 25(1): 162–164.
49. D. Beighton, R. Ludford, D. T. Clark et al., “Use of CHROMagarCandida medium for isolation of yeasts from dentalsamples.” Journal of Clinical Microbiology,. 1995; 33(11):3025–3027.
50. P. Rousselle, A. M. Freydiere, P. J. Couillerot, H. De Montclos,and Y. Gille, “Rapid identification of Candida albicans by usingalbicans ID and fluoroplate agar plates.” Journal of Clinical Microbiology/ 1994; 32(12): 3034–3036.
51. M. A. Pfaller, A. Houston, and S. Coffmann, “Applicationof CHROMagar Candida for rapid screening of clinicalspecimens for Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis, Candidakrusei, and Candida (Torulopsis) glabrata.” Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1996; 34(1): 58–61.
52. A. Schoofs, F. C. Odds, R. Colebunders, M. Ieven, and H.Goossens, “Use of specialised isolation media for recognitionand identification of Candida dubliniensis isolates from HIVinfectedpatients.” European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 1997; 16(4): 296–300.
53. E. Pinjon, D. Sullivan, I. Salkin, D. Shanley, and D. Coleman,“Simple, inexpensive, reliable method for differentiation ofCandida dubliniensis from Candida albicans.” Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1998; 36(7): 2093–2095.
54. Vaishali Wabale, Anju Kagal, Renu Bharadwaj. Characterization of Candida Species from Oral Thrushin Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Seropositive and Seronegative Patients. Bombay Hospital Journal. 2008; 50(2): 212-217.
55. Segal, E., and Elad, D. Candidiasis. In Topleyand Wilson s Medical Mycology. 10th edn.Edward Arnold Publishers. 2005:579-623.
56. Hazen, K., and Howell, S. 2003. Candida,Cryptococcus, and other yeasts of medicalimportance. In: Murray, P., Baron, E., etal.(eds), Manual of Clinical Microbiology,8th edn. Washington DC: ASM Press, 1693-1711.
57. Ellepola AN, Morrison. Laboratory diagnosis of invasive candidiasis. J Microbiol. 2005; 43: 65-84.
58. Campbell CK, Davey KG, Holms AD. Comparison of the API candida system with the auxacolor system for identification of common yeast pathogens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1999; 37: 821-823.
59. Alves SH, Horta JA, Milan EP, Scheid LA,Vainstein MH, Santurio JM et al. Carbohydrate assimilation profiles of Brazilian candida dubliniensis isolates based on ID 32C system. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo. 2005; 47: 109-111.
60. S. G. Gundes, S. Gulenc, R. Bingol, Comparative Performance of Fungichrom I, Candifast and API 20C Aux systems in the Identification of Clinically Significant Yeasts. J. Med. Microbiol. 2001; 50: 1105-1110.
61. Scully C, Ei Kabir M, Samaranayake, LP. Candida and oral candidosis: A review. Critical Reviews In Oral Biology And Medicine. 1994; 5(2); 125-157.
62. R. Wahyuningsih, H. J. Freisleben, H. G. Sonntag, and P. Schnitzler, “Simple and rapid detection of Candida albicans DNA in serum by PCR for diagnosis of invasive candidiasis,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2000; 38(8): 3016–302.
63. Miyakawa, Y., T. Mabuchi, and Y. Fukazawa. New Method for Detection Of Candida Albicans In Human Blood By Polymerase Chain Reaction. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1993; 31:3344– 3347.
64. Neville BW, Damm  DD,  Allen  CM,  Bouquot  JE.  Fungal and protozoal diseases. In: Neville, Damm, Allen, Bouquot Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunder; 2009. p. 224-37
65. Chakrabarti A, Shivprakash  MR.  Medical  mycology  laboratory  procedures.  1st  ed.  Chandighar  Styadeep  Offset  Printers  Pvt.  Ltd.  Centre  of  Advance  Research  in  Medical  Mycology.
66. J. R. Shepard, R. M. Addison, B. D. Alexander et al., “Multicenter evaluation of the Candida albicans/Candida glabrata peptide nucleic acid fluorescent in situ hybridization method for simultaneous dual-color identification of C. albicans and C. glabrata directly from blood culture bottles.” Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2008; 46(1)50–55.
67. J. Trnovsky, W. Merz, P. Della-Latta, F. Wu, M. C. Arendrup, andH.Stender,“Rapidandaccurateidentificationof Candida albicans isolates by use of PNA FISHFlow.” Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2008; 46(4):1537–1540.

(Visited 1,306 times, 1 visits today)