Shettu N, Yasin M. N.Proximate and Mineral Composition of Calanoid Copepod Sinodiaptomus (Rhinediaptomus) Indicus. Biomed. Pharmacol. J.2009;2(1)
Manuscript received on :February 10, 2009
Manuscript accepted on :March 10, 2009
Published online on: 14-11-2015
How to Cite    |   Publication History
Views  Views: 
Visited 545 times, 1 visit(s) today
 
Downloads  PDF Downloads: 
492

N. Shettu and Mohammed Yasin N.

P. G and Research Department of Zoology, Pachaiyappa’s College, Chennai - 600 030 India.

Corresponding Author E-mail:aasin_india@yahoo.com

Abstract

Hatchery techniques and methods for mass production of several aquaculture species advanced markedly. The technology for mass culture of zooplankton has developed considerably, but adequate information on the effect of population density on the propagation of Calanoid Copepod is not available. The effect of different nutrient sources viz. yeast, chlorella and poultry manure on propagation of live food organisms was studied. Data on the proximal and mineral composition of food organism were analysed. There were minor differences in the mineral composition except that the zinc content was found to be less. The nutritional quality of live food organism with respect to protein, lipid and carbohydrate showed negligible differences with that of Artemia taken as control. This study highlights the importance of copepod Sinodiapttomus (Rhinediaptomus) indicus, as an efficient food source for fin fishes and larvae of prawns.

Keywords

Minerals; Yeast; Finfish; Poultry Manure; Chlorella

Download this article as: 
Copy the following to cite this article:

Shettu N, Yasin M. N.Proximate and Mineral Composition of Calanoid Copepod Sinodiaptomus (Rhinediaptomus) Indicus. Biomed. Pharmacol. J.2009;2(1)

Copy the following to cite this URL:

Shettu N, Yasin M. N.Proximate and Mineral Composition of Calanoid Copepod Sinodiaptomus (Rhinediaptomus) Indicus. Biomed. Pharmacol. J.2009;2(1). Available from: http://biomedpharmajournal.org/?p=667

Introduction

A wide variety of live food organisms are utilized in fish larviculture, mainly because of their nutritional value, which is higher than that of artificial diets.  Copepods are a well known natural source of food for fish larvae and fingerlings. Copepods from wild sources as well as cultured in suitable conditions can be used.  The culture methods for marine Copepods are well advanced (Ogle, 1979, Paym and Rippingale, 2001), but relatively few attempts have been made to culture fresh water copepods. One example may be a method of mass culture of Paracyclops fimbriatus developed recently by Szlauer (1995) based on the observations made from a mass occurrence (13000 individuals/litre) during experiments on municipal sewage sludge. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the nutritional quality in terms of proximate and mineral composition of the freshwater calanoid S. (R).indicus from wild and cultured sources, so as to be used as an efficient food source for finfish and prawn larvae.

Materials and Methods

Calanoid copepods were collected from a freshwater pond at Madhavaram near Chennai, using plankton net (150 μm mesh size) by towing at a depth of 1m.  Collections were made between 7 a.m and 8 a.m and the samples were brought to the laboratory.  The plankton was identified according to the taxonomic descriptions of Edmondston (1959), Rangareddy (1994) and Dussart and Defaye (1995). Mass culture of copepods was achieved using yeast, chlorella and poultry manure in different combinations at 250 ppm. The proximate and mineral contents of wild and cultured S. (R). indicus was analysed. The moisture, ash and mineral contents were determined using the standard methods as given in AOAC (1995). Lyophilized samples were analysed for protein by the Lowry’s method using Bovine serum albumin as a standard (Lowry et al., 1951). The carbohydrate content was determined by phenol-sulphuric acid method using glucose as a standard (Dubois et al., 1956). The lipid content was determined by following the procedure of Bligh and Dyer (1959). The results obtained in each experiment were analysed statistically using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Results and Discussion

Investigations of Copepod culture methods and their use as natural food fish larvae might help develop more accurate techniques for large scale culture of Copepods, thus making feasible their use as a high quality and easily digestible food. All the diets used in the present study were efficient. The quality of algal lipid present may vary under different nutrient regions. Smaller prey may be particularly suitable for first feeding or for weaker larvae of the stock, being probably easier to capture and consequently consumed at higher rate (Cunha and Plahnas, 1999)

The proximate composition of wild and cultured species of the Calanoid Copepod S.(R). indicus showed nutritionally comparable results with that of Artemia taken as control is furnished in (Table 1). The carbohydrate content is found to be slightly lesser than Artemia. In the present study lipid content of S. (R). indicus was found to be slightly higher. The ash and moisture contents of S. (R). indicus showed negligible variations among them with respect to culture media. The live food organisms have a high feed value as protein sources for fish (Watanable et al., 1983a). The protein, lipid and phosphorus contents in most zooplanktons appeared to satisfy the requirement of fish. The biochemical composition of zooplanktons can vary seasonally and be affected by the level of nutrient in water (Vijverberg and Frank, 1976)

Table 1: Comparison of Proximate composition in Artemia and S. (R) indicus, wild and cultured in different feed combinations (Y, yeast; C, chlorella; PM, poultry manure).

Proximate Composition (%) Artemia S. (R) indicus ANOVA F; P
Wild Cultured in
Y C PM Y+C Y+PM Y+C+PM
Moisture 82.25 ± 0.10 81.55± 0.10 81.21± 0.11 80.72± 0.02 80.40± 0.04 82.81± 0.02 81.80± 0.02 80.21± 0.02 1072.83; = 0.000
Protein 8.80 ± 0.13 9.22

± 0.08

9.42 ± 0.03 9.21 ± 0.02 8.78 ± 0.02 9.48 ± 0.02 8.36 ± 0.02 9.82 ± 0.02 428.95;

= 0.000

Carbohydrate 5.22 ± 0.08 4.33

± 0.12

3.92 ± 0.03 2.41 ± 0.02 3.89 ± 0.02 4.21 ± 0.02 4.04 ± 0.07 4.23 ± 0.05 987.99;

= 0.000

Lipid 2.23 ± 0.14 3.17 ± 0.08 3.21 ± 0.02 3.71 ± 0.02 2.21 ± 0.02 3.61 ± 0.02 2.81 ± 0.02 3.67 ± 0.11 456.18;

= 0.000

Ash 0.78 ± 0.01 0.72 ± 0.01 0.61 ± 0.02 0.52 ± 0.02 0.62 ± 0.02 0.72 ± 0.02 0.71 ± 0.02 0.73 ± 0.02 175.04;

= 0.000

Values are Mean ± SD of n = 6

Row wise comparison of means (Tukey’s test at 0.05 LS)

Moisture: Y+C, Significantly higher than other means; Y+C+PM significantly lower than all other means

Protein: Y+C+PM significantly higher; Y+PM significantly lower

Carbohydrate: Artemia significantly higher; C, significantly lower

Lipid: C, Y+C and Y+C+PM, significantly higher; Artemia and PM significantly lower

Ash: Artemia significantly higher; C, significantly lower

 

The mineral composition of Calanoid Copepod S.(R). indicus collected from wild sources generally showed similar pattern with that of Artemia except few minor variations (Table 2). The levels of Na, K and Fe were found to be lesser than that of Artemia. The zooplankton generally has greater levels of phosphorus than phytoplankton.  Other nutrient contents showed negligible differences among the cultured S. (R).indicus with respect to different culture media.  But the media containing yeast, chlorella and poultry manure was found to be better than others.  Statistical analysis of proximate and mineral composition of wild and cultured S. (R).indicus showed significance at p<0.05 level.  Recent studies show that it is possible to improve the nutritional quality by feeding them diets rich in essential nutrients and that the essential fatty acid content chiefly determines the dietary value for fish and prawn larvae (Watanable et al, 1983b). Leger et al.,(1987) reported that Artemia naupii and adults have high protein, lipid and carbohydrate contents indicating that the macronutrients for most predators as satisfied by them.

Table 2: Comparison of mineral composition of Artemia and S. (R) indicus wild and cultured in different feed combinations (Y, yeast; C, chlorella; PM, poultry manure).

Mineral Artemia S. (R) indicus ANOVA F; P
Wild Cultured in
Y C PM Y+C Y+PM Y+C+PM
Na (mg/g) 1.57 ± 0.04 0.57 ± 0.02 0.48 ± 0.01 0.68 ± 0.02 0.58 ± 0.02 0.66 ± 0.02 0.63 ±0.02 0.73 ± 0.02 1423.53;

= 0.000

K (mg/g) 1.07 ± 0.03 0.63 ± 0.01 0.72 ± 0.02 0.52 ± 0.03 0.42 ± 0.02 0.83 ± 0.02 0.73 ±0.02 0.90 ± 0.02 491.01;

= 0.000

Ca (mg/g) 0.23 ± 0.01 0.25 ± 0.01 0.33 ± 0.28 0.18 ± 0.01 0.24 ± 0.02 0.31 ± 0.02 0.24 ±0.01 0.41 ± 0.02 3.21;

= 0.000

Mg (mg/g) 0.29 ± 0.01 0.27 ± 0.01 0.28 ± 0.01 0.21 ± 0.02 0.25 ± 0.02 0.28 ± 0.01 0.25 ±0.02 0.31 ± 0.02 19.30;

= 0.000

P (mg/g) 1.23 ± 0.01 1.25 ± 0.01 1.17 ± 0.02 1.15 ± 0.02 1.21 ± 0.02 1.26 ± 0.01 1.23 ±0.02 1.41 ± 0.02 111.98;

= 0.000

Zn (mg/g) 15.70 ± 0.14 21.57 ± 0.14 9.42 ± 0.02 8.73 ± 0.02 9.82 ± 0.02 12.13 ± 0.04 11.61

± 0.02

12.32 ± 0.02 2.0 x 104;

= 0.000

Fe (mg/g) 49.35 ± 0.10 24.47± 0.20 20.62 ± 0.02 18.72 ± 0.03 19.82 ± 0.02 26.23 ± 0.04 23.82 ±0.03 28.42 ± 0.02 8.6 x 104;

= 0.000

Cu (mg/g) 0.52 ± 0.01 2.65 ± 0.10 2.51 ± 0.03 0.81 ± 0.02 2.32 ± 0.02 2.51 ± 0.02 2.42 ±0.02 3.12 ± 0.03 2890.31;

= 0.000

Mn (mg/g) 1.88 ± 0.04 1.17 ± 0.10 1.07 ± 0.07 2.71 ± 0.02 0.82 ± 0.02 1.52 ± 0.02 1.32 ±0.02 1.70 ± 0.05 741.38;

= 0.000

Values are Mean ± SD of n = 6

Row wise comparison of means (Tukey’s test at 0.05 LS)

Na: Artemia significantly higher; Y significantly lower

K: Artemia significantly higher; PM significantly lower

Ca: Y+C+PM significantly higher

Mg: Y+C+PM significantly higher; C, significantly lower

P: Y+C+PM significantly higher; Y and Y significantly lower

Zn:Wild significantly higher

Fe: Artemia, significantly higher

Cu: Y+C+PM, significantly higher; Artemia, significantly lower

Mn; C, significantly higher

 

Natural zooplankton constitutes ideal food for fish larvae because of the presence of vital enzymes that help in the functioning of the digestive tract. According to Ronnestad et al., (1999), the importance of Calanoid Copepods as natural food in fishponds is that Calanoid species contain more that twice the amount of free amino acids per gram weight than other organisms.

Other feed should be developed to replace those commercially available diets. The calanoid Copepod S. (R). indicus might be good alternative, since it is easy to culture and has high nutritional value. Further investigations are in progress to determine the feasibility of large-scale culture of this species to provide sufficient individuals for production of fish larvae. The further studies will throw more light on the simplicity of the feeding techniques involved in the aquaculture feed practice.

References

  1. AOAC, 1995, official methods of analysis, 16th AOAC, Washington, DC.
  2.  Bligh E.G. and Dyer W.J., 1959. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Canadian J. Biochem. Physiol., 37: 911-917.
  3.  Cunha I and Plahnas M, 1999. Optimal prey size for early turbot larvae (Scophthalmus maximaus) based on mouth and ingested prey size. Aquaculture. 175: 103-110.
  4.  Dubois M., K.A. Gilles, J.K. Hamilton, P.A. Rebers and F. Smith, 1956. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances, Anal. Chem., 28: 350-356.
  5.  Dussart B.H. and Defaye D., 1995. Introduction to the Copepod, city country: SPB Academy Publ. Netherlands, pp 1 – 253.
  6.  Edmondson W.T., 1959. Freshwater Biology, 2nd John Willey and Sons. Inc., New York, 1248pp.
  7.  Leger P, Bieber G F and Sorgelos P, 1985. International study on ArtemiaXXXIII. Promising results in larval rearing of Penaeus stylirostris using a prepared diet as algal substitute and for Artemia J. World Maricult. Soc., 16: 354-367.
  8. Lowry O.H., Rosebrough N.J., Farr A.L. and Randall. R.J., 1951. Protein measurement with folin reagent. Biol. Che., 193: 265-275.
  9. Ogle J, 1979. Adaptation of brown water culture technique to the mass culture of the Copepod Acartia tonsa. Gulf Rep. 6: 291-292.
  10. Paym M F, Rippingale R J, 2001. Intensive cultivation of the calanoid Copepod Gladioferens imparipe. Aquaculture, 201: 329-342.
  11. Rangareddy Y, 1994. Copepoda; Calanoida; Diaptomidae. In Rengareddy, HJF Dumont, Edns. Guide to the identification of the macro invertebrates of the continental waters of the world. The Nether land, SPB Publications, pp 1-221.
  12. Ronnestad I, Thorsen A and Finn R N, 1999. Fish larval nutrition: a review of recent advances in the roles of amino acids. Aquaculture. 177: 201-216.
  13. Szlauer L, 1995. Study on the culture of Paracyclops fimbriatus (cyclopoids) and the potential of the species as live food for juvenile fish. Acta Icthyol. Piscat. 25(2): 15-27.
  14. Vijverberg J and Frank H, 1976. The chemical composition and cladocerans in relation to their size. Freshwater. Biol. 6: 333-345.
  15. Watanable, T. Kitajima C. and Fujita S, 1983a. Nutritional value of live organisms used in Japan for mass propagation of fish: a review. Aquaculture, 34: 115-143.
  16. Watanable, T. Tamiya T, Oka A, Hirata M, Kitajima C. and Fujita S, 1983b. Improvement of dietary value of live foods for fish larvae by feeding them on highly unsaturated fatty acid and fat soluble vitamin. Japanese Soc. Sci. Fish. 49: 471-479.
Share Button
Visited 545 times, 1 visit(s) today

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.