Binu T. V, Vijayakumari B. Pharmacognostic aspect of Scoparia dulcis L. Biomed Pharmacol J 2012;5(2)
Manuscript received on :
Manuscript accepted on :
Published online on: 14-12-2015
How to Cite    |   Publication History
Views Views: (Visited 767 times, 1 visits today)   Downloads PDF Downloads: 595

T. V. Binu * and B. Vijayakumari

Department of Botany, Avinashilingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women, Coimbatore - 641 043, India

Abstract

A study was carried out at Avinashilingam Institute for Home Science and Higher education for Women Coimbatore to evaluate the Pharmacognostic, phytochemical and biochemical aspect of Scoparia dulcis (L).The Pharmacognostic studies involved organoleptic study, fluorescence analysis, preliminary photochemical studies and biochemical analysis. Observations revealed the presence of biologically active compounds. The results of root and shoot analysis gave a contribution to the world of traditional medicines. Both the sample showed pleasant odour and bitter taste. The fluorescence analysis of root and shoot powder under UV light and ordinary light showed a little difference only. Biochemical studies on the two samples showed the presence of protein and carbohydrates. Shoot extract showed more content of both protein and carbohydrates.

Keywords

Medicinal plants; Scoparia dulcis L; Pharmacognostic studies; Photochemical

Download this article as: 
Copy the following to cite this article:

Binu T. V, Vijayakumari B. Pharmacognostic aspect of Scoparia dulcis L. Biomed Pharmacol J 2012;5(2)

Copy the following to cite this URL:

Binu T. V, Vijayakumari B. Pharmacognostic aspect of Scoparia dulcis L. Biomed Pharmacol J 2012;5(2). Available from: http://biomedpharmajournal.org/?p=2557

Introduction

Since the dawn of civilization, man utilized plants for their medicinal and edible value. By trial and error, man distinguished between the beneficial and poisonous plants. Today, this method is used by scientists to isolate active compounds from medicinal plants. Majority of rural dwellers in developing countries still depend on medicinal plants to prevent or eliminate diseases. The biochemistry of herbs and Pharmacognostic aspects initiates many herbalists to do researches. An investigation has been carried out to evaluate the Pharmacognostic, phytochemical and biochemical aspect of Scoparia dulcis L.

Material And Methods

To assess the activity of Scoparia dulcis (L.) Pharmacognostic studies like organoleptic studies, fluorescence analysis, preliminary phytochemical studies and biochemical analysis were carried out .Organoleptic studies were carried out on the basis of Jackson and Showdown Method (1968) and fluorescence analysis following Kokoshi et al (1958) and Chare and Pratt(1949).The biochemical parameters like protein (Lowry et al.,1951)and carbohydrates (Hedge and Hofreiter,1962) were also analyzed .

Results and Discussion

Pharmacognostic study

The Pharmacognostic characters of the root and shoot of Scoparia dulcis L. are indicated through the following parameters.

Organoleptic Study

The organoleptic study indicates the external characters like colour, odour and taste. The results of the present study are indicated in Table 1.

Table 1: Organoleptic study of the sample of root and shoot

S.No. Sample Colour Odour Taste
1. Root Yellowish green Pleasant Bitter
2. Shoot Light green Pleasant Bitter

There was a slight colour variation in the two samples. But in both the samples, the odour was pleasant and the taste was bitter. Pandey et al. (1984) and Gupta (1986) tested the plant powders and observed their behaviors. In the present research similar Pharmacognostic study has been done.Organoleptically, Abrus precatorius seeds yield coarse powder and colour of red seeds were yellowish brown with red and black spots and colour of white seeds were white in colour (Prathyusha et al., 2010).

Fluorescence Analysis

The powdered samples of each part extracted in water, 10% NaOH, 50% H2SO4 and 1N HCl. The fluorescence of these extracts were observed under ordinary visible light and also under UV light (254 nm) and recorded in Table 2.

Table 2: Fluorescence analysis of the samples of root and shoot

  Samples Treatment with chemical reagents Under ordinary light Under UV light (254 nm)
1. Root Powder with water Dull white White
Shoot Light green Light green
2. Root Powder with 1 N NaOH Light brown Dark brown
Shoot Light brown Yellowish brown
3. Root Powder with 50% H2SO4 Light green Green
Shoot Dark green Green
4. Root Powder with 1 N HCl Light yellow Yellow
Shoot Light green Pale green

Prathyusha et al. (2010) conducted the fluorescence analysis of seed extracts of red and white forms of Abrus precatorius in day light and at 254 nm UV light and recorded the colour changes of the powder. The fluorescence colour is specific for each compound. A non-fluorescent compound may fluoresce if mixed with reagents (Kala et al., 2011).

Preliminary phytochemical screening

Phytochemical analysis intends to serve as a major resource for information on analytical and instrumental methodology in plant science as was reported in “phytochemical analysis” (Houghton et al., 2004). In the present study, a phytochemical screening was carried out to detect the active constituents such as cellulose, starch, fixed oil, alkaloids, flavonoids, tannins, phenols, steroids, terpenoids and quinine (Table 3).

Table 3: Preliminary phytochemical analysis of Scoparia dulcis L.  root and shoot

 SI NO Sample Extract used Alkaloids Flavonoids Tannin  Phenol Steroids Terpenoids Quinone Starch Cellulose Fixed Oil
1. Root Petroleum ether + + + +
Chloroform + + + + +
Methanol + + + + +
Water + + + + + +
2. Shoot Petroleum ether + + + +
Chloroform + + + +
Methanol + + + + + +
Water + + + + + +

Among the two samples, performance of the root extracts showed maximum result. Of the different extracts water extract showed more positive results. Phytochemical analysis of shoot extracts in comparison with root showed minimum result. In this also water extract showed maximum result compared to other three extracts.

The preliminary phytochemical investigation of selected ethnomedicinal plants of Dindigul district showed the presence of phenolics, flavonoids, terpenoids and alkaloids respectively in 60, 58, 50 and 37 plant species (Karuppusamy and Karmegam, 2005).Qualitative phytochemical analysis of different extract of Abrus precatorius showed the presence of alkaloids, saponins, carbohydrates, gums, steroids, fixed oils and triterpenoids (Prathyusha et al., 2010).

Biochemical analysis

Protein content of both the samples were on par with each other. That is shoot sample showed 9.57 mg / 100 g and root sample showed 9.37 mg / 100 g (Table  4) and .Carbohydrate contents of shoot samples was more when compared to that of root sample (33.95 mg / 100 g and 25.19 mg / 100 g respectively).

Table 4: Estimation of protein and carbohydrates content of root and shoot extracts of Scoparia dulcis l.

S.No. Samples Protein (mg / 100 g) Carbohydrates (mg / 100 g)
1. Root 9.37 25.19
2. Shoot 9.57 33.95

Udayakumar et al. (2003) screened the protein content of the plant Solanum xanthocarpum through Million’s reagents and estimated the protein content. Phytochemical screening of Bauhinia variegata showed the presence of alkaloids in the methanolic and water extract, but was found absent in petroleum ether. Carbohydrates and phenolic compounds were found to be present in all the extracts (Sawhney et al., 2012). Naseerbanu et al. (2003) estimated carbohydrates content in Amaranthus viridis and Spinacea oleracea in which A. viridis showed higher carbohydrates content (35.62 mg / 100 g) than Spinacea oleracea. Amount of carbohydrates in poly herbal powder and various extracts was found to be less when compared with A. viridis.

Conclusion

The results of root and shoot analysis gave a contribution to the world of traditional medicines. The root sample showed yellowish green colour, while shoot showed light green colour. Both the sample showed pleasant odour and bitter taste.

.The fluorescence analysis of root showed a little colour variation under UV light. It showed white and yellowish brown colour variation with different chemicals. Shoot samples showed colour variation from light green to pale green. Root powder showed dull white, light green, light brown and light yellow colour under ordinary light. But the shoot showed light green and light brown colour under ordinary light.

The presence of alkaloids, phenols, steroids, terpenoids, flavonoids, tannins, quinone and starch were confirmed in both root and shoot powders. Fixed oils showed negative result Biochemical studies on the two samples showed the presence of protein and carbohydrates. Shoot extract showed more content of both protein and carbohydrates

References

  1. Chare, C.R. an R.F.Pratt., Fluorescence of powdered vegetable drugs with particular reference to the development of system indication, J.Amer.Pharm.Assn. 38:324-333(1949).
  2. Gupta, M.M., R.K. Verma and S.P. Jain, Antioxidant activity of various tea extracts in relation to their antimutagenicity, Journal of Agriculture Food Chemistry, 47 (1): 23-32.(1986 )
  3. Hedge, J.E. and B.T. Hofreiter., Determination of total carbohydrate by anthrone method, Carbohydrate Chemistry, Academic Press, New York, P. 17(1962)
  4. Houghton, O.H.M.H., P.J. Whang and W.K. Cho., Screening of Korean herbal medicines used to improve cognitive function for anti cholinesterase activity, Phytomedicine, 11 (6): 544-548( 2004).
  5. Jackson, B.P. and D.W. Snodown., Powdered vegetable drugs, Cheer Chill Ltd., London, pp. 25-28. (1968).
  6. Kala, S., M. Johnson, N. Janakiraman, A. Anto-Arockiaraj, S.I. Raj and D. Bosco., Pharmacognostic and phytochemical studies on some selected ethnomedicinal plants of Tamil Nadu, South India, Indian J. Med. Arom. Plants, 1 (2): 89-94(2011).
  7. Karuppusamy, S. and N. Karmegam., Screening of ethno medicinal plants of Dindigul district (South India) for antimicrobial activity, J. Econiol., 17 (1): 455-459(2005).
  8. Kokoshi, C.J., J.R. Kokoshi and F.J. Sharma., Fluorescence of powdered vegetable drugs under ultra violet radiation, J. Amer. Pharmaceu. Assn., 38 (40): 715-717(1958).
  9. Lowry, O.H., N.J. Roserbourgh, A.L. Farr and R.F. Randall., Protein measurement with Folin-phenol reagent, J. Biol. Chem., 193 (7): 257-275(1951).
  10. Naseer Banu, B., Sivakumar, A. and Subramanian, M.S., Effect of manures on biomass production and pharmaco-biochemical properties of some greens, Ancient Science of Life, 23 (2): 123-130(2003).
  11. Pandey, H.C., R.S. Dixit and H.P. Sharma., Addition to the pharmacognosy of Kalimulsi (Curculigo orchioides), Bull. Med. Ethnobot. Res.,5 (1-2) : 55-56( 1984).
  12. Prathyusha, P., S. Modupalayam, Subramanian and R. Sivakumar., Pharmacognostical studies on white and red forms of Abrus precatorius Linn., Indian Journal of Natural Products and Resources, 1 (4) : 476-480(2010).
  13. Sawhney, S.S., M.A. Mir and Sandeepkumar. Phytochemical screening and antioxidant properties of Bauhinia variegata, International Journal of Research in Phytochemistry and Pharmacology, 2 (1) : 21-24( 2012).
  14. Udayakumar, R., K. Velmurugan, K.D. Sivanesan and K. Raghuram., Phytochemcial and antimicrobial studies of extracts of Solanum xanthocarpum, Ancient Science of Life, 23 (2): 90( 2003).
Share Button
(Visited 767 times, 1 visits today)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.