Manuscript accepted on :
Published online on: --
Views: (Visited 166 times, 1 visits today)
PDF Downloads:
581Vijay Ebenezer, R. Balakrishnan and Pradeep Christopher
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sree Balaji Dental College and Hospital, Bharath University, Pallikaranai, Chennai - 600100, India.
DOI : https://dx.doi.org/10.13005/bpj/736
Abstract
Previously in the field of dental implantology, each and every patient had to wait for atleast 8 to 12 months for the extracted site to heal and remodel with the formation of secondary new bone formation for the placement of the implant and for the further fixed prosthesis and it is called as delayed implant placement and now a new trends and advanced treatment materials available currently such as autogenous and allogenous Bone grafts makes the implant placement too easy and the second surgery is avoided and it is called as immediate placement of implant.this article aims to evaluate the clinical stability , efficacy and duration taken for immediate and delayed placement of implant in the extraction sockets.
Keywords
Autogenous bone grafts; atraumatic extraction; peri implantitis; bone resorption; ridged fixation
Download this article as:
| Copy the following to cite this article: Ebenezer V, Balakrishnan R, Christopher P. Comparitive Study of Immediate Vs Delayed Placement of Implant A Radiographic Evalution of 60 Patients. Biomed Pharmacol J 2015;8(October Spl Edition) |
| Copy the following to cite this URL: Ebenezer V, Balakrishnan R, Christopher P. Comparitive Study of Immediate Vs Delayed Placement of Implant A Radiographic Evalution of 60 Patients. Biomed Pharmacol J 2015;8(October Spl Edition). Available from: http://biomedpharmajournal.org/?p=4349> |
