<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>



<records>

  <record>
    <language>eng</language>
          <publisher>Oriental Scientific Publishing Company</publisher>
        <journalTitle>Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal</journalTitle>
          <issn>0974-6242</issn>
            <publicationDate>2015-12-28</publicationDate>
    
        <volume>8</volume>
        <issue>2</issue>

 
    <startPage>879</startPage>
    <endPage>884</endPage>

	 
      <doi>10.13005/bpj/838</doi>
        <publisherRecordId>3305</publisherRecordId>
    <documentType>article</documentType>
    <title language="eng">A Survey and Comparison of the Prevalence Pain and Hematuria and Irritative Symptoms in Patients with Double-J Catheter and Without Double-J Catheter After Trans-Urethral Leitothrips</title>

    <authors>
	 


      <author>
       <name>Rasoul Hashemi Jozdani</name>

 
		
	<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>
    

	 


      <author>
       <name>Fatemeh Mashayekhi</name>


		
	<affiliationId>2</affiliationId>

      </author>
    

	

	


	


	
    </authors>
    
	    <affiliationsList>
	    
		
		<affiliationName affiliationId="1">Endourology Fellowship ,Iran University of Medical Sciences , Tehran , Iran.</affiliationName>
    

		
		<affiliationName affiliationId="2">MSc Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, Lecturer Faculty member of Jiroft University of Medical Sciences, Jiroft, Iran.</affiliationName>
    
		
		
		
		
	  </affiliationsList>






    <abstract language="eng">TUL is a selected treatment for Urethral stones. Leaving the benefits of utilizing TUL, a series of small and large scale side effects might be caused in the patients. Some Urologists recommend putting Double-J catheter in the urethra after TUL in order to prevent Urethral stenosis and pains. This research studies and compares the prevalence of post TUL side effects in patients with Double-J catheter and those without catheter.

this is a descriptive and cross-sectional research whose population includes all the patients with TUL resorting to Imam Khomeini Hospital of Jiroft in the first 6 months of 2015. The researchers have classified patients into two groups including those with Double-J catheter and those without the catheter. Those patients were then studied in terms of causing stimulatory side effects, pain hematuria.

151 patients with TUL were studied in terms of post-surgery side effects. Double-J catheter was used for 70% of the patients after TUL. In both groups of patients with and without catheter, more than 75% of the patients reported side effects such as pain, hematuria and stimulatory symptoms, but no significant relationship was observed between the patients in terms of causing symptoms (p&gt;0.005).

although no significant relationship was observed in patients with double-j catheter and those without the catheter in terms of side effects, high number of complaints about post TUL side effects may lead us to the conclusion that using double-j catheter can cause only excessive costs for the patients. Of course, it is recommended to conduct this study in a larger society.</abstract>

    <fullTextUrl format="html">https://biomedpharmajournal.org/vol8no2/a-survey-and-comparison-of-the-prevalence-pain-and-hematuria-and-irritative-symptoms-in-patients-with-double-j-catheter-and-without-double-j-catheter-after-trans-urethral-leitothrips/</fullTextUrl>

<keywords language="eng">

      
        <keyword>urethral stone</keyword>
      

      
        <keyword> trans-Lithotripsy</keyword>
      

      
        <keyword> double-j catheter</keyword>
      
</keywords>
  </record>
</records>