Jabalameli M, Fard A. B, Noori A, Anbarlo H. A. The Study of Lower Extremity Alignment Correction in Patients with Total Knee Arthroplasty in a Hospital in Tehran, Iran. Biomed Pharmacol J 2014;7(2)

---

Manuscript received on :
Manuscript accepted on :
Published online on: 25-12-2015

---

How to Citeclose    |   Publication History close

 Views: 

Visited 138 times, 1 visit(s) today

 

 PDF Downloads: 

530

Mahmoud Jabalameli¹, Abolfazl Bagheri Fard¹, Abolfazl Noori²* and Hassan Reza Anbarlo³

¹Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shafa Yahiaian Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

²Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mousavi Hospital, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.

³Medical Surgical Nursing and Nursing Education, Supervision General Operation Room in the Mosavi Ayatollah Hospital Zanjan, Iran.

DOI : https://dx.doi.org/10.13005/bpj/513

Abstract

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is being used with the main goal of pain reduction and lower extremity alignment correction with a proven positive impact. Surgeons’ criterion for the suitability of extremity alignment is to compare them (The angle between femur mechanical axis with tibial mechanical axis) with extremity mechanical axis (a line connecting the midpoint of the femoral head to the midpoint of the talus). Most professionals consider ideal up to 3 degrees difference between extremity alignment with extremity mechanical axis after surgery, thereby increasing the life of the arthroplasty components. In this study, the intention was to show parameters associated with surgery success with the evaluation of patients with ATK successful surgery. In this study, 102 patients with TKA operation in Fajr Hospital of Tehran were selected and required information was extracted from their archived files. Having no arthroplasty after the operation was the main criterion for selecting these patients. Statistical analysis showed that parameters such as BMI, gender, urinary tract infection, and so do not affect the success of ATK surgery. However, it was shown that there is a significant relationship between the success rates of surgery on left knee with the type of surgery. Although there is no significant relationship between some underlying factors such as blood group, gender, or urinary tract infections with the success of TKA surgery, the type of surgery can be an important and determinant factor in the success of the surgery. Statistical analysis on TKA surgery can provide useful information to successfully conduct this type of operation in the future.

Keywords

TKA; lower extremity alignment correction

Introduction 

Development and progress in reconstructive operations has led to major developments in orthopedic surgery such as total knee arthroplasty (TKA) which has been proven to have a positive impact during previous researches so far[1-4]. Since the normalization of extremity alignment after joint replacement will lead to more beauty and also reduce subsequent complications, proper position of components during surgery  is of the main concerns of orthopedic surgeon[2].Surgeons’ criterion for the suitability of extremity alignment is to compare them (The angle between femur mechanical axis with tibial mechanical axis) with extremity mechanical axis (a line connecting the midpoint of the femoral head to the midpoint of the talus), so that most professionals consider ideal up to 3 degrees difference between extremity alignment with extremity mechanical axis after surgery (Valgus or Varus)[2, 4-8], and suggest that it causes the life of the arthroplasty components to increase[1, 2, 9-12].  On the other hand, if the angle differences are more than 3 degrees (especially in Varus), IKS score will be  lower  [11, 13, 14]and losning aseptic and failure will be higher [2, 9, 12, 15-20]  But it should be noted that studies have shown that failure in pre-op varus knee alignment during TKA in a 2 to 4-year follow-up has not substantially changed IKS (International Knee Society Score) [21]. Researchers also during in-vitro studies on cadavers have shown that the deviation in the range of 3 degree with extremity mechanical axis gives the best results during Gait analysis and dynamic studies[2, 4, 9, 12, 17] .

It has been shown that in the long term,  there is no significant difference between patients with knee arthroplasty and Group II that this alignment differs more than 3 degrees with mechanical axis)  in the field of revision rate [22, 23]. Dr. Spencer and his colleagues examined TKA cuts in 21 patients using preoperative sagittal MRI, and finally declared that the incidence of postoperative complications (such as bleeding, etc.) in these patients has no significant deference with previous studies with routine surgery or by means of computed assisted methods. And also reported that lower extremity alignment after Surgery with this method will deviate 1 0r 2 degrees to the mechanical axis [24].Dr.  Long Staff and his colleagues set out to examine the impact of some aspects of Alaignment and Rotation Implant  on Functional Outcome after TKA surgery and analyzed 159 patients clinically and radiologically before and after surgery. Finally proved that a good Coronal Alaignment after surgery results in significant improvements in patients’ function during the first year after surgery [14].

Dr. Sikorski et al. stated in a paper that a prospective study with a 15-20 year follow-up is needed to correctly understand the effect of extremity alignment neutering  after TKA surgery on the quality of the results  requires [4]. Dr. Parat and his colleagues in a paper in 2010, after a 15-year follow-up, investigated the results of the two groups of patients who underwent TKA (the first group were those whose extremity alignment after surgery differed3±0 degrees with extremity mechanical axis and the second group were those who differed more than 3±0 degrees with extremity mechanical axis), and finally, they see no significant clinical, radiological or mechanical difference at the end of 15 years.   This group stated that lower extremity alignment correction after TKA surgery is not important [23].

According to the above and also the obligation to investigate the effects of the surgery in Iran, due to the lack of previous researches in Iran, the statistical study of the effectiveness of TKA surgery and the rate of success in of patients in Fajr hospital during the years 2008 to 2013 in this study, due to the different variables associated with infection, hematological parameters and bone mineral density were examined.

Methods

In this study, 102 patients with TKA operation in Fajr Hospital of Tehran in the years 2008 to 2013 were determined and selected after reading their medical records, in the case of not having varus  more than 15 degrees before operation and lack of re-arthroplasty revision during this 5 years operated by a single surgeon and  cemented prostheses were used while maintaining cruciate ligament and also the parameters associated with infection and blood group and also the availability of lumbar and femoral bone mineral density results.

Lumbar and femoral bone mineral density with common indicators of T-Score (bone density compared with what is normally expected in a healthy young adult of same sex. T-score is the number of units — called standard deviations — that bone density is above or below the average.) and Z-Score (Z-score is the number of standard deviations above or below what’s normally expected for someone of same age, sex, weight, and ethnic or racial origin) and also the corrected angles of the knee after surgery and the type of surgery (ps or cr) were studied. Finally, the data were analyzed with SPSS software.

Results

The study population consisted of 102 patients underwent knee surgery due to knee problems. 86.4% of them were female and 13.6 percent were male. Based on “Mann – Whitney U” statistical analysis,  the effect of gender on the corrected angles of knee after surgery were analyzed and it was shown that gender has no effect on the corrected angles left (p-Value = 0.718) and right (0.886p-Value =) knee. Results indicate that 34.5% of studies subjects had a urinary tract infection. This parameter does not impact significantly on the results of surgery. [(p-Value =0.070) for the right knee and (p-Value =0. 366) for the left knee.   The amount of ESR wasn’t normal before surgery in 65.9% of cases and was normal only in 34.1%.

Also, there was no significant relationship between laboratory parameters of ESR, hemoglobin, MVC; RBC; blood group and the amount of angle correction after surgery.

According to the statistical analysis of “Correlations” it was observed that variables related to Z-score don’t affect the corrected angles of left and right knee after surgery. The frequency distribution of lumbar t-score parameter showed that   36.4% of patients were normal, 57.6% had Osteoporese   and 6.1% possessed Severe Steoporese.   According to the statistical analysis of “Kruscal – Wallis” it was found that this variable doesn’t affect the corrected angles of right (p-Value=0.069) and left (p-Value=0.322) knee after surgery

The frequency distribution of t-score parameter can be seen in the following diagram. By examining this variable it was observed that 6.5% of patients were normal, 61.3% had Osteoporese   and 32.3% possessed Severe Steoporese.  Therefore, this variable had no effect on the success of the surgery. Finally, the effect of surgery type on the corrected angles of knee after surgical was analyzed using nonparametric statistical of “Mann – Whitney U” that the results of these tests showed that the type of surgery does not affect the corrected angles of right knee (p-Value = 0.279). It is while that statistical results show the effect of surgery type on the corrected angles of left knee (p-Value = 0.015).

The mean of the corrected angles of left and right knee in Ps surgery was equal to 6.2143 and 5.4286, respectively and the mean of the corrected angles of left and right knee in CR surgery was equal to 4.0256 and 4.3158, respectively.  So, the mean of the corrected angles in Ps surgery is more than CR surgery.

Discussion 

In this study, 102 patients with ATK successful surgery were examined after 5 years and different parameters of these patients were studied. Previous researches and studies about the importance and performance of this surgery had shown that this surgery can lead to relief of pain in patients with varus and valgus.  It has also become more and more important due to the direct effect of this surgery on beauty,. It was also shown that varus and valgus angle, before and after surgery is very important [2, 6 7, 9]. In previous studies carried out by Suliman et al. 2011, it was shown that patients’ BMI before surgery has no significant impact on the success of the surgery[25].Also Burg et al. 2009 with a review of 77 patients referred that none of the parameters related to the patient’s blood has effect on the surgery [26] .Also Bozic and his colleagues had shown the lack of effect of urinary tract infection in TKA surgery [27].  Dr. Connor noted the ineffectiveness of gender in TKA surgery in a paper in 2007.[28].  In 2002, Breth and colleagues demonstrated that  MCV (maximal voluntary contraction) have a significant relationship with the success of ATK surgery [29].

According to a survey conducted in this study, it was shown that there is no significant relationship between gender, BMI, blood infection and factors affecting blood with ATK surgery ahich agrees with previous studies of other researchers, but it was previously shown that MCV has a significant relationship with ATK surgery that no result was obtained to confirm previous results in this study.

The results from the nonparametric statistical test of “Mann – Whitney U” indicates the significant relationship of the effect of surgery type on the corrected angles of  left knee (p-Value = 0.015) indicating more success of ATK surgery on left knee independent of sex, BMI, and other factors.

Also, the angular correction in Ps surgery is greater than CR surgery in our study. Therefore, the type of surgery may also be an important factor in the success of ATK.

Conclusion 

Some underlying factors such as gender, BMI and blood infection have no significant relationship with ATK surgery. But a number of factors such as the type of surgery can be effective in the surgical success rate and angular corrections in TKA surgery.

References 

1. Hvid I, Nielsen S: Total condylar knee arthroplasty: prosthetic component positioning and radiolucent lines. Acta Orthopaedica 1984, 55(2):160-165.
2. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA: Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, British Volume 1991, 73(5):709-714.
3. Jessup D, Worland R, Clelland C, Arredondo J: Restoration of limb alignment in total knee arthroplasty: evaluation and methods. Journal of the Southern Orthopaedic Association 1996, 6(1):37-47.
4. Sikorski J: Alignment in total knee replacement. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, British Volume 2008, 90(9):1121-1127.
5. Bonutti PM, Dethmers D, Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Mont MA: Computer Navigation-assisted versus Minimally Invasive TKA. Clinical orthopaedicsand related research 2008, 466(11):2756-2762.
6. Mason JB, Fehring T, Fahrbach K: Navigated total knee replacement. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery 2007, 89(11):2547-2548.
7. Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C: A Prospective, RandomizedStudy of Computer-Assisted and Conventional Total Knee ArthroplastyThree-Dimensional Evaluation of Implant Alignment and Rotation. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery 2007, 89(2):236-243.
8. Ensini A, Catani F, Leardini A, Romagnoli M, Giannini S: Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 2007, 457:156-162.
9. Bargren JH, Blaha J, Freeman M: Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Correlated biomechanical and clinical observations. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 1983(173):178-183.
10. HSU RW, HIMENO S, COVENTRY MB, CHAO EY: Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and load-bearing distribution at the knee. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 1990, 255: -227
11. Lotke PA, Ecker ML: Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977, 59(1):77-79.
12. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB: Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement its effect on survival. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 1994, 299:153-156.
13. Choong PF, Dowsey MM, Stoney JD: Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty 2009, 24(4):560-569.
14. Longstaff LM, Sloan K, Stamp N, Scaddan M, Beaver R: Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function. The Journal of arthroplasty 2009, 24(4):570-578.
15. Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, Faris PM, Keating EM, Redelman R, Faris GW, Davis KE: The chetranjan ranawat award: Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 2004, 428:26-34.
16. Fang DM, Ritter MA, Davis KE: Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: just how important is it?The Journal of arthroplasty 2009, 24(6):39-43.
17. Insall JN, Binazzi R, Soudry M, Mestriner LA: Total knee arthroplasty. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 1985, 192:13-22.
18. Marmor L: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: ten-to 13-year follow-up study. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 1988, 226:14-20.
19. Moreland JR: Mechanisms of failure in total knee arthroplasty. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 1988, 226:49-64.
20. Tew M, Waugh W: Tibiofemoral alignment and the results of knee replacement. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, British Volume 1985, 67(4):551-556.
21. Magnussen RA, Weppe F, Demey G, Servien E, Lustig S: Residual varus alignment does not compromise results of TKAs in patients with preoperative varus. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 2011, 469(12):3443-3450.
22. Morgan SS, Bonshahi A, Pradhan N, Gregory A, Gambhir A, Porter M: The influence of postoperative coronal alignment on revision surgery in total knee arthroplasty. International orthopaedics 2008, 32(5):639-642.
23. Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ: Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery 2010, 92(12):2143-2149.
24. Spencer BA, Mont MA, McGrath MS, Boyd B, Mitrick MF: Initial experience with custom-fit total knee replacement: intra-operative events and long-leg coronal alignment. International orthopaedics 2009, 33(6):1571-1575.
25. Suleiman LI, Ortega G, Ong’uti SK, Gonzalez DO, Tran DD, Onyike A, Turner PL, Fullum TM: Does BMI Affect Perioperative Complications Following Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty?The Journal of surgical research 2012, 174(1):7-11.
26. Burg A, Dudkiewicz I, Heller S, Salai M, Velkes S: The effects of using a tourniquet in total knee arthroplasty: a study of 77 patients. Journal of Musculoskeletal Research 2009, 12(03):137-142.
27. Bozic KJ, Lau E, Kurtz S, Ong K, Berry DJ: Patient-related risk factors for postoperative mortality and periprosthetic joint infection in medicare patients undergoing TKA. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 2012, 470(1):130-137.
28. O’Connor MI: Sex differences in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2007, 15(suppl 1):S22-S25.
29. Berth A, Urbach D, Awiszus F: Improvement of voluntary quadriceps muscle activation after total knee arthroplasty. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2002, 83(10):1432-1436.