Manuscript accepted on :June 27, 2010
Published online on: 20-11-2015
Views:
PDF Downloads:
A. Sohna Chandra Packiavathy¹, M. Ramalingam² and C. Anchana Devi³
¹Department of Biochemistry, PRIST University, Thanjavur - 614 904 (India).
²Center for Research and Development, PRIST University, Thanjavur - 613 103 (India).
³Department of Microbiology, Bharathidasan University, Trichy - 620 024 (India).
Abstract
The effect of pioglitazone on glycemic control in type 2 diabetics was analysed in the present study. The study groups consisted of 220 type 2 diabetic patients (110 males, 110 females) and 220 age and sex matched type 2 diabetic subjects treated with pioglitazone (110 males, 110 females). The levels of blood glucose, urea, creatinine, HbA1c were found to be significantly decreased by pioglitazone treatment. Lipid status was also found to be normalised by pioglitazone therapy in type 2 diabetics. Hence pioglitazone can be used more often in patients with type 2 diabetes, because they offer excellent glycemic control as well as decrease in insulin resistance and reductions in cardiac risk factors associated with the insulin resistance.
Keywords
Type 2 diabetes mellitus; pioglitazone; glycemic control
Download this article as:
| Copy the following to cite this article: Packiavathy A. S. C, Ramalingam M, Devi C. A. Role of Pioglitazone on Glycemic Control and its Effect on Lipid Profile in Type 2 Diabetics. Biomed Pharmacol J 2010;3(1) |
| Copy the following to cite this URL: Packiavathy A. S. C, Ramalingam M, Devi C. A. Role of Pioglitazone on Glycemic Control and its Effect on Lipid Profile in Type 2 Diabetics. Biomed Pharmacol J 2010;3(1). Available from: http://biomedpharmajournal.org/?p=1106 |
Introduction
Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a heterogeneous group of disorders usually characterized by variable degrees of insulin resistance, impaired insulin secretion and increased glucose production.
Insulin resistance typically becomes worse with the progression of diabetes because of dysregulation of lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. Impaired b-Cell function in these patients as evidenced by altered pulsatility of insulin release, loss of first phase insulin release and reduced insulin release in response to a glucose load plays an important role in the expression of the disease. Finally increased hepatic glucose output correlates well with the fasting plasma glucose levels and is the primary cause of fasting hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes (Defronzo et al., 1992).
The medication class of thiazolidinedione (TZD) was introduced in the late 1990s as an adjunctive therapy for diabetes mellitus (type 2) and related diseases. TZDs are a new class of drugs that act primarily by improving insulin sensitivity in different target tissues such as liver, skeletal muscle and adipose tissue. They are potent synthetic ligands for PPAR-g activation. They have been shown to improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes and appear to have favourable direct effect on other components of the insulin resistance syndrome.
Experimental
The study subjects were recruited from in and around Thanjavur. All the study subjects gave written informed consent prior to study enrolment. The study population consisted of four groups belonging to the age group of 40-70 years.
Group I
This consists of two hundred and twenty freshly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients who were not under mediation for the disease previously.
Group II
This consists of 220 known type 2 diabetic subjects receiving pioglitazone along with sulphonylureas for 6 months.
Serum, plasma and whole blood were utilized for glycemic and lipid studies. Blood Sugar was assayed using 0 – Toluidine method (Fongs et al., 1970). Blood urea was estimated using Diacetylmonoxime method (Harold Varley, 1988). Serum creatinine was assayed using Folin Wu tungstic acid method (Harold Varley, 1988). Glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1C) was determined by colorimetry (Parker et al., 1981).
The serum cholesterol levels were estimated by Zlakitis – Zak Boyle method (Zak and Amer, 1951). Triglyceride (TG) was estimated by the method of Rice (RamnikSood, 2009). The high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol was estimated by Hybenga and Pileggi method (Burstein et al., 1970). Free fatty acid (FFA) was estimated by colorimetric method (Falhoffet al., 1973).
Results And Discussion
The study deals with the effect of pioglitazone on glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients. The results of the present study suggest that pioglitazone therapy in type 2 diabetic patients decreases fasting and postprandial plasma glucose levels by improving hepatic and peripheral muscle tissue sensitivity to insulin. The mechanism of the antidiabetic action of pioglitazone involves activation of insulin receptors and /or high affinity PPAR- g.
Pioglitazone treatment improved fasting and postprandial glycemia principally via inhibition of gluconeogenesis (Gastadelli et al., 2007). Pioglitazone has been shown to decrease glucomeogenesis (Nishimura et al., 1997) and to inhibit expression of key genes involved in gluconeogenesis (Way et al., 2001).
Pioglitazone treatment produces significant decrease in urea and creatinine levels in type 2 diabetic patients as shown in group II (Table 1). Pioglitazone serves as a potential therapeutic agent for diabetic nephropathy that may prevent glomerular dysfunction independent of their insulin sensitizing action through the inhibition of the DAG-PKC-ERK pathway.
Table 1: Glycemic characteristics of study subjects
| Groups Treatment Fasting Postprandial Urea Creatinine HbA1c blood blood sugar (mg/dl) (mg/dl) ( % ) |
| sugar (mg/dl) |
| (mg/dl) |
| I Type 2 diabetic 203.80± 323.18± 68.47± 3.24± 9.26± subjects 40.134b 87.95 b 15.70 b 1.439 b 1.742 b |
| Pioglitazone 97.277± 138.31± 23.99± 1.062± 5.11± |
| treated type 2 10.92 d 19.90 d 6.36 d 0.250 d 0.803 d |
| II diabetic |
| subjects |
| Values were expressed in mean ± SD ( n=220). Values not sharing a common superscript significantly differ at P < 0.01 (paired sample ‘t’ test) |
In patients with type 2 diabetes, the level of HbA1C was significantly decreased by pioglitazone therapy. In a 26 meek clinical trial by (Aronoffet al , 2000) comparing pioglitazone monotherapy in a dose range of 15-45 mg day with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes , pioglitazone treatment resulted in significant improvements in glycosylated hemoglobin and fasting plasma glucose and appeared to confer additional benefit with respect to lipid parameters and fasting insulin.
Pioglitazone significantly decreases cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, TG and FFA levels and increases HDL cholesterol as given in Table 2. Pioglitazone directly affect adipose tissue by enhancing differentiation of preadipocytes into mature adipocytes and the regulation of gene expression in adipose tissue leading to the coordinated regulation of lipid metabolism. Investigations into the mechanisms of plasma TG lowering showed that abolition of hypertriglyceridemia by pioglitazone involves removal of TG from very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) particles and decreased hepatic TG production.
Table 2: Lipid characteristics of study subjects
| Groups Treatment Total Triglyceride HDL LDL FFA |
| cholesterol (mg/dl) (mg/dl) (mg/dl) (mg/dl) |
| (mg/dl) |
| Type 2 249.92± 271.83± 20.932± 160.02± 1060.86± |
| I diabetic 20.41b 46.73 b 8.85 b 18.52 b 175.375 b |
| subjects |
| II Pioglitazone 164.88± 94.06± 63.07± 80.30± 519.49± |
| treated type 12.141d 9.59 d 12.29 d 11.063d 72.209 d |
| 2diabetic |
| subjects |
| Values were expressed in mean ± SD (n = 220) . Values not sharing a common superscript significantly differ at P < 0.01 (paired sample ‘t’ test) |
The anti – diabetic efficacy of piogitazone correlates well with their rank order of binding affinity to PPAR-g. Hence it is inferred that most of the anti – diabetic effects of pioglitazone result from PPAR-g mediated regulation of adipocyte gene expression and the subsequent improvement in adipose physiology.
Conclusion
Hence pioglitazone can be considered as a very attractive candidate for first line glycemic management and prevention of primary and secondary adverse outcomes in patients with metabolic syndrome, cardio diabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus.
References
- Defronzo, R.A., Bonadonna, R.C. and Ferrannini, E. “Pathogenesis of NIDDM.” Diabetes care,15: 318-368 (1992).
- Fongs, C.C., Toltiff, C.C.R. and Duorin, R.T. “Glucose determination by toluidine method using acetic acid.” Practical clinical chemistry.IV Edition.115-118 (1970).
- Harold Varley. Practical clinical Biochemistry.II Edition. 110 and 161 (1988)
- Parker, K.M., England, J.D., Da Costa, J., Hess, R. and Goldstein, D.E. “Improved colorimetric assay for glycosylated haemoglobin.” Clin.Chem., 27: 669-72 (1981).
- Zak, B. and Amer, J.J. Clin.Path.,27: 583 (1951).
- RamnikSood. Concise book of medical laboratory technology. 587 (2009)
- Burstein , M., Scholnk, H.R. and Murflow, R.J. Lipids. Res.,11: 583 (1970).
- Falholf, K., Falholf, W. and Lund, B. “An easy colorimetric method for routine determination of free fatty acids in plasma.” Clin. Chem. Acta., 46: 105-111 (1973).
- Gastadelli, A., Casalaro, A., Pettiti, M., Nannipieri, M., Ciociaro, D., Fiasceera, S., Buzzigoli, E., Baldi, S., Mari, A. and Ferrannini, E. “Effect of pioglitazone on the metabolic and hormonal response to a meal in type II diabetes.” ClinPharmacol. Ther.,81: 205-212 (2007).
- Nishimura, Y., Inone, Y., Takeuchi, H. and Oka, Y. “Acute effects of pioglitazone on glucose metabolism of perfused rat liver.” Beta Diabetol.,34: 206-210 (1997).
- Way, J.M., Harrington, W.W., Brown, K.K., Gotts Chalk, W.K., Sundseth, S.S., Mansfield, T.A., Ramachandran, R.R., Wilson, T.M. and Kliemer, S.A. “Comprehensive messenger ribonucleic acid profiling reveals that peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma activation has coordinate effects on gene expression inmultiple insulin sensitive tissues.” Endocrinology.,142: 1269-1277 (2001).
- Aronoff, S., Rosenblalt, S. and Braithwaite, S. “Pioglitazone hydrochloride monotherapy improves glycemic control in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes.” Diabetes care.,23(11): 1605-11 (2000).
