Manuscript accepted on :August 23, 2009
Published online on: 17-11-2015
Vishnu Vats*, R. K. Upadhyay and Usha Gupta
Department of Chemistry, N.R.E.C.College, Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut India.
Corresponding Author E-mail:vatsvish_2006@yahoo.co.in
Abstract
A new series of substituted aryl-4- thiazolidinones were prepared by cyclocondensation of ketoazomethines and thioglycolic acid. Ketoazomethines were synthesized by condensation of phenyl glyoxal (prepared by partial oxidation of acetophenone) and various Para-substituted anilines. The synthesized compounds were identified by elemental, spectral studies and screened for analgesic activity.
Keywords
Synthesis; Ketoazomethines; 4-thiazolidinones; analgesic activity
Download this article as:Copy the following to cite this article: Vats V, Upadhyay R. K, Gupta U. Synthesis and Analgesic Activity of Some New Substituted Aryl-4-Thiazolidinones. Biomed Pharmacol J 2009;2(2) |
Copy the following to cite this URL: Vats V, Upadhyay R. K, Gupta U. Synthesis and Analgesic Activity of Some New Substituted Aryl-4-Thiazolidinones. Biomed Pharmacol J 2009;2(2).Available from: http://biomedpharmajournal.org/?p=827 |
Introduction
Among biologically active heterocyclic, 4-thiazolidinones are most popular, probably owing to their high versatility in exhibiting diverse potent biological properties viz., anticonvulsant 1, 2 anti inflammatory3-6, antiprotozoa17, antipyretics8-11, anti-HIV12, CFTR-inhibitor13,antimicrobial14etc. Although plenty of thiazolidinones and their derivatives have been synthesized by condensation of schiffs bases 15-17, Haloacetanilide 18, Thiosemicarbazone 19, Thiamide 20 with thiocyanates, halo fatty acid ,aldehydes etc. In the present study we synthesize a new series of substituted aryl-4-thiazolidinones derivatives by condensing ketoazomethines (prepared by Phenyl glyoxal and p-substituted anilines) and thioglycolic acid in benzene (Scheme-1).The structures of these derivatives were assigned on the basis of elemental analysis, IR and H1 NMR spectral data. The compounds were screened for analgesic activities.
Department of Pharmacology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi
Materials and Methods
All the chemicals used were either E-Merck or Qualigens. Melting points were determined in open glass capillary and were found uncorrected. Elemental analyses of samples were done on Euro EA Elemental Analyzer. Infrared spectra were recorded in KBr medium on Thermo Nicolet nexus spectrophotometer and 300 MHz NMR spectra were recorded in dimethylsulphoxide medium on Varien C-13 spectrophotometer using TMS as internal standard. Column Chromatography was carried out by using silica gel (finer than 200#.)
Preparation of Phenyl Glyoxal
Phenyl Glyoxal was prepared by partial oxidation of acetophenone with selenium dioxide. Reaction mixture containing acetophenone (1, 0.2mol) and selenium dioxide (0.4mol) was taken in round bottom flask containing 300ml of ethanol and refluxed for 5 hrs. Orange yellow color reaction mixture was decanted and concentrated over bath water and dissolved in ether to remove selenium from product.
Scheme 1:
Click here to View Scheme |
General procedure for preparation of 4- thiazolidinones
(ll) preparation of ketoazomethines(4a-f)
Phenyl glyoxal(2, 0.2 mol) and aniline (3a-f, 0.2 mol ) were taken in a round bottom flask containing 200 ml of ethanol and refluxed on water bath for 8hrs. Excess of ethanol was removed from reaction mixture and cooled at room temperature. Then it was poured in ice cold water and filtered. Solid obtained were collected and recrystallized with ethanol. Similarly, other ketoazomethines of p-chloro, p-bromo, p-nitro, p-methyl and p-diethylaminoanilines were prepared.
(lll) preparation of 2-ketophenyl-3-substituted aryl-1-thiazolidin-4-one (6a-f)
(scheme-l) ketoazomethines (0.2mol, 4a-f) and thioglyciolic acid (0.3mol, 5) were refluxed in dry benzene for ~ 15 hrs. The reaction mixture was concentrated to half of its volume over water bath and then neutralized with sodium bicarbonate solution. The contents were cooled and poured in ice cold water and filtered. The solid obtained was
collected and purified with recrystallization.
Table: 1 Characterization data of compounds (6a-f).
Compd. m.f.
|
colour |
Yield % |
m.p. (oC) |
Elemental analysis (%)
Cald.(found) |
|||
S | C | H | N | ||||
6a C16H12NO2SCl | Pink | 67.4 | 223 | 7.62
(7.74) |
60.37
(60.44) |
3.77
(3.18) |
4.40
(4.76) |
6b C16H12NO2SBr | Yellow
|
78.5
|
245
|
9.2
(9.18) |
53.35
(53.39) |
3.31
(3.35) |
3.86
(3.15) |
6c C20H22N2O2S | Light brown | 63.6 | 235 | 8.03
(7.82) |
67.79
(67.83) |
6.21
(6.35) |
7.90
(7.65) |
6d C17H15NO2S | Brown | 71.5 | 218 | 8.91
(9.13) |
68.68
(68.65) |
5.75
(5.86) |
4.71
(4.23) |
6e C16H12N2O4S | Light green | 65.6 | 228 | 8.61
(8.53) |
58.53
(58.74) |
3.65
(3.46) |
8.53
(8.32) |
6d C16H13NO2S | Orange | 59.5 | 210 | 8.31
(8.45) |
67.84
(67.73) |
4.59
(4.13) |
4.96
(4.12) |
Pharmacological Studies
Preparation of sample solutions
Standard solutions were prepared by dissolving known quantities of compounds in known volume of non-toxic solvent (dimethylsulphoxide).
Toxicity Study
Albino mice of either sex weighing approximately 25-30 gm, kept in propylene cages in groups of 5 mice per cage under controlled environmental conditions of temperature (22 ± 20C) and humidity (50-55%) with 12:12 hour light dark cycle and free access to food and water, were administered the sample solutions in different doses of 50mg, 75 mg, 100mg, 200mg per kg of body weight intraperitonially whereas pair of control mice received equal volume of solvent only. Mortality of each mice administered different doses was observed after 2hrs and 24hrs for each sample.LD50 values of drugs under study were calculated 21, 22 as follows
Table 2: IR, H1 NMR Spectral data of the compounds (6a-f).
Compd. |
IR (cm-1) (KBr) |
H 1 NMR (δ ppm) |
6a |
560, 700, 750,818, 1241,1324,1486, 1542, 1605,1651,3061 |
7.48-7.50(Ar-H,m),6.89(Ar-H,m), 5.11(1H,s),3.98(2H,s) |
6b |
660, 752 , 822, 1326, 1489,1549, 1609, 1648,3066
|
7.51-7.72(Ar-H,m), 6.78(Ar-H,m), 5.15(1H,s),3.82(2H,s) |
6c | 692,778,1407,1594,1680,1684,
2970,3032 |
7.56-7.73(Ar-H,m), 6.92(Ar-H,m),
5.21(1H,s)3.89(2H,s), 2.75(3H,m) |
6d |
694,756,1238,1316,1496,1543, 1595,1670,3052 |
7.48-7.51(Ar-H,m),4.02(2H,s),4.31(2H,s), 2.75(3H,s,Ar-CH3),5.34(1H,s) |
6e |
683,771,888,1286, 1569,1652, 1713, 3045 |
7.33-7.36(ArH,m),4.05(2H,s), 4.28(2H,s),5.52(1H,s) |
6f |
648,700,748,813,1257,1458, 1515,1682,1726,3056 |
7.35-7.54(Ar-H,m),4.25(2H,s),5.23(1H,s) |
After calculating log dose of each compound corrected factor for 0% and 100% deaths have been calculated as 5% and 95% respectively using formulae.
Corrected factor for 0% deaths = 100(0.25/n)
Corrected factor for 100% deaths = 100(1-0.25/n)
Where n= number of animals in each group
After each value of corrected percent probit, probit percentage has been determined
From probit table, Log dose values of each compound was observed and noted in
Table. 3 as LD50.
Analgesic Study
For analgesic studies animals were divided into three groups.
Control group: It consisted of 6 animals treated with same volume of Vehicle (DMSO solvent) intraperitonially prior to induction to heat application.
(b) Morphine Treated group: It consisted of 6 animals treated with 5mg/kg o body weight of morphine intraperitonially 30 minutes prior to heat application.
(C) Sample Treated group: It consisted of 6 animals per group treated with different doses of each of the thiazolidinones intraperitonially 30 minutes prior to seizure induction. Three doses of each of thiazolidinones proposed were administered to each group of mice.
Table 3: Toxicity Observations And Ld50 Values .
Compound | Dose mg. /kg. body weight | Log
dose |
No. of animals survived in group of 5 |
Death(%) |
Corrected% |
Probit value | LD50 mg./kg. body weight | |||
C16H12NO2SBr |
10.00 | 1.00 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 3.36 |
123.13 |
|||
50.00 | 1.70 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 3.36 | |||||
75.00 | 1.87 | 4 | 20 | 20 | 3.97 | |||||
100.00 | 2.00 | 3 | 40 | 40 | 4.75
|
|||||
C16H12NO2SCl |
10.00 | 1.00 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 3.36 |
112.35 |
|||
50.00 | 1.70 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 3.36 | |||||
75.00 | 1.87 | 3 | 40 | 40 | 4.75 | |||||
100.00 | 2.00 | 3 | 40 | 40 | 4.75
|
|||||
C17H15NO2S |
10.00 | 1.00 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 3.36 |
97.46 |
|||
50.00 | 1.70 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 3.36 | |||||
75.00 | 1.87 | 4 | 20 | 20 | 3.97 | |||||
100.00 | 2.00 | 2 | 60 | 60 | 5.25
|
Analgesic studies were conducted on three thiazolidinones, phenyl-2-keto-3-(4-chloroaryl)-1-, phenyl-2-keto-3-(4-bromoaryl)-1-, phenyl-2-keto-3-aryl-1-thiazolidin-4-one as typical examples using Hot Plate Method23. Animals were individually placed on hot plate maintained at constant temperature (550C) and the reaction of animals, such as paw licking or jump response was taken as end point. Normally animals showed response in 6-10 seconds. A cut off period of 15 seconds was observed to avoid damage to the paws. All the three thiazolidinones selected for pharmacological studies were tested for their toxicity (Table 3). Observations on analgesic activity and the statistical data of three thiazolidinones tested are noted in Table 4.
Table 4: Statistical Data Of Analgesic Study.
Compound | Gp. of mice | Average of reaction time in (seconds) | Standard deviation | ||||
after 30 minutes | after 60 minutes | after 90 minutes | after 30 minutes | after 60 minutes | after 90 minutes | ||
CONTROL |
–
|
2.82 | 4.24 | 9.46 | 1.08 | 0.98 | 1.19 |
Morphine | –
|
5.05 | 4.78 | 5.83 | 2.24 | 3.14 | 3.36 |
C16H12NO2SBr |
A | 3.88 | 3.61 | 4.05 | 2.08 | 2.48 | 2.57 |
B | 2.43 | 3.85 | 3.36 | 2.78 | 2.83 | 3.15 | |
C
|
2.84 | 3.52 | 3.19 | 2.84 | 3.21 | 3.16 | |
C16H12NO2SCl |
A | 3.52 | 4.49 | 3.97 | 1.02 | 3.24 | 4.01 |
B | 3.49 | 3.83 | 4.49 | 1.98 | 2.35 | 2.04 | |
C
|
3.96 | 4.87 | 5.07 | 2.15 | 3.24 | 3.45 | |
C17H15NO2S |
A | 6.22 | 2.11 | 3.99 | 3.56 | 3.24 | 1.58 |
B | 4.16 | 4.68 | 2.15 | 1.08 | 3.64 | 3.84 | |
C
|
3.25 | 4.47 | 4.94 | 1.87 | 2.04 | 2.34 |
Results and Discussion
All the tested compounds have shown some analgesic activity. The compounds phenyl-2-keto-3-(4-chloroaryl)-1-, phenyl-2-keto-3-(4-bromoaryl)-1-, showed moderate analgesic activity while phenyl-2-keto-3-aryl-1-thiazolidin-4-one showed feeble activity. Therefore from the results it is evident that compounds having electronegative groups are responsible for analgesic activity.
Acknowledgement
We are grateful to Mrs. Usha Gupta and the staff of Pharmacology department of Maulana Azad Medical College, staff of I.A.R.I.New Delhi, staff of IIT Roorke for their immense support.
References
- Sun Q., Tafesse L., Limberis J. T. and Islam K., J. Comb. Chem. & High throughput Screening, 6,481(2003).
- Lakhan R. and Singh R. L., J.Agri. Food Chem. 39,580(1991).
- Goel B., Ram T., Tyagi R., Bansal E., Kumar A., Mukherjee D. and Sinha J. N., Euro. J. Med. Chem., 34, 265(1999).
- Taddei A., Folli C., Moran O. Z., Fanen P., Verkmen A. S. and Galietta,L.T.V. FEBS Letters, 52,558(2004).
- Upadhyay R. K., Agarwal N. and Gupta N., J. Ind. Chem. Soc., 70,537(1993).
- Bonde C. G. and Gaikwad N. J., J. Bio.Med.Chem., 12, 2151(2004).
- Tenorio R. P., Carvalho C. S., Pessanha C. S., Lima J. G., Faria A. R., Alves A. J., Melo E. J. T. and Goes A. J. S., J. Bio. & Med. Chem. Letters. 15, 2575(2005).
- Kucukguzel G. , Oruc E. E., Rollas S., Ahin F. and Qzbet A., European. J Med. Chem., 37, 197 (2002).
- Vigorta M. G., Ottana R., Monforte F., Maccari R., Trovato A., Monforte M. T. and Taviano M. F., Bio. & Med. Chem.Letters (Short Communication), 11, 2791(2001).
- Khamees H. A. A., Boyomi S. M., Kandil H. A. and Tahir K. E. H. E., Euro. J. Med. Chem. 25,103(1990).
- Ralkan A., Goren Z., Urgun H., Calts U., Cakar A.N., Atilla P. and Uzbay T.,Arzneim-Forsch/Drug Res. 6,462(2002).
- Rao A., Balzarini J., Carbone A., Chimirri A., Declereq A., Monforte A. M., Monforte P. , Pannecouque C., and Zappala M., Antiviral Research, 63, 79(2004).
- Gargi, “Ph.D. Thesis”, Meerut University, Meerut, (2000).
- Ravi Kumar P., Shanta Yadav M. and Srinivas Rao T., E-J. Chem. 3(10), 44(2006).
- Mehta K. J., Chawala A. C. and. Parikh A. R., J. Ind.Chem. Soc. 56,173(1979).
- Desai N. C., Astik N. C. and Thakar, J. Ind. Chem. Soc., 59,711(1982).
- Kamdar G. C., Bhatt D. J. and Parikh A. R., Acta. Cienc.Indica (sen.) Chem. 8,134(1982
- )Niyogi B. G. and Ghosh D., J. Indian Chem. Soc., 81,22 (2004).
- Mehta K. J., Chawala A.C. and Parikh A R., J. Indian Chem. Soc., 56(2),173(1979).
- Kamdar G. C., Bhatt D. J. and Parikh A. R., Acta. Cienc. Iindica (sen) Chem. 8(3), 134(1982).
- Vogel G. H. and Vogel W. H., “Drug Discovery and Evaluation Pharmacological Assaya”, Springer Publication. pp.487 (1997).
- Vogel G H and Vogel W H, “Drug Discovery and Evaluation Pharmacological Assaya”, Springer Publication, pp. 696, (1997).
- Lakhan R., Agric. Bio. Chem. 46, 557 (1982).