Manuscript accepted on :26-06-2025
Published online on: 30-06-2025
Plagiarism Check: Yes
Reviewed by: Dr. Arif Ansori
Second Review by: Dr. Shoheb Shaikh
Final Approval by: Dr. Patorn Piromchai
Views:
PDF Downloads:
Mohamed Nabil Ibrahim*
Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Jouf University, Qurayat, KSA
Corresponding Author E-mail:Mnmicro2010@gmail.com
DOI : https://dx.doi.org/10.13005/bpj/3210
Abstract
The global health crisis triggered by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has illuminated the intricate interplay among viral infections, psychological well-being, and digital engagement. This commentary synthesizes clinical insights, public health data, and interdisciplinary frameworks to examine how these domains converge to influence post-viral recovery. Persistent neuropsychiatric symptoms following viral infections, compounded by excessive digital engagement, form a cyclical interaction that exacerbates mental health challenges. Vulnerable populations, including adolescents and older adults, face heightened risks due to unique psychological and behavioral patterns. Addressing this triad requires integrated mental health interventions, digital literacy initiatives, and cross-sector collaborations. Further empirical studies are needed to establish causal pathways and develop targeted interventions for this triadic burden. This holistic perspective is critical for advancing post-pandemic health strategies.
Keywords
Digital behavior; Digital overuse; Mental health; Neuropsychiatric sequelae; SARS-CoV-2; Viral infections
Download this article as:
| Copy the following to cite this article: Ibrahim M. N. Viral Infections, Psychological Stress, and Digital Overuse: A Critical Triad in Post-Pandemic Mental Health. Biomed Pharmacol J 2025;18(2). |
| Copy the following to cite this URL: Ibrahim M. N. Viral Infections, Psychological Stress, and Digital Overuse: A Critical Triad in Post-Pandemic Mental Health. Biomed Pharmacol J 2025;18(2). Available from: https://bit.ly/3GuEGkm |
Introduction
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has reshaped public health paradigms, extending beyond acute virological concerns to encompass enduring psychological and behavioral consequences. While the somatic effects of viral infections have been extensively documented, the intricate nexus among biological, psychological, and digital factors remains insufficiently explored. This paper posits that viral infections, psychological distress, and heightened digital engagement constitute an interconnected triad that significantly influences recovery trajectories in the post-pandemic landscape. This constellation aligns with the concept of a “syndemic” which refers to the synergistic interaction of two or more co-occurring epidemics or health conditions that exacerbate each other within a population. By synthesizing current literature and clinical observations, this commentary advocates for a multidisciplinary framework to address the overlapping domains of neuroinflammation, mental health, and digital behavior. When referencing the rise in global mental health burden post-COVID-19, studies from the World Health Organization and The Lancet Global Health highlight a significant increase in anxiety, depression, and related disorders, particularly among youth and vulnerable populations. 1,2
Materials and Methods
This conceptual commentary draws upon a narrative synthesis of peer-reviewed literature, clinical reports, and behavioral analyses published between 2020 and 2024. Databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were queried using combinations of keywords such as “SARS-CoV-2,” “neuropsychiatric sequelae,” “digital behavior,” and “post-acute COVID syndrome.” The selected sources were critically appraised to identify recurrent themes and interdependencies between viral pathophysiology, psychological outcomes, and digital media engagement. Clinical insights from multidisciplinary healthcare providers were also incorporated to contextualize the findings and support hypothesis generation.
Results
Three major thematic domains emerged:
Biological and Psychological Sequelae of Viral Infections
Viral infections, particularly SARS-CoV-2, provoke systemic inflammation characterized by elevated cytokine levels and compromised blood-brain barrier integrity. These pathophysiological changes are linked to persistent neuropsychiatric symptoms such as anxiety, depression, and cognitive deficits collectively known as post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC). SARS-CoV-2, along with other neurotropic viruses such as Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 (HSV-1) and Influenza A, can access and affect the central nervous system, leading to both direct and indirect neuroinflammatory consequences. This viral neurotropism is a critical pathway that contributes to long-term neuropsychiatric outcomes. Psychological distress is compounded by pandemic-associated social stressors including isolation, fear, and stigmatization, leading to a complex clinical presentation that necessitates integrative management approaches. When discussing long COVID, it is essential to distinguish between the persistent physical symptoms (e.g., fatigue, dyspnea) and the neuropsychiatric symptoms (e.g., anxiety, brain fog, depressive states) that often co-occur but may require different intervention strategies. 3,4,13
Digital Engagement as a Behavioral Modifier
The pandemic-induced shift to digital platforms for social, educational, and occupational continuity has introduced new psychological stressors. Prolonged screen exposure, particularly to emotionally charged or distressing content, has been associated with sleep disruption, cognitive overload, and increased anxiety.5 Maladaptive digital behaviors such as compulsive news consumption and social media overuse can intensify psychological symptoms and hinder recovery in post-viral patients. 6,7
A Cyclical Triad Framework
A self-reinforcing cycle was identified among viral neuropsychiatric effects, psychological distress, and maladaptive digital engagement. Individuals experiencing post-viral symptoms may resort to digital environments for relief, inadvertently exacerbating anxiety and cognitive dysfunction.8 The resulting sleep disturbances and emotional dysregulation impair recovery and perpetuate the triad. This model highlights the interconnectedness of these domains and the inadequacy of addressing them in isolation.
Discussion
This study underscores the complex and multifaceted interaction among viral infections, psychological distress, and digital engagement in shaping post-pandemic recovery. The conceptual framework presented here emphasizes the necessity for a multidisciplinary approach to address these intertwined factors and their collective impact on health outcomes.
Vulnerable populations, including adolescents, older adults, and individuals with pre-existing mental health disorders, are at greater risk due to their unique susceptibility to both psychological stressors and digital overdependence.9
Psychological stress is a central mediator in the trajectory of post-viral recovery. Rather than general terms like “stress-related disorders,” this section highlights specific conditions such as Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD), Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), which have shown increased incidence following viral infections and pandemic-related disruptions.4,10 These conditions are well-categorized in both the DSM-5 and ICD-11. Pandemic-related psychological burdens such as social disconnection, economic uncertainty, and health-related anxiety have compounded these disorders. Furthermore, the stress response interacts with neuroinflammatory pathways through the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, microglial activation, and cytokine dysregulation, establishing a biological link between psychological distress and neuropathology.6,10 This bidirectional relationship suggests that addressing mental health is not only critical for psychological recovery but also for mitigating biological sequelae. This observation resonates with previous literature demonstrating the compounding effects of stress, isolation, and disrupted routines during the COVID-19 pandemic.11,12 Furthermore, the digital dimension introduces additional complexity, as individuals may become stranded in a cyclical process where extensive digital engagement further impedes their recovery.13,14 Our framework advocates for tailored interventions that account for these vulnerabilities, integrate mental health screening into post-viral care, promote healthy digital habits, and collaborate with technology stakeholders to implement behavioral safeguards.15,16
While this study offers valuable perspectives, several limitations should be recognized. First, this is a conceptual commentary that draws upon a narrative synthesis of existing literature and clinical observations; it is not a systematic review or a large empirical study. Consequently, there may be a degree of publication bias and limited generalizability stemming from the available data. Second, many of the included studies are cross-sectional or observational in nature, which restricts our ability to make causal inferences. Third, there is a shortage of longitudinal data investigating the trajectory of post-viral recovery and the respective contributions of viral pathophysiology, psychological distress, and digital engagement over time. This limitation underscores the necessity for future prospective, longitudinal, and multidimensional research employing biomarker, psychometric, and behavioral data to better understand these relationships.16 Furthermore, most of the literature focuses on COVID-19, which may limit applicability to other viral infections. Future investigations should aim to include a broader range of viruses to enable a more comprehensive understanding of their respective impacts.
Lastly, this study predominantly draws upon data from high-income and well-connected societies. Thus, there is a limited understanding of how these mechanisms manifest in low-resource or vulnerable settings, where health care, mental health services, and digital infrastructures may be less accessible. Future research should account for these contextual factors to aid in developing culturally sensitive and equitable interventions.
Overall, this triadic framework highlights a novel and complex challenge for health care providers and policy makers alike. Collaborative, multidisciplinary, and data-informed strategies will be essential for mitigating the long-term effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and strengthening resiliency in health care systems. The incorporation of mental health care, digital literacy, and policy measures to guide healthy digital habits hold promise for optimizing patient outcomes in the post-pandemic era.
Conclusion
The COVID-19 pandemic has unveiled a critical interplay between biological, psychological, and digital dimensions of health. This triad constitutes a novel public health challenge that demands integrated, interdisciplinary solutions. By embedding mental health protocols within post-viral care, promoting balanced digital engagement, and fostering collaboration across sectors, healthcare systems can better facilitate holistic recovery. Future research should focus on longitudinal, data-driven models that incorporate biomarkers, psychometric evaluations, and real-time digital behavior tracking to inform precision care strategies. Embracing this unified framework is essential to foster resilience and adaptive mental health in the post-pandemic era.
Acknowledgement
The author expresses sincere gratitude to Jouf University, Saudi Arabia, for its support and encouragement throughout this work.
Funding Sources
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of Interest
The author(s) do not have any conflict of interest.
Data Availability Statement
This statement does not apply to this article.
Ethics Statement
This research did not involve human participants, animal subjects, or any material that requires ethical approval.
Informed Consent Statement
This study did not involve human participants, and therefore, informed consent was not required.
Clinical Trial Registration
This research does not involve any clinical trials
Permission to reproduce material from other sources
Not Applicable
Author Contributions
The sole author was responsible for the conceptualization, methodology, data collection, analysis, writing, and final approval of the manuscript.
References
- Nalbandian A, Sehgal K, Gupta A, et al. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Nat Med. 2021;27(4):601-615.
CrossRef - Boldrini M, Canoll PD, Klein RS. How COVID-19 affects the brain. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021;78(6):682-683.
CrossRef - Taquet M, Geddes JR, Husain M, Luciano S, Harrison PJ. 6-month neurological and psychiatric outcomes in 236,379 survivors of COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021;8(5):416-427.
CrossRef - Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, et al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet. 2020;395(10227):912-920.
CrossRef - Magklara K, Kyriakopoulos M. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on children and young people [English; Modern Greek (1453–)]. Psychiatriki. 2023;34(4):265-268.
CrossRef - Firth J, Torous J, López-Gil JF, et al. From “online brains” to “online lives”: understanding the individualized impacts of Internet use across psychological, cognitive and social dimensions. World Psychiatry. 2024;23(2):176-190.
CrossRef - Neill RD, Blair C, Best P, McGlinchey E, Armour C. Media consumption and mental health during COVID-19 lockdown: a UK cross-sectional study across England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. Z Gesundh Wiss. 2023;31(3):435-443.
CrossRef - Ji J, Zhang Y, Wu P, et al. Viral infections and mental health during the post-pandemic era. Front Psychiatry. 2024; 15:1420348.
CrossRef - Jost GM, Hang S, Shaikh U, Hostinar CE. Understanding adolescent stress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Curr Opin Psychol. 2023 Jun 21:101646.
CrossRef - Lin YC, Huang PC. Digital traps: How technology fuels nomophobia and insomnia in Taiwanese college students. Acta Psychologica. 2025; 252:104674.
CrossRef - Van Tilburg TG, Steinmetz S, Stolte E, van der Roest H, de Vries DH. Loneliness and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a study among Dutch older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021;76(7): e249-e255.
CrossRef - Luo D, Mei B, Wang P, Li X, Chen X, Wei G, Kuang F, Li B, Su S. Prevalence and risk factors for persistent symptoms after COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2024;30(3):328-335.
CrossRef - Marciano L, Ostroumova M, Schulz PJ, Camerini AL. Digital media use and adolescents’ mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Public Health. 2022; 9:793868.
CrossRef - Dunstan DA, Szabo B, Besseny A, et al. Digital mental health literacy: a narrative review. Front Digit Health. 2022; 4:827392.
- Torous J, Bucci S, Bell IH, et al. The growing field of digital psychiatry: current evidence and the future of apps, social media, chatbots, and virtual reality. World Psychiatry. 2021;20(3):318-335.
CrossRef - Ceban F, Ling S, Lui LMW, et al. Fatigue and cognitive impairment in post-COVID-19 syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Behav Immun. 2022; 101:93-135.
CrossRef
