<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>



<records>

  <record>
    <language>eng</language>
          <publisher>Oriental Scientific Publishing Company</publisher>
        <journalTitle>Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal</journalTitle>
          <issn>0974-6242</issn>
            <publicationDate>2022-09-29</publicationDate>
    
        <volume>15</volume>
        <issue>3</issue>

 
    <startPage>1271</startPage>
    <endPage>1275</endPage>

	 
      <doi>10.13005/bpj/2463</doi>
        <publisherRecordId>45577</publisherRecordId>
    <documentType>article</documentType>
    <title language="eng">Performance of Two Rapid Antigen Detection Tests for Detecting COVID-19 Compared to RT-PCR in Indonesia</title>

    <authors>
	 


      <author>
       <name>Anak Agung Gede Budhitresna</name>

 
		
	<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>
    

	 


      <author>
       <name>Dewa Putu Surawan</name>


		
	<affiliationId>3</affiliationId>

      </author>
    

	 


      <author>
       <name>Ratna Kartikadewi</name>

		
	<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>
    

	 


      <author>
       <name>Adi Harta Yoga</name>

		
	<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>
    


	 


      <author>
       <name>Putri Permana Lestari</name>

		
	<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>
    


	 


      <author>
       <name>Nyoman Trisna Sumadewi1</name>

		
	<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>
    
    </authors>
    
	    <affiliationsList>
	    
		
		<affiliationName affiliationId="1">Sri Masyeni</affiliationName>
    

		
		<affiliationName affiliationId="2">3</affiliationName>
    
		
		
		
		
	  </affiliationsList>






    <abstract language="eng">Antigen tests to screen coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is effective in symptomatic patients, leading to its wide usage in informing whether the person is COVID-19 positive or negative. Our current work had an objective to investigate the diagnostic performance of two antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) which are commonly used in Indonesia. A cross-sectional study was carried out to compare specificity, sensitivity, as well as expected predictive values of Anhui Ag-RDT and Lungene Ag-RDT by comparing the results with that obtained from real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. A total of 98samples were tested for both Ag-RDTs and RT-PCR. The median value of the patients age obtained to be 41.78 years old (interquartile range: 1 to 91 years old). The proportion between female and males was: 52.53% vs 47.47%. The sensitivities of Anhui Ag-RDT and Lungene Ag-RDT were 55.56% and 51.58%, where both Ag-RDTs had specificity of 100%. In conclusion, sensitivity values of Lungene Ag-RDT and Anhui Ag-RDT are similar, where both possess 100% specificity with zero false-positive results. Both of the investigated Ag-RDTs are useful since positive results are likely to be COVID-19 positive.</abstract>

    <fullTextUrl format="html">https://biomedpharmajournal.org/vol15no3/performance-of-two-rapid-antigen-detection-tests-for-detecting-covid-19-compared-to-rt-pcr-in-indonesia/</fullTextUrl>

<keywords language="eng">

      
        <keyword>COVID-19</keyword>
      

      
        <keyword> Ct value</keyword>
      

      
        <keyword> Diagnostic Performance</keyword>
      

      
        <keyword> Rapid Antigen Test</keyword>
      

      
        <keyword> RT-PCR</keyword>
      
</keywords>
  </record>
</records>