Valilshchykov M, Babalyan M, Ionov I, Babaieva O. Peculiarities of Reparative Osteogenesis in Fractures of the Proximal Femur in Patients with Concomitant Arterial Hypertension. Biomed Pharmacol J 2021;14(4).

---

Manuscript received on :16-06-2021
Manuscript accepted on :18-11-2021
Published online on: 04-12-2021

---

Plagiarism Check: Yes
Reviewed by: Dr. Ahmar Rauf
Second Review by: Dr. Khalil Alhadidy
Final Approval by: Dr. Fai Poon

---

How to Citeclose    |   Publication History close

 Views: (Visited 356 times, 1 visits today)    PDF Downloads: 256

Mykyta Valilshchykov^1*, Volodymyr Babalyan¹, Igor Ionov² and Olga Babaieva³

¹Department of Traumatology, Anesthesiology and Military Surgery, Kharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61176

²H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61168

³Department of Biochemistry, Forensic Toxicology and Pharmacy, Kharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61176

Corresponding Author E-mail: cndl@med.edu.ua

DOI : https://dx.doi.org/10.13005/bpj/2280

Abstract

Treatment of patients with fractures of the proximal femur is an important problem in modern traumatology. Hip fractures are more commonly associated with osteoporosis. Elderly and senile people make up a significant proportion of patients with fractures. Arterial hypertension (AH) in the elderly population is a disease with a high prevalence. When treating fractures of the proximal femur, it is necessary to take into account the features of reparative osteogenesis characteristics of patients with concomitant arterial hypertension. Medicines used to treat hypertension have a beneficial effect on bone tissue. Pharmacological correction of hypertension in these patients is essential to optimize fracture healing.

Keywords

Arterial Hypertension; Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEI); Fractures of the Proximal Femur

Introduction

Relevance

Treatment of patients with fractures of the proximal femur is an urgent problem of modern traumatology. These fractures result in significant morbidity and mortality, along with a large socioeconomic burden^1,2. As life expectancy and geriatric populations increase, the number of hip fractures worldwide to increase from 1.26 million in 1990 to 4.5 million by 2050³. Fractures of the proximal femur occur, as a rule, in young patients through high-energy trauma and in elderly patients as a result of low-energy osteoporotic disorders⁴. A significant part of these fractures are fractures of persons of the elderly and senile age.

The relationship between fractures and osteoporosis

Hip fractures are more likely to be associated with osteoporosis⁵. According to the World Health Organization, osteoporosis is a progressive systemic skeletal disease characterized by low bone mass and disruption of bone histoarchitecture with a subsequent increase in bone fragility and increased risk of fracture⁶. He is considered a “silent thief” who usually does not show up clinically until a fracture occurs. In the USA, osteoporosis is responsible for 1.3 million fractures, including 250000 hip fractures⁷. The prevalence of osteoporosis in Europe is 27.6 million, and one in three women and one in five men over the age of 50 suffer from osteoporotic fractures⁸. Patients with a lower bone mineral density (BMD) with hip fractures are more likely to fracture in the intertrochanteric region than the femoral neck⁹. Another study found no correlation between the type of fracture and the severity of osteoporosis¹⁰.

FRAX algorithm

Bone regeneration is a genetically programmed physiological process. However, about 10% of fractures do not heal normally¹¹. Therefore, the identification of risk factors that disrupt reparative osteogenesis is an important area of research. Algorithmized models are used to assess the risk of fracture based on special questionnaires. These models make it possible to predict the likelihood of fractures in men and women, taking into account the patient’s existing pathology, lifestyle, hereditary factors, history of fractures, etc. The FRAX (Fracture Risk Assessment Tool) algorithm is widely used to identify individuals at high risk of fractures. It was developed in the UK by a group of WHO experts led by Professor John Kanis and supported by various international organizations working on the problem of osteoporosis¹². Using this program can calculate the 10-year probability of a femoral neck fracture and other typical fractures (vertebral bodies, radius, and humerus) associated with osteoporosis in people aged 40 to 90 years. The value of the FRAX algorithm lies in the fact that bone densitometry (BMD of the femoral neck) can be used to determine the risk of fracture, or risk assessment can be performed without this indicator. However, the FRAX program is in its present form does not capture specific aspects of fracture history that are required to differ individuals at high risk from those at very high risk of fracture. The occurrence of a recent major fragility fracture, particularly of the spine or hip, indicates the need for prompt assessment and early intervention in such patients¹³.

Bone metabolic disorders

Bone regeneration restores bone tissue lost due to injuries, fractures, etc. Bone tissue is biologically very active and is constantly regenerated due to the balanced activity of bone-resorbing osteoclasts and bone-forming osteoblasts¹⁴. An imbalance in the functioning of these cells ultimately disrupts bone metabolism and leads to metabolic bone disease, most often to osteoporosis¹⁵. Based on bone metabolism, osteoporosis can be divided into two forms: osteoporosis with a low and high metabolism. The condition with low metabolism is characterized by a decrease in both bone-forming and bone-resorption activity. Conversely, a state with a high degree of turnover is characterized by increased activity of these processes. High-turnover osteoporosis is the most common form and occurs in postmenopausal women (called primary type I osteoporosis) or in patients with hyperparathyroidism¹⁶. Low-turnover osteoporosis occurs in the elderly (called age-related osteoporosis or primary type II osteoporosis) or after medication¹⁷. In elderly and senile patients against the background of osteoporosis, a violation of the mechanisms of remodeling is noted, which is expressed in the dominance of resorption over bone formation. Bone loss can also be associated with chronic medical conditions¹⁸. Regeneration research aims to understand the molecular  mechanisms that control regeneration, potentially providing attractive therapeutic targets for reactivating latent regenerative responses in adulthood or with aging¹⁹.

Bone structure

It is known that in morphofunctional terms, bone is one of the most complex and biologically active tissues. In many respects it is superior to other body systems and is the most massive, multifunctional, has a high metabolic and reparative activity. There are three main types of cells involved in the repair and regeneration of bones: osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and osteocytes. They interact via signaling molecules to regulate the differentiation of progenitor cells for skeletal modeling and remodeling²⁰.

Osteoblasts, derived from mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) of bone marrow, blood, and pericytes, are involved in bone formation and repair bone tissue removed by osteoclasts²¹. Biochemical and cytochemical studies have shown that osteoblasts contain a high content of RNA, which reflects their activity and constant biosynthetic function²².

Each osteoblast synthesizes and builds up a new bone matrix around it, mineralizes it, and turns into an osteocyte with processes in the tubular system that connects it to neighboring cells. Changes in the overall rate of tubular network formation increase osteoblast activity and bone formation²³.

Osteocytes are definitively differentiated cells immobilized in the bone matrix. Osteocytes are able to recognize old or damaged areas of bone and attract osteoclast precursors to sites that require restructuring²⁴.

Osteoclasts provide bone resorption. They are multinucleated cells formed by fusion and differentiation of monocytes / macrophages. Osteoclast formation and activity are regulated by macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) and receptor activator of nuclear factor–κB ligand (RANKL), produced by osteoblasts²⁵.

The most important component of bone tissue is the intercellular substance – a unique complex of organic and inorganic components that fill the space between cells. The extracellular matrix (ECM) is a complex dynamic bio environment with exactly regulated physical and biochemical properties²⁶. Moreover, its components depends on gender, age, and health status. The bone matrix consists of inorganic compounds (60%) and organic (40%). The composition of inorganic components mainly includes ECM, calcium-deficient apatite and trace elements. In contrast, organic the ECM is much more complex and consists of collagen type I (90%) and non-collagenous proteins (10%). Its synthesis is mainly performed by osteoblasts prior the mineralization process takes place²⁷. Non-collagen proteins can be divided into four groups: proteoglycans, proteins containing γ-carboxyglutamate, glycoproteins, and small integrin-binding ligands, N-linked glycoproteins (SIBLIN)²⁸.

Key signaling pathways that control bone resorption by osteoclasts and bone formation by osteoblasts are receptor activator of nuclear factor–κB (RANK)/RANKL/osteoprotegerin and canonical Wnt signaling. Cytokines, growth factors, and prostaglandins act as paracrine regulators of the cycle²⁹. Systemic neuroendocrine regulation is carried out by hormones and substances with hormone-like action. The most studied are parathyroid hormone, sex hormones, vitamin D metabolites, calcitonin, glucocorticoids, thyroid hormones^30,31.

Fracture healing process

The process of fracture healing often consists of three intersecting phases: inflammatory, reparative and remodeling, where each phase is a complex spatio-temporal distribution of cells, extracellular matrix, and bioactive signals. Fracture healing begins with trauma-induced hematoma and inflammation. Further, the short phase of endochondral formation of the external callus changes to a long phase of bone restructuring (remodeling)³².

In terms of tissue repair, bone is unique as it is able to heal without scarring³³. Bone fractures can heal in two forms: primary and secondary. Primary healing, or osteonal, occurs without intermediate or significant callus in the cartilage. When rigid fixation is achieved after an almost ideal reduction, the fracture heals due to the fact that osteoclasts create tunnels through the fracture site, which are subsequently filled with new³⁴. Secondary bone healing, the most common form of healing, occurs with slight interfragmentary movement at the fracture site. Interfragmentary movement causes the formation of soft callus and leads to the formation of secondary bone through intramembranous and endochondral ossification³⁵. This form of bone healing begins in the anabolic phase and overlaps with the catabolic phase when the callus is reduced. After these processes, the bone remodeling phase begins with the coordinated activity of osteoblasts and osteoclasts for several months. Callus tissue (soft bone marrow) is reabsorbed and lamellar bone is formed³⁶.

During the healing of fractures, it takes a long time from the moment of alteration to the formation of morphologically mature bone tissue filling the bone defect and restoration of bone function. In this case, the staging of the reparative process and the time duration of each stage depend on many conditions: the volume and mechanism of damage, functional disorders of individual regulatory systems and their combined dysfunctions, the degree of damage to transport systems, and the severity of edema and hypoxia.

With the accurate reduction and good fixation of bone fragments, preservation of the area of blood supply to the damaged bone in patients with an uncomplicated history, the reparative process has a favorable course and result. Advanced age, large bone defects, violation of the fracture blood supply zone, hereditary diseases, etc., reduce the body’s ability to osteogenesis³⁷.

In randomized trials of osteoporosis therapies with different mechanisms of action, the treatment altered the BMD of the hip, which significantly reduced fractures (44-67%)³⁸.

Two types of drugs are used to treat osteoporosis: those that slow bone resorption (estrogens, calcitonin, and bisphosphonates) and those that stimulate bone formation (teriparatide and strontium ranelate)³⁹.

Homeostatic Fracture Disorders

For the successful treatment of fractures, it is necessary not only to create optimal local conditions for osteogenesis but also to normalize homeostatic disorders, which significantly affect the metabolism of bone tissue.

An important link in the pathogenesis of osteoporotic disorders is a decrease in the blood supply to bone tissue, which causes an imbalance in the processes of remodeling and reparative regeneration of bone tissue⁴⁰. One of the reasons for the violation of the regional blood supply to the bone tissue is endothelial dysfunction, which, with the help of a negative effect on microcirculation, can lead to disturbances in the processes of osteogenesis and osteoreparation, thereby contributing to the occurrence of osteoporosis. The structure of the microvasculature of bone tissue differs significantly from the morphology of the vascular bed of other tissues. Bone microvessels have only endothelium and do not have connective tissue and muscle layers. Therefore, it is the endothelial cells that mediate the entire humoral regulation of exchange between osteocytes, osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and blood⁴¹.

Clinical evidence links low bone mass to cardiovascular disease and endothelial dysfunction^42,43, as well as the risk of mortality. Decreased total BMD of the femur is a preliminary predictor of overall mortality in the elderly⁴⁴.

Effect of pharmaceutical treatment of arterial hypertension on bone tissue repair

Arterial hypertension (AH) in the elderly population is a disease with a high prevalence (about 60%)⁴⁵. Hypertension can significantly reduce BMD⁴⁶. Disorders of bone structure and mechanics, in turn, can lead to a higher incidence of fractures⁴⁷. Drugs used to treat hypertension have a positive effect on bone tissue. Blood pressure-lowering drugs such as β-blockers and thiazides have been shown to reduce the risk of fractures⁴⁸.

In addition, the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) also acts on bone. RAS is a hormonal cascade thought to act as a major regulator of fluid balance in the body and thus blood pressure⁴⁹. RAS is an important target for antihypertensive drugs⁵⁰. Szekanecz et al. are noting the commonality of the pathogenesis of arterial hypertension and osteoporosis⁵¹. The activity of RAS, on the one hand, by affecting the local blood flow and blood supply to the bones, causes vasoconstriction of the microvasculature, and on the other hand, it directly affects the production of angiotensin II. Angiotensin II is a growth factor that directly stimulates osteoclast proliferation and increases endothelin-1 levels. The content of endothelin-1 upon activation of RAS increases not only in the endothelium but also in osteoclasts^52,53,54.

RAS activation causes high-turnover osteoporosis with accelerated bone tissue resorption. Also, angiotensin II, by reducing ionized calcium and increasing the level of parathyroid hormone, can regulate calcium metabolism⁵⁵. RAS components such as renin, the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) receptors, and angiotensin II are expressed in the local bone⁵³. The results of the study showed a significant increase in renin and angiotensinogen mRNA expression in the femur of aging mice⁵⁶.

It has been suggested that angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) and ACE inhibitors (ACEIs), which are widely used drugs that inhibit RAS, have beneficial effects on bone tissue and are associated with a reduced risk of hip fractures⁵⁴. Shown association of ACEIs with beneficial changes in bone mass, suggesting a possible negative effect of angiotensin II on bone⁵⁷. Another study reports an increase in BMD in patients treated with ACEIs while reducing the risk of fractures⁵⁸. There is also evidence of a positive effect of RAS blockers on the risk of femoral neck fracture⁵⁹. However, there is little evidence of an increased risk of hip fractures at the start of treatment with ACEIs in older people with hypertension⁶⁰, or studies showing that the use of RAS inhibitors is not associated with the long-term risk of composite fractures^61,62.

Because ARBs show effects similar to those of ACEIs, they are often used as an alternative in patients who cannot tolerate ACEIs. However, ACEIs and ARBs have different effects on angiotensin II, and therefore, their effects on the level and function of ACE may be different⁶¹. In a pilot study by Bayar A. et al., it was shown that an ACEI has a positive effect on fracture healing, while ARB losartan, does not show any positive effects⁶³.

Thus, when treating fractures of the proximal femur, it is important to take into account the features of reparative osteogenesis characteristic of patients with concomitant arterial hypertension. Pharmacological correction of hypertension in these patients is essential to optimize fracture healing.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that have no conflicts of interest.

Funding Source

This study was funded by the Ministry of Health of Ukraine from the state budget.

References

1. Kani K. K, Porrino J. A, Mulcahy H and Chew F.S. Fragility fractures of the proximal femur: review and update for radiologists. Radiol., 2019; 48(1): 29-45.
   CrossRef
2. Burgers P. T, Hoogendoorn M, Van Woensel E. A, Poolman R. W, Bhandari M, Patka P, Van Lieshout E. M and HEALTH Trial Investigators. Total medical costs of treating femoral neck fracture patients with hemi- or total hip arthroplasty: a cost analysis of a multicenter prospective study. Osteoporos Int., 2016; 27(6): 1999-2008.
   CrossRef
3. Veronese N and Maggi S. Epidemiology and social costs of hip fracture. Injury, 2018; 49(8): 1458-1460.
   CrossRef
4. Kim D, Honeycutt M and Riehl J. Hip fractures: current review of treatment and management, Current Orthopaedic Practice, 2019; 30(4): 385-394.
   CrossRef
5. Haentjens P, Magaziner J, Colón-Emeric C. S, Vanderschueren D, Milisen K, Velkeniers B and Boonen S. Meta-analysis: excess mortality after hip fracture among older women and men. Ann. Intern. Med., 2010; 152(6): 380-390.
   CrossRef
6. Consensus development conference: diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis. Am. J. Med., 1993; 94(6): 646-650.
   CrossRef
7. Nayak N. K, Khedkar C. C, Khedkar G. D and Khedkar C. D. Osteoporosis. In: Caballero B, Finglas P. M, Toldrá F, editors. Encyclopedia of Food and Health. Academic Press; Oxford, UK: 2016. pp. 181-185.
   CrossRef
8. Hernlund E, Svedbom A and Ivergård M. Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden: A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch. Osteoporos., 2013; 8:
   CrossRef
9. Bernstein D, Davis J, Fairbanks C, McWilliam-Ross K, Ring D and Sanchez H. Lower Bone Mineral Density is Associated with Intertrochanteric Hip Fracture. B. J. S., 2018; 6(6): 517-522.
10. Hayer P. S, Deane A. K, Agrawal A, Maheshwari R and Juyal A. A study on the correlation of pertrochanteric osteoporotic fracture severity with the severity of osteoporosis. J. Clin. Diagn. Res., 2016; 10(4): RC9-11.
    CrossRef
11. Einhorn T. A and Gerstenfeld L. C. Fracture healing: mechanisms and interventions. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol., 2015; 11: 45-54.
    CrossRef
12. Kanis J.A. FRAX and the assessment of the fracture probability in men and women from UK. Osteoporos. Int., 2008; 19: 385-397.
    CrossRef
13. Compston J. E and Drake M. T. Defining Very High Fracture Risk: Is FRAX Fit for Purpose? J. Bone Miner. Res., 2020; 35(8): 1399-1403.
    CrossRef
14. Schlickewei C. W, Kleinertz H, Thiesen D. M, Mader K, Priemel M, Frosch K. H and Keller J. Current and Future Concepts for the Treatment of Impaired Fracture Healing. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2019; 20(22): 5805.
    CrossRef
15. Szulc P, Bauer D. C and Eastell R. Biochemical markers of bone turnover in Osteoporosis. In Primer on the metabolic bone diseases and disorders of mineral metabolism. 8th edition. Ed. Rosen C. J. American Society of Bone and Mineral Research, Washington DC, USA: 2013. pp. 297-306.
    CrossRef
16. Rowe P, Koller A and Sharma S. Physiology, Bone Remodeling. [Updated 2020 Mar 29]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499863
17. Colangelo L, Biamonte F, Pepe J, Cipriani C and Minisola S. Understanding and managing secondary osteoporosis. Expert. Rev. Endocrinol. Metab., 2019; 14(2): 111-122.
    CrossRef
18. Pavlov B, Kumechko M. V, Litvinova O. B, Babenko N. M and Goncharova A. V. Bone regulatory mechanisms destruction in experimental chronic kidney disease. Fiziol. Zh., 2016; 62(3): 54-59.
    CrossRef
19. Iismaa S. E, Kaidonis X, Nicks A. M, Bogush N, Kikuchi K, Naqvi N, Harvey R. P, Husain A and Graham R. M. Comparative regenerative mechanisms across different mammalian tissues. N. P. J. Regen. Med., 2018; 3: 6.
    CrossRef
20. Hutchings G, Moncrieff L, Dompe C, Janowicz K, Sibiak R, Bryja A, Jankowski M, Mozdziak P, Bukowska D, Antosik P, Shibli J. A, Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska M, Bruska M, Kempisty B and Piotrowska-Kempisty H. Bone Regeneration, Reconstruction and Use of Osteogenic Cells; from Basic Knowledge, Animal Models to Clinical Trials. J. Clin. Med., 2020; 9(1): 139.
    CrossRef
21. Sims N. A and Civitelli R. Cell-cell signaling: broadening our view of the basic multicellular unit. Calcif. Tissue Int., 2014; 94: 2-3.
    CrossRef
22. Khismatullina Z. Factors affecting bone metabolism and leading to diseases of the skeletal system. KNITU Bulletin, 2015; 18(22): 165-172 (in Russian).
23. Dole S, Mazur C. M, Acevedo C, Lopez J. P, Monteiro D. A, Fowler T. W, Gludovatz B, Walsh F, Regan J. N, Messina S, Evans D. S, Lang T. F, Zhang B, Ritchie R. O, Mohammad K. S and Alliston T. Osteocyte-Intrinsic TGF-β Signaling Regulates Bone Quality through Perilacunar/Canalicular Remodeling. Cell Rep., 2017; 21(9): 2585-2596.
    CrossRef
24. Lerner U. H, Kindstedt E and Lundberg P. The critical interplay between bone resorbing and bone forming cells. J. Clin. Periodontol., 2019; 46(21): 33-51.
    CrossRef
25. Lin X, Xiao Y, Chen Z, Ma J, Qiu W, Zhang K, Xu F, Dang K and Qian A. Microtubule actin crosslinking factor 1 (MACF1) knockdown inhibits RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis via Akt/GSK3β/NFATc1 signalling pathway. Mol. Cell Endocrinol., 2019; 494: 110494.
    CrossRef
26. Lin X, Patil S, Gao Y. G and Qian A. The Bone Extracellular Matrix in Bone Formation and Regeneration. Front. Pharmacol., 2020; 11: 757.
    CrossRef
27. Mansour A, Mezour M. A, Badran Z and Tamimi F. * Extracellular Matrices for Bone Regeneration: A Literature Review. Tissue Eng. Part A, 2017; 23(23-24): 1436-1451.
    CrossRef
28. Paiva K. B. S and Granjeiro J. M. Matrix Metalloproteinases in Bone Resorption, Remodeling, and Repair. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci., 2017; 148: 203-303.
    CrossRef
29. Kenkre J. S and Bassett J. The bone remodelling cycle. Ann. Clin. Biochem., 2018; 55(3): 308-327.
    CrossRef
30. Basurto-Acevedo L, Saucedo-García R, Vázquez-Martínez A, Cruz-García M, Valle-Hernández M. M, Rosales-Cruz E and Sánchez-Arenas R. Relationship between bone remodeling and metabolism in the elderly. Med. Inst. Mex. Seguro Soc., 2018; 56(1): S6-S11 (in Spanish).
31. Pavlov S. B, Babenko N. M, Kumetchko M. V and Litvinova, O. B. Violations of cell-molecular mechanisms of bone remodeling under influence of glucocorticoids. Mech. Biosyst., 2018; 9(1): 124-129.
    CrossRef
32. Ghiasi M. S, Chen J, Vaziri A, Rodriguez E. K and Nazarian A. Bone fracture healing in mechanobiological modeling: A review of principles and methods. Bone Rep., 2017; 6: 87-100.
    CrossRef
33. Baht G. S, Vi L and Alman B. A. The Role of the Immune Cells in Fracture Healing. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep., 2018; 16: 138-145.
    CrossRef
34. Hak D. J, Fitzpatrick D, Bishop J. A, Marsh J. L, Tilp S, Schnettler R, Simpson H and Alt V. Delayed union and nonunions: epidemiology, clinical issues, and financial aspects. Injury, 2014; 45(2): S3-7.
    CrossRef
35. Claes L, Recknagel S and Ignatius A. Fracture healing under healthy and inflammatory conditions. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol., 2012; 8(3): 133-143.
    CrossRef
36. Schindeler A, McDonald M. M, Bokko P and Little D. G. Bone remodeling during fracture repair: the cellular picture. Cell Dev. Biol., 2008; 19(5): 459-466.
    CrossRef
37. Kostenuik P and Mirza M. Fracture healing physiology and the quest for therapies for delayed healing and nonunion. J. Orthop. Res., 2017; 35(2): 213-223.
    CrossRef
38. Black M, Bauer D. C, Vittinghoff E, Lui L. Y, Grauer A, Marin F, Khosla S, de Papp A, Mitlak B, Cauley J. A, McCulloch C. E, Eastell R and Bouxsein M. L. Treatment-related changes in bone mineral density as a surrogate biomarker for fracture risk reduction: meta-regression analyses of individual patient data from multiple randomised controlled trials. The lancet. Diabetes & Endocrinology, 2020; 8(8): 672-682.
    CrossRef
39. Chitra V and Sharon S. E. Diagnosis, Screening and Treatment of Osteoporosis – A Review. Biomed. Pharmacol. J., 2021; 14(2).
    CrossRef
40. Tomlinson E and Silva M. J. Skeletal Blood Flow in Bone Repair and Maintenance. Bone Res., 2013; 1(4): 311-322.
    CrossRef
41. Faitelson А. V. Pharmacological Correction of Experimental Osteoporosis of Combination Resveratrol with Enalapril. Belgorod State University Scientific Medicine. Pharmacy., 2012; 4(123): 239-245 (in Russian).
42. Campos-Staffico M, Freitas W. M, Carvalho L. S. F, Coelho-Filho O. R, Nadruz W. Jr, Oliveira R. B, Sposito A. C and Brasilia Study on Healthy Aging and Brasilia Heart Study. Lower bone mass is associated with subclinical atherosclerosis, endothelial dysfunction and carotid thickness in the very elderly. Atherosclerosis, 2020; 292: 70-74.
    CrossRef
43. Prasad M, Reriani M, Khosla S, Gössl M, Lennon R, Gulati R, Prasad A., Lerman L. O and Lerman A. Coronary microvascular endothelial dysfunction is an independent predictor of development of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Vasc. Health Risk Manag., 2014; 10: 5338.
44. Domiciano D. S, Machado L. G, Lopes J. B, Figueiredo C. P, Caparbo V. F, Oliveira R. M, Scazufca M, McClung M. R and Pereira R. M. Bone Mineral Density and Parathyroid Hormone as Independent Risk Factors for Mortality in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Population-Based Prospective Cohort Study in Brazil. The São Paulo Ageing & Health (SPAH) Study. J. Bone Miner. Res., 2016; 31(6): 1146-1157.
    CrossRef
45. Pinto I. C and Martins D. Prevalence and risk factors of arterial hypertension: A literature review. J. Cardiovasc. Med. Ther., 2017; 1(2): 1-7.
46. Ye Z, Lu H and Liu P. Association between essential hypertension and bone mineral density: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget., 2017; 8(40): 68916-68927.
    CrossRef
47. Tiyasatkulkovit W, Promruk W, Rojviriya C, Pakawanit P, Chaimongkolnukul K, Kengkoom K, Teerapornpuntakit J, Panupinthu N and Charoenphandhu N. Impairment of bone microstructure and upregulation of osteoclastogenic markers in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Sci. Rep., 2019; 9: 12293.
    CrossRef
48. Puttnam R, Davis B. R, Pressel S. L, Whelton P. K, Cushman W. C, Louis G. T, Margolis K. L, Oparil S, Williamson J, Ghosh A, Einhorn P. T, Barzilay J. I and Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) Collaborative Research Group. Association of 3 Different Antihypertensive Medications With Hip and Pelvic Fracture Risk in Older Adults: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. J. A. M. A. Intern. Med., 2017; 177(1): 67-76.
    CrossRef
49. Namazi S, Ardeshir-Rouhani-Fard S and Abedtash H. The effect of renin angiotensin system on tamoxifen resistance. Med. Hypotheses, 2011; 77: 152-
    CrossRef
50. Arendse L. B, Danser A. H. J, Poglitsch M, Touyz R. M, Burnett J. C. Jr, Llorens-Cortes C, Ehlers M. R and Sturrock E. D. Novel Therapeutic Approaches Targeting the Renin-Angiotensin System and Associated Peptides in Hypertension and Heart Failure. Pharmacol. Rev., 2019; 71(4): 539-570.
    CrossRef
51. Szekanecz Z, Raterman H. G, Pethő Z and Lems W. F. Common mechanisms and holistic care in atherosclerosis and osteoporosis. Arthritis Res. Ther., 2019; 21(1): 15.
    CrossRef
52. Gebru Y, Diao T. Y, Pan H, Mukwaya E and Zhang Y. Potential of RAS inhibition to improve metabolic bone disorders. Biomed. Res. Int., 2013; 2013: 932691.
    CrossRef
53. Asaba Y, Ito M and Fumoto T. Activation of renin-angiotensin system induces osteoporosis independently of hypertension. J. Bone Miner. Res., 2009; 24: 241-
    CrossRef
54. Momenzadeh M, Khosravian M and Lakkakula B. V. K. S. Potential of renin-angiotensin system inhibition to improve metabolic bone disorders. J. Nephropharmacol., 2021; 10(2): e16.
    CrossRef
55. Kaneko K, Ito M, Fumoto T, Fukuhara R. Ishida J, Fukamizu A and Ikeda K. Physiological function of the angiotensin AT1a receptor in bone remodeling. J. Bone Miner. Res., 2011; 26: 2959-2966.
    CrossRef
56. Gu S. S, Zhang Y and Li X. L. Involvement of the skeletal renin-angiotensin system in age-related osteoporosis of ageing mice. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem., 2012; 76: 1367-
    CrossRef
57. Solomon D. H, Ruppert K, Zhao Z, Lian Y. J, Kuo I. H, Greendale G. A and Finkelstein J. S. Bone mineral density changes among women initiating blood pressure lowering drugs: a SWAN cohort study. Osteoporos. Int., 2016; 27(3): 1181-1189.
    CrossRef
58. Nakagami H, Osako M. K and Morishita R. Potential effect of angiotensin II receptor blockade in adipose tissue and bone. Curr. Pharm. Des., 2013; 19: 3049-3053.
    CrossRef
59. Ruths S, Bakken M. S, Ranhoff A. H, Hunskaar S, Engesaeter L. B and Engeland A. Risk of hip fracture among older people using antihypertensive drugs: a nationwide cohort study. BMC Geriatr., 2015; 15: 153.
    CrossRef
60. Butt D. A, Mamdani M, Austin P. C, Tu K, Gomes T and Glazier R. H. The risk of hip fracture after initiating antihypertensive drugs in the elderly. Arch. Intern. Med., 2012; 172(22): 1739-1744.
    CrossRef
61. Kunutsor S. K, Blom A. W, Whitehouse M. R, Kehoe P. G and Laukkanen J. A. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and risk of fractures: a prospective cohort study and metaanalysis of published observational cohort studies. Eur. J. Epidemiol., 2017; 32: 947-959.
    CrossRef
62. Choi H. J, Park C, Lee Y. K, Ha Y. C, Jang S and Shin C. S. Risk of fractures in subjects with antihypertensive medications: a nationwide claim study. Int. J. Cardiol., 2015; 184: 62-67.
    CrossRef
63. Bayar A, Turan A, Gulle K, Akpolat M, Turan I and Turhan E. The effects of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril and the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker Losartan on fracture healing in rats. Clin. Invest. Med., 2015; 38(4): E164-172.
    CrossRef