Hassan M. F, Sengupta P, Dutta S. Assisted Reproductive Technologiesfor Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome. Biomed Pharmacol J 2021;14(3).
Manuscript received on :27-04-2021
Manuscript accepted on :25-08-2021
Published online on: 15-09-2021
Plagiarism Check: Yes
Reviewed by: Dr. Abdelmonem Hegazy
Second Review by: Dr. Hozefa Ujjainwala
Final Approval by: Dr Anton R Kiselev

How to Cite    |   Publication History
Views  Views: 
Visited 821 times, 1 visit(s) today
 
Downloads  PDF Downloads: 
416

Muhjah Falah Hassan1*, Pallav Sengupta2 and Sulagna Dutta3

1Department Of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Kerbala, College of Medicine, Iraq

2Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Bioscience and Nursing, MAHSA University, Malaysia

3Department of Oral Biology and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, MAHSA University, Malaysia

Corresponding Author E-mail: doctor89muhjah@yahoo.com

DOI : https://dx.doi.org/10.13005/bpj/2231

Abstract

Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is the most common cause of anovulatory fertility problems in women of reproductive age, with a prevalence as high as 40% to 75%. There are different treatment modalities for increasing the chance of pregnancy in PCOS patients. Since most of the PCOS patients suffer from ovulatory problems, therapeutic efforts are focused mainly towards restoring normal ovulation. However, even after pharmacological interventions to ameliorate ovulatory irregularities, women with polycystic ovary are still at high risk of fetal loss. Thus, assisted reproductive techniques (ARTs) have become popular approaches which significantly increase the chances of successful pregnancy in these women, bypassing the conditions of PCOS. The present mini-review ‘pinpoints’ on the suitability of ARTs for PCOS patients who fail to ovulate following the conventional infertility treatment. The article also briefly explains how intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), the most effectiveART, correlates with better biological parameters, fertilization rate and better quality of embryos in PCOS women.

Keywords

Assisted Reproductive Techniques; Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection; Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome

Download this article as: 
Copy the following to cite this article:

Hassan M. F, Sengupta P, Dutta S. Assisted Reproductive Technologiesfor Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome. Biomed Pharmacol J 2021;14(3).

Copy the following to cite this URL:

Hassan M. F, Sengupta P, Dutta S. Assisted Reproductive Technologiesfor Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome. Biomed Pharmacol J 2021;14(3). Available from: https://bit.ly/3loDssp

Introduction

Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is the most common gynecological health issue and heterogenous endocrinopathy among reproductive-aged women 1, 2. The first attempt in defining PCOS was made by the National Institute of Health (NIH) as a clinical disorder characterized by clinical and/or biochemical hyperandrogenism associated with a menstrual disorder, and that to make an accurate diagnosis, other conditions such as Cushing syndrome, congenital adrenal hyperplasia and hyperprolactinemia should be excluded 3. In 2003, Rotterdam criteria defined PCOS as a condition in which the affected females should show at least two of three symptoms of(a) clinical or biochemical hyperandrogenism (oligomenorrhoea: cycles>35days), (b) anovulation (cycles >180 days) and (c) polycystic ovarian morphology (one or both ovaries having volume of atleast 10cm3 and/or follicle of 2-9 mm size and one or both the ovaries bearing ≥12 follicles)4.PCOS is the most common cause of anovulatory subfertility or infertility in reproductive-aged women 5 with theprevalence of infertility ranging from 40% to 75% 6. Women with PCOS usually fail to get pregnant spontaneously 7. Numerous treatment modalities have beenintroduced to increase the chances of pregnancy 7,  including, lifestyle modifications, pharmacological therapies, surgical interventions and assisted reproduction1, 8, 9.Followed by the treatments with ovulation-inducing agents10 or insulin sensitizing drugs11 or gonadotrophin treatment12 or laparoscopic ovarian drilling13, assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs)are one of the most suitable treatment options in PCOS women with variable success rates 14.

Assisted reproduction in PCOS

ARTs include different acronyms with a similar aims, i.e.facilitating sperms and eggs to interact in a close proximityto each other to enhance the probability of fertilization and achieve a successful conception15. ARTs like,intrauterine insemination (IUI), in vitrofertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) must be proceeded by multiple sequential steps to obtain best results16. Pharmacological stimulation of both ovaries to produce adequate number of eggs and laboratory preparation ofsemen sample to yield progressively motile, morphologically normal sperms are prerequisites of successful ART procedure. Eachprocedure isperformed for specific indications, like ICSI which is usually used for cases with severe impairment of semen quality17, 18.IUI, where female uterus is generally inseminated with the male sperms, is carried out in mild-to-moderate impairment in semen quality and failure of ejaculation e.g. retrograde or an ejaculation for males, cervical hostility, mild-moderate endometriosis for females and presence of anti-sperm antibodies (ASAs) and unexplained infertility for both19, 20. The success rate is for IUI is 15% to20%21.In vitro fertilization (IVF) is the procedure by which both sperms and eggs have been cultured in the laboratory to get fertilized eggs. Its main indications are female tubal obstruction and severe endometriosis in addition to the indications of IUI22.ICSI was introduced to ARTs in 1990 as a best ART option for severe male factor infertility treatment[23]. Since then, it has become the gold standard fertility treatment, and now-a-days it is generally recommended to a significant number of subfertile couples who are candidate for ARTs. This is due to the advantage that only single motile, morphologically normal sperm was needed to fertilize each oocyte23. The success rate for ICSI is about 25% to 30%. ARTs are not free from complications. The most significant indications are severeovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and multiple pregnancy (25% twins and 1% triplets)24. To a lesser extent are viral disease transmission (infection with human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B and C viruses), bleeding, severe pelvic infection, ectopic pregnancy and failure to get a pregnancy24-26.

As mentioned earlier, various treatment strategies are available to subfertile women with PCOS, but the optimal infertility treatment is still a controversy.As the majority of the patients suffer from ovulatory problems, efforts are predominantly centered towards restoring normal ovulation.In patients with insulin resistance (IR), ovulation rate can be improved by pharmacologic agents to increase insulin sensitivity[14].Even after bypassing ovulatory dysfunctions by pharmacological interventions, women with polycystic ovary still remain at higherrisk of fetal loss of about three-folds. This indicates that additional factors in the etiology might be implicated 27. ARTs are the suitable treatment modality for PCOS patients who fail to ovulate following the conventional infertility treatment due to poor or no response or those who show a resistance to the conventional treatment28.  In addition, it may be offered tocouples with co-existingfactors, such as severe male factor infertility, female tubal obstructions and endometriosis which necessitate ICSI29. It had been believed that the oocytes retrieved from polycystic ovary had an abnormality in the structure of  zona  pellucida (ZP) which leads to decrease fertilization rate in those patients and ICSI can overcome this problem by artificial injection of the sperm in to the oocyte and may increase the fertilization rate in PCOS women30. ICSI also can increase the chance of conception and successful pregnancy by choosing top quality embryos from all resulted embryos to be transferred to the uterus31. With IVF or ICSI, the number of transferred embryos can be determined, and thus multiple pregnancy can, therefore possibly, be reduced25. So, ICSI, as an ART, may correlate with better biological parameters, such as, fertilization rate and better embryo quality in PCOS women32. OHSS is a potential complication of ARTs in PCOS patients due to an excessive response to gonadotropins during controlled ovarian hyper-stimulation which necessitates cancelling the cycle and freezes all embryos33. Different stimulation protocols have been offered for PCOS patients undergoing ARTs, which are mainly the GnRH agonist and antagonist protocols. There is no clear evidence for the advantage of one over the other. The GnRH agonist was initially considered to be the protocol of choice in PCOS women. Due to increased risk of mid-cycle gonadotrophin flares, multiple pregnancies and OHSS, its usage has been restricted to certain situations34. GnRH antagonist has been shown to have an advantage over the former protocolin form of quicker onset of action, short duration of treatment, lesser total dose of gonadotropins required, lower cost, higher tolerance, lower incidence of LH surge, lower incidence of OHSS and being more patient friendly35. Recent information obtained from systematic review and meta-analysis studies suggest that there is no significant difference in fertilization rate and pregnancy outcome between the two GnRH analogues: agonist versus antagonist in PCOS and normal women36. However, there is report thatshowed higher clinical pregnancy was attained viaultra-long agonist therapy instead of long agonist protocol37. The aim of every IVF or ICSI program is to achieve multi-follicular development and collection of several appropriately matured oocytes without causing OHSS and with a comparable pregnancy rate. This is especially important in women with PCOS as they usually exhibit greater sensitivity to exogenous gonadotropin stimulation than women with normal ovaries 38, 39.

Conclusion

Assisted reproduction, predominantlyICSI, can be considered as a good option to overcome the biological key events within polycystic ovary, increase the chance of oocyte fertilization, choosing best quality embryos to be transferred to the uterus and ultimately increase the chance of pregnancy.

References

  1. Bhattacharya K, Sengupta P, Dutta S, Chaudhuri P, Mukhopadhyay LD, Syamal AK. Waist-to-height ratio and BMI as predictive markers for insulin resistance in women with PCOS in Kolkata, India. Endocrine 2021:1-10.
    CrossRef
  2. Escobar-Morreale HF. Polycystic ovary syndrome: definition, aetiology, diagnosis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2018;14(5):270.
    CrossRef
  3. Carmina E. Diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome: from NIH criteria to ESHRE-ASRM guidelines. Minerva Ginecol 2004;56(1):1-6.
  4. Chen X, Yang D, Mo Y, Li L, Chen Y, Huang Y. Prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome in unselected women from southern China. European J Obs Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008;139(1):59-64.
    CrossRef
  5. Adam H. Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Management–Diagnosis and Treatment. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2014:201-236.
  6. Farsad K. Essentials of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Yale J Biol Med 1998;71(5):410.
  7. Katulski K, Czyzyk A, Podfigurna-Stopa A, Genazzani AR, Meczekalski B. Pregnancy complications in polycystic ovary syndrome patients. Gynecol Endocrinol 2015;31(2):87-91.
    CrossRef
  8. Arain F, Arif N, Halepota H. Frequency and outcome of treatment in polycystic ovaries related infertility. Pakistan JMed Sci 2015;31(3):694.
    CrossRef
  9. Agarwal A, Sengupta P, Durairajanayagam D. Role of L-carnitine in female infertility. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2018;16(1):1-18.
    CrossRef
  10. Balen AH. Ovulation induction in the management of anovulatory polycystic ovary syndrome. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2013;373(1-2):77-82.
    CrossRef
  11. Hu L, Shen H, Wu Q, Tian L, Hu M. Treatment of polycystic ovarian syndrome with insulin resistance by insulin-sensitizer. Clin Exp Obs Gynecol 2014;41(3):288-292.
  12. Saha L, Kaur S, Saha PK. Pharmacotherapy of polycystic ovary syndrome–an update. Fundament Clin Pharmacol 2012;26(1):54-62.
    CrossRef
  13. Lebbi I, Ben Temime R, Fadhlaoui A, Feki A. Ovarian drilling in PCOS: is it really useful? Front Surg 2015;2:30.
    CrossRef
  14. Susie J, Thomas H, Adam H. Polycystic ovary syndrome and assisted reproduction. Textbook of assisted reproductive techniques David K and Colin M(eds) 5th ed, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group 2018:762-772.
  15. Boulet SL, Mehta A, Kissin DM, Warner L, Kawwass JF, Jamieson DJ. Trends in use of and reproductive outcomes associated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Am Med Assoc 2015;313(3):255-263.
    CrossRef
  16. Huang JYJ, Rosenwaks Z. Assisted reproductive techniques. Human Fertility: Springer; 2014. p. 171-231.
    CrossRef
  17. Palermo G, O’Neill C, Chow S, Cheung S, Parrella A, Pereira N, et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: state of the art in humans. Reproduction 2017;154(6):F93-F110.
    CrossRef
  18. Agarwal A, Sharma R, Gupta S, Finelli R, Parekh N, Panner Selvam MK, et al. Sperm Morphology Assessment in the Era of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection: Reliable Results Require Focus on Standardization, Quality Control, and Training. World J Men’s Health 2021;39.
    CrossRef
  19. Starosta A, Gordon CE, Hornstein MD. Predictive factors for intrauterine insemination outcomes: a review. Fertil Res Pract 2020;6(1):1-11.
    CrossRef
  20. Gupta S, Sharma R, Agarwal A, Parekh N, Finelli R, Shah R, et al. A Comprehensive Guide to Sperm Recovery in Infertile Men with Retrograde Ejaculation. World J Men’s Health 2021;39.
    CrossRef
  21. Hoffman B, Schorge J, Schaffer J, Lisa M, Karen D, GaryCunningham F. Polycystic ovarian syndrome and hyperandrogenism. Williams Gynecology 2nd ed McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc 2012:400-606.
  22. Weissman A, Howles CM, Shoham Z. Textbook of Assisted Reproductive Techniques, Volume 1: Laboratory Perspectives. 5th ed, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group 2018.
  23. McDowell S, Kroon B, Ford E, Hook Y, Glujovsky D, Yazdani A. Advanced sperm selection techniques for assisted reproduction. Cochr Datab Systemat Rev 2014(10):CD010461.
    CrossRef
  24. Verberg M, Macklon N, Heijnen E, Fauser B. ART: iatrogenic multiple pregnancy? Best PractRes Clin Obs Gynaecol 2007;21(1):129-143.
    CrossRef
  25. Orvieto R, Ben-Rafael Z. Bleeding, severe pelvic infection and ectopic pregnancy. Assisted reproductive techniques: laboratory and clinical perspectives 4th ed London: Informa Healthcare 2012:374-381.
    CrossRef
  26. Englert Y, Lesage B, Van Vooren JP, Liesnard C, Place I, Vannin AS, et al. Medically assisted reproduction in the presence of chronic viral diseases. Human Reprod Update 2004;10(2):149-162.
    CrossRef
  27. Bazarganipour F, Taghavi SA, Allan H, Hosseini N. Facilitating and inhibiting factors related to treatment adherence in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A qualitative study. Int JReprod Biomed 2017;15(9):553.
    CrossRef
  28. Russell J. Immature oocyte retrieval combined with in-vitro oocyte maturation. Human Reprod 1998;13(suppl3):63-70.
    CrossRef
  29. Costello MF, Chew CYM, Lindsay K, Wang A, McNally G. Effect of polycystic ovaries on in vitro fertilization and intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection treatment outcome. Asian Pacific J Reprod 2016;5(3):182-187.
    CrossRef
  30. Salvetti NR, Ortega HH, Veiga-Lopez A, Padmanabhan V. Developmental programming: impact of prenatal testosterone excess on ovarian cell proliferation and apoptotic factors in sheep. Biol Reprod 2012;87(1):22, 21-10.
    CrossRef
  31. Fancsovits P, Murber Á, Gilán ZT, Rigó Jr J, Urbancsek J. Human oocytes containing large cytoplasmic vacuoles can result in pregnancy and viable offspring. Reprod Biomed Online 2011;23(4):513-516.
    CrossRef
  32. Khrouf M, Kdous M, Bouyahia M, Chaker A, Zhioua F, Zhioua A. Clinicals and biological aspects of ICSI cycles on patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. La Tunisie Med 2010;88(3):152-157.
    CrossRef
  33. Nastri C, Teixeira D, Moroni R, Leitão V, Martins W. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: pathophysiology, staging, prediction and prevention. Ultrasound Obs Gynecol 2015;45(4):377-393.
    CrossRef
  34. Lainas TG, Sfontouris IA, Zorzovilis IZ, Petsas GK, Lainas GT, Alexopoulou E, et al. Flexible GnRH antagonist protocol versus GnRH agonist long protocol in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome treated for IVF: a prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT). Hum Reprod 2010;25(3):683-689.
    CrossRef
  35. Jayakrishnan K, Nambiar D, Fency JL. Comparison of ovarian response between PCOS and Non-PCOS patients undergoing ICSI with antagonist protocol. J Infertil Reprod Biol 2015;3(3):199-207.
    CrossRef
  36. Xiao J, Chen S, Zhang C, Chang S. Effectiveness of GnRH antagonist in the treatment of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing IVF: a systematic review and meta analysis. Gynecol Endocrinol 2013;29(3):187-191.
    CrossRef
  37. Tu J, Lin G, Lu C, Gong F. A novel modified ultra-long agonist protocol improves the outcome of high body mass index women with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing IVF/ICSI. Gynecol Endocrinol 2014;30(3):209-212.
    CrossRef
  38. Xing W, Lin H, Li Y, Yang D, Wang W, Zhang Q. Is the GnRH antagonist protocol effective at preventing OHSS for potentially high responders undergoing IVF/ICSI? PloS One 2015;10(10):e0140286.
    CrossRef
  39. Casper RF. Reducing the risk of OHSS by GnRH agonist triggering. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015;100(12):4396-4398.
    CrossRef
Share Button
Visited 821 times, 1 visit(s) today

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.