Surale-Patil S. A, Patil T, Kulkarni K. A Probe into Prohealing Potential of Glyceryl Trinitrate. Biomed Pharmacol J 2019;12(4).
Manuscript received on : 30- 10-19
Manuscript accepted on :11-06-2019
Published online on: 19-11-2019
Plagiarism Check: Yes
Reviewed by: Vijay Rekulapally 
Second Review by: Saranya V
Final Approval by: Ayush Dogra

How to Cite    |   Publication History
Views  Views: 
Visited 421 times, 1 visit(s) today
 
Downloads  PDF Downloads: 
330

Smita A. Surale-Patil1, Tatyasaheb Patil2 and Ravindra Kulkarni3

1Department of pharmacology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences Deemed To be University, Karad, Maharashtra, India, Pincode- 415110

2Pharmacologist Consultant Physician, Gurukripa, Station Road, Miraj, Maharashtra, India

3Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University Medical College and Hospital, Sangli

Corresponding Author E-mail: smitaasp73@gmail.com

DOI : https://dx.doi.org/10.13005/bpj/1806

Abstract

Wound healing is a complex, delicate process which consists of series of cellular and biochemical events leading to re-establishment of anatomical continuity.  Anal fissure is a painful, chronic, non-healing wound. Its chronicity is due to spasm of anal sphincter and local ischemia. It is treated surgically by sphincterotomy to eliminate sphincter spasm.  Therefore, Glyceryl trinitrate(GTN)  has been used as a non-surgical alternative treatment due to its spasmolytic activity. The present study was undertaken to determine wound healing potential of GTN in wistar rats. 18 male wistar rats were divided in three groups, 6 rats per group Control (Normal saline), GTN, GTN Ointment base.  A 500 mm2 excisional wound , circular in shape was created . The drugs were applied topically over the wound, one day after the wounding. Two parameters were studied viz; wound contraction and period of epithelization. Glyceryl trinitrate has shown statistically signfiicant difference in wound contraction compared to control on 10th day. Period of epithelization was not reduced significantly by Glyceryl trinitrate when compared to  Control. Glyceryl trinitrate has wound healing potential apart from its spasmolytic action.

Keywords

Glyceryl trinitrate; excisional wound; wound contraction; epithelization

Download this article as: 
Copy the following to cite this article:

Surale-Patil S. A, Patil T, Kulkarni K. A Probe into Prohealing Potential of Glyceryl Trinitrate. Biomed Pharmacol J 2019;12(4).

Copy the following to cite this URL:

Surale-Patil S. A, Patil T, Kulkarni K. A Probe into Prohealing Potential of Glyceryl Trinitrate. Biomed Pharmacol J 2019;12(4). Available from: https://bit.ly/2OkWek0

Introduction

Wound healing is a complex, delicate process which consists of series of cellular and biochemical events leading to re-establishment of anatomical continuity. Generally wounds heals without complications. There are many factors which affect wound healing. These factors may interfere with one of the phases of wound healing. There may be impaired wound healing, which leads to chronicity of wound eg. Chronic anal fissure, diabetic foot wound, venous ulcers. Chronic wound requires several days of treatment to achieve satisfactory healing without complications. The need for improving impaired wound healing has resulted in continued research on wound healing in human as well as animals.

Anal fissure is a painful, chronic, non-healing wound. It’s chronicity is due to spasm of anal sphincter and local ischemia.1,2  Commonly, anal fissure is treated surgically by sphincterotomy to eliminate sphincter spasm.  Glyceryl trinitrate(GTN) is a non-surgical alternative treatment due to its spasmolytic action.3,4

GTN is also used to promote wound healing.5,6. GTN has been used in chronic anal fissure and compared with calcium channel blockers for its therapeutic effect.7.

The prohealing effect of  GTN  is believed to be  due to smooth muscle relaxation resulting in mitigation of sphincter spasm and local ischemia.8,9 Since wound healing is a complex phenomenon, there is a possibility that wound healing potential of GTN may not be solely due to smooth muscle relaxant action. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to investigate, whether GTN has any wound healing property apart from its spasmolytic action. We have also studied the effect of GTN ointment base, to see if wound healing is  due to the drug itself or is potentiated by the base.

Aim and Objectives

To determine wound healing potential of GTN.

Materials and methods

Study was carried out in 3 groups of rats ( 6 rats per group) for  wound healing potential of Glyceryl trinitrate at Dept of Pharmacology and Central Animal House, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University, Medical College & Hospital Sangli.

Synopsis was discussed in IAEC (Institutional Animal Ethical Committee). IAEC approved the project, IAEC approval registration no.- BVDUMC&H, Sangli CAH/ 2015/11

Total 18 male Wistar rats weighing 150-250 gm were taken. These were divided into three groups, 6 rats per group.

Chemicals / Drugs:  surgical material used

Glyceryl trinitrate ointment- 0.2% (GTN) –Troikaa Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

Ointment base (OB) – Troikaa Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

Thiopental sodium, Spirit and Normal Saline, scissor, scalpel blade, artery forcep

Table 1: Group of animals and Drug Treatment Schedule for excisional wound model

Group No. No. of  Animals          Drugs  
1 6 Control (Normal Saline)
2 6 0.2% Glyceryl trinitrate ointment
3 6 GTN Ointment Base

Methodology

It was a double blinded study. Randomization was done by simple random method.

The animals bearing experimental wounds were treated with Normal Saline, GTN, GTN Ointment Base.

Wounding Procedure

The nape of neck of rat was shaved. All the rats were starved overnight with water ad libitum and the next day, surgical intervention under general anaesthesia was done to create excisional wound.

About 500 mm2 full thickness skin was excised, circular in shape with scalpel blade on the nape of the neck by using method of  Morton and Malone10.

Drug Schedule

18 rats were wounded. 6 rats in each group received Normal Saline, GTN and GTN Ointment Base.  Drug application was done locally once daily from the next day of wounding. The drug application was continued till the wound healed completely, as shown by total epithelization of the wound.

Monitoring of healing

Excisional wounds

Two parameters viz; contraction of wound and epithelization period were monitored. The wound contraction was accomplished by periodical (every 4th day post wounding) recording of wound size by planimetry or by tracing the wound area on polythene paper first and subsequently on mm2 paper every 4th day. The degree of wound healing was calculated as percentage closure of the original wound area using the following formula-

Percentage closure =A0 -Ad/ A0 х 100

Where A0 = wound area on zero day and

Ad= wound area on corresponding day.

The mean percentage of wound contraction and standard error of mean were calculated in control ( Normal Saline), GTN and  GTN Ointment Base treated groups. The time required for epithelization was  assessed in terms of days required for total fall of eschar with no trace of wound and full covering by glistening young epithelium.

Statistical Analysis

The level of significance between individual group was analysed  using one way ANOVA. Data was expressed as mean ± SEM with a probability of  p < 0.05 considered to be significant.

After completion of epithelization, animals were followed up by standard procedures as outlined by CPCSEA guidelines and rehabilitated.

Observations and Results

Table 2: Percentage of wound contraction.

Group

 

No of Animals                             .Drugs Mean Percentage Wound Contraction  ±  .S.E.M.                                         
6th day.     10th day 14th day
1 6    Control(Normal Saline)      55.33±6.04    74.00±1.63 90.33±1.82
2 6 GTN    70.67± 2.04 *    81.00±1.98  * 90.33± 1.50
3 6 Ointment Base      67.33±8.04      72.33±7.42 94.6±1.34

Data is expressed as Mean ± S.E.M.  p < 0.05  is significant *=   p < 0.05 When  compared  with Control

There was statistically significant difference in mean percentage of wound contraction of drug teated groups – GTN, when compared with Control   indicating GTN, has enhanced wound contraction than Control on 10th day.

There was no statistically significant difference in mean percentage of wound contraction of drug treated groups – GTN, when compared with Control   indicating GTN, has not enhanced wound contraction than Control on 6th day and 14th day.

 Graph 1

Graph 1

Click here to View graph

Period of Epithelization in Days

Group no. No of Animals Drugs Mean Period Of       Epithelization
1. 6 Control 19.00±0.45
2. 6 GTN

 

17.83± 0.31
3. 6 Ointment Base 19.00±0.45

Data is expressed as Mean ± S.E.M.     p < 0.05  is significant   * = p < 0.05 compared with Control

There was no statistically significant difference in means of period of epithelization with drug treated groups – GTN, GTN Ointment base, when compared to control indicating similar effect.

 Graph 2

Graph 2

Click here to View graph

Discussion

GTN is used to treat chronic anal fissure. It acts by release of nitric oxide (NO), which increases concentration of Guanylyl cyclase. It increases cyclic GMP and brings out vasodilatation. GTN promotes wound healing by increasing blood supply and there by nourishment to the wound area.  In addition, GTN activates cGMP, an intracellular intermediate, that inhibits the calcium activity. Calcium modulates cellular proliferation, modification, maturation of  keratinocytes and fibriblasts.11

GTN increases angiogenesis which is more vital. Wound contraction mediated by  myofibroblasts  is a secondary effect  to  angiogenesis. GTN application stimulates the production of organized collagen fibres and dampens inflammatory response by reducing  number of  polymorphonuclear cells. An NO inhibitor or NO synthase inhibitor can retard wound healing and NO donors have beneficial effects on wound healing,  which confirms the role of  NO in wound healing.11

GTN acts as an NO donor. NO plays an important role in modulating cytokines that initiate the process of inflammation after formation of wound. NO modulates inflammation induced oedema formation and it inhibits inflammatory cell infiltration into granulomas. It is vital for the activity of pro-angiogenic cytokines. It also important in the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) dependent and independent angiogenesis. Angiogenesis in wound bed is important to maintain newly formed granulation tissue. Keratinocyte proliferation and wound re-epithelization is NO dependent, which is mediated by VEGF. It plays important role in collagen synthesis which is important in the proliferative phase of wound healing, as collagen gives strength to wound.12,13. In  a previous study it has been observed that NO has promoted re- epithelization in healing of wounds.6,14. An NO inhibitors or iNOS   inhibitor can retard wound healing by decreasing proliferation of keratinocytes and delays healing.15,16

The present study was undertaken to determine if GTN possesses wound healing potential.   The property of GTN regarding wound healing was compared with control group. GTN has shown increase in mean percentage of wound contraction on 10th day after wounding. Percentage of wound contraction of Control group (74.00±1.63) and  that of GTN group is (81.00±1.98).  There was statistically significant difference in mean percentage of wound contraction and GTN was better than control group. There was no statistically significant difference in period of  epithelization  when compared with control.

Thus from  present study it seems that apart from spasmolytic activity Glyceryl trinitrate has wound healing property  as it has enhanced mean percentage of wound contraction.

Conclusion

Apart from the spasmolytic activity of Glyceryl trinitrate, wound healing property has been demonstrated in our study, as it has enhanced mean percentage of wound contraction.

Acknowledgement

Authors acknowledge to Mrs Gore, Associate Professor, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Bharati Medical college and Hospital, Sangli for her valuable support in statistical analysis.

Conflict of Interest

No conflict of Interest

Funding Source

No funding was required

References

  1. Maria G. Etal. A Comparison of botulinum toxin and saline for the treatment of chronic anal fissure. N Eng J Med.1998; 338; 217-20.
  2. Schouten WR, Briel JW, Auwerda JJA, De Graaf E JR. Ischaemic nature of anal fissure. Br J Surg .  1996; 83:63-65.
  3. Lund JN, Scholefield JH.Randomized prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of Glyceryl trinitrate ointment in the treatment of anal fissure. Lancet. 1997; 349:11-14.
  4. Banerjee  AR. Treating anal fissure. GTN  ointment may remove the need for surgery. Br Med J. 1997; 314:1638-39.
  5. Effect of 0.2% GTN oint. On wound healing in streptozocin induced diabetes rats an expt’ study. Asian J Med Cli Sci. 2012; 1(2) : 86-88.
  6. Ghori V, Mandavia DR, Patel Tk, Tripathi  CB. et al. Effect of topical nitric  oxide donor (0.2% GTN) on wound healing in diabetic wistar rats. Int. J  Diabetes Dev Countries. 2014; 34: 45-49.
  7. Franceschilli L ,Luca E, Milito G,Gaspari AL.Role of 0.4% glyceryl trinitrate ointment after haemorrhoidectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis.2012 Aug; 1544-51.
  8. Simon AJ, Breat RW Jr. GTN for anal fissure. Lancet. 1996;348: 491-92.
  9. Lund JN, Scholefield JM. Follow-up of patient with chronic anal fissure treated with topical GTN. Lancet 1998; 352: 491-92.
  10. Wild T,Rabarnia A, Kellner M, Sobotka L,Eberlein T. Basics in nutrition and wound healing.Nutrition.2010; 26: 862-66.
  11. Tripathi KD. Antianginal & other Antieschemic Drugs.In: Tripathi KD, editor.Essentials of Medical Pharmacology. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers(p) Ltd; 2013. p.539-57.
  12. Chong DY, Michel T. Pharmacology of vascular tone. In: Golan DE, Tashjian AH, Armastrong  EJ, Armstrong AW, editor.Principles of  pharmacology. Phildelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins publisher; 2008. P. 367- 81.
  13. Katzung BG, Vasodilators  &  The Treatment of  Angina  Pectoris. In: Katzung BG, Trevor AJ, editor. Basic &  Clinical Pharmacology. New Delhi : McGraw Hill Education(India). Publisher; 2015. P.191- 207.
  14. Stallmeyer B,Anhold M,Wetzler C,Kahlina K,Pfelschifter J, Frank S.Regulation of Enos in normal and diabetis- impaired skin repair: implications for tissue regeneration. Nitric Oxide. 2002; 6: 168-77.
  15. Opal SM,DePalo VA. Anti- inflammatory cytokines.Chest 2000; 117: 1162-72.
  16. Zuh H, Ka B,Murad F. Nitric Oxide accelerates the recovery from burn wounds. World J Surg .2007;31: 624-31.
Share Button
Visited 421 times, 1 visit(s) today

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.