Hameed R. A. Physiological and Molecular Assessment of Sesbania Root Nodules Bacteria from Different Iraqi Areas for Salt Tolerance. Biomed Pharmacol J 2019;12(1).
Manuscript received on :14-Nov-2018
Manuscript accepted on :18-Jan-2019
Published online on: 29-01-2019
Plagiarism Check: Yes
Reviewed by: Giovanni Damiani
Second Review by: Kulvinder Kaur  
Final Approval by: Dr. Ayush Dogra

How to Cite    |   Publication History
Views Views: (Visited 552 times, 1 visits today)   Downloads PDF Downloads: 505

Rana A. Hameed

Department of Biology, College of Science, University Al –Mustansiriyah.

Corresponding Author E-mail: dr.alkarkhi@gmail.com

DOI : https://dx.doi.org/10.13005/bpj/1652

Abstract

Thirty two isolates of aerobic gram-negative bacteria associated with Sesbania sesban grown in different saline Iraqi soils was identified according to morphological and physiological characteristics, cultured on yeast-mannitol agar medium (YEMA) supplemented with different NaCl concentrations. It was indicated that 53.12% of isolates were highly tolerant to salinity, tolerated from 4.0 to 5.0 w/v NaCl. All thirty two Rhizobia isolates performed positive strong reaction to Catalase enzyme except for three were negative to this enzyme. Concerning exo-polysaccharide (EPS) production the isolates displayed a significant difference between them and that salt tolerance isolates gave a high amount of EPS production in compare to the sensitive ones. As for antibiotic sensitivity of Sesbania isolates data revealed that 83% of isolates were highly resistant to Ampicilin at 50 µgml-1, the cluster analysis based on all phenotypical and physiological characters divided the isolates into two major groups, the first group included one isolate Ses10, which was salt moderate tolerant. The second group included the rest of isolates which splits into two subgroups with 6% similarity, the first subgroup comprised all sensitive isolates plus one salt moderate tolerant isolate (Ses9).The assumption that district environmental conditions plays a vital role on field survival of bacteria, give rise to the use of PCR methods to identify Rhizobia. In this study the genetic divergence of fast nodulating bacteria connected with Sesbania in Iraq was examined. A selection of Rhizobia isolates were characterized by RAPD –PCR. Amplification of genomic DNA using three random primers (RAPD) gave various bands, the results revealed that most efficient and highest discrimintory power primer was 35.4% and 37% respectively for primer OPA-10. The cluster analysis based on RAPD-PCR amplification results showed two divergent groups with 15% similarity, the first group included two salt sensitive Ses17 and Ses28, and the second major group comprised all salt moderate and tolerant isolates.

Keywords

Molecular; Physiological; Root Nodules; Salt Tolerance; Sesbania

Download this article as: 
Copy the following to cite this article:

Hameed R. A. Physiological and Molecular Assessment of Sesbania Root Nodules Bacteria from Different Iraqi Areas for Salt Tolerance. Biomed Pharmacol J 2019;12(1).

Copy the following to cite this URL:

Hameed R. A. Physiological and Molecular Assessment of Sesbania Root Nodules Bacteria from Different Iraqi Areas for Salt Tolerance. Biomed Pharmacol J 2019;12(1). Available from: https://bit.ly/2RWWutW

Introduction

Nitrogen fixation using biological organisms is a powerful source of nitrogen in the biosphere (200-300 kg N/ha/year), it plays a significant role in nitrogen enhancement of the earth. Leguminous plants by their symbiotic association with certain gram-negative soil bacteria, commonly known as Rhizobia, promote to fix atmospheric nitrogen. Most of rhizobial strains isolated from wild legumes were classified as members of the genera Rhizobium.1

In corporation with rhizobia, Sesbania sesban is a plant growing in various environments, even in salinity areas, drought and arid infertility.2 Salinity influence the survival and multiplication of Rhizobium spp. In rhizosphere and soil, as well as reducing plant growth, photosynthesis, yet rhizobial populations are known to differ in their tolerance to important environment factors.3 In 2009 Ali and his coworker4 indicated that inoculation with salt tolerant strains would improve nitrogen fixing ability and nodulation of the leguminous plants subjected to saline conditions. Also in 2017  Yan and his coworker 5 reported that bacteria associated with Sesbania cannabina could grow weakly in the presence of 5.0% w/v NaCl. Ali (4) revealed that rhizobia isolated from tree legumes Leucaena leucocephala were tolerant up to 2.5-3.5% salinity.

Many Iraqi areas had under gone harmful environmental conditions in the last decades, such like salinity and drought due to miss usage of efficient irrigation systems and low rainfalls. In 2013 Sharma and his coworker6 pointed that the naturally occurring soil rhizobia nodulating legumes plants lived in the desert areas are expected to have higher tolerance to common adverse conditions such as salt stress. While N-fixing legumes tolerant of environmental stresses represent an important procedure to improve agricultural productivity, Rhizobia with genetic potentiality for stress tolerance are evenly vital for efficient nodulation and increase productivity of the host plants.1

Materials and Methods

Different geographical agricultural field sites of Iraqi regions of host plant Sesbania nodule sample were collected. Thirty two isolates were obtained from these regions, the isolates were isolated from nodules after surface sterilization according to Vincent7 and cultured on yeast extract mannitol agar (YEMA) media containing Congo-red dye, petri dish plates were incubated at 28°C in the dark. The bacterial isolates were examined for morphological characteristics and gram-staining reaction as described by Somasegaran and Hoben.8 Rhizobia authenticity for host specificity was studied as demonstrated by Engelke and his coworker.The effect of salt on isolates were studied by inoculating one loop full of each isolate on YEMA media in triplicate plates containing 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 w/v% NaCl, growth was compared with control(no NaCl) and evaluated qualitatively according to Somasegaran and Hoben.8 Enzymes activity were examined for Catalase, Urease and Gelatinase enzymes as displayed by Ronald and his coworkers,10 appearance of gas bubble indicate the presence of Catalase enzyme. Intrinsic antibiotics resistance (IAR) were examined by taking freshly prepared, filter sterilized (0.22 µm) solution of antibiotics and added to cooled, molten YEMA media to give the following concentration µg/ml: 10, 25 and 50 of Ampicillin, Erythromycin and Kanamycin. The control treatment was consisted of YEMA plates without antibiotics. Isolates showing growth were scored as positive. Triplicate plates for each antibiotic were incubated at 28°C for 7 days, and scored for growth. For the evaluation of exo polysaccharide production (EPS), a loop full of each Sesbania isolates were inoculated into conical flasks containing 100 ml of yeast extract mannitol broth media. The flasks were incubated at 28°C on revolving shaker at 200 rpm for 72h. After incubation, the broth was centrifuged 3500 xg and the supernatant was mixed with two volumes of chilled acetone. The crude polysaccharide developed was collected by centrifugation at 3500 xg for 30 min. EPS then Was washed with distilled water and acetone alternatively, then transferred to a filter paper and weighed after overnight drying at105°C.

DNA Extraction of Sesbania isolates was done using Wizard genomic DNA purification kit (promega), DNA purity was identified using Shimadzu spectrophotometer, DNA concentration was calculated using the following equation:

ds DNA con. = O.D 260 nm x dilution factor x 50µg /ml (Sambrook et al., 1989). DNA fingerprinting of Sesbania isolates by RAPD-PCR was applied using Master Mix reaction kit and three random primers from Bioneer Coporation (South Korea). Sequence of the primers and the reaction conditions were described in table-1. Amplification products were separated and electrophoresed on 1.5% w/v agarose gel. Total band number were calculated according to Sahi and his coworkers.11

Table 1: RAPD primers and PCR reaction conditions.

Primer Sequence from 5 to 3 end
OPA-10 GTGATCGCAG
OPC-16 CACACTCCAG
OPN-16 AAGCGACCTG
PCR reaction condition
Initial denaturizing 5 min , 94°C
Denaturizing 1 min , 94 °C—-
Annealing 1 min , 32°C | 34cycle
Extension 1 min , 72°C—-
Final extension 1 min , 72°C

 

Primer efficiency and primer discriminatory power was measured using the formulas:

Primer efficiency=total number of bands amplified by a primer / total number of bands amplified by all primers x 100.

Primer discriminatory power= the total of polymorphic bands amplified by a primer / total number of polymorphic bands amplified by all primers x 100.12

Statistical analysis for EPS production was done using ANOVA. Significant differences were identified by the least significant difference (L.S.D) multiple mean comparison test at p ≤0.05 (Genestat program software, 2008, VSN International Ltd), as for physiological traits, comparison was performed quantitavelly on the basis of growth + or no growth – for each isolate. PCR fingerprints pattern were converted into a two-dimensional binary matrix (1, presence of a band, 0, absence of a band) and analyzed using statistic software package (version 1.92; past software, Ohammer, 2009).

Results and Discussion

Morphological Characterization

All thirty two Sesbania isolates were comparable in form with translucent gummy glistening, entire margin and circular rounded with diameter of 2.5-3.5mm, except of the isolates (Ses4, Ses5, Ses30 and Ses23) which were little translucent, milky and about 1-2mm in diameter after two days growth. The isolates were tested on Congo red as indicator incorporated with YEMA media, the data showed that all isolates did not absorb Congo red under dark conditions except Ses8, Ses9 and Ses19 that appeared to be pink as a result of taking Congo red. Table- 2 shows the nomination and geographical origin and soil description. All isolates were examined under microscope and it revealed that the isolates were rod, motile and gram-negative cells.

Table 2: Nomination, Geographical origin and soil description of Sesbania isolates.

Isolate Name Geographical Origin EC Soil description Isolate Name Geographical Origin EC Soil description
Ses1 Amryia-Fallujah 1 5.3 Arid Ses17 Mustansiryia,1 Baghdad 2.2 g. irrigate
Ses 2 Amryia-Fallujah 2 4.6 Arid Ses18 Mustansiryia 2, Baghdad 1.7 g. irrigate
Ses 3 Abu-ghreb 1 7.7 Arid Ses19 Rashdiya, Baghdad 1.2 g. irrigate
Ses 4 Abu-ghreb 2 7.1 Arid Ses20 Zafrania 1, Baghdad 6.1 arid
Ses 5 Abu-ghreb 3 5.8 Semiarid Ses21 Zafrania 2, Baghdad 5.7 arid
Ses 6 Khaluss 1, Diyala 5.0 Semiarid Ses22 Nasir, Nasiriyah 3.0 g. irrigate
Ses 7 Khaluss 2, Diyala 4.6 g. irrigate Ses23 Fajir 1, Nasiriyah 4.9 Semiarid
Ses 8 Khaluss 3, Diyala 4.5 g. irrigate Ses24 Fajir 2,Nasiriyah 5.4 Semiarid
Ses 9 Baquba 1,Diyala 3.8 g. irrigate Ses25 Mahmodea1, Baghdad 5.2 Semiarid
Ses 10 Baquba 2,Diyala 3.0 g. irrigate Ses26 Mahmodea2, Baghdad 4.7 Semiarid
Ses 11 Baquba 3, Diyala 4.3 Semiarid Ses27 Saydia 1, Baghdad 3.4 g. irrigate
Ses 12 Balad 1, Diyala 5.1 Semiarid Ses28 Saydia 2, Baghdad 3.2 g. irrigate
Ses 13 Balad 2, Diyala 5.4 Semiarid Ses29 Saydia 3, Baghdad 4.0 g. irrigate
Ses 14 Seqlawea 1, Baghdad 1.3 v.g.irrigate Ses30 Mahawel 1, Babel 5.6 Semiarid
Ses 15 Seqlawea 2, Baghdad 1.7 v.g.irrigate Ses31 Mahawel 2, Babel 5.7 Semiarid
Ses 16 Seqlawea 3, Baghdad 2.0 v.g.irrigate Ses32 Mahawel 3, Babel 6.0 Semiarid

 

Physiological characterization

Salt Stress Response

Viability of Rhizobia isolates grown under various salt concentration using NaCl was measured. Table-3 displayed a high level of variety between isolates, data showed that 53.12% of Sesbania isolates were highly tolerant to salinity, tolerated from 4-5%w/v NaCl and that 18.75% of isolates were salt sensitive, tolerated up to 1.0%NaCl.

Table 3: Salinity tolerating levels of Sesbania isolates.

Isolate. No Highest NaCl con. tolerated (%) Isolate. No Highest NaCl con. tolerated (%)
Ses1 4 Ses17 1
Ses 2 5 Ses18 3
Ses 3 4 Ses19 1
Ses 4 5 Ses20 5
Ses 5 5 Ses21 5
Ses 6 4 Ses22 2
Ses 7 3 Ses23 4
Ses 8 3 Ses24 4
Ses 9 2 Ses25 5
Ses 10 2 Ses26 4
Ses 11 4 Ses27 3
Ses 12 4 Ses28 1
Ses 13 5 Ses29 1
Ses 14 2 Ses30 4
Ses 15 1 Ses31 4
Ses16 1 Ses32 2

 

Enzymes Activity

Data in table-4 showed that all isolates gave strong positive reaction to Catalase enzyme except for Ses19, Ses28 and Ses29 were negative for Catalase test. As for Urease the table cleared that 88.23% of salt tolerant isolates were negative for this enzyme comparing to 50% of salt sensitive isolates. In regards to Gelatinase enzyme, results indicated that 70.58% of salt tolerant isolates were negative for Gelatinase production.

Table 4: Enzymes reaction pattern of Sesbania  isolates.

Isolate no. Catalase Urease Gelatinase Isolate. No Catalase Urease Gelatinase
Ses1 ++ Ses17 + +
Ses 2 ++ + Ses18 ++ +
Ses 3 ++ Ses19 + +
Ses 4 ++ + Ses20 +
Ses 5 ++ Ses21 ++
Ses 6 ++ + Ses22 +
Ses 7 ++ + Ses23 + +
Ses 8 ++ Ses24 ++
Ses 9 + Ses25 +
Ses 10 + Ses26 + +
Ses 11 ++ Ses27 ++ +
Ses 12 ++ Ses28 + +
Ses 13 ++ + Ses29 + + +
Ses 14 + + Ses30 + +
Ses 15 + Ses31 +
Ses16 + Ses32 + +

 

Antibiotic Sensitivity

All thirty two isolates were tested against three kinds of antibiotics in 10, 25, 50 µgml-1 concentration. Table-5 showed that all isolates were highly resistant to Ampicilin at 50 µgml-1 concentration.

Table 5: Antibiotic resistance of thirty two Sesbania isolates.

Antibiotic % Resistance of isolates
10µgmL-1 25µgmL-1 50µgmL-1
Erthromycin 71 42 33
Kanamycin 56 44 24
Ampicilin 86 85 83

 

Exopolysaccharide (EPS) Production

Table-6 showed a significant difference between Sesbania isolates regarding EPS production, the results revealed that salt tolerant isolates gave higher amount of EPS production in compared to sensitive isolates, this is agreed with Freitas and his coworkers as well as Saritha and her coworkers in addition to Alroomi.13-16 The highest production of EPS was recorded for the isolate Ses21 producing 981.2 mg/g EPS, and the least production was found in Ses17 producing 296.6 mg/g EPS. Cluster analysis based on phenotypical and physiological traits divided the isolates into two divergent groups, the first one included one isolate Ses10, which was salt moderate tolerant, and the second main group included the rest of Sesbania isolates which splits into two subgroups with 6% similarity, the first subgroup comprised all sensitive isolates plus one salt moderate (Ses9), and the second subgroup included all salt tolerant and moderate isolates.

Table 6: EPS production in Sesbania isolates(mg/g).

Isolate EPS mg/g Isolate EPS mg/g
Ses1 900.1 Ses17 296.6
Ses 2 678.3 Ses18 746.3
Ses 3 720.8 Ses19 361.0
Ses 4 923.6 Ses20 867.3
Ses 5 892.6 Ses21 981.2
Ses 6 763.3 Ses22 324.6
Ses 7 522.1 Ses23 656.8
Ses 8 564,9 Ses24 654.0
Ses 9 497.9 Ses25 566.3
Ses 10 488.9 Ses26 786.2
Ses 11 656.6 Ses27 678.2
Ses 12 745.6 Ses28 401.0
Ses 13 824.2 Ses29 325.3
Ses 14 325.6 Ses30 697.4
Ses 15 433.3 Ses31 548.9
Ses16 312.9 Ses32 300.4

 

Table 7: Fragments amplified by three random primers in eight Sesbania isolates and the efficiency and discriminatory power of each primer.

Primer No. of bands amplified in all isolates Primer efficiency (%) Primer discriminatory power (%)
Total polymorphic
OPA-10 11 10 35.4 37.0
OPC-16 10 8 32.2 29.6
OPN-16 10 9 32.2 33.3
Total 31 27

 

Figure 1: Dendrogram showing similarity levels between Sesbania isolates based on phenotypical and physiological characterization. Figure 1: Dendrogram showing similarity levels between Sesbania isolates based on phenotypical and physiological characterization.

 

Click here to view figure

 

Molecular Characterization

Molecular methods used in this study was applied on eight representative isolates, salt tolerant (Ses2, Ses13, and Ses20), salt sensitive (Ses17 and Ses28) and salt moderate tolerant (Ses7, Ses18, and Ses32). DNA purity ranged from 1.3 _1.7 O.D. The RAPD-PCR amplification products comprised different bands (fig 2,3, and 4), table-6 cleared that most efficient and highest discriminatory power was 35.4% and 37% respectively for the primer OPA-10, also the cluster analysis based on RAPD-PCR products showed two divergent groups with 15% similarity, the first group contained all salt sensitive isolates, while the second group included all salt moderate and tolerant isolates, this group subdivided into two subgroups with 44% similarity, the first subgroup included all salt tolerant isolates which show 100% similarity between them, and the second subgroup comprised the salt moderate tolerant.

Figure 2: RAPD fingerprint of Sesbania isolates generated by primer OPA-10. 1= Ses17; 2-Ses28; M= 1kb DNA ladder; 3=Ses7; 4=Ses18; 5=Ses32; 6=Ses2; 7=Ses13; and 8= Ses20. Figure 2: RAPD fingerprint of Sesbania isolates generated by primer OPA-10. 1= Ses17; 2-Ses28; M= 1kb DNA ladder; 3=Ses7; 4=Ses18; 5=Ses32; 6=Ses2; 7=Ses13; and 8= Ses20.

 

Click here to view figure

 

Figure 3: RAPD fingerprint of Sesbania isolates generated by primer OPC-16. M= 1kb DNA ladder 1= Ses2; 2-Ses13; 3=Ses20; 4=Ses17; 5=Ses28; 6=Ses7; 7=Ses18; and 8= Ses32. Figure 3: RAPD fingerprint of Sesbania isolates generated by primer OPC-16. M= 1kb DNA ladder 1= Ses2; 2-Ses13; 3=Ses20; 4=Ses17; 5=Ses28; 6=Ses7; 7=Ses18; and 8= Ses32.

 

Click here to view figure

 

 

Figure 4: RAPD fingerprint of Sesbania isolates generated by primer OPN-16. M= 1kb DNA ladder 1= Ses17; 2-Ses28; 3=Ses7; 4=Ses18; 5=Ses32; 6=Ses13; 7=Ses20; and 8= Ses2. Figure 4: RAPD fingerprint of Sesbania isolates generated by primer OPN-16. M= 1kb DNA ladder 1= Ses17; 2-Ses28; 3=Ses7; 4=Ses18; 5=Ses32; 6=Ses13; 7=Ses20; and 8= Ses2.

 

Click here to view figure

 

Figure 5: Dendrogram of Sesbania isolates derived from RAPD fingerprints generated using three different primers (OPA-10, OPC-16, and OPN-16). Figure 5: Dendrogram of Sesbania isolates derived from RAPD fingerprints generated using three different primers (OPA-10, OPC-16, and OPN-16).

 

Click here to view figure

 

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that we could isolate and purify salt tolerant Sesbania isolates from Iraqi soils, the cluster based on physiological and phenotypical traits shows that these isolates represents divers populations and this could offer selection advantage in survival and adaptation to harsh environment conditions. RAPD technique was effectively utilized to discriminate between Sesbania isolates. And the genetic potential for increased tolerance to salinity could improve production of high tolerant inoculum strains for legume plants.

Acknowledgement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  1. Zahran H. Rhizobium- legume symbiosis and nitrogen fixation under sever conditions and in arid climates. Microbiol Mol. Biol. R. 1999;63:968-989.
  2. Rao D and Gill H. Biomass and biofertilizer production by Sesbania cannabania in alkaline soil. Bioresour Technol. 1995;53:169-172.
    CrossRef
  3. Wei G., Yang X., Zhang Z., Yang Y and Lindstrom K. Strain Mesorhizobium CCNWGX035, a stress tolerant isolate from Glycyrriza glabra displaying a wide host range of no dulation. Pedosphere. 2008;18:102-112.
    CrossRef
  4. Ali S., Rawat  S., Meghvansi M and Mahna S. Selection of stress-tolerant rhizobial isolates of wild legumes growing in dry regions of Rajasthan, India. ARPN J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 2009;4:13-18.
  5. Yan J., Li Y., Yan H., Chen W., Zhang X., Wang E., Han X and Xie Z. Agrobacterium salinitolerance sp. Nov., a saline- alkaline- tolerant bacterium isolated from root nodule of Sesbania cannabina. Int. J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017;67:1906-1911.
    CrossRef
  6. Sharma S.,Rao N.,Gokhale T and Ismail S. Isolation and characterization of salt –tolerant rhizobia native to the desert soils of United Arab Emirates. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2013;25(2):102-108.
    CrossRef
  7. Vincent j. A manual for the practical study of the root-nodule bacteria International Biological Program. Oxford UK. Blackwell Scientific. 1970.
  8. Somasegaran P and Hoben H. Handbook of Rhizobia methods in legume-rhizobium technology. Springer-verlag. New York, U.S.A. 1994.
    CrossRef
  9. Engelke T., Jagadish M and Puhler A. Biochemical and genetical analysis of Rhizobia meliloti mutants defective in C4-dicarboxylate transport. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1987;133:19-29.
  10. Ronald M., Lawrence C and Alfred E. Laboratory manual of experimental microbiology. Mosby- Year book Inc. 1995;87-95.
  11. Sahi J., Akeel H., Hadeel A.  Application of the random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) marker to analyze the genetic variability in species of the fungus Ahernaria. J. Raf. Sci. 2011;22(1): 1-16.
  12. Grudman H., Schneider C.,Hartung D., Daschner F and Pith T.  Discriminatory power of three DNA typing techniques for aeruginosa. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1995;3:28-32.
  13. Freitas A.. Vieira C.,Santos C.,Stamford N and Lyra M.  Characterization of rhizobia isolates cultivated in saline soil. Bragantia. 2007;66:497-505.
    CrossRef
  14. Saritha B., Raghu M and Mallaiah K. Studies on exopolysaccharide and indole acetic acid production by rhizobium strains from Indigofera. African J. Microbiol. Res. 2009;3(1):0-14.
  15. Al-roomi R. A. Genetic variations of Sinorhizobium meliloti Iraqi isolates differing in their ability to drought tolerance, DNA diversity and phenotypic characterization.  Ph.D.Thesis submitted to Ibn-Al-Haithem, University of Baghdad. 2014.
  16. Elboutahiri N., Thami-Alami I., El-Houssine Z., Udupa S. M. Physiological and Genetic Diversity in Rhizobium sullaefrom Morocco. Biomedical and life Sciences. 2010;85-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8706-5_10.
    CrossRef
  17. Hameed R.,Hussein N and Al-jabouri A. Phenotypic characterization of indigenous Iraqi Sinorhizobium meliloti isolates for a biotic stress performance. J. OF Life Sciences. 2014;8(1):1-9.
Share Button
(Visited 552 times, 1 visits today)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.