<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>



<records>

  <record>
    <language>eng</language>
          <publisher>Oriental Scientific Publishing Company</publisher>
        <journalTitle>Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal</journalTitle>
          <issn>0974-6242</issn>
            <publicationDate>2018-12-25</publicationDate>
    
        <volume>11</volume>
        <issue>4</issue>

 
    <startPage>2215</startPage>
    <endPage>2220</endPage>

	 
      <doi>10.13005/bpj/1604</doi>
        <publisherRecordId>24875</publisherRecordId>
    <documentType>article</documentType>
    <title language="eng">Compared to Conventional Dressing Techniques, Tranexamic Acid Injection Provide Better Surgical Outcomes in Spinal Fusion Surgery</title>

    <authors>
	 


      <author>
       <name>Ahmad Fauzi  </name>

 
		
	<affiliationId>1</affiliationId>
      </author>
    

	 


      <author>
       <name>Adam Moelyono </name>


		
	<affiliationId>2</affiliationId>

      </author>
    

	 


      <author>
       <name>S Dohar Tobing</name>

		
	<affiliationId>3</affiliationId>
      </author>
    

	


	


	
    </authors>
    
	    <affiliationsList>
	    
		
		<affiliationName affiliationId="1">Orthopaedic-Spine Consultant, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia.</affiliationName>
    

		
		<affiliationName affiliationId="2">Orthopaedic-Spine Consultant, Faculty of Medicine, Gajah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.</affiliationName>
    
		
		<affiliationName affiliationId="3">Orthopaedic-Spine Consultant, Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.</affiliationName>
    
		
		
		
	  </affiliationsList>






    <abstract language="eng">The use of mechanical and chemical hemostatic control techniques in spinal fusion surgery is common in Indonesia. However, there has been no study comparing the two in a single clinical trials. This study aims to find out which best of tranexamic acid injection,  a bulky compression dressing and a standard dressing in providing surgical outcomes in spinal fusion surgery. Thirty patients were grouped into three, 10 patients  each. To Group 1, tranexamic acid at a dose of 500 mg/ml was administered pre operation and 2 hours later. For Group 2, a bulky compression dressing was performed by covering the surgical wounds with a low-adherent dressing, overlaid with  four layers of sterile gauze and then sealed with a conformable adhesive retention tape. Standard dressing was applied to the patients of Group-3 using the same type of bandage and adhesive tape given to the Group-2, but only overlaid with two layers of sterile gauze. There is no statistical difference among trials groups for preoperative (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.220) and postoperative (<em>P </em>&gt; 0.380) hemoglobin levels and the level of perioperative blood loss (<em>P </em>&gt; 0.110). With respect to number of transfusion required, the tranexamic acid group was significantly lower compared to the standard dressing group (<em>P </em>= 0.018). No abnormality of wound seen in all three trials groups and only 2 patients of bulky compression dressing group reported experience of headache. In conclusion, tranexamic acid is better to promote hemostasis compared to conventional dressing techniques.</abstract>

    <fullTextUrl format="html">https://biomedpharmajournal.org/vol11no4/compared-to-conventional-dressing-techniques-tranexamic-acid-injection-provide-better-surgical-outcomes-in-spinal-fusion-surgery/</fullTextUrl>

<keywords language="eng">

      
        <keyword>Compression Dressing</keyword>
      

      
        <keyword> Spine Surgery</keyword>
      

      
        <keyword> Surgical Outcomes</keyword>
      

      
        <keyword> Tranexamic Acid</keyword>
      
</keywords>
  </record>
</records>