G. Devaki and R. Shobha

Symbiosis School of Biological Sciences (SSBS), Symbiosis International, Deemed University, Taluka: Mulshi, District: Pune-412115.

Corresponding Author E-mail: devakijgokhale@gmail.com

DOI : https://dx.doi.org/10.13005/bpj/1436

Abstract

Low birth weight is one of the major causes of neonatal disease and death. Low birth weight comprises of mounting serious health problems in adult life and is a cause of concern in many countries, India being one of them. Various factors influence and determine the risk of delivering an infant with a birth weight. less than 2500g. Maternal anthropometry is one such factor which has an association with pregnancy outcome. More so, nutritional status assessment a prominent factor for assessment for risk of low birth weight depends heavily on maternal anthropometric factors, some reflect the maternal nutritional status or energy stores such as height, pre-pregnancy weight, pre-pregnancy BMI, while others reflect the changes during the course of pregnancy such as weight and weight gain patterns. Studies done globally and in India have reported various such indicators along with their cut offs for determining the risk of low birth weight, this review focuses on few such crucial maternal anthropometric parameters and their effect on neonatal birth weight.

Keywords

Anthropometry; Birth Weight; Maternal Low Nutritional Status

Download this article as: 

Copy the following to cite this article: Devaki G, Shobha R. Maternal Anthropometry and Low Birth Weight: A Review. Biomed Pharmacol J 2018;11(2).

Copy the following to cite this URL: Devaki G, Shobha R. Maternal Anthropometry and Low Birth Weight: A Review. Biomed Pharmacol J 2018;11(2). Available from: http://biomedpharmajournal.org/?p=20530

Introduction

Birthweight is an influential predictor of infant’s growth and survival and is predominantly determined by mother’s own health and nutritional status prior to conception as well as during pregnancy. Low birth weight (LBW) (<2500 g) results in impaired growth, a higher risk of mortality and morbidity.¹ impaired brain development.² and risk of chronic diseases in later life.³ A Unicef-publication from 2014 states the worldwide situation of LBW in developing countries as more than twice the level in developed countries, 16.5 % versus 7 % , where South Asia has the highest incidence of low birth weight with 28 % having one in four new-borns who weigh less than 2,500 grams.⁴ Especially Indian women have smaller babies attributed to their shortness and thinness and consume less calories before as well as during pregnancy, their ethnicity or racial differences can also be an indirect cause of LBW.⁵ Similarly another study reports prevalence of low birth weight to be higher in Asia than elsewhere because of undernutrition of mother prior and during pregnancy.³ Thus one may say that there are several factors which underline the cause of LBW and many of them are interdependent. One of the most important causes of all is mother’s anthropometry which is a proximate indicator of mother’s nutritional status. Maternal anthropometry includes an array of various maternal body measurements this review includes the effect of maternal anthropometry on birth weight through studies on pre-pregnancy and pregnancy weight, pre-pregnancy body mass index (kg/m2), maternal weight gain patterns and height.

Pre-Pregnancy Weight and Body Mass Index

Weight and body mass index before pregnancy are closely linked to the pregnancy outcome. The pre-pregnancy weight of the mother is influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. The maternal body weight is genetically determined and, genes that control adiposity or lean body mass can also be expressed in the infant as well. However, even in the absence of such genetic expression, maternal weight prior to conception replicates the nutritional reserves that are available intrauterine for the growing fetus.⁵ Shamsun Nahar, 2005.⁶ in one study suggested that the best predictor as a continuos variable for the birth weight was weight prior to conception. Further, he suggested that at registration with each 1 kg increase in maternal weight was associated with around 200 g increase in birth weight as well. In a review on association between maternal BMI, energy intake and pregnancy outcomes, Neggers and Goldenberg.⁷ found that weight prior to conception  time and again predicted most infant measurements as against various other maternal factors. Several studies have also reported that mothers who have pre-pregnancy weight of <40 kg have a three times greater risk of having an LBW baby as compared to mothers with pre-pregnancy weight of >40 kg.^8-10

Pre-pregnancy body mass index on the other hand is the measure of pre-pregnancy weight in kilograms divided by the height in meters square. This index aids in determining the nutritional status of the mother prior to conception. The relationship between pre-pregnancy BMI and growth of the foetus intrauterine is biologically probable. However, the direct pathway by which it affects the infant birth weight is not known. A large body of data links the pre-pregnancy BMI to adverse pregnancy outcomes which includes fetal death, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, low birth weight, and complicated deliveries.¹¹ Few studies indicate pre-pregnancy BMI to be the best indicator of birth weight of the child especially when measured ≤ 13 weeks.^11-13 Recent Indian studies on rural populations have also highlighted that low pre-pregnancy BMI is linked with high risk of low birth weight infants.^14,15 whereas other studies indicate that women can minimize the risk of low birth weight babies by maintaining normal pre-pregnancy BMI.^12-16 Thus inappropriate pre-pregnancy weight and body mass index can predispose adverse events in development and growth of the infant.

Maternal Weight and Weight Gain Patterns

Maternal weight and weight gain patterns are crucial and strongest predictors of placental weight and birth weight.¹⁷ Maternal weight gain results from diverse factors which includes maternal dietary intake, pre pregnancy weight and height, gestational period, and fetal size. Many studies done globally and in India alone have highlighted that even in presence of other confounding factors such as socio-demographic factors maternal weight and weight gain patterns have an independent influence on birth weight of the infant. A meta-analysis on 25 studies related to maternal anthropometric indicators across 20 countries, reported that the weight attained during pregnancy had a strong relationship with infant birth weight and intrauterine growth.¹⁸

Quite a lot of cut-off points have been recommended by various studies done globally and in India. Kramer’s meta-analysis,⁵ and studies from developing countries^19-25 have identified weight of the mother (<45kg), as a potential risk factor for babies born low birth weight. A variable range of average maternal weight is reported across India ranging from 41.7kg,²⁶ 45kg,²⁷ 51.2kg,³ Tripathi et al.,⁸ and Karan Mathur²⁸ provided a cut off range between 40kg to 45 kg for predicting risk of low birth weight in Asian countries regardless of the gestational age. Whereas another study done by Sachin Mumbar 2012²⁹ and Sudha G³⁰ indicated weight ≤55kg and ≤ 52kg as the risk factor for low birth weight. However a review of study conducted by Mija-tesse Ververs,2013³¹ suggested that as there is no  potential scientific evidence to determine which weight gain cut-off is most sensitive to low birth weight, and as weight gain changes every trimester and at least two measurements are needed, this indicator may not be suitable for screening purposes in case of any emergencies.

The relationship between a woman’s dietary intake during pregnancy and the birth weight of an infant is a multifaceted process and is moderated through maternal weight gain patterns during pregnancy. In 2009, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) revised the guidelines for weight gain during gestation based on pre-pregnancy BMI, aimed at achieving positive pregnancy outcomes.³

Table 1

Pre-pregnancy BMI	BMI kg/m2 (WHO)	Total weight gain range	Rates of weight gain- 2nd and 3rd trimester
Underweight	<18.5	12.5-16	0.5
Normal weight	185-24.9	11.5-15	0.4
Overweight	25-29.9	7-11.5	0.3
Obese (includes all categories)	≥30	5-9	0.2

 

Haugen, M, 2014³³ found that for normal and overweight women gestational weight gain greater than IOM standard increased the risk for unfavourable birth outcome. Fredrick et al, 2008³⁴ reported that gestational weight gain within the limits set by guidelines of IOM was linked to a decreased risk of delivering infants who are low birth weight. Some recent studies from Asia have concluded that IOM guidelines are suitable for the Asian population.^35-36 However, few Indian studies have been reported on comparison to the standards prescribed by IOM so far³⁷ which have suggested that excess as well as less weight gain during pregnancy could lead to adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Chihara, I., et al, 2015³⁸ found that women with inadequate weight gain in pregnancy were found to deliver low birth weight infants. An Indian observational cohort study on pregnant women carried out by Radhakanta Pal ^, 2017³⁹ reported that antenatal weight gain is significantly related to pre-pregnancy BMI with a significant increase in antenatal complications and caesarean section related to obesity. A study done by Manerkar et al, 2017⁴⁰ reported the average gestational weight gain to be higher for pregnant mothers who delivered normal weight babies as against those who delivered babies with low birth weight.

Maternal Height

This indice of anthropometry indicates the nutritional status of the mother in the past and is considered as the proximate indicator of mother’s nourishment in her childhood. Several studies done globally^13,41,42 and in India in recent past^25,43 and latest^44,45 on maternal factors associated with low birth weight highlight that the short stature of mother can contribute to low birth weight infants. Further there have been studies undertaken to identify the height cut offs for identifying the risk for low birth weight. According to studies reported in the west⁴⁶ maternal height less than 156cm increased the risk of low birth weight in women whereas a case control study with matched pairs done on rural pregnant mothers of Maharashtra reported that maternal height of ≤145 cm results in infants delivered low birth weight.²⁹ Most studies^{45, 47, 48} indicate a maternal height ranging from <146 cm to <150 cm with statistical significance for LBW. However, a review by Mija-tesse Ververs, 2013³¹ suggested the paucity of appropriate cut offs for maternal heights.

Maternal Sitting Height

Sitting height is defined as the measurement from the vertex of the head to the base when seated.⁴⁹ It allows the measurement of the stature in terms of head and trunk, mothers sitting height too depicts the past nutritional status in terms of her childhood and pubertal growth. This anthropometric measurement is less reported in the literature; however it is one of the simplest techniques to determine the risk of low birth weight. European studies have been done on identifying the nationwide references for sitting height and its ratio.⁵⁰

So far no Indian study has reported regarding the sitting height measurements and risk of low birth weight however a study conducted in Ranchi by Sudip datta banik, 2016⁵¹ stated that the average sitting height of women is 74.3cm and further states that sitting height measurements would be an appropriate index over the currently used body mass index to identify the nutritional status. Similar approach in terms of pregnant women however is yet to be explored.

Conclusion

Low birth weight is a burning issue worldwide as well as in a developing country like India. It is of public health importance as well as the measure of quality of life and survival of the new generation. This review thus emphasizes the independent role of maternal anthropometric indicators and its interrelationship with low birth weight especially because pre-pregnancy weight,BMI and weight gain happen to be the modifiable risk factors of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Acknowledgement

Authors acknowledge the support of Symbiosis International (Deemed University) provided for the study.

Funding Source

There is no funding source

Conflict of Interest

There is no conflict of interest

References

1. Grantham-McGregor S. M. Small for gestational age, term babies, in the first six years of life. European journal of clinical nutrition. 1998; 52 (1): S59-64. PubMed PMID: 9511021. 11.
2. Ashworth A. Effects of intrauterine growth retardation on mortality and morbidity in infants and young children. European journal of clinical nutrition. 1998; 52 (1): S34-41. discussion S- 2. PubMed PMID: 9511018.
3. Muthayya S. Maternal nutrition & low birth weight – what is really important. The Indian journal of medical research. 2009; 130(5): 600-608. PubMed PMID: 20090114. 9.
4. UNICEF global databases, 2014, based on Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS), Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) and other nationally representative surveys, 200-2013 (for % not weighted is 2008-2012), with the exception of India and Indonesia.
5. Kramer M.S. Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 1987; 65(5): 663.
6. Nahar S, Mascie-Taylor C and Begum H. Maternal anthropometry as a predictor of birth weight. Public Health Nutrition. 2007; 10(9): 965-970. doi:10.1017/S1368980007217975.
   CrossRef
7. Neggers Y and Goldenberg R. L. Some thoughts on body mass index, micronutrient intakes and pregnancy outcome. Journal of Nutrition. 2003; 133, 1737S.
   CrossRef
8. Tripathi A.M, Agarwal D.K, Devi R.R, Cherian S. Nutritional status of rural pregnant women and fetal outcome. Indian Pediatrics. 1987; 24: 703–712.
9. Kardjati S, Kusin J.A, de with C. Energy supplementation in the last trimester of pregnancy in East Java: I. Effect on birthweight. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1988; 95: 783–794.
   CrossRef
10. Esguerra A.B, Diamante A.N, Ramos M. M, Jr, Doctor V.S, Valdes C.B, Pagorogon R.R. et al. Concise screening scales for high-risk mothers and newborns. In: Del Mundo F, Ines-Cuyegkeng E, Aviado DM eds, Primary Maternal and Neonatal Health: A Global Concern. New York: Plenum Press. 1983; 347–369
    CrossRef
11. Ellen A. Nohr, Michael Vaeth, Jennifer L. Baker, Thorkild I.A. Sørensen, Jorn Olsen, Kathleen M Rasmussen. Combined associations of prepregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain with the outcome of pregnancy. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2008; 87(6): 1750–1759.
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/87.6.1750.
    CrossRef
12. Han Y. S, Ha E. H, Park H. S, Kim Y. J and Lee S. S. Relationships between pregnancy outcomes, biochemical markers and pre-pregnancy body mass index. International Journal of Obesity. 2011; 35(4): 570-577.
    CrossRef
13. Winther I. Maternal anthropometry as a predictor of birth weight. A study performed at Okhaldhunga Community Hospital in rural Nepal. Master’s thesis https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/10852/38947.
14. Moghaddam Tabrizi F and Saraswathi G. Maternal anthropometric measurements and other factors: relation with birth weight of neonates. Nutrition research and practice. 2012; 6(2): 132-137.
    CrossRef
15. Raje S and Rao S. Maternal Food Consumption Patterns and Risk of Low Birth Weight in Rural Maharashtra. Indian Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2015; 52(2).
16. Munim S and Maheen H. Association of gestational weight gain and pre-pregnancy body mass index with adverse pregnancy outcome. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2012; 22(11): 694-698.
17. Gernand A.D, Christian P, Paul R.R, Shaikh S, Labrique A.B, Schulze K.J, Shamim A.A, West K.P. Maternal weight and body composition during pregnancy are associated with placental and birth weight in rural Bangladesh. The Journal of nutrition. 2012; 142(11): 2010-6.
    CrossRef
18. Kelly A, Kevany J, de Onis M, Shah P.M. A WHO Collaborative Study of Maternal Anthropometry and Pregnancy Outcomes. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 1996(53): 219–233.
    CrossRef
19. Ferraz E.M, Gray R.H, Cunha T.M. Determinants of preterm delivery and intrauterine growth retardation in north-east.  Int J Epidomiol. 1990(19): 101-8.
20. Mavalankar D.V, Gray R.H, Trivedi C.R. Risk factors for preterm and term low birth weight in Ahmedabad. India. Int  J Epidemiol. 1992(21): 263-72.
    CrossRef
21. Fikree F.F, Berendes H.W. Risk factors for term intrauterine growth retardation: Community based study in Karachi. Bull WHO. 1994(72): 581-7
22. Pelletier D, Arimond M, Johnson F.C, Liang E, Low J, Mvula P. et al. Maternal anthropometry predictors of IUGR and prematurity in Malawi Maternal and Child Nutrition study (OMS Supplement). Bull WHO. 1995: 73:81.
23. Jafari F, Eftekhar H, Pourreza A, Mousavi J. Socio- economic and medical determinants of low birth weight in Iran: 20 years after establishment of a primary healthcare network. Public Health. 2010; 124: 153-8.
    CrossRef
24. Acharya D, Nagraj K, Nair N.S, Bhat HV. Maternal determinants of intrauterine growth retardation: a case control study in Udupi District, Karnataka. Indian J Community Med. 2004; 29: 181-3.
25. Yajnik C. S, Fall C. H. D, Coyaji K. J, Hirve S. S, Rao S, Barker D. J. P and Kellingray S. Neonatal anthropometry: the thin–fat Indian baby. The Pune maternal nutrition study. International journal of obesity. 2003; 27(2): 173.
    CrossRef
26. Rao S, Yajnik C. S, Kanade A, Fall C. H, Margetts B. M, Jackson A. A and Desai B. Intake of micronutrient-rich foods in rural Indian mothers is associated with the size of their babies at birth: Pune Maternal Nutrition Study. The Journal of nutrition. 2001; 131(4): 1217-1224.
    CrossRef
27. Mohanty C, Prasad R, Srikanth Reddy A, Ghosh J.K, Singh T.B, Das B.K. Maternal anthropometry as predictors of low birth weight. J Trop Pediatr 2006; 52(1): 24-9
    CrossRef
28. Karan S and Mathur Y. C. Risk factors in mothers and newborn. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics. 1987; 54(1): 35-40
    CrossRef
29. Mumbare S. S, Maindarkar G, Darade R, Yenge S, Tolani M. K and Patole K. Maternal risk factors associated with term low birth weight neonates: a matched-pair case control study. Indian pediatrics. 2012; 49(1): 25-28.
    CrossRef
30. Sudha G, Reddy T.M, Narasimhulu S, Reddy K.K, Reddy K.S. Prevalence and Correlates of Low Birth Weight in Chittoor District of Andhra Pradesh, India. Obstet Gynecol Int J. 2017; 7(1): 00233. DOI: 10.15406/ogij.2017.07.00233.
    CrossRef
31. Ververs M, Antierens A, Sackl A, Staderini N and Captier V. Which Anthropometric Indicators Identify a Pregnant Woman as Acutely Malnourished and Predict Adverse Birth Outcomes in the Humanitarian Context? PLoS Currents, 5
32. Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. Weight gain during pregnancy: reexamining the guidelines. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2009.
33. Haugen M, Brantsaeter A.L, Winkvist A, Lissner L, Alexander J, Oftedal B. et al. Associations of pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain with pregnancy outcome and postpartum weight retention: a prospective observational cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14:201. pmid:24917037.
34. Frederick I. O, Williams M. A, Sales A. E, Martin D. P and Killien M. Pre-pregnancy body mass index, gestational weight gain, and other maternal characteristics in relation to infant birth weight. Maternal and child health journal. 2008; 12(5); 557-567.
    CrossRef
35. Yang Y.D, Yang H.X. Investigation into the clinical suitability of Institute of Medicine 2009 guidelines regarding weight gain during pregnancy for women with full term singleton fetus in China. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2012; 47: 646–50.
36. Liu Y, Dai W, Dai X, Li Z. Prepregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain with the outcome of pregnancy: A 13-year study of 292,568 cases in China. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012; 286: 905–11.
    CrossRef
37. Radhakrishnan U, Kolar G, Nirmalan P.K. Cross-sectional study of gestational weight gain and perinatal outcomes in pregnant women at a tertiary care center in Southern India. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014; 40: 25-31.
    CrossRef
38. Chihara I, Hayes D. K, Chock L. R, Fuddy L. J, Rosenberg D. L and Handler A. S. Relationship between gestational weight gain and birthweight among clients enrolled in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), Hawaii, 2003–2005. Maternal and child health journal. 2014; 18(5): 1123-1131.
    CrossRef
39. Pal R, Maiti M, Roychoudhury B, Sanyal P, Chowdhury B. Association of Pregestational BMI and Antenatal Weight Gain With Pregnancy Outcome: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study. International Journal of Womens Health and Reproduction Sciences. 2017; 1;5(1): 37-40.
40. Manerkar K, Gokhale D. Effect of Maternal Diet Diversity and Physical Activity on Neonatal Birth Weight: A Study from Urban Slums of Mumbai. Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research, Oct 2017.
41. Kiserud T, Piaggio G, Carroli G, Widmer M, Carvalho J, Jensen L.N, Giordano D, Cecatti J.G, Aleem H.A, Talegawkar S.A, Benachi A. The World Health Organization Fetal Growth Charts: a multinational longitudinal study of ultrasound biometric measurements and estimated fetal weight. PLoS medicine. 2017; 24; 14(1): e1002220.
42. Pickett K. E, Abrams B and Selvin S. Maternal height, pregnancy weight gain, and birthweight. American Journal of Human Biology. 2000; 12(5): 682-687.
    CrossRef
43. Hirve S. S and Ganatra B. R. Determinants of low birth weight: a community based prospective cohort study. Indian pediatrics. 1994; 31(10): 1221-5.
44. Agrawal A, Sharma V. To Study the maternal factors which determine the low birth weight babies?. Pediatric Review: International Journal of Pediatric Research. 2017; 31; 4(01).
45. Shrivastava J, Agrawal A, Giri A. Maternal anthropometry in relation to birth weight of newborn: A prospective hospital based study. Indian Journal of Child Health. 2016 25; 3(1): 59-63.
46. Elshibly E.M, Schmalisch G. The effect of maternal anthropometric characteristics and social factors on gestational age and birth weight in Sudanese newborn infants. BMC Public Health 2008; 8: 244.
    CrossRef
47. Dhar B, Bhadra S.K. Use of anthropometric indicators for predicting risk of delivering low birth weight babies. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull. 2008; 34(2): 64-6.
    CrossRef
48. Ojha N and Malla D. S. Low birth weight at term: relationship with maternal anthropometry. 2007.
49. Carr R. V, Rempel R. D and Ross W. D. Sitting height: an analysis of five measurement techniques. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 1989; 79(3): 339-344.
    CrossRef
50. Fredriks A. M, Buuren van S, Heel van W. J. M, Dijkman-Neerincx R. H. M, Verloove-Vanhorick S. P and Wit J. M. Arch Dis Child 2005 90: 807-812 originally published online April 29, 2005; doi:
    10.1136/adc.2004.050799 Updated
    CrossRef
51. Banik S. D. Sitting height ratio and interpretation of BMI-based nutritional status among Sarak adults of Bundu, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India. Anthropological Notebooks. 2016; 22(1): 109-115.

(Visited 2,216 times, 2 visits today)