{"id":58065,"date":"2024-06-25T11:32:37","date_gmt":"2024-06-25T11:32:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/?p=58065"},"modified":"2024-07-04T11:21:27","modified_gmt":"2024-07-04T11:21:27","slug":"non-invasive-bio-impedance-diagnostics-delving-into-signal-frequency-and-electrode-placement-effects","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/vol17no2\/non-invasive-bio-impedance-diagnostics-delving-into-signal-frequency-and-electrode-placement-effects\/","title":{"rendered":"Non-Invasive Bio-impedance Diagnostics: Delving into Signal Frequency and Electrode Placement Effects"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Introduction<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bio-impedance\nspectroscopy has emerged as a powerful non-invasive technique for assessing the\nelectrical properties of biological tissues and their physiological conditions.\nThis method utilizes the variation in impedance, which includes resistance and\nreactance, in response to alternating current signals across a range of frequencies.\nThe electrical properties of tissues are influenced by factors such as cell\ncomposition, fluid distribution, and cellular membrane characteristics.\nTherefore, bio-impedance spectroscopy has found applications in fields ranging\nfrom medical diagnosis to monitoring changes in body composition [1]. Recent\nadvances in biomedical engineering have emphasized the significance of\nelectrode designs and their impact on capturing bioelectrical signals. A\ncomb-shaped surface electrode for measuring signals from tissues cultured with\nelectric stimulation, underscoring the need for innovative designs in achieving\nprecise measurements. Similarly, the relevance of design configurations in\nrecording bioelectric signals, particularly in the assessment of ultraviolet\nradiation effects on tissues [3].<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Implantable electrodes\nand their biocompatibility are also of paramount importance. The investigation\non tissue reactions to a polyimide cuff electrode implanted around the sciatic\nnerves of rats, emphasizing the challenges associated with foreign body\nresponses and the importance of selecting appropriate insulating materials [2].\nFurther delving into the technical aspects, Finite element model was utilized\nto simulate surface EMG signals. They focused on the role of dielectric\nproperties and electrode configurations in influencing the myoelectric activity\ndetected at the surface, highlighting the critical interplay between electrode\ndesign and tissue properties [4].<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moreover, the integration\nof optical measurements with bioelectrical readings has garnered attention. A\nnovel photometric patch electrode capable of simultaneous neural electrical\nactivity and optical signal measurements in brain tissues, underscoring the\npotential of such integrative approaches in advancing diagnostic and\ninvestigative capabilities [5].  The\nfield of bio-impedance is witnessing a shift towards Multi-frequency\nBio-impedance Analysis (MF-BIA), allowing simultaneous measurements across\nvarious frequencies for comprehensive tissue assessment. Coupled with this,\nadvancements in wearable bio-impedance devices enable continuous monitoring,\nblending diagnostic precision with user convenience, aligning seamlessly with\ntele-health and real-time health monitoring trends.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bio-impedance approaches\nare fully reliant on the use of a high-frequency low-intensity input signal.\nThe key determinants of bio-impedance diagnosis depend on the frequency [6] at\nwhich the measurement is carried out, the type of electrode, electrode location\nand the separation between the electrodes. The error generated during the\nmeasurement depends on the frequency [7] at which the measurement is performed\nas well as on the intensity of the applied current. As a result, choosing the\nright amplitude of current and frequency utilized for measurement is crucial.\nThe flow of current through a biological tissue relies completely on the\nelectrical characteristics of the tissue [8] and also on the electrical characteristics\nof the applied signal. The intracellular fluid behaves as a good conductor of\nelectricity and therefore develops a resistance for any applied alternating\ncurrent. The presence of ionic components in the extracellular fluid develops\nresistance [9] to any flow of current in the extracellular region. The internal\nand external cellular fluids, separated by the cell membrane which act as\ncapacitance storing the charges at either side of the membrane when excited by\nan external applied current. The capacitance developed by the cell membrane\ninduces capacitive reactance which depends on the structural composition of the\nmembrane as well as on the applied signal frequency [10]. The frequency of the\nexcited signal has an inverse relationship with the capacitive reactance(Xc =\n1\/2\u03c0fC). Thus, an electrical bio-impedance is generated by the resistance\noffered by the intracellular and extracellular fluid [11] and also by the\ncapacitance that has developed across the cell membrane.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/td>\n\n

Figure 1: Equivalent circuit representation of cell.<\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Click here to view Figure<\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n

The generalized\nelectrical circuit representation of cell and its associated impedance is shown\nin figure1.The bio-impedance generated varies according to the input excitation\ncurrent and its frequency. To perform any measurement using bio-impedance technique\nit is crucial to identify the variation in the peak bio-impedance value with\nrespect to the frequency. For this purpose AD5933 evaluation board by Analog\nDevices were chosen. It is an impedance generating system with great precision [12]\nthat estimates the peak magnitude and corresponding phase of the impedance at\nregular frequency points. Experiment was conducted by applying a low magnitude\ncurrent using two of electrodes. These electrodes are positioned at the lower\npart of the neck exactly at the latero-cervical region. Other set of two\nelectrodes are positioned at the mid axillaries line at the upper abdominal\nregion [13]. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The induced electric\ncurrent takes its path through the aorta and the venae cavae of thoracic\nregion. This flow of current depends on blood volume [14] [15] of the\nunderlying tissue and therefore produces trans-thoracic impedance that changes\naccording to the blood flow. Using a constant current source of 10mA,\nmeasurement of impedance was performed by varying the frequency from 1KiloHertz\nto 100 KHz. Generated bio-impedance signal is influenced by blood flow and\nblood volume, distribution of current [16] and variations in the blood flow\nresistance in the place where electrodes are positioned. A sine wave with\nvoltage of 2V(P-P) was selected from the current source. To obtain an\nundistorted impedance wave, the feedback resistor connected between the voltage\npins Vin<\/sub> and Vout<\/sub> was adjusted to ensure correct\ncalibration.. After the initial configuration, set values were loaded into the\nregister of the program device and the set up were completed to determine the\nfactor of gain. The frequency was varied to excite tissue with various\npredefined range of frequency. Impedance values were tabulated and graph was\nplotted against the signal frequency and the mean impedance value as shown in\nfigure 1.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The study of\nbio-impedance spectroscopy has garnered significant attention due to its\npotential in providing insights into various physiological and pathological\nconditions [17]. They emphasized that the selection of appropriate frequency\nand current amplitude is crucial for accurate measurements. Measurement error\nvaries with frequency and current intensity, underlining the need for careful\nconsideration in experimental design were highlighted [19].Researchers have\ninvestigated the role of electrode positioning in bio-impedance measurements [20].\nThe type of electrode used and its distance from the tissue surface can\nintroduce variations in the obtained impedance values. Different types of\nelectrodes, such as disposable foam pad electrodes, metallic disc electrodes,\nmetallic plate electrodes, and suction cup electrodes, have been explored for\ntheir suitability in bio-impedance measurements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In this study, we delve into the nuanced dynamics of bio-impedance signals, focusing on two central variables: input signal frequency and electrode positioning. Initially, we use the AD5933 evaluation board to examine how varying frequencies influence bio-impedance. Subsequently, we pivot to assess the role of electrode placement, experimenting with different types, including foam pad and metallic disc electrodes. By systematically altering electrode positions and distances, and measuring impedance across varied frequencies, we aim to discern the optimal conditions for precise bio-impedance readings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Materials and Methodology<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Electrodes can be constructed from a wide range of materials. Silver, titanium, copper, platinum are the most common materials utilized. Electrodes made of silver-silver chloride are commonly utilized for measurement of bio-impedance. The electrodes [21] [22] are generally categorized as gel type, capacitive type, active and passive type. For bio potential measuring system, electrodes are categorized as metal surface electrodes that are non-invasive and microelectrodes that are invasive [23]. Most popularly used metal surface electrodes can be further classified as <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Disposable foam pad electrodes<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Metallic disc electrodes<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Metallic plate electrodes<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Suction cup electrodes<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/td>\n\n

Figure 2: a. Disposable foam pad electrode, b. Metallic disc electrode,
c. Metallicplate electrode and d. Suction cup electrode<\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Click here to view Figure<\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n

For\nmeasurement and diagnosis need most often used electrode is foam pad disposable\ntype electrode which can be used for patients undergoing surgery and for those\nsuffering from contagious condition. This type of electrode has a silver plate\ndisc with electrolytic gel which is coated with silver chloride layer and the\nfoam is occupied by an adhesive biocompatible material [24] [25]. The substrate\ncomprising of silver is submerged in chlorine ion solution and electrolysis is\ndone. The copper wire connected to the electrode helps in transuding ionic\ncurrents into electrical current thus picking up the bio signals. The non polarisable\nbehaviour of the silver- silver chloride electrode produces less electrical\nnoise. Therefore, this type of electrode is preferred for measuring low voltage\nbio signals [26] [27]. Metallic suction cup surface electrodes do not require\nany adhesive. These types of electrodes are easy to place on the surface of the\nskin without causing any irritation to skin [28]. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bio-impedance\nanalysis (BIA) serves as a critical tool in correlating the impedance values of\nbiological tissues to specific physiological or pathological states. When\nexamining body composition, a diminished impedance value often denotes an\nincreased water or muscle content, while heightened impedance suggests a\npredominant fat presence, proving pivotal for evaluations related to obesity\nand malnutrition. Fluid status in patients can also be gauged: a spike in\nimpedance may signal dehydration, whereas a drop may highlight edema,\nespecially crucial for patients with heart or renal ailments. Monitoring wound\nrecovery is another application. If an injured area displays a progressive\ndecline in impedance, it’s indicative of enhanced blood flow and healing; conversely,\nstagnant or rising values may signify potential necrosis. In the context of\npulmonary examinations, particularly for conditions like congestive heart\nfailure, an upswing in thoracic impedance can be suggestive of decreased fluid\naccumulation in the lungs. Additionally, the differentiation between malignant\nand benign tumors can be aided by BIA, as malignant growths may present\ndistinct impedance values in contrast to benign ones or the adjacent tissues.\nWhile less conventional, bone health assessments can also leverage BIA.\nVariations in impedance could potentially infer changes in bone mineral\ndensity, offering insights for osteoporosis screenings. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hardware Description<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

For our bio-impedance\nevaluations, we made use of the AD5933 impedance converter system from Analog\nDevices, Inc. This tool combines a frequency generator with a 12-bit, 1 MSPS\nADC. By exciting external complex impedance at a specified frequency, the\nAD5933 records the resultant signal through its in-built ADC. A subsequent Discrete\nFourier Transform is carried out by the onboard DSP, providing real and\nimaginary data values for each frequency point. After calibration, this enables\nthe precise calculation of both the impedance magnitude and phase. The internal\ncircuit for our AD5933-based bio-impedance measuring system is depicted in\nFigure 3, illustrating its design and interconnections. This system’s\ndemonstrated proficiency in bioelectrical impedance analysis made it\nparticularly suitable for our research activities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/td>\n\n

Figure 3A: Schematic of the AD5933-Based Bio-Impedance Measuring Circuitry<\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Click here to view Figure<\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n

To analyze the impact of\nelectrode positioning and its distance experiment was carried out by a waveform\ngenerator with variable frequency AD5955evaluation board which is an impedance analyzer\n[29] [30].  A sine wave of 2V peak to\npeak excitation signal is generated with a frequency of 500Hz. The frequency of\nthe signal is varied in step of 100 from 500Hz to 10 KHz and the variation in\nthe peak bio-impedance value is observed. Bio-impedance is obtained with the\nhelp of electrodes. Different type of electrodes are available for measurement\npurpose, but most commonly used electrode for bio-impedance measurement is\nsilver-silver chloride surface electrode [31] [32] Widely utilized measuring\nset up for electrode system is the tetra polar system, where four electrodes\nare used [33] [34]. One set of electrodes introduced for injecting the input signal\nand another set of electrodes is utilized to detect the output potential [35]\n[36]. The separation between the output electrodes plays a significant role in\nthe diagnosis. Thus, distance between output electrodes is varied in accordance\nwith the frequency of the excitation signal [37] [38].<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The experiment involves\nassessing the impact of electrode positioning and signal frequency on\nbio-impedance measurements [39] [40]. A waveform generator with a variable\nfrequency AD5955 evaluation board, serving as an impedance analyzer, is used\n[41] [42]. A sine wave with a 2V peak-to-peak excitation signal is generated at\na frequency of 500Hz. The frequency is varied in increments of 100Hz from 500Hz\nto 10 KHz, and the corresponding peak bio-impedance values are observed [43]\n[44]. The tetra polar electrode setup is employed, utilizing four electrodes.\nOne set of electrodes injects the input signal, while another set detects the\noutput potential. The separation between the output electrodes is varied based\non the frequency of the excitation signal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Frequency Dependence Analysis<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The variation in the\nmagnitude and phase of the bio-impedance signal is analyzed and tabulated for\ndifferent frequencies. The mean impedance values and standard deviations are\ncomputed and recorded in Table 1. The analysis shows that the impedance value decreases\nas the frequency increases. At lower frequencies, the impedance is higher due\nto the dominance of extracellular fluid conductance. As the frequency\nincreases, the capacitive reactance decreases, allowing current to penetrate\nthe cell membrane, resulting in decreased impedance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Electrode Distance and Impedance:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

To evaluate the influence\nof electrode distance on bio-impedance, experiments are conducted with varying\nelectrode spacing. The peak impedance values for different electrode distances\nare recorded in Table 2. The results show a linear correlation between\nelectrode spacing and peak impedance values. As the distance between electrodes\nincreases, the impedance magnitude also increases. This emphasizes the\nimportance of accurate electrode placement to ensure undistorted peak impedance\nvalues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/td>\n\n

Figure 3B: Four electrode system placement position.<\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Click here to view Figure<\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n

Results and Discussion<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Our experiment aimed to investigate the relationship between impedance and frequency, as well as the effects of electrode spacing on peak impedance. The results have provided several specific insights which will be discussed in depth below.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Impedance Variation with Frequency:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

As shown in Table 1,\nthere’s a distinct trend observed in the variation of impedance with frequency.\nSpecifically, the mean impedance value drops significantly as we move from 1KHz\nto 200KHz.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Table 1: Variation of Impedance with frequency<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

S.NO<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

FREQUENCY (HZ)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

MEAN IMPEDANCE (\u2126)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

STANDARD DEVIATION<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

1<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1K<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1316.43<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6.54<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

2<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

10K<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1258.13<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

5.74<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

3<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20K<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

738.25<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3.88<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

30K<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

615.66<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.46<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

5<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

40K<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

567.12<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.13<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

6<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

50K<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

502.52<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1.77<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

7<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

60K<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

469.74<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1.36<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

8<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

70K<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

413.36<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.19<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

9<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

80K<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

353.78<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3.14<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

10<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

90K<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

279.47<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4.36<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

11<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

100K<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

221.36<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1.79<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

12<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

110K<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

219.58<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3.3<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

13<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

120K<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

215.88<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1.93<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

14<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

130K<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

210.16<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.06<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

15<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

140K<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

195.24<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4.5<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

16<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

150K<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

189.47<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0.86<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

17<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

160K<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

185.14<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3.87<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

18<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

170K<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

176.18<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1.36<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

19<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

180K<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

162.77<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.69<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

20<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

200K<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

157.93<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.84<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n\n\n

At 1KHz, the mean\nimpedance is 1316.43\u03a9 with a standard deviation of 6.54. By the time we reach\n200KHz, this value drops to 157.93\u03a9 with a standard deviation of 2.84. This is\na remarkable decrease by almost 87.99% over this frequency range. The largest drop\nin mean impedance is observed between 10KHz and 20KHz, where the value falls by\napproximately 41.26%. This interval provides a crucial insight into the behaviour\nof biological tissues and their capacitive and resistive components. Figure 4,\nwhich visually plots the mean impedance against frequency, reaffirms the\ninverse relationship seen in the tabulated data. The graphical representation\nmakes it evident that the impedance values drop sharply initially and then\nbegin to plateau at higher frequencies. This behaviour is consistent with the\ntheoretical understanding that at lower frequencies, the capacitive reactance\nof cell membranes dominates, thereby showing higher impedance due to restricted\ncurrent penetration. As frequency rises, this capacitive barrier reduces,\nallowing more current to penetrate through the cell membrane, leading to a\ndecrease in impedance values.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Peak Impedance Variation with Electrode Distance:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Table 2 and Figure 5 shed\nlight on another important aspect of our study – the relationship between\nelectrode distance and peak impedance. \nStarting from an electrode distance of 4 cm which records a peak\nimpedance of 201\u03a9, we see a linear increase in impedance as the distance\nincreases, culminating in 230\u03a9 at 22 cm. It is evident that as the spacing\nbetween electrodes increases, so does the magnitude of impedance. This is\nparticularly significant between distances of 4 cm and 22 cm, showing an\nincrease of approximately 14.42%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/td>\n\n

Figure 4: Mean impedance plot with respect to frequency<\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Click here to view Figure<\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n

Table 2: Variation of peak impedance with electrode distance<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

S.NO<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

ELECTRODE DISTANCE (CM)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

PHASE<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

MAGNITUDE<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

PEAK IMPEDANCE (OHM)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

1<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

22<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

9.64<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6732.603<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

230<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

2<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

11.04<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6530.755<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

225<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

3<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

18<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

11.48<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6489.356<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

221<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

16<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6.82<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6344.05<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

219<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

5<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

14<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

12.37<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6314.951<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

217<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

6<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

12<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

13.05<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6028.763<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

209<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

7<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

10<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

13.19<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6020.925<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

205<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

8<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

8<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

7.74<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6000.469<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

204<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

9<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

7.58<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

5858.264<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

193<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

10<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

7.32<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

5955.906<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

201<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/td>\n\n

Figure 5: Peak Impedance variations with respect to Electrode spacing.<\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Click here to view Figure<\/a><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n

It is also interesting to note the phase variations across different distances. For instance, the phase at 4 cm is 7.32, and it shows variability, reaching a maximum of 13.19 at a 10 cm distance, before reducing again.  The direct relationship between electrode spacing and peak impedance emphasizes the importance of precise electrode placement. To ensure accurate bio-impedance measurements, attention must be given to the exact distance between electrodes, especially as the magnitude of impedance is found to increase linearly with spacing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In our comprehensive study on bio-impedance analysis, we meticulously examined two key parameters: the relationship between signal frequency and impedance, and the influence of electrode spacing on peak impedance. Our experimental data from Table 1 revealed a notable decrease in mean impedance, specifically a reduction of approximately 87.99% as we transitioned from 1KHz to 200KHz. This highlights the pivotal role of frequency selection in obtaining accurate impedance readings. Similarly, the data from Table 2 demonstrated a linear increase in peak impedance of roughly 14.42% as electrode spacing ranged from 4 cm to 22 cm. This emphasizes the paramount importance of precise electrode positioning for accurate measurements. Thus, we’ve established concrete relationships between signal frequency, electrode positioning, and bio-impedance, presenting foundational insights that are crucial for enhancing the precision of bio-impedance diagnostics in diverse healthcare applications.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Future Scope<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Exploring the effects of\nvarying tissue thickness and type can yield deeper insights into impedance\nvalues across diverse biological samples. Additionally, investigating the\ninfluence of different current amplitudes on impedance can further refine our\nunderstanding of bio-impedance behaviour, emphasizing the need for meticulous\nexperimental setups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

References<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

  1. S. Hashimoto et al., “Design of comb-shaped surface electrode to measure signal from tissue cultured with electric stimulation,” in WMSCI 2016 – 20th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, Proceedings, 2016, vol. 2, pp. 99-104.<\/li>
  2. Baumgartner R. N, Chumlea W. C, Roche A. F (1988), \u201cBioelectric impedance phase angle and body composition\u201d, Am. J. Clin. Nutr., vol.48, pp.16\u201323.
    CrossRef <\/a><\/li>
  3. Beckmann L., Riesen D., Leonhardt S. (2007), “Optimal electrode placement and frequency range selection for the detection of lung water using Bioimpedance Spectroscopy”, In the Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS Cit\u00e9 International, Lyon, France August 23-26, pp. 2685-2688.
     CrossRef <\/a><\/li>
  4. Bera T. K.,Nagaraju J. (2011), \u201cElectrical Impedance Spectroscopic Study Of Broiler Chicken Tissues Suitable For The Development Of Practical Phantoms In Multifrequency EIT,\u201d Journal of Electrical Bioimpedance, Vol. 2, pp. 48\u201363.
     CrossRef <\/a><\/li>
  5. Caicedo-Eraso J. C., Gonz\u00e1lez-Correa C. H., Gonz\u00e1lez-Correa C. A. (2012),  \u201cUse of electrocardiogram (ECG) electrodes for Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA)\u201d, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 407 012008.
     CrossRef <\/a><\/li>
  6. Cornish B, Ward L, Thomas B, Jebb S, Elia M (1996), \u201cEvaluation of multiple frequency bioelectrical impedance and cole-cole analysis for the assessment of body water volumes in healthy humans\u201d, Eur. J. Clin. Nutr., vol.50, pp.159\u2013164. <\/li>
  7. Cox-Reijven P L and Soeters P B (2000), \u201cValidation of bio-impedance spectroscopy: Effects of degree of obesity and ways of calculating volumes from measured resistance values\u201d, International Journal of Obesity, vol.24, pp.271-280.
    CrossRef <\/a><\/li>
  8. Dai T. and Adler A. (2009), \u201cIn vivo blood characterisation from bioimpedance spectroscopy of blood pooling\u201d, IEEE Trans. on Instr. And Meas., vol.58, no.11, pp.3831-3838.
    CrossRef <\/a><\/li>
  9. Krishnan, G.H., Natarajan, R.A., and Nanda, A., “Comparative study of rheumatoid arthritis diagnosis using two methods,” Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 379-381, 2014. doi: 10.13005\/bpj\/502
     CrossRef <\/a><\/li>
  10. Hari Krishnan, G.H., Ananda Natarajan, R., and Nanda, A., “Impact of upper limb joint fluid variation on inflammatory diseases diagnosis,” Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 2114-2117, 2014. doi: 10.5370\/JEET.2014.9.6.2114
    CrossRef <\/a><\/li>
  11. Mohandass, G., Ananda Natarajan, R., and Hari Krishnan, G., “Comparative analysis of optical coherence tomography retinal images using multidimensional and cluster methods,” Biomedical Research (India), vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 273-285, 2015.<\/li>
  12. B. Hiebl et al., “In vivo assessment of tissue compatibility and functionality of a polyimide cuff electrode for recording afferent peripheral nerve signals,” Applied Cardiopulmonary Pathophysiology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 212-219, 2010.<\/li>
  13. F. Garay et al., “Design of a Device for Recording Bioelectric Signals with Surface Electrodes, in the Evaluation of the Effect of Ultraviolet Radiation on a Tissue,” in Communications in Computer and Information Science, 2018, vol. 916, pp. 428-441.
     CrossRef <\/a><\/li>
  14. Krishnan, G.H., Natarajan, R.A., and Nanda, A., “Microcontroller based non invasive diagnosis of knee joint diseases,” in Proc. of the 2014 International Conference on Information Communication and Embedded Systems (ICICES 2014), 2015. doi: 10.1109\/ICICES.2014.7034178
     CrossRef <\/a><\/li>
  15. V. G. Anand, G. H. Krishna, G. Mohandass, R. J. Hemalatha and S. Sundaram, “Predicting grade of prostate cancer using image analysis software,” Trendz in Information Sciences & Computing (TISC2010), Chennai, India, 2010, pp. 122-124, doi: 10.1109\/TISC.2010.5714621.
     CrossRef<\/a> <\/li>
  16. Hemalatha, R.J., Krishnan, G.H., Umashankar, G., and Abraham, S., “Computerized breast cancer detection system,” Biosciences Biotechnology Research Asia, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 907-910, 2014. doi: 10.13005\/bbra\/1357
     CrossRef <\/a><\/li>
  17. Hari Krishnan, G., Hemalatha, R.J., Umashankar, G., Ahmed, N., and Nayak, S.R., “Development of Magnetic Control System for Electric Wheel Chair Using Tongue,” in Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 308 AISC, no. VOLUME 1, pp. 635-641, 2015. doi: 10.1007\/978-81-322-2012-1_68
     CrossRef <\/a><\/li>
  18. Sudhakar, T., Hari Krishnan, G., Krishnamoorthy, N.R., Janney J, B., Pradeepa, M., and Raghavi, J.P., “Sleep Disorder Diagnosis using EEG based Deep Learning Techniques,” in Proc. of the 2021 IEEE 7th International Conference on Bio Signals, Images and Instrumentation (ICBSII 2021), 2021. doi: 10.1109\/ICBSII51839.2021.9445158
     CrossRef <\/a><\/li>
  19. A. Teklemariam et al., “A Finite Element Model simulation of surface EMG signals based on muscle tissue dielectric properties and electrodes configuration,” in 2014 9th International Symposium on Communication Systems, Networks and Digital Signal Processing, CSNDSP 2014, 2014, pp. 193-197.
     CrossRef <\/a><\/li>
  20. Abdurrahman A., Price D., Bhansali S.(2007),\u201d Effect of electrode geometry on the impedance evaluation of tissue and cell culture Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical Vol 127 Issue 1 pp 89- 96.
     CrossRef <\/a><\/li>
  21. Ayllon D, Seoane F, Gil-Pita R (2009), \u201cCole equation and parameter estimation from electrical bioimpedance spectroscopy measurements-a comparative study\u201d, In Proceedings of Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC 2009), Minneapolis, pp.3779\u20133782.
    CrossRef <\/a><\/li>
  22. Nagarjuna Reddy, A., Hari Krishnan, G., and Raghuram, D., “Real time patient health monitoring using raspberry PI,” Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 570-575, 2016.<\/li>
  23. Hari Krishnan, G., Umashankar, G., and Abraham, S., “Cerebrovascular disorder diagnosis using MR angiography,” Biomedical Research (India), vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 773-775, 2016.<\/li>
  24. Santhosh, S., Juliet, A.V., and Krishnan, G.H., “Predictive analysis of identification and disease condition monitoring using bioimpedance data,” Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 2955-2963, 2021. doi: 10.1007\/s12652-020-02452-7
     CrossRef <\/a><\/li>
  25. Ilangovan, N. and Hari Krishnan, G., “Wheel chair movement control using human input: Comparative study approach,” Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 568-570, 2015.<\/li>
  26. Hari Krishnan, G., Abinaya, N., Hemalatha, R.J., and Mohandass, G., “Hardware implementation for feedback control based health monitoring and drug delivery,” Biomedicine (India), vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 123-126, 2017.<\/li>
  27. Santhosh, S., Juliet, A.V., and Krishnan, G.H., “Impact of electrodes separation distance on bio-impedance diagnosis,” Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 141-146, 2021. doi: 10.13005\/bpj\/2108
     CrossRef <\/a><\/li>
  28. Umashankar, G., Hari Krishnan, G., Hemalatha, R.J., Abraham, S., and Divakaran, S., “Assistive system for remote accident patients,” Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 516-520, 2014.<\/li>
  29. Sudhakar, T., Hari Krishnan, G., Santosh, S., Meenakshi, S., and Thomas, L., “Prosthetic arm control using processing device, a comparative approach,” Biomedical Research (India), vol. 29, no. 13, pp. 2904-2907, 2018. doi: 10.4066\/biomedicalresearch.29-17-3417
     CrossRef <\/a><\/li>
  30. Sudhakar, T., Krishnan, G.H., Umashankar, G., Divakaran, S., Bhurnima, U., and Shanchita, B., “Drug Retrieving System in Hospitals Using Robotics,” Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1239-1244, 2020. doi: 10.13005\/bpj\/1992
     CrossRef <\/a><\/li>
  31. Sudhakar, T., Hari Krishnan, G., Prem Kumar, J., Divakaran, S., Janney, B., Mohandass, G., Devanesan, P.S., and Shalini, S., “Inducement of Artificial Sleep using Low Strength Magnetic Waves,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 2318, no. 1, 2022. doi: 10.1088\/1742-6596\/2318\/1\/012028
     CrossRef <\/a><\/li>
  32. Ganesan, U., Paul, N.E.E., Krishnan, G.H., Aarthi, S., and Swamy, I.K., “Detecting Diabetes Mellitus from Tongue Image Hybrid Features and Neural Network Classifier,” in Proc. of the 4th International Conference on Cybernetics, Cognition and Machine Learning Applications (ICCCMLA 2022), 2022, pp. 425-427. doi: 10.1109\/ICCCMLA56841.2022.9989053
     CrossRef <\/a><\/li>
  33. Abraham, S., Krishnan, G.H., Hemalatha, R.J., Divakaran, S., and Umashankar, G., “Design of voice based pill ejector system,” Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 231-234, 2014. doi: 10.13005\/bpj\/478
     CrossRef <\/a><\/li>
  34. Radhakrishna Rao, G. and Hari Krishnan, G., “Comparative study of pacemaker energy harvesting techniques,” Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1545-1547, 2015.<\/li>
  35. Nandhini, P., Hari Krishnan, G., and Umashankar, G., “Home based telemedicine system for respiratory disorder patients,” International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. B227-B231, 2015.<\/li>
  36. Margreat, L. and Hari Krishnan, G., “Statistical approach for diagnosis of diseases using histopathology data,” International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. B199-B203, 2015.<\/li>
  37. Sabarivani, A. and Hari Krishnan, G., “Home health assistive system for critical care patients,” Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 629-633, 2015.<\/li>
  38. Umashankar, G., Hari Krishnan, G., Abraham, S., Hemalatha, R.J., Bethanney Janney, J., Krishnakumar, S., Kirubika, T.R., and Rajendran, M., “Proximity sensing system for retinal surgery patients,” Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 607-610, 2015.<\/li>
  39. Umashankar, G., Vimala, J.A., and Hari, K.G., “Elbow Joints for Upper-Limb Prosthesis: Analysis of Biomedical EEG Signals using Discrete Wavelet Transform,” International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, vol. 70, no. 7, pp. 190-197, 2022. doi: 10.14445\/22315381\/IJETT-V70I7P220
     CrossRef <\/a><\/li>
  40. David Naranjo Hern\u00e1ndez, Javier Reina-Tosina, Mart Min, (2019)\u201d Fundamentals, Recent Advances, and Future Challenges in Bioimpedance Devices for Healthcare Applications\u201d, Journal of Sensors, Volume 2019, Article ID 9210258, 42 pages
     CrossRef <\/a><\/li>
  41. Gautam Anand, Andrew Lowe (2020),\u201d Investigating Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy for Estimating Blood Flow-Induced Variations in Human Forearm\u201d, Sensors 2020, 20, 5333.
     CrossRef <\/a><\/li>
  42. Gong WeiYan, LV JingHua, Wang Yan, Sha Hong, Zhao Shu, RenChaoShi, (2009).\u201d The impedance property of Electrode used in Electrical Bioimpedance Measurement\u201d, 3rd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, Beijing, China, IEEE Xplore; 11-13.
    CrossRef <\/a><\/li>
  43. Hannan W, Cowen S, Plester C, Fearon K, DeBeau A (1995), \u201cComparison of bieimpedance spectroscopy and multi frequency bioimpedance analysis for the assessment of extracellular and total body water in surgical patients\u201d, Clin. Sci., vol.89, pp.651\u2013658.
     CrossRef <\/a><\/li><\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Introduction Bio-impedance spectroscopy has emerged as a powerful non-invasive technique […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":15,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[115],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-58065","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-vol17no2"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58065","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/15"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=58065"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58065\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":59740,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58065\/revisions\/59740"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=58065"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=58065"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=58065"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}