{"id":54218,"date":"2023-12-31T10:08:15","date_gmt":"2023-12-31T10:08:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/?p=54218"},"modified":"2024-01-05T07:59:40","modified_gmt":"2024-01-05T07:59:40","slug":"diagnostic-value-of-crp-h-fabp-pct-lp-pla2-and-cytokines-in-stable-angina","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/vol16no4\/diagnostic-value-of-crp-h-fabp-pct-lp-pla2-and-cytokines-in-stable-angina\/","title":{"rendered":"Diagnostic Value of CRP, H-FABP, PCT, Lp-PLA2 and Cytokines in Stable Angina"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Introduction<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Coronary artery disease&nbsp; (CAD)&nbsp;\nis a significant cause of worldwide&nbsp;\nmortality and morbidity, with an incidence of one in every 6 deaths in\nWestern countries <sup>1<\/sup>. In the past, coronary heart disease showed high\nincidence in older ages <sup>2<\/sup>.&nbsp;However, nowadays, de to accelerated lifestyle\nchanges, economic stresses, and other factors, the incidence of coronary heart\ndisease has increased &nbsp;in middle-aged\nadults <sup>3<\/sup>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In\nstable angina, increased oxygen demand occurs only with physical exertion. Increased myocardial\noxygen demand from exercise is due to increases of heart rate and blood\npressure, as well as increased the contractility of the myocardium, among other\nfactors <sup>4<\/sup>.<sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Many biochemical markers are\nsensitive and specific for myocardial ischemia and can be easily and rapidly\nmeasured in serum <sup>5<\/sup>. &nbsp;Elevated\nlevels of CK-MB activities, Trop I, and MYO are routinely used in early\ndiagnosis of acute coronary syndrome <sup>6<\/sup>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Heart-fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP)\ncould be an important biomarker for the early diagnosis of coronary\nsyndrome&nbsp; according to many recent\ninvestigations. FABPs are relatively low molecular weight cytoplasmic proteins\nthat are prominent in tissues with high metabolism of fatty acid, such as the\nheart <sup>7<\/sup>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Different cardiac diseases,\nincluding coronary syndrome and atherosclerosis, are associated with elevation\nof serum proinflammatory cytokines and CRP <sup>8-13<\/sup>. Furthermore, lipoprotein-associated\nphospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) has been considered as one of the &nbsp;inflammatory biomarker of many cardiovascular\ndiseases<sup> 7<\/sup>. Procalcitonin (PCT) is also implicated as an\ninflammatory marker of early atherosclerosis <sup>14<\/sup>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The current study aims to investigate\nthe diagnostic values of additional biomarkers in stable angina. The establishment of new diagnostic\ntests will enhance the diagnostic abilities to facilitate fast decision making\nin emergency units.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Methods<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Patients and exclusion criteria<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The current study was performed on 86\npatients complaining &nbsp;stable angina, at\nNasiriyah Heart Center from October 2021 to October&nbsp; 2022.&nbsp; Eighty-six,\nhealthy subjects (age-matched) were taken as &nbsp;a control group.&nbsp; Patients with&nbsp; unstable angina,&nbsp; myocardial infarction, and any other heart\ndisease, and those on statins therapy\nwere not included in the study, to avoid interference with the studied parameters.\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Methods<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Blood samples were drawn in the\nemergency department. Serum CRP hs, H-FABP, CK-MB, Trop I, MYO, Lp-PLA2 and PCT\nwere determined by electro-chemiluminescence immunoassay (Nipigon Health Corp.,\nCanada).&nbsp;&nbsp; Blood sugar (Randox,\nUnited Kingdom) and\nserum total cholesterol,&nbsp; triglycerides (Biolabo \/France),&nbsp; LDL, VLDL and HDL (Cobas \/Germany) were determined using Cobas\nC311 photometric assays. Serum&nbsp;IL-6 was determined\nby electro-chemiluminescence immunoassay (ECL, Canada) and serum IL-9, IL-1\u03b2\nand TNF-\u03b1 were assayed by ELISA (Wuhan Fine Biotech Co., Ltd., China),\naccording to operational manuals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Ethical\napproval<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The ethical committee at Thi-Qar\nHealth Directorate has approved the research, and informed consent was taken\nfrom all participants.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Statistical analysis<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The significant variations between groups were assayed\nusing the Student t-test (SPSS, version 26). &nbsp;Proportions were analyzed by\nChi-square. If\nthe p-value is 0.05 or less, the differences were considered significant.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Results<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Characteristics\nof patients<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Eighty\nsix patients with stable angina and eighty-six &nbsp;healthy subjects were studied in this research.\nThe patient&#8217;s&nbsp;mean age was 44.0\u00b110.9 years and the healthy\nsubjects mean age was 41.9\u00b110.1 years (P = 0.192). Among\nthe patients, 47(54.65%)\nwere males and 39 (45.35%) were females and among the healthy subjects, 73(84.88%)\nwere males and 13(15.12%) were females (P&lt;0.001).\nAmong the patients and control groups, 39 (45.35%) and&nbsp; 40 (46.51%) respectively were smokers (P = 0.823).\nThere was no significant variation in the frequency of\noverweight\n[41 (47.67%) vs 37 (43.02%), P = 0.080] and obesity [28 (32.56%) vs 19 (22.10%),\nP = 0.080] between patients and the control group respectively. However, the\ngroup of patients with stable angina showed more frequent occurrence of hypertension\n[27 (31.40%) vs 1 (1.16%), P &lt; 0.001] and diabetes [39 (45.35%)&nbsp; vs 1 (1.16%), P &lt; 0.001] compared to the &nbsp;healthy control (Table 1). <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Biomarkers in stable angina<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Table 2 showed that the level of troponin I\nwas not significantly changed (0.0210\u00b10.0034 vs 0.0200\u00b10.0038 ng\/ml, P = 0.054)\nin stable angina. However, in comparison with the healthy control, the&nbsp; stable angina patients showed a significant elevation\nof serum CK-MB level (3.02\u00b11.46 vs 2.15\u00b11.91 ng\/ml, P &lt; 0.001), myoglobin (62.02\u00b18.40\nvs 49.40\u00b16.00 ng\/ml, P &lt; 0.01), hsCRP (28.90\u00b15.50 vs 7.35\u00b13.51 nmol\/l, P &lt; 0.01), Lp-PLA2 (127.6\u00b119.2 vs 105.0\u00b122.7\nng\/ml, P &lt; 0.01), H-FABP) 6.59\u00b12.71 vs 4.90\u00b11.43, ng\/ml, P &lt; 0.001) &nbsp;and PCT\n(0.056\u00b10.05 vs 0.026\u00b10.02 ng\/ml, P &lt; 0.01). <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Lipid\nprofile in stable angina<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">As\nshown in Table 3, the&nbsp; stable angina\npatients exhibited significantly higher serum level of total cholesterol\n(171.1\u00b124.5 vs 161.2\u00b125.1 mg\/dl, P &lt; 0.05), triglycerides (184.7\u00b137.7 vs 131.8\u00b127.3, mg\/dl, P &lt;\n0.001), LDL cholesterol (90.7\u00b18.5 vs 79.5\u00b128.5 mg\/dl, P &lt; 0.05), and VLDL\ncholesterol (38.3\u00b114.5 vs 27.1\u00b111.3 mg\/dl, P &lt; 0.01), with a significant\ndecline in serum HDL cholesterol (36.0\u00b110.2 vs 43.0\u00b19.2 mg\/dl, P &lt; 0.01). <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Cytokines\nin stable angina&nbsp; <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In comparison with healthy control group, the\npatients with stable angina showed significantly elevated serum levels of IL1\u03b2\n(11.5\u00b13.6 vs 4.6\u00b13.2 nmol\/l, P &lt; 0.001), IL-6 (7.9\u00b16.8 vs 4.3\u00b12.2 Pg\/ml, P &lt;\n0.001), IL-9 (3.7\u00b12.5 vs 2.5\u00b11.6 pg\/ml, P &lt; 0.01) and&nbsp; TNF-\u03b1 (5.2\u00b14.6&nbsp; vs 2.6\u00b11.7 ng\/ml, P &lt; 0.001) (Table 4). <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Table 1: The characteristics of patients with stable angina in comparison with healthy control group. <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n<table style=\"width: 95%;\" border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"4\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"2\" width=\"291\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Parameters<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"146\">\n<p><strong>Control Group<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"142\">\n<p><strong>Patients Group<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"106\">\n<p><strong>P. value<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" colspan=\"2\" width=\"291\">\n<p><strong>Patient number<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"146\">\n<p><strong>86<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"142\">\n<p><strong>86<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"106\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"2\" width=\"291\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">Age (yrs)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"146\">\n<p>41.9\u00b110.1<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"142\">\n<p>44.0\u00b110.9<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"106\">\n<p>&nbsp;NS<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td rowspan=\"2\" width=\"124\">\n<p>Gender<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"167\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">Male<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"146\">\n<p>73 (84.88%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"142\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">47 (54.65%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td rowspan=\"2\" width=\"106\">\n<p>&lt;0.001<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"167\">\n<p>Female<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"146\">\n<p>13 (15.12%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"142\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">39 (45.35%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"2\" width=\"291\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">Smoking<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"146\">\n<p>40 (46.51%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"142\">\n<p>39 (45.35%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"106\">\n<p>NS<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" colspan=\"2\" width=\"291\">\n<p>Hypertension<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"146\">\n<p>1 (1.16%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"142\">\n<p>27 (31.40%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"106\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">&lt;0.001<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td rowspan=\"3\" width=\"124\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">Obesity<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"167\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">Normal weight<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">(18.5 \u2013 24.9) Kg\/m<sup>2<\/sup><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"146\">\n<p>30 (34.88%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"142\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">17(19.77%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" rowspan=\"3\" width=\"106\">\n<p>&nbsp;NS<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"167\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">Overweight<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">(25.0 \u2013 29.9) Kg\/m<sup>2<\/sup><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"146\">\n<p>37 (43.02%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"142\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">41 (47.67%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"167\">\n<p>Obese, \u226530 Kg\/m<sup>2<\/sup><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"146\">\n<p>19 (22.10%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"142\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">28 (32.56%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td colspan=\"2\" width=\"291\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">Diabetic<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"146\">\n<p>1 (1.16%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"142\">\n<p>39 (45.35%)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"106\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">&lt;0.001<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>NS: non-significant<\/p>\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Table 2: Serum biochemical markers levels in&nbsp; stable angina&nbsp; in comparison with the healthy control group. <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n<table style=\"width: 95%;\" border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"4\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"199\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Serum biochemical markers<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\">\n<p><strong>Control Group<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"166\">\n<p><strong>Patients Group<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"118\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>P. value<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"199\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">hsCRP (nmol\/l(<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"159\">\n<p>7.35\u00b13.51<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"166\">\n<p>28.90\u00b15.50<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"118\">\n<p>&lt;0.01<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"199\">\n<p>H-FABP )ng\/ml (<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"159\">\n<p>4.90\u00b11.43<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"166\">\n<p>6.59\u00b12.71<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"118\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">&lt;0.001<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"199\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">CK-MB) ng\/ml(<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"159\">\n<p>2.15\u00b11.91<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"166\">\n<p>3.02\u00b11.46<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"118\">\n<p>&lt;0.001<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"199\">\n<p>Trop I (ng\/ml (<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"159\">\n<p>0.0200\u00b10.0038<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"166\">\n<p>0.0210\u00b10.0034<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"118\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">&nbsp;(NS)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"199\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">MYO) ng\/ml (<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"159\">\n<p>49.40\u00b16.00<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"166\">\n<p>62.02\u00b18.40<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"118\">\n<p>&lt;0.01<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"199\">\n<p>Lp-PLA2 )ng\/ml (<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"159\">\n<p>105.0\u00b122.7<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"166\">\n<p>127.6\u00b119.2<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"118\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">&lt;0.01<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"199\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">PCT (ng\/ml (<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"159\">\n<p>0.026\u00b10.02<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"166\">\n<p>0.056\u00b10.05<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"118\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">&lt;0.01<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>CK-MB: Creatine kinase,&nbsp; H-FABP: heart type fatty acid binding protein,&nbsp; hsCRP: High sensitive C reactive protein,&nbsp; Lp-PLA2: Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2,&nbsp; MYO: Myoglobin,&nbsp; NS: non-significant, PCT: Procalcitonin, Trop I: Troponin I,<\/p>\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Table 3: Lipid profile and blood sugar in&nbsp; stable angina&nbsp; in comparison with the healthy control group.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n<table style=\"width: 95%;\" border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"4\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"228\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Parameters<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"151\">\n<p><strong>Control Group<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"142\">\n<p><strong>Patients Group<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"118\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>P. value<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"228\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">Triglycerides (mg\/dl)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"151\">\n<p>131.8\u00b127.3<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"142\">\n<p>184.7\u00b137.7&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"118\">\n<p>&lt;0.001<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"228\">\n<p>Total cholesterol (mg\/dl)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"151\">\n<p>161.2\u00b125.1<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"142\">\n<p>171.1\u00b124.5 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"118\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">&nbsp;&lt; 0.05<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"228\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">HDL (mg\/dl)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"151\">\n<p>43.0\u00b19.2<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"142\">\n<p>36.0\u00b110.2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"118\">\n<p>&lt;0.01<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"228\">\n<p>LDL (mg\/dl)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"151\">\n<p>79.5\u00b128.5<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"142\">\n<p>90.7\u00b18.5<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"118\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">&nbsp;&lt; 0.05<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"228\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">VLDL (mg\/dl)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"151\">\n<p>27.1\u00b111.3<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"142\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">38.3\u00b114.5<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"118\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">&lt;0.01<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Table 4: Serum cytokines levels in&nbsp; stable angina&nbsp; in comparison with the healthy control group.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n<table style=\"width: 95%;\" border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"4\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"228\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Parameters<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"151\">\n<p><strong>Control Group<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"142\">\n<p><strong>Patients Group<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"118\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>P. value<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"228\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">IL-6 &nbsp;(Pg\/ml)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"151\">\n<p>4.3\u00b12.2<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"142\">\n<p>7.9\u00b16.8<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"118\">\n<p>&lt;0.001<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"228\">\n<p>IL-9 &nbsp;(Pg\/ml)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"151\">\n<p>2.5\u00b11.6<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"142\">\n<p>3.7\u00b12.5<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"118\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">&lt;0.01<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"228\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">IL1\u03b2 (nmol\/l)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"151\">\n<p>4.6\u00b13.2<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"142\">\n<p>11.5\u00b13.6<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"118\">\n<p>&lt;0.001<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"228\">\n<p>TNF-\u03b1) ng\/ml(<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"151\">\n<p>2.6\u00b11.7<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"142\">\n<p>5.2\u00b14.6<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"118\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">&lt;0.001<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Discussion<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Coronary artery disease &nbsp;is a significant cause of worldwide&nbsp; mortality and morbidity. Patients with stable\nCAD can have an unexpected clinical course, therefore, additional diagnostic\nand predictive biomarkers are still required <sup>15<\/sup>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Our results showed a slight\nnonsignificant elevation in serum Troponin I level&nbsp; in patients with stable angina.&nbsp; Previous studies have also, recorded a slight\nincrease in &nbsp;serum troponin I level in\npatients with stable angina. The elevation was positively correlated with the\nextension and severity of atherosclerosis. The necrosis of cardiomyocytes was\nunlikely to be the main cause of the increased levels <sup>16-17<\/sup>.&nbsp;Patients of\nstable angina with elevated troponin levels\nshowed &nbsp;poor long-term prognoses,\nwith higher earlier heart failure and sudden death <sup>18<\/sup>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In our study, patients\nwith ischemic heart diseases also showed significant elevation of the serum levels\nof CK-MB and MYO. Increased serum level of CK-MB in stable angina was also\nrecorded by many authors. Furthermore, readmission and mortality, were more\nfrequently occurred in patients with high CK-MB <sup>19-21<\/sup>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Myoglobin was also moderately increased\nin stable angina <sup>22<\/sup>. &nbsp;However,\nmyoglobin is useful for early exclusion of myocardial infarction, but is less\nuseful when blood sample was taken later.&nbsp; Therefore, the elevation of serum myoglobin must\nbe used with other assessments to aid in the diagnosis <sup>23-24<\/sup>.<sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Our results also revealed that the\nserum level of &nbsp;hs-CRP was elevated significantly\nin patients with stable angina. The previous studies mentioned that\ninflammation played an essential &nbsp;roles\nin atherogenesis initiation and progression.&nbsp;\nAlthough hs-CRP&nbsp; was elevated in stable angina, but its level\nwas significantly less than the level recorded in patients with acute\nmyocardial infarction <sup>25-26<\/sup>.Increased hs-CRP level was proportional\n&nbsp;to the necrotic core in the culprit\nlesion, the length of the lesion was positively correlated\nwith the hs-CRP level.&nbsp; In stable angina, elevation of hs-CRP\nreflected the inflammatory severity of the atherosclerotic plaque <sup>27<\/sup>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">H-FABP was also significantly elevated in\nstable angina in the current research. In studying the value of H-FABP in diagnosis\nand prognosis in a multicenter, prospective study carried out on patients with stable coronary artery disease, it appeared that H-FABP was a potential\nprognostic biomarker for future outcomes.&nbsp;\nMany studies reported that high H-FABP increased the hospital\nreadmission and mortality <sup>28-32<\/sup>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">According to our results, the patients with\nstable angina also showed significantly increased serum Lp-PLA2 levels. Many\nprevious studies revealed that its level was significantly increased in stable\nangina. Several evidences\nsuggested the Lp-PLA2 promoted atherosclerosis by several pathways <sup>33-35<\/sup>.\nHigher level of Lp-PLA2 in stable angina was associated with poor\nintracoronary function (coronary arteriosclerosis, vasoconstriction, and poor\noutflow). Lp-PLA2 is an important factor linked between inflammatory changes\nand endothelial dysfunction, which enhances&nbsp;\nthe development of CAD. These studies recommended the use of Lp-PLA2 as\na useful tool for assessing the level of risk in CAD <sup>36-39<\/sup>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">We also recorded that procalcitonin\n(PCT) was significantly elevated in stable angina. PCT is the precursor of the\nhormone calcitonin, it was a biomarker utilized in the diagnosis of sepsis. It\nindicated the severity of bacterial infection when it progressed into sepsis,\nits high level was correlated with high mortality <sup>40-41<\/sup>. &nbsp;The impact of PCT in cardiovascular diseases\nwas also studied, it appeared that in patients with CAD, the extent of\natherosclerosis and its adverse outcome were positively correlated with PCT\nlevels <sup>42-44<\/sup>.<sup> <\/sup>The high level of&nbsp; PCT within 48 hours post-admission reflected\nan inflammatory condition that associated with increased early and six-month\nmortality <sup>14<\/sup>.<sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Recent\nresearches showed that the atherosclerosis is an\ninflammatory disease. Inflammatory\ncytokines were participated in its &nbsp;initiation and progression, and their serum\nlevels strongly predict coronary artery disease <sup>45-47<\/sup>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Our study revealed that IL-6 was significantly elevated in\nstable angina, many previous studies recorded that serum IL-6 levels were elevated\nsignificantly in patients with stable angina in comparison with control <sup>48-51<\/sup>.\nThe\nIL-6 genetic deficiency enhanced atherosclerotic plaques induced by pathogen\nand\/or diet <sup>52<\/sup>.&nbsp; While, the lipids and other vascular risk were\nbeneficially modified with the clinical using of tocilizumab, the IL-6 receptors\nblocker <sup>53<\/sup>.<sup> &nbsp;<\/sup>IL-6,\nwhich is largely produced by mononuclear cells, and may affected the initiation\nand development of coronary artery disease via a number of mechanisms. It\nincreased blood viscosity, platelet counts and accelerated fibrinogen\ndeposition <sup>54<\/sup>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The\ncurrent study also showed that the serum TNF-\u03b1\nlevel was increased significantly in stable angina compared with control.&nbsp; The same results were previously recorded by many\nauthors <sup>55-56<\/sup>.<sup>&nbsp; <\/sup>In\natherosclerosis, Th cells secrete large amounts of TNF-\u03b1&nbsp; and promoted the progression of\natherosclerosis and plaque enlargement <sup>57<\/sup>. Many&nbsp; TNF-\u03b1 inhibitors suppressed the development\nof&nbsp; atherosclerosis <sup>58<\/sup>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The significant elevation of IL-1\u03b2\nin our study was in agreement with many previous studies <sup>51, 59-60<\/sup>. IL-1\u03b2\nis released during ischemia and triggered neutrophil infiltration into the\nmyocardium. After reperfusion, under the synergistic action of IL-1\u03b2 with other\ncytokines and complements, neutrophils are subsequently activated and interact\nwith endothelial cells, generating reactive oxygen species (ROS) and\naggravating myocardial injury <sup>61<\/sup>.The\nischemic damage was followed by remodeling and healing process that was\ncharacterized by a potent inflammatory response. In injured tissue, the\ninflammatory response was amplified by cryopyrininflammasome. Caspase-1,\ncleaves pro-IL-1\u03b2 once the inflammasome has been triggered by injury.\nFurthermore, leukocyte chemotaxis was induced by IL-1\u03b2&nbsp; in injured myocardium and promoted chemokine\nand cytokine&nbsp; production, and enhanced\nthe inflammatory response <sup>62<\/sup>. <sup><\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The serum IL-9 level was also\nsignificantly increased in stable angina in the current study. Elevation of\nplasma IL-9 has been recorded in ischemic heart diseases and acute ischemic\nstroke <sup>63-64<\/sup>-64]. It was also increased significantly in coronary\natherosclerosis, with elevation of the &nbsp;IL-9R expression and IL-9 level in the\natherosclerotic plaques <sup>65<\/sup>.It was one of cytokines which involved\nin the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis. Treatment with IL-9 exacerbates\natherosclerosis, while, neutralization of IL-9 prevents atherosclerosis\ndevelopment. IL-9 enhances VCAM-1 expression in aortic endothelial cells through\na STAT3-dependent pathway, while, &nbsp;&nbsp;neutralization of VCAM-1 protected from the increasing\nof plaque size induced by IL-9 <sup>66<\/sup>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In general, elevation of the serum\ncytokines may reflect the severity of inflammation in atheroseclerosis, it represented part of the pathogenesis of unstable\nangina and is positively correlated with the course of clinical and\nhemodynamically significant&nbsp;coronary artery disease <sup>49-50, 67<\/sup>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Conclusions<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Early diagnosis remains the main\nprinciples in the treatment of stable angina.\nThis study aims to investigate the benefit&nbsp;\nof additional biochemical markers in diagnosis&nbsp; of stable angina pectoris. The study\nrevealed that hs-CRP, H-FABP, PCT, Lp-PLA2 and cytokines are sensitive, and can serve as diagnosis indicators of stable\nangina pectoris.&nbsp; The elevation of some\ncytokines in patients of&nbsp; stable angina\nmay open the door for subsequent studies to investigate the participation of cytokines&nbsp; in pathogenicity of the disease, and to study\ntheir suppression as a new therapeutic approach.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Acknowledgements<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Wethank the dean and the staff of postgraduate department, Faculty of Medicine, Sousse, Tunisia.We thank the patients who participate in this research. We appreciate the efforts of the staff of Nasiriyah Heart Center.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Conflict of Interest&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There is no conflict of interest<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Funding<\/strong> <strong>Sources<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The authors declare that they do not received&nbsp; financial support from any source.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>References<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>Mozaffarian, D., Benjamin, E. J., Go, A. S., Arnett, D. K., Blaha, M. J., Cushman, M. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics&#8211;2015 Update: A Report from the American Heart Association. <em>Circulation<\/em>.<em>&nbsp; <\/em>2015;131(4):e29-322. <\/li><li>Mirzaei, M., Truswell, A. S., Taylor, R., Leeder, S. R. Coronary Heart Disease Epidemics: Not All the Same.&nbsp; <em>Heart<\/em>. 2009;95(9):740\u2013746.<\/li><li>Leeder, S., Raymond, S., Greenberg, H., Liu, H., Esson, K. A Race Against Time: The Challenge of Cardiovascular Disease in Developing Economies. 2<sup>nd<\/sup> ed. <em>Columbia Univ. <\/em>&nbsp;2014. <\/li><li>Ferrari, R., Camici, P. G., Crea, F., Danchin, N., Fox, K. Maggioni, A. P., Manolis, A. J., Marzilli, M., Rosano, G. M. C., Lopez-Sendon, J. L. Expert Consensus Document: A &#8216;Diamond&#8217; Approach to Personalized Treatment of Angina. <em>Nat Rev Cardiol.<\/em> 2018;15(2):120-132. <\/li><li>Thygesen, K., Alpert, J. S., White, H. D. Joint ESC\/ACCF\/AHA\/WHF Task Force for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction. Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. <em>J Am Coll Cardiol<\/em>. 2007;50(22):2173-2195.&nbsp; <\/li><li>Panteghini, M. Role and Importance of Biochemical Markers in Clinical Cardiology. <em>Eur Heart J.<\/em> 2004;25(14):1187-1196.&nbsp; <\/li><li>MacPhee, C. H., Moores, K. E., Boyd, H. F., Dhanak, D., Ife, R. J., Leach, C. A., Leake, D. S., Milliner, K. J., Patterson, R. A., Suckling, K. E., Tew, D. G., Hickey, D. M. Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2, Platelet-Activating Factor Acetylhydrolase, Generates Two Bioactive Products During the Oxidation of Low-Density Lipoprotein: Use of a Novel Inhibitor. <em>Biochem J<\/em>. 1999;338 (Pt 2):479-487. <\/li><li>Ozdogru, I., Kalay, N., Dogan, A., Inanc, M. T., Kaya, M. G., Topsakal, R., Gul, I., Kutukoglu, I., Kilic, H., Eryol, N. K. The Relationship Between <em>Helicobacter pylori<\/em> IgG Titre and Coronary Atherosclerosis. <em>Acta Cardiol.<\/em> 2007;62(5):501-505.&nbsp; <\/li><li>Videm V. <em>Chlamydia pneumoniae<\/em> Infection and Coronary Artery Disease.&nbsp; <em>Int&nbsp; J Cardiol<\/em>. 2009; 135(3):410. <\/li><li>Skapenko, A.,&nbsp; Schulze-Koops, H. Analysis of Th1\/Th2 T-Cell Subsets. <em>Arthritis Research<\/em>. 2007; 136:87\u201396.<\/li><li>Khalid, H. A., Thuwaini, M. M., Al-Snafi, A. E.&nbsp; Clinical Usefulness of Cytokines as Diagnostic and Follow up Markers in Patients with Stable Angina Pectoris.&nbsp;<em>International Journal of Health Sciences<\/em>. 2022;&nbsp;6(S6): 7102\u20137113.<\/li><li>Tian. R., Hou, G., Li, D., Yuan, T. F. A Possible Change Process of Inflammatory Cytokines in the Prolonged Chronic Stress and its Ultimate Implications for Health. <em>Scientific World Journal<\/em>. 2014;2014:780616. <\/li><li>Hansson, G. K. Inflammation, Atherosclerosis, and Coronary Artery Disease. <em>N Engl J Med<\/em>. 2005;352(16):1685-1695. <\/li><li>Atao\u011flu, H. E., Yilmaz, F., Uzunhasan, I., Cetin, F., Temiz, L., D\u00f6venta\u015f, Y. E., Kaya, A., Yenig\u00fcn, M. Procalcitonin: A Novel Cardiac Marker with Prognostic Value in Acute Coronary Syndrome. <em>J Int Med Res<\/em>. 2010;38:52-61.<\/li><li>McCarthy, C. P., McEvoy, J. W., Januzzi, J. L. Jr. Biomarkers in Stable Coronary Artery Disease. <em>Am Heart J<\/em>. 2018;196:82-96.<\/li><li>Dan\u011bk, J., Hn\u00e1tek, T., Mal\u00fd, M., T\u00e1borsk\u00fd,&nbsp; M., B\u011bl\u00e1\u010dek, J., \u0160kvaril, J., Posp\u00ed\u0161ilov\u00e1, L., \u010cernohous, M., Sedlo\u0148,&nbsp; P., Haj\u0161l, M., Zavoral, M. Troponin Levels in Patients with Stable CAD. <em>Cor et Vasa<\/em>. 2017; 59: e229-e234.<\/li><li>Korosoglou, G., Lehrke, S., Mueller, D., Hosch, W., Kauczor, H. U., Humpert, P. M., Giannitsis, E., Katus, H. A. Determinants of Troponin Release in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From CT Angiography Characteristics of Atherosclerotic Plaque. <em>Heart<\/em>. 2011;97(10):823-831.<\/li><li>Omland, T., de Lemos, J. A., Sabatine, M. S., Christophi, C. A., Rice, M. M., Jablonski, K. A., Tjora, S., Domanski, M. J., Gersh, B. J., Rouleau, J. L., Pfeffer, M. A., Braunwald, E. A Sensitive Cardiac Troponin T Assay in Stable Coronary Artery Disease. <em>The New England Journal of Medicine. <\/em>2009;361:2538\u20132547.<\/li><li>Vikenes, K., Melberg, T., Farstad, M., Nordrehaug, J. E. Elevated CK-MB Values After Routine Angioplasty Predicts Worse Long-Term Prognosis in Low-Risk Patients. <em>Scand Cardiovasc J<\/em>. 2010;44(2):69-75.<\/li><li>Vikenes, K., Melberg, T., Farstad, M., Nordrehaug, J. E. Long-Term Prognostic Value of CK-MB and the Troponins After Angioplasty in Patients with Stable Angina. <em>Scand Cardiovasc J<\/em>. 2011;45(3):146-152.&nbsp; <\/li><li>Wu, Y. W., Ho, S. K., Tseng, W. K., Yeh, H. I., Leu, H. B., Yin, W. H., Lin, T. H., Chang, K. C., Wang, J. H., Wu, C. C., Chen, J. W. Potential Impacts of High-Sensitivity Creatine Kinase-MB on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Stable Coronary Heart Disease. <em>Sci Rep<\/em>. 2020;10(1):5638.<\/li><li>Bhayana, V., Henderson, A. Biochemical Markers of Myocardial Damage. <em>Clinical Biochem<\/em>. 1995;28:1:1-29.<\/li><li>Roxin, L. E., Cullhed, I., Groth, T., H\u00e4llgren, T., Venge, P. The Value of Serum Myoglobin Determinations in the Early Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction. <em>Acta Med Scand<\/em>. 1984;215(5):417-425.<\/li><li>Kubasik, N. P., Guiney, W., Warren, K., D&#8217;Souza, J. P., Sine, H. E., Brody, B. B. Radioimmunoassay of Serum Myoglobin: Evaluation and Modification of a Commercial Kit and Assessment of its Usefulness for Detecting Acute Myocardial Infarction. <em>Clin Chem<\/em>. 1978;24(11):2047-2049.&nbsp;<\/li><li>Seyedian, S. M., Ahmadi, F., Dabagh, R., Davoodzadeh, H.&nbsp; Relationship Between High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Serum Levels and the Severity of Coronary Artery Stenosis in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.&nbsp; <em>ARYA Atheroscler<\/em>. 2016; 12(5):231-237. <\/li><li>Madadi, R., Haddadian, K., Ghaderi, E.. Diagnostic Value of High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein Levels in Differentiation of Stable Angina from Unstable Angina. <em>Chron Dis<\/em> <em>J. <\/em>2014;2(2):69-73.<\/li><li>Kubo, T., Matsuo, Y., Hayashi, Y., Yamano, T., Tanimoto, T., Ino, Y., Kitabata, H., Takarada, S., Hirata, K., Tanaka, A., Nakamura, N., Mizukoshi, M., Imanishi, T., Akasaka, T. High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein and Plaque Composition in Patients with Stable Angina Pectoris: A Virtual Histology Intravascular Ultrasound Study. <em>Coron Artery Dis<\/em>. 2009;20(8):531-535. <\/li><li>Ye, X. D., He, Y., Wang, S. Heart-Type Fatty Acid Binding Protein (H-FABP) as a Biomarker for Acute Myocardial Injury and Long-Term Post-Ischemic Prognosis. <em>Acta Pharmacol Sin<\/em>. 2018;39:1155-1163.<\/li><li>O&#8217;Donoghue, M., de Lemos, J. A., Morrow, D.A. Prognostic Utility of Heart-Type Fatty Acid Binding Protein in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes. <em>Circulation<\/em>. 2006;114:550-557.<\/li><li>Viswanathan, K., Kilcullen, N., Morrell, C. Heart-Type Fatty Acid-Binding Protein Predicts Long-Term Mortality and Re-Infarction in Consecutive Patients with Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Who are Troponin-Negative.<em> J Am Coll Cardiol<\/em>. 2010;55:2590-2598.<\/li><li>Kilcullen, N., Viswanathan, K., Das, R. Heart-Type Fatty Acid-Binding Protein Predicts Long-Term Mortality After Acute Coronary Syndrome and Identifies High-Risk Patients Across the Range of Troponin Values.<em> J Am Coll Cardiol.<\/em> 2007;50:2061-2067.<\/li><li>Matsumoto, S., Nakatani, D., Sakata, Y. Elevated Serum Heart-Type Fatty Acid-Binding Protein in the Convalescent Stage Predicts Long-Term Outcome in Patients Surviving Acute Myocardial Infarction. <em>Circ J.<\/em> 2013;77:1026-32.<\/li><li>Yang, L., Liu, Y., Wang, S., Liu, T.,&nbsp; Cong, H. Association Between Lp-PLA2 and Coronary Heart Disease in Chinese Patients. J<em>ournal of International Medical Research<\/em>. 2017;45(1): 159-169.<\/li><li>Epps, K. C.,&nbsp; Wilensky, R. L. Lp-PLA2- A Novel Risk Factor for High-Risk Coronary and Carotid Artery Disease.<em> J Intern Med<\/em>. 2011;269:94\u2013106.<\/li><li>Ling, Y., Tang, S., Cao, Y., Fu, C. Relationship Between Plasma Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 Concentrations and Apolipoprotein in Stable Coronary Artery Disease Patients. <em>Dis Markers<\/em>. 2020 ;2020:8818358. doi: 10.1155\/2020\/8818358.<\/li><li>Lavi, S., McConnell, J. P., Rihal, C. S., Prasad, A., Mathew, V., Lerman, L.O. Local Production of Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 and Lysophosphatidylcholine in the Coronary Circulation: Association with Early Coronary Atherosclerosis and Endothelial Dysfunction in Humans. <em>Circulation<\/em>. 2007;115:2715\u20132721.<\/li><li>Zannad, F., De Backer, G., Graham, I., Lorenz, M., Mancia, G., Morrow, D. A. Risk Stratification in Cardiovascular Disease Primary Prevention &#8211; Scoring Systems, Novel Markers, and Imaging Techniques. <em>Fundam Clin Pharmacol<\/em>. 2012;26:163\u2013174.<\/li><li>Tousoulis, D., Papageorgiou, N., Androulakis, E., Stefanadis, C. Lp-PLA2- A Novel Marker of Atherosclerosis: to Treat or not to Treat? <em>Int J Cardiol<\/em>. 2013;165: 213\u2013216.<\/li><li>Yang, E. H., McConnell, J. P., Lennon, R. J., Barsness, G. W., Pumper, G., Hartman, S. J. Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 is an Independent Marker for Coronary Endothelial Dysfunction in Humans. <em>Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol<\/em>. 2006;26:106\u2013111.<\/li><li>Oberhoffer, M., Vogelsang, H., Russwurm, S., Hartung, T., Reinhart, K. Outcome Prediction by Traditional and new Markers of Inflammation in Patients with Sepsis. <em>Clin Chem Lab Med<\/em>. 1999; 37: 363-368.<\/li><li>Wunder, C., Eichelbronner, O., Roewer, N. Are IL-6, IL-10 and PCT Plasma Concentrations Reliable for Outcome Prediction in Severe Sepsis? A Comparison with APACHE III and SAPS II. <em>Inflamm Res<\/em>. 2004;53:158-163.<\/li><li>Kelly, D., Khan, S. Q., Dhillon, O., Quinn, P., Struck, J., Squire, I. B., Davies, J. E., Ng, L. L.&nbsp; Procalcitonin as a Prognostic Marker in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction. <em>Biomarkers.<\/em> 2010; 15: 325- 331.<\/li><li>Sent\u00fcrk, T., Cordan, J., Baran, I., Ozdemir, B., G\u00fcll\u00fcl\u00fc, S., Aydinlar, A., G\u00f6ral, G.&nbsp; Procalcitonin in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: Correlation with High-Sensitive C-Reactive Protein, Prognosis and Severity&nbsp; of Coronary Artery Disease. <em>Acta Cardiol<\/em>. 2007; 62: 135-141.<\/li><li>Hashemipour, S. V., Pourhosseini, H., Hosseinsabet, A. Correlation Between the Serum Procalcitonin Level and the Extension and Severity of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. <em>Cardiovasc Endocrinol Metab<\/em>. 2019;8(2):62-66.<\/li><li>Amin, M. N., Siddiqui, S. A., Ibrahim, M., Hakim, M. L., Ahammed, M. S., Kabir, A., Sultana, F. Inflammatory Cytokines in the Pathogenesis of Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer. <em>SAGE Open Med<\/em>. 2020;8:2050312120965752. <\/li><li>Wolf, D., Ley, K. Immunity and Inflammation in Atherosclerosis. <em>Circ Res<\/em>. 2019;124(2):315-327. <\/li><li>Pedro-Botet, J., Climent, E., Benaiges, D. Atherosclerosis and Inflammation. New Therapeutic Approaches. <em>Med Clin (Barc)<\/em>. 2020;155(6):256-262. <\/li><li>Gabriel, A. S., Ahnve, S., Wretlind, B., Martinsson, A. IL-6 and IL-1 Receptor Antagonist in Stable Angina Pectoris and Relation of IL-6 to Clinical Findings in Acute Myocardial Infarction. <em>J Intern Med<\/em>. 2000;248(1):61-66. <\/li><li>Tang, J. N., Shen, D. L., Liu, C. L., Wang, &nbsp;X. F., Zhang, L., Xuan, D. X., Zhang, &nbsp;J. Y., Cui, L. L.&nbsp; Plasma levels of Cl q\/TNF-Related Protein 1 and Interleukin 6 in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome or Stable Angina Pectoris. <em>The American Journal of Medical&nbsp; Sciences<\/em>. 2015; 349(2):130-136.&nbsp; <\/li><li>Ozdemir, O., Gundogdu, F., Karakelleoglu, S., Sevimli, S., Pirim, I., Acikel, M., Arslan, S., Serdar, S. Comparison of Serum Levels of Inflammatory Markers and Allelic Variant of Interleukin-6 in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Stable Angina Pectoris. <em>Coron Artery Dis<\/em>. 2008;19(1):15-19. <\/li><li>Simon, A. D., Yazdani, S., Wang, W., Schwartz, A., Rabbani, L. E. Circulating Levels of IL-1beta, a Prothrombotic Cytokine, are Elevated in Unstable Angina Versus Stable Angina. <em>J Thromb Thrombolysis<\/em>. 2000;9(3):217-22. <\/li><li>Madan, M., Bishayi, B., Hoge, M., Amar, S. Atheroprotective Role of Interleukin-6 in Diet- and\/or Pathogen-Associated Atherosclerosis Using an ApoE Heterozygote Murine Model. <em>Atherosclerosis<\/em>. 2008;197(2):504-514. <\/li><li>McInnes, I. B., Thompson, L., Giles, J. T., Bathon, J. M., Salmon, J. E., Beaulieu, A. D., Codding, C. E., Carlson, T. H., Delles, C., Lee, J. S., Sattar, N. Effect of Interleukin-6 Receptor Blockade on Surrogates of Vascular Risk in Rheumatoid Arthritis: MEASURE, a Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Study. <em>Ann Rheum Dis<\/em>. 2015;74:694\u2013702. <\/li><li>Lubrano, V., Gabriele, M., Puntoni, M. R., Longo, V., Pucci, L. Relationship Among IL-6, LDL Cholesterol and Lipid Peroxidation. <em>Cell Mol Biol Lett<\/em>. 2015;20(2):310-322. <\/li><li>Sepehri, Z. S., Masoomi, M., Ruzbehi, F., Kiani, Z., Nasiri, A. A., Kohan, F., Sheikh Fathollahi, M., Kazemi Arababadi, M., Kennedy, D., Asadikaram, G. A. Comparison of Serum Levels of IL-6, IL-8, TGF-\u03b2 and TNF-\u03b1 in Coronary Artery Diseases, Stable Angina and Participants with Normal Coronary Artery. <em>Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand)<\/em>. 2018;64(5):1-6.&nbsp;<\/li><li>Martins, T. B., Anderson, J. L., Muhlestein, J. B., Horne, B. D., Carlquist, J. F., Roberts, W. L., Carlquist, J. F. Risk Factor Analysis of Plasma Cytokines in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease by a Multiplexed Fluorescent Immunoassay. <em>Am J Clin Pathol<\/em>. 2006;125(6):906-913. <\/li><li>Khalid, H. A., Thuwaini, M. M.,&nbsp; Al-Snafi, A. E. Relation of IL-1\u03b2, IL-5, IL-6 and IL-8 with Stable Angina Pectoris.&nbsp;&nbsp; <em>University of Thi-Qar Journal of Science<\/em>.&nbsp; 2023; 10(1): 101-105. &nbsp;<\/li><li>Zhu, Y., Xian, X., Wang, Z., Bi, Y., Chen, Q., Han, X., Tang, D., Chen, R. Research Progress on the Relationship Between Atherosclerosis and Inflammation. <em>Biomolecules<\/em>. 2018;8(3):80. <\/li><li>Bai, Y. J., Li, Z. G., Liu, W. H., Gao, D., Zhang, P. Y., Liu, M. Effects of IL-1\u03b2 and IL-18 Induced by NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation on Myocardial Reperfusion Injury After PCI. <em>Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci<\/em>. 2019;23(22):10101-10106. <\/li><li>\u00d8rn, S., Ueland, T., Manhenke, C., Sandanger, \u00d8., Godang, K., Yndestad, A., Mollnes, T. E., Dickstein, K., Aukrust, P. Increased Interleukin-1\u03b2 Levels are Associated with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Remodelling Following Acute ST Segment Elevation Myocardial infarction Treated by Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. <em>J Intern Med<\/em>. 2012;272(3):267-276. <\/li><li>Pluijmert, N. J., Atsma, D. E., Quax, P. H. A. Post-Ischemic Myocardial Inflammatory Response: A Complex and Dynamic Process Susceptible to Immunomodulatory Therapies. <em>Front Cardiovasc Med<\/em>. 2021;8:647785. <\/li><li>Toldo, S., Mauro, A. G., Cutter, Z., Abbate, A. Inflammasome, Pyroptosis, and Cytokines in Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. <em>Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol<\/em>. 2018;315(6):H1553-H1568. <\/li><li>Cappuzzello, C., Di Vito, L., Melchionna, R., Melillo, G., Silvestri, L., Cesareo, E., Crea, F., Liuzzo, G., Facchiano, A., Capogrossi, M. C., Napolitano, M. Increase of Plasma IL-9 and Decrease of Plasma IL-5, IL-7, and IFN-\u03b3 in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure. <em>J Transl Med<\/em>. 2011;9:28. <\/li><li>Ormstad, H., Aass, H. C., Lund-S\u00f8rensen, N., Amthor, K. F., Sandvik, L. Serum Levels of Cytokines and C-Reactive Protein in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients, and Their Relationship to Stroke Lateralization, Type, and Infarct Volume. <em>J Neurol<\/em>. 2011;258(4):677-685. <\/li><li>Gregersen, I., Skjelland, M., Holm, S., Holven, K. B., Krogh-S\u00f8rensen, K., Russell, D., Askevold ET, Dahl CP, \u00d8rn S, Gullestad L, Mollnes TE, Ueland T, Aukrust P, Halvorsen B. Increased Systemic and Local Interleukin 9 Levels in Patients with Carotid and Coronary Atherosclerosis. <em>PLoS One<\/em>. 2013;8(8):e72769. <\/li><li>Zhang W, Tang T, Nie D, Wen S, Jia C, Zhu Z, Xia N, Nie S, Zhou S, Jiao J, Dong W, Lv B, Xu, T., Sun, B., Lu, Y., Li, Y., Cheng, L., Liao, Y., Cheng, X. IL-9 Aggravates the Development of Atherosclerosis in ApoE-\/- Mice. <em>Cardiovasc Res<\/em>. 2015;106(3):453-464. <\/li><li>Amer, M. H., Hajri, S. E., Al-Snafi, A E. Diagnostic Value of CRP, H-FABP, IL-6, PCT and Lp-PLA2 and Cytokines in Acute Myocardial Infarction. <em>J Adv Med Biomed Res<\/em>. 2023; 31 (147) :13-13.<\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Abbreviations<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">CK-MB: Creatine kinase, CRP hs: High\nsensitive C reactive protein,&nbsp; cTnI: Cardiac Troponin I,&nbsp; HDL-C: high\ndensity lipoprotein cholesterol, H-FABP: heart type fatty acid binding\nprotein,&nbsp; IL6:&nbsp; Interleukin 6, LDL-C: low density lipoprotein\ncholesterol, Lp-PLA2: Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2, MI: Myocardial\ninfarction,&nbsp; MYO: Myoglobin, PCT:\nProcalcitonin, BS: blood sugar, TC: total cholesterol, TG: triglycerides,\nVLDL-C: very low density lipoprotein cholesterol. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Introduction Coronary artery disease&nbsp; (CAD)&nbsp; is a significant cause of  [&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":15,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[111],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-54218","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-vol16no4"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54218","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/15"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=54218"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54218\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":55180,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54218\/revisions\/55180"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=54218"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=54218"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=54218"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}