{"id":41418,"date":"2021-12-30T10:32:52","date_gmt":"2021-12-30T10:32:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/?p=41418"},"modified":"2022-01-04T11:50:40","modified_gmt":"2022-01-04T11:50:40","slug":"effectiveness-of-educative-session-on-knowledge-attitude-and-practice-on-diabetes-and-dyslipidemia-of-patients-attending-a-private-medical-college-hospital-in-south-india","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/vol14no4\/effectiveness-of-educative-session-on-knowledge-attitude-and-practice-on-diabetes-and-dyslipidemia-of-patients-attending-a-private-medical-college-hospital-in-south-india\/","title":{"rendered":"Effectiveness of Educative Session on Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice, on Diabetes and Dyslipidemia, of Patients Attending a Private Medical College Hospital in South-India"},"content":{"rendered":"

Introduction<\/strong><\/p>\n

Non-communicable diseases like diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia are on the floor of insulin resistance favored by a common, prevalent condition called obesity. Although it seems very simple to control and get rid of the condition, lack of knowledge or unawareness, attitude\u00a0 towards it, and wrong daily life practices are likely to affect the maintenance of a healthy lifestyle.<\/p>\n

Statistics by the W.H.O in 2016 say that worldwide obesity has nearly tripled since 1975. In 2016, more than 1.9 billion adults, 18 years and older, were overweight. Of these over 650 million were obese. 41 million children under the age of 5 were overweight or obese in 2016.<\/p>\n

The phase 1 study conducted by The Indian Council of Medical Research\u2013India Diabetes (ICMR-INDIAB) study has estimated that 135 million and 153 million have general and abdominal obesity respectively\u00b9<\/sup>.<\/p>\n

The study aims to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice of the patients regarding diabetes and dyslipidemia including the lipid profile and blood sugar parameters. The collected information is of much importance in<\/p>\n

Advocacy \u2013 to set guidelines by the Healthcare providers<\/p>\n

Communication \u2013 increase awareness in subpopulation and<\/p>\n

Social mobilization \u2013 improve services and expand community support.<\/p>\n

The knowledge, attitude, and practice were evaluated before and after an educative session to emphasize the importance of the knowledge and the knowledge provider in preventing and treating the diseases.<\/p>\n

According to a study conducted by ICMR-INDIAB during the year 2008 to 2010 and published online in 2017, the prevalence of diabetes in urban regions was 14.4% and in rural regions was 7.4% in Tamilnadu1<\/sup>.<\/p>\n

The ICMR-INDIAB study group has also published several important subgroup analyses of their findings of the phase 1 study. Among the lipids, the group confirmed that reduced high-density\u00a0lipoprotein (Dyslipidemia) was the most common lipid abnormality observed in almost three-fourths of the subjects2<\/sup>. Similarly, it has been estimated that prediabetes and diabetes are affecting 77.2 and 62.4 million people, respectively in India3<\/sup>.<\/p>\n

The increasing prevalence of diabetes urges immediate intervention of knowledge and changes of attitude and practices of the population by the healthcare providers.<\/p>\n

Materials and methods<\/strong><\/p>\n

The study is a cross-sectional study involving patients attending the Outpatient and the participants undergoing MHC (Master Health Checkup) at SRM MCH & RC of age group 18-50 participated in the study after obtaining written consent. The participants were selected on a Simple random sampling from Outpatient identity numbers on alternate days of data collection, to avoid bias.<\/p>\n

A Self-administered questionnaire was prepared based on a pilot study conducted two weeks before the original study, which included 20 patients attending different departments (Master health checkups, General medicine, surgery, orthopedics, pulmonology, and nephrology) of the\u00a0hospital as an accessible population. The study population was then decided to be involving the Departments of Master health checkups and General medicine. The Self-administered questionnaire was prepared based on the pilot study. The questionnaire included 7 personal questions based on which the patients were grouped under different categories like educative\u00a0status, self-activity, and livelihood. The questionnaire consisted of 3 questions based on the knowledge of the individual on diabetes and dyslipidemia and 3 questions on attitude and practice of the individual on the same. Dietary fiber, healthy dietary habits, and regular exercise\u00a0were included in attitude and practice. The questions were explained to a few of them who found difficulty in understanding the same. After analyzing the answers, a set of study materials were framed to meet the educative status of the individual as school, undergraduate, and post-graduate to educate them.<\/p>\n

The study population was asked to inform the principal investigator before attending the outpatient and MHC departments. The same set of questionnaires was given to the individual to answer. The period between the two questioning sessions was maintained as a minimum of two\u00a0weeks and a maximum of 6 months. Those who were not attending the checkup were requested to answer the same on the telephone by the investigators.<\/p>\n

To avoid bias, the patients who are not being treated by the authors will only be included. The questionnaire will also not reveal the identity of patients or their treating doctors. Patients beyond the age group 18-50 and medical and healthcare workers were excluded from the study.<\/p>\n

Results<\/strong><\/p>\n

The study population (100) was provided with a self-administered questionnaire on personal aspects and diabetes and dyslipidemia. The characteristics of the study population are evident in Table 1. Based on the personal questions, they were grouped based on their educational status, livelihood, and self-activity. Among the study participants, 18% were schooling, 74% were\u00a0undergraduates and 8% were postgraduates [Table 2].\u00a0 The frequency of livelihood showed 84% from rural and 16% from an urban background in study participants.\u00a0 71% were following active and 29% were following sedentary self-activity. The source of information regarding the\u00a0treatment of patients was also obtained from the patients to implement the same in advocacy. It was also found that 91% of the population was aware of the questions asked in the questionnaire from their treating physicians. This indicates the inevitable role of doctors in educating society.<\/p>\n

Table 1: Characteristics of the study population<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Characteristics<\/strong><\/td>\nDistribution<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Age (Median)<\/td>\n41<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Gender (N=100)<\/td>\n41 female<\/td>\n59 male<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Duration of Diabetes Mellitus<\/p>\n

(Mean \u00b1 Standard deviation)<\/td>\n

15 \u00b1 2 (years)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Table 2: Educational status of the study population<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Education<\/strong><\/td>\nPercentage (Frequency)<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
School<\/td>\n18<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Under-graduate<\/td>\n74<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Post-graduate<\/td>\n8<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

The knowledge of the study group on various aspects including the causes, symptoms, tests, complications of diabetes mellitus, lipid profile parameters, dietary fiber, and exercises was calculated as percentage or frequency before and after the educative session. We found the\u00a0 participants significantly gained knowledge about diabetes and dyslipidemia after the educative session [Table 3].<\/p>\n

Table 3: Knowledge <\/strong>of the study population in various aspects<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Knowledge on<\/strong><\/td>\nNumber of participants aware BES<\/strong><\/td>\nNumber of participants aware AES<\/strong><\/td>\np-Value<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Causes of diabetes<\/td>\n72<\/td>\n86<\/td>\n0.025*<\/sup><\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Symptoms of diabetes<\/td>\n43<\/td>\n77<\/td>\n0.019*<\/sup><\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Diabetic profile tests<\/td>\n86<\/td>\n91<\/td>\n0.000*<\/sup><\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Complications of diabetes<\/td>\n47<\/td>\n63<\/td>\n0.008*<\/sup><\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Good and Bad cholesterol<\/td>\n62<\/td>\n81<\/td>\n\n

0.022*<\/sup><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

*<\/sup><\/strong>p < 0.05 \u2013 statistically significant, BES – Before the educative session, AES – After the educative session<\/p>\n

The knowledge level was classified as clear and unclear based on the explained answers. We assessed the clarity of explanation about diabetes before and after the educative session. We observed there is an improvement in clear explanation and decline in the unclear explanation about the knowledge of causes 7%, symptoms 11%, profile tests 11%, complications 16% of\u00a0diabetes and cholesterol 20% after the educative session [Table 4].\u00a0 We found that there is a significant association between the knowledge of diabetes and unclear explanation before and after the educative session which indicates that there is a substantial development of knowledge of diabetes among the study participants who were unclear about diabetes [Table 5]. This\u00a0indicates the beneficial outcome of the educative session.<\/p>\n

Table 4: <\/strong>Percentage of improvement after the educative session<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Knowledge of Diabetes<\/strong><\/td>\nClear explanation<\/strong><\/td>\nUnclear explanation<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
BES<\/strong><\/td>\nAES<\/strong><\/td>\nOutcome<\/strong><\/td>\nBES<\/strong><\/td>\nAES<\/strong><\/td>\nOutcome<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Causes<\/td>\n66<\/td>\n73<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n34<\/td>\n27<\/td>\n7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Symptoms<\/td>\n51<\/td>\n62<\/td>\n11<\/td>\n49<\/td>\n38<\/td>\n11<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Profile tests<\/td>\n71<\/td>\n82<\/td>\n11<\/td>\n29<\/td>\n18<\/td>\n11<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Complications<\/td>\n58<\/td>\n74<\/td>\n16<\/td>\n42<\/td>\n26<\/td>\n16<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Cholesterol<\/td>\n19<\/td>\n39<\/td>\n20<\/td>\n81<\/td>\n61<\/td>\n20<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Table 5: Association of <\/strong>knowledge of diabetes with explanation<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Knowledge of Diabetes<\/strong><\/td>\nClear Explanation<\/strong><\/td>\nUnclear Explanation<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
BES<\/strong><\/td>\nAES<\/strong><\/td>\nP-Value<\/strong><\/td>\nBES<\/strong><\/td>\nAES<\/strong><\/td>\nP-Value<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Causes<\/td>\n66<\/td>\n73<\/td>\n0.8157<\/td>\n34<\/td>\n27<\/td>\n0.2275<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Symptoms<\/td>\n51<\/td>\n62<\/td>\n0.1815<\/td>\n49<\/td>\n38<\/td>\n0.0045*<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Profile tests<\/td>\n71<\/td>\n82<\/td>\n0.7406<\/td>\n29<\/td>\n18<\/td>\n0.1394<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Complications<\/td>\n58<\/td>\n74<\/td>\n0.8967<\/td>\n42<\/td>\n26<\/td>\n0.0204*<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Cholesterol<\/td>\n19<\/td>\n39<\/td>\n0.2045<\/td>\n81<\/td>\n61<\/td>\n0.0245*<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

*<\/sup><\/strong>p < 0.05 \u2013 statistically significant<\/p>\n

In our study population, we surveyed about the knowledge of diet and exercise.\u00a0 We observed that very few people were aware of fiber involvement in diet and other diet habits alone were sufficient in the prevention of diabetes.\u00a0\u00a0 Most of the study population was aware that only routine exercises were enough to prevent diabetes.\u00a0 Around 80% of the responders believed that\u00a0both fiber and routine exercises would contribute to the same.\u00a0 We found a significant rise in the percentage of awareness on the importance of both fiber and exercises in preventing diabetes [Table 6].\u00a0 These results suggest that the study population has enhanced knowledge about the diet and exercises for prevention and management of the disease.<\/p>\n

Table 6: Knowledge <\/strong>of the study population on diet and exercises<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Knowledge of diet and exercises<\/strong><\/td>\nNumber of participants aware BES<\/strong><\/td>\nNumber of participants aware AES<\/strong><\/td>\np-Value<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Fiber involvement in diet<\/td>\n17<\/td>\n35<\/td>\n0.036*<\/sup><\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Routine exercises<\/td>\n91<\/td>\n96<\/td>\n0.013*<\/sup><\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Both fiber and exercises<\/td>\n81<\/td>\n92<\/td>\n0.004*<\/sup><\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Practicing other diet habits<\/td>\n8<\/td>\n6<\/td>\n0.045*<\/sup><\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

*<\/sup><\/strong>p < 0.05 \u2013 statistically significant<\/p>\n

The group of patients was subjected to questions on their attitude and practice on diet, exercise, and health care before and after the educative session.\u00a0 Analysis before educative session resulted that very less percentage of the study population was aware of the attitude and practice whereas others significantly gained knowledge of practicing proper diet, exercises and routine\u00a0health care after educative session [Table 7].\u00a0 We observed there is a significant association of diet, regular exercise, regular checkup, and self-responsibility with prominent knowledge about the causes, symptoms, profile tests, complications of diabetes, and cholesterol status among survey responders [Table 8].<\/p>\n

Table 7: Attitude and practice on the diet, exercise, and health care<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Attitude and practice on the diet, exercise, and health care<\/strong><\/td>\nNumber of participants aware before the educative session<\/strong><\/td>\nNumber of participants aware after the educative session<\/strong><\/td>\np-Value<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Practicing a regular balanced diet<\/td>\n12<\/td>\n48<\/td>\n0.039*<\/sup><\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Practicing regular exercises<\/td>\n26<\/td>\n65<\/td>\n0.014*<\/sup><\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Regular health checkups<\/td>\n31<\/td>\n61<\/td>\n0.000*<\/sup><\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Feeling Self-responsible<\/td>\n39<\/td>\n82<\/td>\n0.002*<\/sup><\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

*<\/sup><\/strong>p < 0.05 \u2013 statistically significant<\/p>\n

Table 8: Association of <\/strong>knowledge of diabetes with diet, exercise, and health care.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Knowledge of Diabetes<\/td>\nAssociation parameters (Fisher exact P-value)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Regular diet<\/td>\nRegular exercise<\/td>\nRegular checkups<\/td>\nSelf-responsibility<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Causes<\/td>\n0.0006**<\/td>\n0.0103*<\/td>\n0.0831<\/td>\n0.0267*<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Symptoms<\/td>\n0.0390*<\/td>\n0.3011<\/td>\n0.7729<\/td>\n0.5882<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Profile tests<\/td>\n0.0001**<\/td>\n0.0017**<\/td>\n0.0203*<\/td>\n0.0059**<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Complications<\/td>\n0.0039**<\/td>\n0.0405*<\/td>\n0.1957<\/td>\n0.1044<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Cholesterol<\/td>\n0.0015**<\/td>\n0.0269*<\/td>\n0.1717<\/td>\n0.0754<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

*<\/sup><\/strong>p < 0.05 \u2013 statistically significant, **p <0.01 \u2013 highly significant<\/p>\n

Discussion<\/strong><\/p>\n

The study included different classes of the population with dissimilar levels of knowledge, attitude, and practice on diabetes and dyslipidemia. Out of the total study population of 100 patients, 18% had school level education, 74% had education at the under-graduation level and 8% were post-graduates. The importance of the education status is explained by the study\u00a0conducted by Senet al, with a significance of p<0.054<\/sup>. The reflection of more graduates participating in our study was evident as our study had 72% and 43% of the study group aware of the causes and complications respectively. These figures rose to 86% and 77% after a session of information. This was in contrast to the study conducted by Kant et al and Priyanka Raj et al5,6<\/sup>.<\/p>\n

The study population was also sorted based on the area to which they belong as rural and urban as 84% and 16% respectively. Self-activity was used to differentiate the total population as active (71%) and sedentary (29%). These characteristics were used mainly to understand the influence of the above characteristics on their knowledge, attitude, and practice on the given set\u00a0of questions.<\/p>\n

In a study conducted by Jagadeesan et al among college students, 73% had a belief that physical activity to overcome obesity, but around 90% took no steps to overcome7<\/sup> it. About 68% of medical students were obese says a study conducted by Shah T et al8<\/sup>. Another study conducted\u00a0among medical students by Shrivastava et al showed that 78% were aware that physical exercises would prevent obesity9<\/sup>. Kim et al found that around 49% of Korean students were undertaking regular exercise10<\/sup>. A study conducted by Konduru et al says only 50% of diabetics were aware of\u00a0the importance of physical activity on diabetes11<\/sup>. This was per our study with only 26% practicing regular exercise despite 91% being aware of the fact. This reflects their poor attitude and practice. However, this had improved to 65% after the educative session.<\/p>\n

It was evident that the principal information and knowledge provider for most of the patients (91%) are their treating physicians. This in turn highlights the role of the doctors and the institution in communication and social mobilization of the population attending the treatment\u00a0 center this as per a study conducted by Shah et al12<\/sup>, which says around 50% of the study group had consultation time less than 5 minutes.<\/p>\n

Tham et al conducted a study showing about 50% of diabetics were taking self-care13<\/sup>. Another study by Memon et al shows that only 9% of diabetics in Karachi were undergoing regular retinal examination14<\/sup>. This was in contrast to our study showing only 31% visiting the hospital for a regular checkup.<\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n

This study concludes that the knowledge, attitude, and practice of the patients attending the tertiary care center are different based on their education status and livelihood. From the study, it is also evident that the principal knowledge or information providers are their treating physicians, who play a major role in educating the patients. Diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia are metabolic diseases that can be controlled and treated to a certain extent by regular physical activities, a healthy diet, and lifestyle changes with the help of simple educative sessions and counseling.<\/p>\n

This emphasizes the importance of educative and counseling sessions to be provided as a routine part of the treatment plan to all the patients attending the tertiary care center for the treatment of diabetes and dyslipidemia.<\/p>\n

Acknowledgment<\/strong><\/p>\n

We are sincerely thankful for those who volunteered to participate in our study.<\/p>\n

Conflict of Interest<\/strong><\/p>\n

There is no conflict of interest<\/p>\n

Funding\u00a0Sources<\/strong><\/p>\n

There is no funding sources<\/p>\n

References<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Pradeepa R, Anjana RM, Joshi SR, Bhansali A, Deepa M, Joshi PP, et al. Prevalence of generalized & abdominal obesity in urban & rural India – the ICMR-INDIAB study (Phase-I) [ICMR-INDIAB-3]. Indian J Med Res2015; 142: 139-50.
    \nCrossRef<\/a><\/li>\n
  2. Joshi SR, Anjana RM, Deepa M, Pradeepa R, Bhansali A, Dhandania VK, et al. ICMR-INDIAB Collaborative study Group. Prevalence of dyslipidemia in urban and rural India: the ICMR-INDIAB study. PLoS One 2014; 9: e96808.
    \n    CrossRef<\/a><\/li>\n
  3. Anjana RM, Pradeepa R, Deepa M, Datta M, Sudha V, Unnikrishnan R, et al; ICMR-INDIAB Collaborative study Group. Prevalence of diabetes and prediabetes (impaired fasting glucose and\/or impaired glucose tolerance) in urban and rural India: phase I results of the Indian Council of Medical Research-INdiaDIABetes (ICMR-INDIAB) study. Diabetologia2011; 54: 3022-7.
    \n    CrossRef<\/a><\/li>\n
  4. Sen J, Mondal N, Dutta S. Factors affecting overweight and obesity among urban adults: a cross-sectional study Epidemiology Biostatistics and Public Health. 2013;10(1)e8741-11.<\/li>\n
  5. Kant R et al. Knowledge attitude and practice of type 2 diabetic patients in a tertiary care teaching hospital in India.Integr Food NutrMetab, 2015;2(1): 131-135.
    \n    CrossRef<\/a><\/li>\n
  6. CK Priyanka Raj, MM Angadi. Hospital-based KAP Study on Diabetes in Bijapur, Karnataka. Indian Journal of Medical Specialities 2010;1(2):80-83.
    \n    CrossRef<\/a><\/li>\n
  7. Jagadeesan M, Prasanna Karthik S, Kannan R, Immaculate Bibiana C, Kanchan N, Siddharthan J, et al. A study on the knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) regarding obesity among engineering college students. Int J Adv Med 2017;4:1681-4.
    \n    CrossRef<\/a><\/li>\n
  8. Shah T, Purohit G, Nair SP, Patel B, YashRawal R, Shah M. Fast Food Consumption, Physical Activity and Soft Drink Intake in Medical Students Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2014;8(5): CC05-7.
    \nCrossRef<\/li>\n
  9. Shrivastava S, Shrivastava P, Ramasamy J. Assessment of knowledge about obesity among students in a medical college in Kancheepuram district, Tamil Nadu. Prog Health Sci. 2013;3(1):54-60.
    \nCrossRef<\/li>\n
  10. Kim O, Kim K. Body mass index, body shape satisfaction and weight control behaviors among Korean girls, Psychol Rep. 2005;96(3):676-80.
    \n    CrossRef<\/a><\/li>\n
  11. Konduru et al. Assessment of Diabetes Related Knowledge, Attitude and Practice among Diabetics and Non-diabetics using Self Prepared Questionnaire for Awareness of Health Promotion. Indian Journal of Pharmacy Practice 2017;10(1):32-38.
    \n    CrossRef<\/a><\/li>\n
  12. Shah VN, Kamdar PK, Shah N. Assessing the knowledge, attitudes and practice of type 2 diabetes among patients of Saurashtra region, Gujarat. International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries. 2009;29(3):118-122.
    \n    CrossRef<\/a><\/li>\n
  13. Tham KY, Ong JJ, Tan DK, How KY. How much do diabetic patients know about diabetes mellitus and its complications? Ann Acad Med Singapore 2004; 33: 503-509.<\/li>\n
  14. Memon MS, Shaikh SA, Shaikh AR, Fahim MF, Mumtaz SN, Ahmed N. An assessment of knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) towards diabetes and diabetic retinopathy in a suburban town of Karachi. Pak J Med Sci 2015;31(1):183-188.
    \n    CrossRef<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Introduction Non-communicable diseases like diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia are on […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":15,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[94],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-41418","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-vol14no4"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41418","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/15"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=41418"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41418\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":42645,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41418\/revisions\/42645"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=41418"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=41418"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=41418"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}