{"id":33368,"date":"2020-06-25T10:18:47","date_gmt":"2020-06-25T10:18:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/?p=33368"},"modified":"2020-07-06T10:02:35","modified_gmt":"2020-07-06T10:02:35","slug":"effect-of-angiotensin-ii-receptor-blocker-treatment-on-adipokine-of-corpulence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/vol13no2\/effect-of-angiotensin-ii-receptor-blocker-treatment-on-adipokine-of-corpulence\/","title":{"rendered":"Effect of Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker Treatment on Adipokine of Corpulence"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Introduction<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Hypertension is a disease of cardiovascular system that associated with endothelial dysfunction, which thereafter through many pathways may lead to metabolic homeostasis disorders that include obesity and diabetes <a href=\"#bib1\"><sup>1<\/sup><\/a><sup>,<\/sup><sup><a href=\"#bib2\">2<\/a><\/sup>. Metabolic syndrome, an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease and mainly caused by obesity, is typified by hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, dyslipidemia and hypertension <sup>3,4 <\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p>In the vascular wall, elevation of oxidative stress and then initiation of an inflammatory cascade were due to the stimulation of angiotensin II type-1 receptors. Therefore, treatment with angiotensin II type-1 receptor blockers (ARBs) drugs may lead to decrease these events in addition to decrease blood pressure <sup>5,6 <\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p>Many studies found that there is a relationship between obesity and hypertension because of over-expression of angiotensinogen (AGT) in adipose tissue. Actually, angiotensinogen formed mainly in the liver, expressed in adipose tissue, and is enzymatically converted to angiotensin I then angiotensin II by the action of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) <sup>7<\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p>Angiotensin II is biologically active and exerts its effect by binding to its receptors type -1 and type-2 . Angiotensin II type- 1 receptor (AT1R) antagonist drugs\u00a0 have been prioritized in the treatment of hypertension instead of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) drug\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 for many advantages such as high specificity of blocking AT1 receptor and then occluding renin-angiotensin system, non-elevating bradykinin level and not causing dry cough <sup>8 <\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p>The reduction of blood pressure by the using of Angiotensin II type- 1 receptor (AT1R) antagonists is dose dependent without increase incidents of adverse events. Besides high doses, these drugs may produce well protection of the organ than its ordinary doses <sup>9<\/sup> .<\/p>\n<p>Candesartan cilexetil is one of the Angiotensin II type- 1 receptor antagonists that has a definite effect after additive dosing than other drugs such as losartan. Candesartan cilexetil is an oral drug that gave once-daily dose and is completely transformed into its active metabolite, during intestinal absorption, which has a longer duration of action and invincible effect <sup>10 <\/sup>.<sup>\u00a0<\/sup><\/p>\n<p>Omentin is a secretory protein that was superiorly and selectively express in visceral adipose tissue than in subcutaneous adipose tissue <sup>11,12<\/sup> .Additionally, omentin was inferiorly express in another tissues and called intelectin <sup>13<\/sup> .These tissues involved intestinal Paneth cells <sup>14<\/sup> , endothelial cells <sup>15 <\/sup>, and stromal-vascular cells <sup>11<\/sup> . Omentin may has a role in adjusting insulin sensitivity by many ways such as elevated signal transduction of insulin by triggering the protein kinase Akt\/ protein kinase B and improving\u00a0 the glucose transporter that stimulated by insulin and testified in isolated human adipocytes (In vitro study) <sup>15<\/sup> .<\/p>\n<p>Chemerin is a protein that releases from adipocyte and hepatocyte. It has a role in controlling discrimination of adipocyte in an autocrine\/paracrine mode of effect <sup>16<\/sup> . Chemerin has many splitting ways that produce different biological properties, one of them has a high attractive ability that responsible for in\ufb02ammatory reaction and activation of dendritic cells and macrophages <sup>17<\/sup>.Other has ability to deactivate macrophage and act as anti- in\ufb02ammatory protein <sup>18 <\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p>The Purpose of this prospective clinical study is to appraise the therapeutic role of candesartan cilexetil (16 mg daily) in corpulent patients with essential hypertension.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Materials and Methods<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Study Design<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This study is a prospective clinical study, conducted at Al yarmouk hospital\/in Iraq and is constituted of sixty five patients (40 males and 25 females), aged (37- 47) years of either sex, with essential hypertension at which the systolic blood pressure (SBP) ranged\u00a0 140 -160\u00a0 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ranged 90 -100 mmHg.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Patients\u2019 Selection<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>All patients participated in this study were randomly selected and were put on wash-out period for two-weeks by stopping intake of all antihypertensive drugs or other drugs. Thereafter, they checked depending on their medical histories, physical examination, blood pressure measurement, and electrocardiogram. Preclusion criteria omitted the patients with secondary hypertension, liver function abnormality, kidney function abnormality, impaired cardiovascular conditions and patients with exceptional sensitivity to angiotensin-II receptor blocker or calcium antagonists. All eligible participants provided written informed consent to partake in this study. The study protocol accommodates to the ethical guidelines of the Helsinki declaration and endorsed by the institution\u2019s ethics committee.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Data Collection and Laboratory Measurements<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>All parameters were evaluated at baseline (before treatment), and after three months of treatment with candesartan cilexetil (AstraZeneca) in a dose of 16 mg daily. All adverse events reported to evaluate adequacy and acceptability of the treatment.<\/p>\n<p>All blood parameters were determined after 12-hrours overnight fasting. Venous blood samples took from all patients between 8 &#8211; 9 am. Body mass index calculated by measuring the weight of the patients in kilograms and divided by the height of the patients in squared meters.<\/p>\n<p>Serum Leptin , Omentin-1, and\u00a0 Chemerin levels were estimated by using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). While serum Total cholesterol, High-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and Triglyceride were assessed by using Photometric Colorimetric Tests.<strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Statistical Analyses<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Results presented as mean \u00b1 SD (standard deviation) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Comparisons of continuous variables analyzed by using Student\u2019s <em>t<\/em>-test. All tests for statistical significance were two-tailed and <em>P<\/em> values of &lt;0.05 was chosen as cut-off point for statistical significance. All statistical analyses performed using series SPSS version 18 and Microsoft Excel.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Results<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Clinical characteristics and statistical analyses of the data of the studied group stratified in\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Table 1. Adverse events assessment during the period of the treatment with candesartan cilexetil\u00a0 \u00a0(16 mg daily) reported in Table 2. Giddiness was the most common neural adverse event observed during the period of the study. Most adverse events were mild or moderate in severity, therefore it does not intermitting the study. Obviously, a high significant decrease in blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) was noted after three months treatment with candesartan cilexetil (16 mg daily) when compared to baseline mean values (Table 1).<\/p>\n<p><strong>Table 1: <\/strong><strong>Alterations of blood pressure and clinical bioassay before and after three months treatment with candesartan<\/strong><strong> cilexetil<\/strong><strong> (16 mg daily)<\/strong><\/p>\n<table style=\"width: 95%;\" border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"4\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"175\"><strong>Variables<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"132\"><strong>Baseline\u00a0<\/strong><strong>(prior\u00a0 treatment)<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"154\"><strong>After Candesartan treatment\u00a0<\/strong><strong>(three months)<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"127\"><strong><em>P<\/em><\/strong><strong>-value<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"175\">Total number<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"132\">65<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"154\">65<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"127\">0.0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"175\">Gender (Male \/ Female)<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"132\">(40 , 25)<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"154\">(40 , 25)<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"127\">0.0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"175\">Age\u00a0 (years)<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"132\">42 \u00b1 5<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"154\">42 \u00b1 5<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"127\">0.0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"175\">BMI (Kg\/m<sup>2<\/sup>)<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"132\">30.6 \u00b1 2.05<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"154\">29.7 \u00b1 2.04<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"127\">0.0145<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"175\">SBP (mmHg)<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"132\">150 \u00b1 13<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"154\">143 \u00b1 10<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"127\">0.001<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"175\">DBP (mmHg)<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"132\">93 \u00b1 10<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"154\">88 \u00b1 8<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"127\">0.00245<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"175\">S.TC (mg\/dL)<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"132\">195 \u00b1 16<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"154\">189 \u00b1 15.2<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"127\">0.032<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"175\">S.HDL-C (mg\/dL)<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"132\">51.3 \u00b1 5<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"154\">51 \u00b1 5<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"127\">0.733<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"175\">S.TG (mg\/dL)<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"132\">188 \u00b1 20<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"154\">181 \u00b1 18<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"127\">0.039<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"175\">S.Leptin (ng\/mL)<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"132\">15.5 \u00b1 4.5<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"154\">13.4 \u00b1 4.7<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"127\">0.0113<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"175\">S.Omentin-1(ng\/mL)<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"132\">248 \u00b1 32<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"154\">262 \u00b1 28<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"127\">0.00986<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"175\">S.Chemerin (ng\/mL)<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"132\">217 \u00b1 20<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"154\">205\u00a0 \u00b1 17<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"127\">0.00046<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Data are presented as mean \u00b1 SD for continuous variable, <em>P \u02c20.05<\/em>\u00a0 significant difference\u00a0 <em>vs<\/em>. baseline,<sup>\u00a0 <\/sup><em>P \u02c20.01<\/em> least significant difference (LSD) <em>vs.<\/em> baseline,<em> P \u02c20.001<\/em> high significant difference <em>vs.<\/em> baseline.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Table 2: <\/strong><strong>The number (n) and the percent (%) of the patients who had adverse events during three months treatment with candesartan<\/strong><strong> cilexetil<\/strong><strong> (16 mg daily)<\/strong><\/p>\n<table style=\"width: 95%;\" border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"4\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"370\"><strong>Total number<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"90\"><strong>N=65<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"81\"><strong>100 %<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"370\">1.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Nervous system disorder<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"90\">2<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"81\">3.077 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"370\">2.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Cardiac disorder<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"90\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"81\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"370\">3.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Vascular disorder<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"90\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"81\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"370\">4.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Skin and subcutaneous disorder<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"90\">1<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"81\">1.54 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"370\">5.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorder<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"90\">1<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"81\">1.54 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"370\">6.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Gastrointestinal disorder<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"90\">2<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"81\">3.077 %<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"370\">7.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Renal and urinary disorder<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"90\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"81\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Analyses of lipid tests after three months treatment with candesartan cilexetil (16 mg\u00a0 daily) revealed a significant decrease (<em>P<\/em> \u02c2 0.05) in mean serum levels of total cholesterol and triglyceride as compared with their baseline mean. Conversely, insignificant alteration noted in mean serum level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol as compared with its baseline means, Table 1.<\/p>\n<p>In contrast to the prior treatment, the mean serum levels of leptin and chemerin were appreciably lower in patients with candesartan treatment (Table-1).There were 0.86 folded decreased in mean serum level of leptin and 0.94 folded decreased in mean serum level of chemerin as compared to their baseline mean\u00a0 (Figure 1). Contrarily, the mean serum level of omentin-1 was considerably higher in those patients after the treatment with candesartan as compared to their baseline level and it was appear to be increased by 1.06 folded as noted in Figure 1.<\/p>\n<table style=\"width: 70%;\" border=\"1\" cellpadding=\"5\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-33371\" src=\"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Vol13No2_Eff_Fer_Fig1-150x150.jpg\" alt=\"Figure 1: Bar graph elucidated the number of the folded changes for the serum levels\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" srcset=\"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Vol13No2_Eff_Fer_Fig1-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Vol13No2_Eff_Fer_Fig1-256x256.jpg 256w, https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Vol13No2_Eff_Fer_Fig1.jpg 625w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 150px) 100vw, 150px\" \/><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-family: inherit; font-size: inherit;\"><strong>Figure 1: <\/strong><strong>Bar graph elucidated the number of the folded changes for the serum levels <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Vol13No2_Eff_Fer_Fig1.jpg\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-family: inherit; font-size: inherit;\">Click here to View Figure<\/span><\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Power analysis for the minimum detectable effect of candesartan cilexetil treatment 16 mg daily on serum levels of total cholesterol, triglyceride, leptin, chemerin , and omentin-1 after three months treatment are illustrated\u00a0 in Figure 2. There were\u00a0 80% probability that the treatment with candesartan cilexetil 16 mg daily caused the detection of 6.83 mg\/dL(3.5%) decrease in mean serum level of total cholesterol, 8.33 mg\/dL (4.43%) decrease in mean serum level of triglyceride, 2.01 ng\/ml (13%) decrease in mean serum level of leptin , 8.12 ng\/ml (3.74%) decrease in mean serum level of chemerin and 13.16 ng\/ml (5.31%) increase in mean serum level of omentin-1 .<\/p>\n<table style=\"width: 70%;\" border=\"1\" cellpadding=\"5\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-33370\" src=\"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Vol13No2_Eff_Fer_Fig2-150x150.jpg\" alt=\"Figure 2: Power analysis for the minimum detectable effect percentage of candesartan\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" srcset=\"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Vol13No2_Eff_Fer_Fig2-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Vol13No2_Eff_Fer_Fig2-256x256.jpg 256w, https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Vol13No2_Eff_Fer_Fig2.jpg 626w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 150px) 100vw, 150px\" \/><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-family: inherit; font-size: inherit;\"><strong>Figure 2: <\/strong><strong>Power analysis for the minimum detectable effect percentage of candesartan <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Vol13No2_Eff_Fer_Fig2.jpg\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"font-family: inherit; font-size: inherit;\">Click here to View Figure<\/span><\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><strong>Discussion<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Hypertension is the most popular diseases that if untreated, may lead to high-risk complication associated with cardiovascular function and renal function. This study evaluated the effect of candesartan treatment on reducing blood pressure in patients with high body weight. The most common adverse effect reported in this study was Giddiness, which may be occurs because of reducing blood pressure.<\/p>\n<p>Many studies quested the hypotensive effect of angiotensin-I receptor blocker drug, candesartan, either alone or in combination with other hypotensive drugs. They found that candesartan was a potent hypotensive drug and its ameliorative effect seems to be at higher doses rather than usual doses <sup>9,19 <\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p>Other\u00a0 studies inferred that there is alliances between elevation\u00a0 of leptin and origination and development of hypertension, coronary disease , and left ventricular hypertrophy as a result of leptin effects on increased levels of the inflammatory mediators of the blood vessel, excessive growth of vascular smooth muscle, and lipid peroxidation <sup>20, 21<\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p>Moreover, Candesartan can suppress the elevated level of leptin that enhanced by Angiotensin II <a href=\"#bib44\"><sup>22<\/sup><\/a> .Along with the above studies, the results of the present study ascertained that treatment with candesartan suppress the elevated blood level of leptin and lipid profile.<\/p>\n<p>As predicted, the serum level of omentin-1 in this study ameliorated after three months treatment with candesartan in those corpulent patients.Various studies found that the blood level of omentin-1 was indirectly proportional to the blood level of leptin and corpulence and was directly proportional to the blood level of adiponectin. Likewise, the effect of omentin-1 and adiponectin have shared in modulating insulin sensitivity and protecting coronary arteries <sup>23,24<\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p>The blood level of chemerin in this study suppressed with candesartan treatment. This result is consistent with numerous studies that showed a positive effect between serum chemerin levels and corpulence risk factors like decrease in insulin sensitivity and metabolic syndrome <sup>25,26<\/sup> . Corpulence risk factors also associated with increased incidence of hypertension and blood vessels injuries. Therefore, the elevated level of chemerin is associated with hypertension as observed in this study and consistent with other studies <sup>27,28<\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p>Kaur et al. revealed that chemerin has specific receptor\u00a0 at the endothelial cells of blood vessels and the activation of this receptor was enhanced by the inflammatory cytokines such as tumor\u00a0 necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-a), interleukin-one (IL-1b), or interleukin \u2013six <sup>29<\/sup> . Likewise, in this study, the decreased blood pressure with candesartan treatment may be associated with the lessening of blood vessels injuries and thereafter lowering chemein level.<\/p>\n<p>Limitation of this study comprised the number of the enrolled patients, which was nearly small, and the follow-up period, which was approximately short. Therefore, advanced studies with larger sample size and longer follow- up period are suggested to confirm the effect of candesartan on adipocytokines of corpulence.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The treatment with candesartan cilexetil (16 mg daily) exhibited suppression of blood pressure\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 (<em>P<\/em> value &lt; 0.001) \u00a0, serum levels of leptin (0.86 folded), chemerin (0.94 folded) and lipid profile (<em>P<\/em> value &lt; 0.05). As well, amelioration of serum level of omentin-1 (1.06 folded) was achieved. Therefore, candesartan treatment may be more favorable for corpulent patients with hypertension.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Acknowledgements<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The author would like to express her genuine thanks to the president of Al-Nahrain University\/ Iraq, for the reinforcement to perform this research.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Conflicts of Interest<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>There are no conflicts of interest to declare.<\/p>\n<p><strong>References<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Han SH, Quon MJ, Koh KK. Reciprocal relationships between abnormal metabolic parameters and endothelial dysfunction.<em>Curr Opin Lipidol<\/em>. 2007;18 :58\u201365.<\/li>\n<li>Rada FH. Peroxisome proliferator- activated receptors family overview. <em>Eur J Pharm Med Res<\/em>. 2019;6(1) :167-170.<\/li>\n<li>Maury E, and Brichard SM. Adipokine dysregulation, adipose tissue inflammation and metabolic syndrome. <em>Mol Cell Endocrinol<\/em>. 2010 ; 314(1) : 1-16.<\/li>\n<li>Rada FH. Effect of lipid fractions levels with cardiovascular disease. <em>Asian J Pharm Clin Res<\/em>. 2017;10 (3) :180-182.<\/li>\n<li>Dohi Y, Ohashi M, Sugiyama M, Takase H, Sato K, Ueda R. Candesartan reduces oxidative stress and inflammation in patients with essential hypertension. <em>Hypertens Res<\/em>. 2003; 26 :691\u2013697.<\/li>\n<li>Rada FH. Oxidative stress and some inflammatory biomarkers in patients with coronary heart disease. <em>Eur J Pharm Med Res<\/em>. 2018;5(1):9 -12.<\/li>\n<li>Guerre-Millo M. Adipose tissue and adipokines: for better or worse. <em>Diabetes Metab<\/em>. 2004 ;30(1):13-19.<\/li>\n<li>Siegl PKS, Kivlighn SD, Broten TP.Pharmacology of angiotensin II receptor antagonists: Comparison with renin inhibitors and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. <em>Expert Opin Invest Drugs<\/em> .1994; 3: 925-944.<\/li>\n<li>Burgess E, Muirhead N, Rene de Cotret P, Chiu A, Pichette V, Tobe S. Supramaximal dose of candesartan in proteinuric renal disease .<em>J Am Soc Nephrol<\/em>. 2009; 20(4) : 893\u2013900.<\/li>\n<li>Belz GG, Breithaupt-Grogler K, Butzer R, Fuchs W, Hausdorf C, Mang C<em>. <\/em>The pharmacological potency of various AT-1 antagonists assessed by Schild regression technique in man. <em>J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst (JRAAS)<\/em>. 2000; 1:336\u2013341.<\/li>\n<li>Yang RZ, Lee MJ, Hu H, Pray\u00a0 J, Wu\u00a0 HB, Hansen\u00a0 BC,\u00a0 <em>et al<\/em>. Identification of omentin as a novel depotspecific adipokine in human adipose tissue: possible role in modulating insulin action. <em>Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab<\/em>. 2006 ; 290 (6) : E1253\u2013E1261.<\/li>\n<li>Kralisch S, Klein J, Bluher M, Paschke R, Stumvoll M, Fasshauer Therapeutic perspectives of adipocytokines. <em>Expert Opin Pharmaco ther<\/em>. 2005; 6: 863\u2013872.<\/li>\n<li>Tsuji S, Uehori\u00a0 J, Matsumoto M, Suzuki\u00a0 Y, Matsuhisa\u00a0 A, Toyoshima\u00a0 Human intelectin is a novel soluble lectin that recognizes galactofuranose in carbohydrate chains of bacterial cell wall. <em>J Biol Chem<\/em>. 2001;276 :23456 \u201323463.<\/li>\n<li>Komiya T, Tanigawa\u00a0 Y, Hirohashi\u00a0 Cloning of the novel gene intelectin, which is expressed in intestinal Paneth cells in mice. <em>Biochem Biophys Res Commun<\/em>. 1998;251:759 \u2013762.<\/li>\n<li>Lee JK, Schnee\u00a0 J, Pang\u00a0 M, Wolfert\u00a0 M, Baum LG, Moremen KW, Pierce\u00a0 Human homologs of the Xenopus oocyte cortical granule lectin XL35. <em>Glycobiology.<\/em> 2001; 11: 65\u201373.<\/li>\n<li>Ernst MC, Haidl\u00a0 ID, Zuniga\u00a0 LA, Dranse\u00a0 HJ, Rourke\u00a0 JL, Zabel\u00a0 BA, <em>et al.<\/em> Disruption of the chemokine-like receptor-1 (CMKLR1) gene is associated with reduced adiposity and glucose intolerance. <em>Endocrinology<\/em> 2012;153(2):672e82.<\/li>\n<li>Wittamer V, Franssen\u00a0 JD, Vulcano\u00a0 M, Mirjolet\u00a0 JF, Le Poul\u00a0 E, Migeotte\u00a0 I, <em>et al.<\/em>\u00a0 Specific recruitment of antigenpresenting cells by chemerin, a novel processed ligand from human inflammatory fluids. <em>J Exp Med<\/em>. 2003;198 (7): 977\u2013985.<\/li>\n<li>Du XY, Leung\u00a0 Proteolytic regulatory mechanism of chemerin bioactivity. <em>Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai)<\/em>. 2009;41:973e9.<\/li>\n<li>Kloner RA, Weinberger\u00a0 M, Pool\u00a0 JL, Chrysant\u00a0 S, Prasad\u00a0 R, <em>et al.<\/em> For the Comparison of Candesartan and Amlodipine for Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy (CASTLE) Study Investigators. Comparative effects of candesartan cilexetil and amlodipine in patients with mild systemic hypertension. <em>Am J Cardiol<\/em>. 2001;87: 727-731.<\/li>\n<li>Koh KK, Park\u00a0 SM, Quon MJ. Leptin and cardiovascular disease: response to therapeutic interventions. <em>Circulation<\/em> 2008;117:3238\u20133249.<\/li>\n<li>Correia ML, Haynes WG. Leptin, obesity and cardiovascular disease. <em>Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens<\/em>. 2004; 13 : 215\u2013223.<\/li>\n<li>Skurk T, van Harmelen\u00a0 V, Blum\u00a0 WF, Hauner\u00a0 Angiotensin II promotes leptin production in cultured human fat cells by an ERK1\/2-dependent pathway. <em>Obes Res<\/em>. 2005;13 : 969\u2013973.<\/li>\n<li>Tschritter O,Fritsche A,Thamer C, Haap M, Shirkavand\u00a0 F, Rahe\u00a0 S, <em>et al<\/em> .Plasma adiponectin concentrations predict insulin sensitivity of both glucose and lipid metabolism. <em>Diabetes <\/em>2003; 52: 239 \u2013243.<\/li>\n<li>De Souza Batista CM, Yang R, Lee MJ, Glynn NM. Omentin Plasma Levels and Gene Expression Are Decreased in Obesity. <em>Diabetes<\/em> 2007; 56:1655-1661.<\/li>\n<li>Hart R, Greaves DR. Chemerin contributes to inflammation by promoting macrophage adhesion to VCAM-1 and fibronectin through clustering of VLA-4 and VLA-5. <em>J Immunol<\/em>. 2010;185: 3728e39.<\/li>\n<li>Okpechi IJ and Rayner\u00a0 Update on the role of candesartan in the optimal management of hypertension and cardiovascular risk reduction. <em>Integr Blood Press Control<\/em> 2010 ; 3: 45-55.<\/li>\n<li>Meric M, Soylu\u00a0 K, Avci\u00a0 B, Yuksel\u00a0 S, Gulel\u00a0 O, Yenercag M, Coksevim\u00a0 M, Uzun\u00a0 Evaluation of plasma chemerin levels in patients with non-dipper blood pressure patterns. <em>Med Sci Monit.<\/em> 2014; 20: 698\u2013705.<\/li>\n<li>Bozaoglu K, Segal\u00a0 D, Shields\u00a0 K, Cummings\u00a0 N, Curran\u00a0 J,Comuzzie\u00a0 A, <em>et al.<\/em> Chemerin is associated with metabolic syndrome phenotypes in a Mexican-American population. <em>J Clin Endocrinol Metab. <\/em>2009; 94(8) :3085e8.<\/li>\n<li>Kaur\u00a0 J, Adya\u00a0 R, Tan\u00a0 BK, Chen\u00a0 J, Randeva\u00a0 HS. Identification of chemerin receptor (ChemR23) in human endothelial cells: chemerin-induced endothelial angiogenesis. <em>Biochem Biophys Res Commun.<\/em> 2010 ; 391:1762e8.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>Abbreviations<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>SBP: Systolic blood pressure, DBP: Diastolic blood pressure, S.TC: Serum Total cholesterol, S.HDL-C: Serum High density lipoprotein cholesterol, S.TG: Serum Triglyceride.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Introduction Hypertension is a disease of cardiovascular system that associated  [&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":13,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[77],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-33368","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-vol13no2"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33368","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/13"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33368"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33368\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":34372,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33368\/revisions\/34372"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33368"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33368"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33368"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}