{"id":2396,"date":"2015-04-25T07:10:36","date_gmt":"2015-04-25T07:10:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/?p=2396"},"modified":"2016-12-05T05:13:09","modified_gmt":"2016-12-05T05:13:09","slug":"sex-determination-in-deltans-using-mandibular-canine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/vol5no1\/sex-determination-in-deltans-using-mandibular-canine\/","title":{"rendered":"Sex Determination in Deltans using Mandibular Canine"},"content":{"rendered":"

Introduction<\/strong><\/p>\n

All the structures in the human body in their functional morphology and histology continuously maintain the bodies physiological equilibrium. The human body is made up of skeletal framework of bones, soft tissue and circulatory fluid.<\/p>\n

The teeth being the hardest tissue in the body , are selectively preserved and fossilfied thereby providing by far the best documented record from evolutionary study. Their durability in the face of fire and bacterial decomposition makes them invaluable for identification (William et al 2000). Teeth are resistant to heat, chemicals and microbial attack and there is possibility of doing restoration for lost structure due to failure to regenerate when destroyed and have been described as the fourth most hardest structure on earth. All these factors are helpful in personal identification and sex determination (Kavitha 2005). Sex determination could be done successfully in using chromosomal studies as the male has XY chromosomes and female has XX chromosome.this is only possible in the laboratory and takes a longer time and this facility is hardly \u00a0available in all places. Hence , sex determination with the help of the teeth is necessary for an interpretation in law and justice.<\/p>\n

Tooth size standards based on odntometric investigation can be used in age and sex determination (Black 1902).<\/p>\n

The mandibular canine, have a mean age of eruption of 10.98 years and is less affected than other teeth by periodontal diseases. These are the last teeth to be extracted with respect to age. Canines are also better likely to survive severe trauma such as air disasters, hurricanes or conflagration. These findings all suggest that mandibular canines can be considered as the \u201ckey teeth\u201d\u00a0\u00a0 for\u00a0\u00a0 personal identification (Dahberg 1963).<\/p>\n

This research establishes the impact of \u201csex factor\u201d on the morphometry of mandibular canines. It defines the morphometric criteria for mandibular canine index (MCI) \u00a0in indigenes of Delta state of Nigeria and this is of definite significance as tooth morphology often influenced by environment, cultural and racial factors (Halim, 2001).<\/p>\n

The aim of this study is to help in providing a method for forensic scientist in determining\u00a0 the sex elements in Deltans by using the canine tooth.<\/p>\n

Gram et al (1967) stated the magnitude of sexual dimorphism in tooth size as well as percentage dimorphism in 243 subjects\u00a0 from south west ohio. The largest sexual dimorphism in meso-distal tooth size was exhibited by the mandibular , first and second molars D=0.52 and 0.45mm respectively with the maxillary and mandibular canines next in order of difference (D=0.44) and (0.42mm). On percentage basis, dimorphism was greatest for canines and least for mandibular incisors. But canine dimorphism was specific to mesio-distal diameter. Mesio-distally the lower canines showed the greatest difference between the sexes. Rao et al (1989) derived MCI for establishing sex identity , the index was derived as ratio between two parameters in permanent mandibular canines. Namely the maximum crown width and the canine arch width (mm) and was calculated as follows:<\/p>\n

MCI= mesiodistal crown width of mandibular canine<\/u><\/p>\n

Mandibular canine arch width<\/p>\n

Accuracy of sex determination was found to be 84.3% in males and 87.5% in females.<\/p>\n

Materials and Methods<\/strong><\/p>\n

The instrument used for this study were a divider with a fixing device and a meter rule graduated in millimeters (resolution 0.50mm)<\/p>\n

The width of the mandibular canines were taken as the greatest mesio-distal width between contact points of the teeth on either side of the jaw , the intercanine distance was measured between tips of both canines in the lower jaw. Intra oral measurements was taken in 200 subjects (100 males and 100 females) in the age group of 17-21 years. All measurements were taken on an anatomically sound basis using a meter rule with a resolution of 0.50mm and a divider with a fixing device.<\/p>\n

The readings obtained were subjected to statistical analysis to derive a conclusion. Sexual dimorphism in right and left mandibular canines was calculated using formular given by Garm et al (1967) as follows.<\/p>\n

Sexual dimorphism =Xm<\/u><\/p>\n

XF<\/p>\n

Xm = mean value for males<\/p>\n

Xf= mean value for females<\/p>\n

Further mandibular canine index was calculated based on the formular by Rao et al (1989)<\/p>\n

Mandibular Canine Index(Mci)<\/strong><\/p>\n

MCI= mesiodistal crown width of mandibular canine<\/u><\/p>\n

Mandibular canine arch width or inter-canine<\/p>\n

Standard Mandibular Canine Index<\/strong><\/p>\n

The standard mandibular canine index of the population studied was obtained from the measurement taken in the sample by applying the following formular<\/p>\n

Std MCL = (mean male MCI +SD) + (mean female MCI+SD)<\/u><\/p>\n

2<\/p>\n

According to Rao et al (1989) if the calculatedmandibular canine index for the individual was higher than the standard mandibular canine index the individual was considered to be a male. If it was the other way round the subjects was taken as a female.<\/p>\n

Prediction of sex was done using the same method for the selected Deltan subjects with lower anterior dental alignment. The findings were represented graphically.<\/p>\n

Results<\/strong><\/p>\n

The following parameters were determined in males and females<\/p>\n

Inter-canine Distance<\/p>\n

Right mandibular canine width<\/p>\n

Left mandibular canine width<\/p>\n

Right mandibular canine index<\/p>\n

Left mandibular canine index<\/p>\n

Table 1:S<\/strong>howing statistical significance of different parameters.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Parameter<\/strong><\/td>\nsex<\/strong><\/td>\nmean<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0+ <\/u>S.D<\/strong><\/td>\nCoefficient of variation<\/strong><\/td>\nt’ state\u00a0 ‘p’value<\/strong><\/td>\nSignificance<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
inter-canine distance<\/td>\nM<\/td>\n28.29<\/td>\n1.75<\/td>\n5.04<\/td>\n\u00a02.638<0.006<\/td>\nHighly significant<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nF<\/td>\n26.7<\/td>\n1.49<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
RT Canine width<\/td>\nM<\/td>\n7.84<\/td>\n0.52<\/td>\n4.12<\/td>\n7.872<7.4 *10<\/td>\nHighly significant<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nF<\/td>\n7.2<\/td>\n0.49<\/td>\n4.1<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
LT Canine width<\/td>\nM<\/td>\n7.75<\/td>\n0.51<\/td>\n4.85<\/td>\n7.730 < 2.31<\/td>\nHighly significant<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nF<\/td>\n7.2<\/td>\n0.54<\/td>\n5.03<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
RT\u00a0 MCI<\/td>\nM<\/td>\n0.27<\/td>\n0.08<\/td>\n4<\/td>\n9.821 < 7.70<\/td>\n\u00a0 Highly\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 significant<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nF<\/td>\n0.26<\/td>\n0.08<\/td>\n4.21<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
LT\u00a0 MCI<\/td>\nM<\/td>\n0.27<\/td>\n0.08<\/td>\n5.02<\/td>\n4.178 < 7.02<\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0 Highly significant<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/td>\nF<\/td>\n0.26<\/td>\n0.49<\/td>\n5.87<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n

Table 2:\u00a0Showing Sexual Dimorphism in Mandibular Canine<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n
Canine Tooth \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\nSexual Dimorphism<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
RT Canine<\/td>\n8.58%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
LT Canine<\/td>\n8.54%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n

Table\u00a03: showing percentage\u00a0 of cases correctly predicted RMCI ( RT= 0.273)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n
SEX<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Number\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n\u00a0 Percentage<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
M<\/td>\n100<\/td>\n50.94%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
F<\/td>\n100<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n

Table 4: Showing percentage of cases correctly predicted\u00a0using LMCI (Standard MCI (LT) = 0.272.)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n
SEX<\/strong><\/td>\nNumber\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\npercentage<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
M<\/td>\n100<\/td>\n50.94%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
F<\/td>\n100<\/td>\n49.06%<\/p>\n

 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

The result in tables 3 and 4 shows the probability of sex determination to be as high as 100%, when the width\u00a0 of either canine is greater than 7.8 the sex is a male.Using the mandibular canine index sex was accurately predicted as high as 50.94% and 49.06%\u00a0 for males and females respectively.<\/p>\n

Table 5: showing range of Canine\u00a0 width, male\u00a0 versus\u00a0 female.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n
sex<\/strong><\/td>\nRT Canine Width (mm)<\/strong><\/td>\nLT Canine Width(mm)<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
M<\/td>\n7.3-8.<\/td>\n7.5-8.4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
F<\/td>\n6. 8-7.8<\/td>\n6.85-7.65<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n

Discussion<\/strong><\/p>\n

This study confirms the fact that there is statistically significant sexual dimorphism in mandibular canines . it is consistent with kausal et al 2004 who conducted a study on sixty North Indians (30 female , 30 males) and found that the mandibular canines exhibited statistical significance. Hashim and murshid 1993 who conducted a study on Saudi males and females also found that only the canines of both jaw exhibited significant sexual difference while other teeth did not.\u00a0 , this was also confirmed in \u00a0study\u00a0 on Chinese (Lew and keng1991).Among the significant findings that can be obtained from the teeth are race, age sex habits and customs(Molnar 1971) ,so any measurement of teeth unaccompanied by age sex or race of the individual must be treated with reserve.(Gabriel 1958). Since this study was conducted in both sexes in a definite age group in the Deltan population . it establishes a morphometric criteria of canine size for the Deltan population. This study indicates the probability of male sex determination to an extent as high as 100% when the width of either canine is greater than 7.8mm, this finding is of definite significance as the determination of sex makes identification easier and it is of immense forensic importance, Kaushal et al 2003. In this study sex determination was successfully predicted as high 50.94% and 49.06% for males and females respectively. Similar success to a higher percentage has been recorded .In the literature, 75 % \u00a0kaushal et al (2004), 85.5%\u00a0 Rao et al. but such method of sex determination has limitations as sex of the subjects to whom the fragment of the mandible belongs can be determined at best if the fragment is found in the geographical area where the subject was born, . This implies that it is necessary to make up a random sample of the population from this geographical area to calculate the corresponding standard mandibular canine index.<\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n

The standard MCI is a fast and easy method for determining sex in identification, but one must be prudent in interpreting the results which must be confirmed by other methods since accuracy has never exceeded 84-87% in any previous study. We recommend that further studies be carried out on various ethnic populations of Nigeria for comparison and robust data<\/p>\n

Reference<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. William PL, Bannister LH, Dyson M, Berry MM,Collins P, Dussek JE, Fergusson MWJ. Gray\u2019s Anatomy; The Teeth. 38th Ed, Churchill Livingstone, London.<\/li>\n
  2. Dahberg AA. Dental traits as identification tools. Dent Prog. 1963; 3: 155-160.<\/li>\n
  3. Black GV. Descriptive Anatomy of Human teeth. 4th Ed. Philadelphia, S.S.White Dental MfgCo.1902.<\/li>\n
  4. Camps EF. 3rd Ed; John Wright and Sons.1976.<\/li>\n
  5. Rao NG, Rao NN, Pai ML, Kotian MS. Mandibular Canine Index – A Clue For Establishing Sex Identity. Forensic Sci. Int.42 (1989)249-254.<\/li>\n
  6. Muller M, LupiPegurier L, Quatrehomme G,Bolla M. Odontometrical Method Useful In Determining Gender And Dental Alignment.Forensic Science International. 2001; 121:194-196<\/li>\n
  7. Halim A. Regional and clinical anatomy for dental students; General principles of Anthropology. 1st Ed; Modern Publishers. 2001.<\/li>\n
  8. Vacher BR and Gupta RK. A study of prevalence of periodontal disease using Ramfjord\u2019s technique. J. All. India. Dent. Ass.1966; 38 (1):215-227.<\/li>\n
  9. Hashim HA and Murshid ZA. Mesio-distal Tooth Width \u2013 A comparison between Saudi Males and Females. Egypt Dent. J. 1987; 39 (1): 343-6.<\/li>\n
  10. Lew KK and Keng SB. Anterior Crown Dimensions and Relationship in an Ethnic Chinese Population with Normal Occlusions.\u00a0Aust. Orthod. J. 1991; 12 (2): 105-9.<\/li>\n
  11. LeBot P. Aspects anthropologiques et genetiques des mensurations dentaires, Revued\u2019 Orthope\u2019die Dento-Faciale 1976; 10: 71-96.<\/li>\n
  12. Garn SM, Lewis AB, Swindler DR, Kerewsky RS. Genetic Control of Sexual Dimorphism in Tooth Size. J.Den.Res. 1967; 46:963-972.<\/li>\n
  13. Garn SM, Lewis AB. Bucco-Lingual Size Asymmetry and Its Developmental Meaning.Angle Orthod. 1967; 37 (1): 186-93.\u00a049JIAFM, 2004; 26(2). ISSN 0971-0973<\/em><\/li>\n
  14. Lysell L and Myrberg N. Mesio-distal Tooth Size in Deciduous and Permanent Dentitions. Eur.J. Orthod. 1982; 61 (1): 113-22.<\/li>\n
  15. Nair P, Rao BB and Annigeri RG. A study of tooth size, symmetry and sexual dimorphism. J. Forensic Med. Toxicol. 1999;16 (2): 10-13.<\/li>\n
  16. Eimerl S and DeVore L. The Primates, New York, Times Inc. 1965.<\/li>\n
  17. Gabriel AC. Some Anatomical Features of the Mandible. Journal of anatomy, 1958; 92 (4): 580.<\/li>\n
  18. Kaushal S, Patnaik VVG, Agnihotri G. Mandibular Canines in Sex Determination. J. Anat. Soc.India. 2003; 52(2): 119-124.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Introduction All the structures in the human body in their […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2396","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-vol5no1"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2396","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2396"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2396\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10372,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2396\/revisions\/10372"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2396"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2396"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2396"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}