{"id":11834,"date":"2016-12-22T10:06:59","date_gmt":"2016-12-22T10:06:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/?p=11834"},"modified":"2020-04-24T10:21:37","modified_gmt":"2020-04-24T10:21:37","slug":"efficacy-of-organic-component-on-hardness-and-fracture-toughness-of-human-dentin-using-heat-treatment-in-vitro-study","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/vol9no3\/efficacy-of-organic-component-on-hardness-and-fracture-toughness-of-human-dentin-using-heat-treatment-in-vitro-study\/","title":{"rendered":"Efficacy of Organic Component on Hardness and Fracture Toughness of Human Dentin Using Heat treatment \u2013 In vitro Study."},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Introduction<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The mature human\u00a0 dentin\u00a0 is composed of 70% of inorganic component, 20% of organic material and 10% of water by weight.<sup>1<\/sup> The inorganic material is mainly composed of calcium phosphate related to the hexagonal hydroxyapatite, whose chemical formula is Ca<sub>10<\/sub>(PO<sub>4<\/sub>)<sub>6<\/sub>\u00b72(OH).<sup>2<\/sup> The organic matrix is composed of collagen (85-90%) and a variety of non collagenous proteins.<sup>3,4,5 <\/sup>Most of the collagen is type I.<sup>6<\/sup> The dentin serves as an elastic foundation for the enamel and as a protective enclosure for the pulp and therefore mechanical properties are of utmost importance in determining the tooth strength. The most striking morphological feature of dentin is the tubule, with its hypermineralized peritubular cuff, influenced the mechanical properties of dentin.<sup>7<\/sup> The elastic behavior of dentin was due to intertubular dentin matrix, and not the dentinal tubules.<sup>8<\/sup> Any changes in the mineral imbalance caused by caries or developmental disorders, compromise the mechanical integrity of the tooth. But, the influence of organic components of dentin on the mechanical properties has not been clearly proved. Hence, the objective of the present study was to acquire the details on the influence of organic matrix on hardness and fracture toughness of the human dentin.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Methods<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Sample preparation<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Twenty human mandibular premolars free of caries extracted for orthodontic reasons from young individuals were used for this study. The premolars were rinsed with saline after extraction and stored at\u00a0 &#8211; 40\u00b0C and was used within one month. The samples were mounted in acrylic resin at room temperature and cut in the mid sagittal plane using hard tissue microtome (Leica, Rotterdam) to obtain specimens with the thickness of 1.5mm.The study included two groups, the control group being the samples with organic component (n=8). The experimental group was heat treated to remove the organic content in the dentin specimen (n=8).<\/p>\n<p><strong>Thermal treatment<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The heat treatment temperature for human dentin was determined as 800\u00b0C by thermogravimetric analysis in order to facilitate complete removal of organic component (Fig. 1). The heat treatment was performed with 8 specimens in a tubular furnace (Indfur, India) with oxygen atmosphere for 4 hours to 800\u00b0C to remove the organic matrix from the dentin. The removal of proteins from dentin was confirmed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (Perkin Elmer, USA) (Fig. 2). The untreated 8 samples were used as a negative control.<\/p>\n<table style=\"width: 70%;\" border=\"1\" cellpadding=\"5\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>\u00a0<img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-11835 size-thumbnail\" src=\"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/Vol9No3_Effi_Rama_fig1-150x150.jpg\" alt=\"Vol9No3_Effi_Rama_fig1\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" srcset=\"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/Vol9No3_Effi_Rama_fig1-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/Vol9No3_Effi_Rama_fig1-256x256.jpg 256w, https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/Vol9No3_Effi_Rama_fig1.jpg 581w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 150px) 100vw, 150px\" \/><\/td>\n<td><strong>Figure 1: The thermogram of dentin shows mass loss of 8% at about 210\u00b0C and 20% of weight loss at about 800\u00baC, which correspond respectively to water and organic component.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/Vol9No3_Effi_Rama_fig1.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">Click here to View figure<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<table style=\"width: 70%;\" border=\"1\" cellpadding=\"5\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>\u00a0<img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-11836 size-thumbnail\" src=\"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/Vol9No3_Effi_Rama_fig2-150x150.jpg\" alt=\"Figure 2: The differences in the ratios of peak intensities of amide I (major protein absorbance band) and PO4 were used to monitor organic matrix removal. The amide I absorbance at 1600-1700 cm-1 was significantly reduced in the heated sample, due to protein removal.\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" srcset=\"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/Vol9No3_Effi_Rama_fig2-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/Vol9No3_Effi_Rama_fig2-256x256.jpg 256w, https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/Vol9No3_Effi_Rama_fig2.jpg 631w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 150px) 100vw, 150px\" \/><\/td>\n<td><strong>Figure<\/strong> <strong>2: The differences in the ratios of peak intensities of amide I (major protein absorbance band) and PO<sub>4 <\/sub>were used to monitor organic matrix removal. The amide I absorbance at 1600-1700 cm-1 was significantly reduced in the heated sample, due to protein removal.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/Vol9No3_Effi_Rama_fig2.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">Click here to View figure<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hardness and fracture toughness analyses<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The hardness of the dentin was evaluated using Vickers diamond tip. The tests were carried out at room temperature with different loads form 0.98N \u2013 49N, until crack formation and dwell time of 15 seconds. For each sample, 8 indentations were made in the circumpulpal dentin. A distance of at least two times the impression diagonal was kept between the indentations to minimize interactions between neighboring indentations. The Vickers hardness was calculated according to the equation, HV = 1.854x P\/ D<sup>2<\/sup>, where, HV -Vickers hardness, P &#8211; applied load, D &#8211; indentation diagonal (\u00b5m).<sup>9<\/sup><\/p>\n<p>The fracture toughness was computed according to the equation, K<sub>IC <\/sub>= P\/ l <sup>3\/2<\/sup> \u03b2<sub>0 ,<\/sub>where, K<sub>IC <\/sub>\u2013 Fracture toughness , P \u2013 load, l \u2013 crack length, \u03b2<sub>0 <\/sub>\u2013 Indenter constant equal to 7 for a vicker\u2019s indenter.<sup>10<\/sup><\/p>\n<p><strong>Results<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>In the mid sagittal plane, the lowest hardness values were observed in the heat treated specimens when they were subjected to different loads from 0.98N \u2013 49N (Table, Fig. 3a). In both treated and untreated specimens, a pronounced load-dependent hardness behavior was evident. The hardness decreased as the load increased (Table). The decrease in hardness was observed up to 55% in the samples in which organic matrix was absent by heat treatment. The optical micrography revealed smaller indentation impression in the untreated specimens compared to the samples in which organic matrix were absent. The fracture toughness and hardness values were directly correlated to each other and inversely proportional to load (Table, Fig. 3). The fracture toughness is related to the crack length. The optical micrography of the samples revealed the crack formed at a greater load in untreated than heat treated specimens. The crack was formed in untreated dentin samples when the load of 49N was applied. The samples in which the organic matrix was removed, the crack formation occurred when subjected to the load of 9.8N (Table, Fig. 3).The removal of organic matter led to a substantial decrease in the fracture toughness of about 57% in the specimens.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Table 1: Mechanical characteristics of untreated and heat treated human coronal dentin.<\/strong><\/p>\n<table style=\"width: 95%;\" border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"4\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" rowspan=\"2\" width=\"55\"><strong>Load (N)<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" colspan=\"2\" width=\"162\"><strong>Mean<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Hardness (Kg \/ mm<sup>2<\/sup>)<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" colspan=\"2\" width=\"162\"><strong>Mean<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Crack length (<\/strong><strong>m<\/strong><strong>m)<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" colspan=\"2\" width=\"195\"><strong>Mean<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Fracture toughness <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>(Mpa m\u00bd)<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"92\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Untreated<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"70\"><strong>Heat treated<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"92\"><strong>Untreated<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"70\"><strong>Heat treated<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"92\"><strong>Untreated<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"103\"><strong>Heat treated<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"55\">0.98<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"92\">61.42<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"70\">34.25<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"92\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"70\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"92\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"103\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"55\">1.96<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"92\">60.06<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"70\">31.76<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"92\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"70\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"92\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"103\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"55\">2.94<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"92\">58.63<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"70\">27.16<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"92\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"70\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"92\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"103\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"55\">4.9<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"92\">56.25<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"70\">23.68<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"92\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"70\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"92\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"103\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"55\">9.8<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"92\">52.23<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"70\">20.68<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"92\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"70\">97.87<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"92\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"103\">1.46<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"55\">19.6<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"92\">46.82<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"70\">17.02<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"92\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"70\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"92\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"103\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"55\">29.4<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"92\">40.66<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"70\">15.37<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"92\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"70\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"92\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"103\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"55\">49<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"92\">29.62<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"70\">12.25<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"92\">153.75<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"70\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"92\">3.43<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: center;\" width=\"103\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<table style=\"width: 70%;\" border=\"1\" cellpadding=\"5\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-11837\" src=\"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/Vol9No3_Effi_Rama_fig3a-150x150.jpg\" alt=\"Figure 3a: Comparison of hardness in heat treated and untreated samples\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" srcset=\"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/Vol9No3_Effi_Rama_fig3a-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/Vol9No3_Effi_Rama_fig3a-256x256.jpg 256w, https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/Vol9No3_Effi_Rama_fig3a.jpg 536w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 150px) 100vw, 150px\" \/><\/td>\n<td><strong>Figure 3a: Comparison of hardness in heat treated and untreated samples<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/Vol9No3_Effi_Rama_fig3a.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">Click here to View figure<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<table style=\"width: 70%;\" border=\"1\" cellpadding=\"5\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>\u00a0<img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-11838\" src=\"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/Vol9No3_Effi_Rama_fig3b-150x150.jpg\" alt=\"Figure 3b: Comparison of fracture toughness in heat treated and untreated samples\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" srcset=\"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/Vol9No3_Effi_Rama_fig3b-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/Vol9No3_Effi_Rama_fig3b-256x256.jpg 256w, https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/Vol9No3_Effi_Rama_fig3b.jpg 429w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 150px) 100vw, 150px\" \/><\/td>\n<td><strong>Figure 3b: Comparison of fracture toughness in heat treated and untreated samples<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/Vol9No3_Effi_Rama_fig3b.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">Click here to View figure<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The Students t \u2013 test was used to test for significant difference in hardness and fracture toughness values among the heat treated and untreated dentin specimens. The statistically significant difference (p&lt;0.001) was found between the control and experimental groups in the parameters, hardness and fracture toughness.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Discussion<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Human dentin essentially is a hydrated composite composed of nanocrystalline carbonated (calcium \u2013 phosphate \u2013 based ) apatite mineral (45% by volume), type I collagen fibrils (33% by volume) and water (22% by volume).The results of this study demonstrated that, although the dentin comprises 20% of organic matter by weight, it significantly influenced its mechanical properties confirming previous hypothesis.<sup>11 <\/sup>With the objective to prove the validity of this hypothesis, we intended to remove the organic matrix in the dentin to check for its influence in hardness and fracture toughness. Thermal treatment method of organic removal was chosen since wet chemical techniques have been shown to alter the mineral content of bone which is similar to dentin.<sup>12 <\/sup>Heating at high temperature (700\u00b0C &#8211; 900\u00b0C) removed the organic constituents of cortical bone and the coralline hydroxyapatite without, apparently, affecting the interlocking framework of the hydroxyapatite crystallites.<sup>13,14,15<\/sup><\/p>\n<p>The results of the present study showed statistically significant difference (p&lt;0.001) in the mechanical properties tested, between the control and experimental groups as the collagen fibrils in dentin are roughly 50 &#8211; 100 nm in diameter; they are randomly oriented in a plane perpendicular to the direction of dentin formation<sup>16<\/sup> and the mineral occupies two sites within this collagen scaffold: intrafibrillar (inside the periodically spaced gap zones in the collagen fibril) and extrafibrillar (in the interstices between the fibrils). The apatite crystals are believed to nucleate initially in the gap zone, followed by secondary mineralization of the interstitial positions between the fibrils.<sup>17<\/sup> The hydroxyapatite crystals, which average 0.1 \u00b5m in length, are formed along their fibers with their long axes oriented parallel to the collagen fibers.<sup>18<\/sup> It is generally believed that collagen fibrils form a felt work structure laid down perpendicular to the tubules and in the plane of the advancing mineralization front<sup>19<\/sup> and the intertubular dentin matrix, and not the dentinal tubules, dominates the elastic behavior.<sup>8<\/sup> \u00a0Hence, the removal of organic component in human dentin significantly decreased the hardness and fracture toughness and weakens entire structure of dentin, as the type I collagen which acts as a scaffold that accommodates a large proportion of mineral (56%) in holes and pores of fibrils.<sup>1<\/sup><\/p>\n<p><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Our findings provide information that the removal of organic matrix resulted up to 55% and 57% decrease in hardness and fracture toughness, which implied that the organic matrix is not only essential during hard tissue formation, but also has a functional role in the mature tissue and emphasizing its importance in maintaining the integrity of human dentin.<\/p>\n<p><strong>References<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Ten cate AR. Oral histology: development,structure, and function 7<sup>th<\/sup> edn. St. Louis: Mosby, 2008.<\/li>\n<li>Le Geros RZ. Calcium phosphates in oral biology and medicine, Howard M. Myers, Edn, San Francisco, California, 1991.<\/li>\n<li>Veis A, Spector AR, Zamascianyk H. Isolation of an EDTA- soluble phosphoprotein from mineralizing bovine dentin. Bio chem Biophys Acta 1972;257:404-413.<\/li>\n<li>Termine JD, Kleinman HK, Whitson WS, Conn KM, McGarvey ML. Osteonectin, a bone-specific protein linking mineral to collagen. Cell 1981;26:99-105.<\/li>\n<li>Price PA, Otsuka AS, Poser JW, Kristaponis J, Raman N. Characterization of a \u03b3 \u2013 carboxyglutamic acid \u2013 containing protein from bone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1976;73:1447-1451.<\/li>\n<li>Maglorie, Joffre, Grimaud, Herbage, Couble, Chavrier. Identification of type I collagen fibrils in human dentine. Electron microscope immunotyping. Cell Mol Life Sci 1983;39:169-171<em>.<\/em><\/li>\n<li>Sano H, Ciucchi B, Matthews WG, Pashley DH. Tensile properties of mineralized and demineralized human and bovine dentin. J Dent Res 1994;73:1205-1211.<\/li>\n<li>Kinney JH, Balooch M, Marshall GW, Marshall SJ. A micromechanics model of the elastic properties of human dentine. Arch Oral Biol 1999;44:813\u2013822.<\/li>\n<li>ASTM. ASTM designation E 384. In: Standard test method for microhardness of materials. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials, 1991.<\/li>\n<li>Navamathavan R, Arivuoli D, Attolini G, Pelosi C, Chi Kyu Choi. Mechanical properties of some binary, ternary and quaternary III-V compound semiconductor alloys. Physica B 2007;392:51-57.<\/li>\n<li>Jameson MW, Hood JAA, Tidmarsh BG. The effects of dehydration and rehydration on some mechanical properties of human dentin<em>. <\/em>J Biomech 1993;26:1055-1065.<\/li>\n<li>Broz JJ, Simske SJ, Corley WD, Greenberg AR. Effects of deproteinization and ashing on site-specific properties of cortical bone. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 1997;8:395-401.<\/li>\n<li>Cowin. Bone mechanics. CRC Press, Boca Raton,FL,1980.<\/li>\n<li>Wang PE, Chaki TK. Sintering behaviour and mechanical properties of hydroxyapatite and dicalcium phosphate. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 1993;4:150-158.<\/li>\n<li>Murugan R, Panduranga\u00a0Rao k and\u00a0Sampath\u00a0Kumar TS. Heat-deproteinated xenogeneic bone from slaughterhouse waste: Physico-chemical properties. Bull.Mater Sci 2003;26:523-528.<\/li>\n<li>Jones SJ, Boyde A. Ultrastructure of dentin and dentinogenesis. In: Dentin and dentinogenesis. Linde J, editor. Boca Raton: CRC Press,1984,81-134.<\/li>\n<li>Landis WJ, Librizzi JJ, Dunn MG, Silver FH. A study of the relationship between mineral content and mechanical properties of turkey gastrocnemius tendon. J Bone Mineral Res 1995;10:859\u2013867.<\/li>\n<li>Orban. Oral histology and embryology 11<sup>th<\/sup> edn. St. Louis: Mosby, 2001.<\/li>\n<li>Johnson NW, Poole DFG . Orientation of collagen fibers in dentine. Nature 1967;213:695\u2013696.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Introduction The mature human\u00a0 dentin\u00a0 is composed of 70% of  [&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11834","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-vol9no3"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11834","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11834"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11834\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":32710,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11834\/revisions\/32710"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11834"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11834"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/biomedpharmajournal.org\/staging\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11834"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}