Insights from the Interfaces of Corona Viral Proteins: Homomers Versus Heteromers
Christina Nilofer
and Arumugam Mohanapriya*School of Biosciences and Technology, VIT University, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
Corresponding Author E mail: mohanapriyaa@vit.ac.in
Abstract: The outbreak of COVID-19 and its mutant variants has become a life-threatening and fatal viral disease to mankind. Several studies have been carried out to identify an effective receptor against coronavirus using clinically driven samples distinguished as hematological, immunological and biochemical biomarkers. Simultaneously, protein interfaces are being researched to understand the structural and functional mechanism of action. Therefore, we characterized and examined the interfaces of corona viral proteins using a dataset consisting of 366 homomeric and 199 heteromeric protein interfaces. The interfaces were analyzed using six parameters including interface area, interface size, van der Waal, hydrogen bond, electrostatic and total stabilizing energies. We observed the interfaces of corona viral proteins (homomer and heteromer) to be alike. Therefore, we clustered the interfaces based on the percent contribution of vdW towards total stabilizing energy as vdW energy dominant (≥60%) and vdW energy subdominant (<60%). We found 91% of interfaces to have vdW energy in dominance with large interface size [146±29 (homomer) and 122±29 (heteromer)] and interface area [1690±683 (homomer) and 1306±355 (heteromer)]. However, we also observed 9% of interfaces to have vdW energy in sub-dominance with small interface size [60±12 (homomer) and 41±20 (heteromer)] and interface area [472±174 (homomer) and 310±199 (heteromer)]. We noticed the interface area of large interfaces to be four-fold more when compared to small interfaces in homomer and heteromer. It was interesting to observe that the small interfaces of homomers to be rich in electrostatics (r2=0.50) destitute of hydrogen bond energy (r2=0.04). However, the heteromeric interfaces were equally pronounced with hydrogen bond (r2=0.70) and electrostatic (r2=0.61) energies. Hence, our earlier findings stating that the small protein interfaces are rich in electrostatic energy remaintrue with the homomeric interfaces of corona viral proteins whereas not in heteromeric interfaces.
Keywords: Corona viral proteins; Hydrogen Bond Energy; Electrostatic Energy; Interface Area; Interface Size; Protein-Protein Interaction; Protein Interface; Total Stabilizing Energy; Van Der Waals Energy Back to TOC