M. Rathinavel Pandian*¹, Ashish R. Jain¹, Ragavendra Jayesh²,  Narasimman. M¹, R. Pradeep¹

¹Department of Prosthodontics, Tagore Dental College and Hospitals,Chennai, India. ²Department of Prosthodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College & Hospital, Bharath University, Chennai-600100.

DOI : https://dx.doi.org/10.13005/bpj/684

Abstract

The use of artificial bone graft substitutes has increased as the surgical applications widen and the availability of allograft bone decreases. The ideal graft substitute should reabsorb with time to allow and encourage new bone formation whilst maintaining its properties as an osteoconductive scaffold until it is no longer required. A potential disadvantage of some synthetic substitutes is their long dissolution time. Autologous bone grafting is currently considered as the gold standard to restore bone defects. However, clinical benefit is not guaranteed and there is an associated 8–39% complication rate. This has resulted in the development of alternative (synthetic) bone substitutes.

Keywords

osteoconductive; Bones;bone substitutes

Download this article as: 

Copy the following to cite this article: Pandian M. R, Jain A. R, Jayeshc R, Narasimman M, Pradeep R. Bone Substitues In Prosthodontic Service. Biomed Pharmacol J 2015;8(October Spl Edition)

Copy the following to cite this URL: Pandian M. R, Jain A. R, Jayeshc R, Narasimman M, Pradeep R. Bone Substitues In Prosthodontic Service. Biomed Pharmacol J 2015;8(October Spl Edition). Available from: http://biomedpharmajournal.org/?p=3934>

(Visited 405 times, 1 visits today)