C. Narasimha Rao¹, K. Balaji¹, C. Narasimha Rao² and P. Venkateswarlu¹*

¹Department of Chemistry, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati - 517 502 India.

²Department of Zoology, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati - 517 502 India

Corresponding Author E-mail: pvprofvenkat51@gmail.com

Abstract

A sensitive differential pulse voltammetric (DPV) method for the determination of Nalmefene(NLM) at Clay modified carbon paste electrode (CMCPE) was developed. Peak currents showed a linear response in the concentration range 1.4 × 10-9 to 5.2 × 10-5 M. The effect of pH of buffer solution, accumulation time and accumulation potential on peak currents were studied. Limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantization (LOQ) were found to be 1.1 × 10-8 and 0.334 × 10-7 M respectively with a correlation coefficient of 0.9982. The proposed method has been successfully applied for the determination of NLM in spiked urine samples, human serum samples and pharmaceutical formulations.

Keywords

Nalmefene; Clay modified carbon paste electrode; differential pulse voltammetry

Download this article as: 

Copy the following to cite this article: Rao C. N, Balaji K, Rao C. N, Venkateswarlu P. Electroanalysis of Nalmefene and its Determination in Pharmaceutical Formulations and Biological Fluid Samples. Biomed. Pharmacol. J.2009;2(1)

Copy the following to cite this URL: Rao C. N, Balaji K, Rao C. N, Venkateswarlu P. Electroanalysis of Nalmefene and its Determination in Pharmaceutical Formulations and Biological Fluid Samples. Biomed. Pharmacol. J.2009;2(1). Available from: http://biomedpharmajournal.org/?p=678

Introduction

Nalmefene [17-cyclopropylmethyl-4,5α-epoxy-6-methylenemorphinan-3,14-diol]  (NLM) is an opioid antagonist used in the treatment of opioid over dose and postoperative opioid depression.  GC-MS (1) and HPLC (2 ) methods were reported for the determination of NLM. But voltammetric  methods have not  been reported which are simple, rapid and more accurate than the above methods. We reported the determination of drugs based on their electrochemical reduction (3, 4). In the present method, a clay modified carbon paste electrode has been employed because they are able to adsorb and to incorporate electroactive species for the determination of an analyte. (5-10).

Experimental

Voltammograms were recorded with Metrohm 757 VA computrace (Herisau, Switzerland).Nalmefene (NLM) was purchased from Sigma. Graphite powder (l-2 mm particle size), paraffin oil from Aldrich India Ltd., Bangalore. All chemicals used for the preparation of buffers and supporting electrolytes are of reagent grade.

Recommended Procedure

An appropriate amount of NLM working standard solution is placed in the electrolytic cell which contained Britton Robinson buffer of pH 3.0. Subsequently a steam of oxygen-free nitrogen gas is passed into the solution for 10 min. The laboratory made working electrode is placed in the cell, during the deposition of the test species the solution is stirred for 150 s at

-0.4 V. The stirring (2000rpm) is stopped and after 25 s of equilibration time, the cathodic sweep is carried out toward negative potential. All the measurements are made at 21± 2 °C.

Results and Discussion

Cyclic Voltammetry

Fig. 1  illustrates the cyclic voltammogram recorded for NLM at carbon paste electrode (CPE) and clay modified carbon paste electrode (CMCPE). On scanning towards a negative potential on a bare carbon paste electrode, only a much smaller cathodic peak is observed. When CMCPE is used a large increase in the peak currents is observed. No peaks are observed in the anodic sweep indicating that the reduction of NLM under investigation is of irreversible.

Figure 1: Typical CV of  NLM at (a) bare CPE; (b) CMCPE.   Click here to View figure

 

Differential Pulse Voltammetry

Fig. 2  illustrates differential pulse voltammogram obtained at bare carbon paste electrode and clay modified carbon paste electrodes for NLM in BR buffer of pH 3.0. From the obtained results the peak currents obtained at clay modified carbon paste electrode are almost twice than those at carbon paste electrode of concentration 1.6×10^-9M NLM.

Figure 2: Typical DPAdSV of NLM (a)    bare CPE; (b) CMCPE .   Click here to View figure

 

The peak is attributed  to the reduction of carbon, carbon double bond according to the currently accepted mechanism for the electroreduction of carbon, carbon double bond containing compounds.(11, 12).

Scheme.1 Reduction of Nalmefene

Scheme 1: Reduction of Nalmefene.   Click here to View Scheme

 

Effect of pH, Accumulation Potential and Accumulation Time

The results from the overall the experiment show that peak current is maximum at the pH 3.0. The peak currents of NLM increase as the accumulation potential increases from -0.1 V and reaches maximum at -0.4 V; as the E_acc increases further, the i_p values started decreasing. Thus, an optimal accumulation potential of-0.4 V is used for further studies.Sharp increasing peak currents are obtained up to accumulation time 300 s and 150 s of NLM at CPE and CMCPE respectively. For longer accumulation times above 300 and 150 s the peak currents practically level off. . So in the further studies, a preconcentration time of 150 s is preferred as effective criteria.

Table 1: Experimental data of  NLM.

Parameters	NLM
	CPE	CMCPE
Linearity range (M)	2.4 ´ 10-8 to	1.4 ´ 10-9 to
	1.6 ´ 10-5	5.2 ´ 10-5
Calibration curve equation	Y(mA)=0.3035X + 0.0335	Y(mA)= 0.9862 X + 0.1195
Correlation coefficient	0.9975	0.9982
L.O.D (M)	1.6 ´ 10-8	1.1 ´ 10-9
L.O.Q (M)	0.533 ´ 10-7	0.334 ´ 10-8
Repeatability of	4.12	4.18
peak currents
%RSD)
Repeatability of	0.43	0.49
Peak potentials
%RSD)
Reproducibility of peak currents	3.51	3.82
%RSD)
Reproducibility of potentials	0.32	0.41
%RSD)
Numbers of assays	12	12

 

Table 2: Chosen Experimental Conditions.

Variable	Chosen Value
pH	3.0
Buffer volume (ml)	10
Temperature (°C)	21
Purge time (s)	300
Accumulation potential (V)	-0.4
Accumulation time (s)	150
Rest time (s)	25
Stirring rate (rpm)	2000
Scan rate (mVs-1)	10
Pulse amplitude (mV)	50

 

Table 3: Determination of NLM in Pharmaceutical formulations.

Name of the drug	Amount labeled (m.g/L)	*Average amount found (m.g/L)	Recovery percentage (%)	+ S.D	RSD
NLM	2	1.956	97.8	0.0152	0.78
	4	3.923	98.07	0.0602	1.534
	6	5.80	96.66	0.0670	1.155

 

Table 4 : Determination of NLM in spiked human serum samples.

Name of the drug	Amount Spiked (m.g/L)	*Average amount found (m.g/L)	Recovery percentage (%)	+ S.D	RSD
NLM	2	1.987	99.35	0.0152	0.765
	6	5.957	99.28	0.0251	0.4213
	10	9.933	99.33	0.0321	0.323

 

Table 5: Determination of NLM in spiked human serum samples

Name of the drug	Amount Spiked (m.g/L)	*Average amount found (m.g/L)	Recovery percentage (%)	+ S.D	RSD
NLM	2	1.981	99.05	0.022	1.1
	4	3.90	97.50	0.0353	0.905
	6	3.892	97.3	0.033	0.84

 

Conclusion

Higher sensitivity has achieved at CMCPE when compared to CPE. The irreversibility of reduction behavior of NLM has been investigated. The present method has been compared with already existing methods for the determination of NLM  and found better recovery, more accurate, more sensitive and achieved at lower detection limits.

References

1. Shan Xie, Raymond F. Suckow, Barbara J. Mason, David Allen, Thomas B.Cooper, J. Chrom. B.: Anal. Tech. Biomed. Life Sci., 773 (2002) 143-149.
2. James Z. Chou, Henrik Albeck, Mary Jeanne Kreek,J. Chrom. Biomed. Appli., 613 (1993) 359-364.
3. C.Narasimha Rao, M. Suman, C.Narasimha Rao, K. Balaji and P. Venkateswarlu, Material sciences research India, Vol. 5(2), 383-390 (2008).
4. C.Narasimha Rao, K. Balaji, C.Narasimha Rao, and P. Venkateswarlu, Material sciences research India, Vol. 5(2), 305-312 (2008).
5. Z. Navratilova and Petre Kula, Fresenius. J. Anal. Chem. 367 (2000) 369.
6. P. Hernandez, J. Vivente, M. Gonzalz and L. Hernandez, Talanta 37 (8) (1990) 789.
7. L. Hernandez, P. Hernandez and E. Lorenzo, “Contemporary Electroanalytical Chemistry” (Ed., A. Ivaska) Plenum Press, New York (1990) p. 205.
8. Valdimir Borek and Matthew J. Morra, Environ. Sci. Technol., 32 (1998) 2149.
9. Jyh-Myng Zen and Ping-Jyh Chen, Anal. Chem., 69 (1997) 5087.
10. Y. Sallez, P. Bianco, E. Lojou, J. Electroanal. Chem. 493 (2000) 37.
11. S. Fedez, de Bentono, J. M. Moreda, A 329 (1996) 25-31
12. M. Sreedhar, Madhusudana T. Reddy, K. Balaji, Jayarama S. Reddy, Intern. J.Environ. Anal. Chem. 86 (2006) 757-767.

(Visited 139 times, 1 visits today)