Hasan S, Jangra J, Choudhary P. Current Update on Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid. Biomed Pharmacol J 2017;10(4).
Manuscript received on :er-mb-Nove
Manuscript accepted on :er-mb-Dece
Published online on: --
How to Cite    |   Publication History
Views Views: (Visited 22 times, 1 visits today)    PDF Downloads: 29
Current Update on Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid  

Shamimul Hasan1, Jogender Jangra2 and  Priyadarshini Choudhary3  

1Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Faculty of dentistry, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India.

2Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,Government Dental College, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India.

3Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Kalinga Institute of dental sciences, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha.

Corresponding Author E-mail: shamim0571@gmail.com

DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.13005/bpj/1293

Abstract:

Mucous membrane pemphigoid is a rare mucocutaneous disorder that has a predilection for the mucous membranes. Oral cavity is the chief site of involvement and desquamative gingivitis is the main presenting manifestation. Other mucous membranes like ocular, nasal, tracheal, laryngeal, pharyngeal and genital mucosa may also be affected. The disorder affects females in the middle age group. Histopathological and immunofluorescent features are highly diagnostic for the disease. Steroids are the mainstay of treatment, along with other immunosuppressive agents. This paper aims to present a recent update on mucous membrane pemphigoid taking in account its etio-pathogenesis, clinical and oral features, diagnostic aids and treatment protocols.

Keywords:

Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid; Desquamative Gingivitis; Nikolsky Sign; Corticosteroids

Download this article as: 
Copy the following to cite this article:

Hasan S, Jangra J, Choudhary P. Current Update on Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid. Biomed Pharmacol J 2017;10(4).

Copy the following to cite this URL:

Hasan S, Jangra J, Choudhary P. Current Update on Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid. Biomed Pharmacol J 2017;10(4). Available from: http://biomedpharmajournal.org/?p=18193

Introduction

Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is a chronic autoimmune, inflammatory, sub epithelial, blistering disorder. The condition predominantly affects the mucosal membranes, with or without clinically apparent scarring. [1] MMP constitutes a part of subepithelial bullous mucocutaneous disorders. MMP was earlier referred to as “cicatricial pemphigoid”, “benign MMP,” and “ocular or oral–gingival pemphigoid.” Currently, the disorder is named as Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP). [2]

Mucous membrane pemphigoid was first reported by Wichmanns[3] and Thost first decribed the essential characterstics and nomenclature of the disorder. [4,5]

Etiopathogenesis

MMP is an autoimmune disorder with an unknown etiology. Variety of inflammatory trauma to mucosa, [6]medications (clonidine, D-penicillamine, indomethacin), [6] viral agents, UV light, and occasional occurrence with other autoimmune diseases are some of the predisposing factors.[7] Racial or geographic predilections are unknown, but there is a possibility of an immunogenetic background that is associated with HLA DQB1*0301.[8,9] The most frequently presenting feature in MMP is desquamation of  gingiva and frequently occurs in post-menopausal women. There is no cited literature supporting the association of MMP and post menopausal condition or habit of smoking. [10]

MMP is an autoimmune disorder. The basement membrane complex proteins are primarily targeted by the autoantibodies (usually IgG). The immunoglobulins formed attract and trigger the leukocytes (chiefly neutrophils) which liberate proteolytic enzymes. These proteolytic enzymes cause blister formation byattaching to thebasement membrane zone fibrils.[11]The salt split skin test demonstrates IgG autoantibodies bound toantigens on the epidermal side, however, occasional cases have shown the presence of IgG autoantibodies on the dermal side. [12] The autoantibodies bound to the dermal side precipitate the glycoprotein epiligrin and bind to the basement membrane of the lower portion of the lamina lucida at its interface with the lamina densa. [13,14] There is also a mention about cell mediated immunity and cytokines in the etio-pathogenesis of MMP. [15]

Epidemiological Characterstics

MMP is reported with an incidence of 1.5-9.5 cases per 100,000 inhabitants every year. [16]Various data analysis suggest that Bullous pemphigoid is 7 times more common than MMP. [17]A number of immunofluorescence studies have shown 3 times more frequent occurrence of MMP as compared toPemphigus. [18-20] There is a predilection for middle aged adults and the condition infrequently affects children and old age individuals. The condition predominantly affects females (M:F-2:1) . [21]

Clinical and Oral Manifestations

Mucous membranes are chiefly affected by the condition. The condition frequently affects the oral mucosa, followed by ocular, pharyngeal, laryngeal, nasal, esophageal, tracheal and genital mucosa. Oral mucosal involvementoccurs in more than 90% cases and ocular lesions are seen in 60-70% cases.[22,23]Only about 25% of patients may report cutaneous lesions.

The most frequently occurring manifestations in the oral cavity are desquamation of gingiva,vesicles and bulla formation, and ulcerations. Gingiva is the most frequently affected intraoral site [24,25] and healing with scarring is characteristically seen. Desquamative gingivitis is a salient intra-oral feature of MMPand may be the only manifestationin few cases. [26] The patient usually gives a long history of gingival soreness. Chronic superficial gingival erosions and isolated epithelial tags may be contributory to the diagnosis. [27]The common presenting manifestations are tender gums with bleeding on slight provocation, mucosal peeling with difficulty in swallowing (dysphagia).[28]

Fluid filled blisters develop or sometimes due to mild to moderate trauma blisters may be blood-filled. A positive Nikolsky’s sign is characteristically seen in MMP. When tangential pressure is applied to erythematosus area or to apparently normal mucosa adjacent to lesional tissue, it results in blister formation. [29]These flaccid blisters eventually rupture producing denuded tender ulcers that show slow healing. A variable pattern of severity occurs in MMP, and ranges from infrequent blisters to continuous severe blister formation and ulceration. Gingival lesions usually do not demonstrate scarring, although healing with scarring in other oral lesions is associated with diminished functions.[30]Intact bullae is infrequently seen intraorally, and fibrin covered shallow erosions with irregular marginis a common manifesting feature in MMP.[31]Adhesive apertures may develop between various parts of oral cavity in advanced and severe MMP. Ankyloglossia or limited tongue protrusive movements may be seen in cases of frenal involvement. [32]

Ocular mucosa is the second commonest site of involvement in MMP. Ocular lesions show scarring conjunctivitis withfibrotic changes in the subconjunctival tissues.Fornix foreshortening and formation of adhesion between bulbar and palpebral conjunctiva (symblepharon) is also seen in MMP.[23,33]Initial lesions show non-specific features and remain confined to one eye. Advanced stage is characterized by conjunctival fibrosis, severe entropion, trichiasis, symblepharon, dry eye syndrome, corneal erosions and ulcerations, keratitis and even ultimately result in blindness. [33]

Life threatening asphyxia may occur in stenosis of larynx. Difficulty in swallowing (dysphagia ) may be seen in cases of esophageal webs. Occassionally rupture of esophageal webs occurs and cause mediasinitis.[9]Pharyngeal involvement in MMP may cause hoarseness or dysphagia.[1]

Diagnosis

Histopathological and immunofluorescence findings form the standard diagnostic aids.[34] The chosenbiopsy location should be a vesicle or the tissue surrounding the lesion. Gingival biopsy should be avoided, as gingival inflammation may be induced and will result in improper diagnosis.

The characteristic histopathologic feature in MMP isa sub-epithelial split caused due to disruption at the basement membrane. Eosinophil, neutrophil and lymphocytes predominate the inflammatory cells in the lamina propria.[35]

Direct immunofluorescent testing (DIF), being both a specific and sensitive test is regarded as principal diagnostic aid for MMP. [1]Linear deposition of immunoreactants, chiefly IgG, IgA or complement proteins (C3), along the epithelial / sub epithelial basement membrane zone of a mucous membrane is highly diagnostic for MMP. Indirect immunofluorescence using salt-split mucosa provides more sensitive assay. [36]

Treatment

Topical corticosteroids, either alone or in association with systemic corticosteroids form the mainstay of treatment. [37]Promising and dramatic responses have been achieved with Dapsone. [38-40]Patient should be subjected to regular blood profile testing as prolonged dapsone use may induce hemolytic anemia. Immunosuppressive drugs such as methotrexate, azathioprine, levamisole, cyclophosphamide, and mycophenolate mofetil are also used as a treatment protocol in MMP.[41-43]MMP has also been treated with a tetracycline derivative or a combination of tetracycline and niacinamide.[44-46] Maintaining dental hygiene and avoidingpredisposing factorsis important in the management of patients with MMP.[47]Intravenous immunoglobulins, plasmapheresis, and Low level laser therapy (LLLT) constitute the recent development in the management strategies of MMP.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to acknowledge the staff at Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Jamia Millia Islamia.

Conflict of Interest

There is no conflict of interest among authors.

Funding Source

There is no funding source for the manuscript.

References

  1. Chan LS, Ahmed AR, Anhalt GJ, et al. The first Internationalconsensus on mucous membrane pemphigoid: definition,diagnostic criteria, pathogenic factors, medical treatment, andprognostic indicators. Arch Dermatol 2002; 138: 370-379.
  2. Hasan S. Desquamative gingivitis – A clinical sign in mucous membrane pemphigoid: Report of a case and review of literature. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2014 Apr-Jun; 6(2): 122–126.
  3. Wichmanns JE: Ideen zur Diagnostik. Hanover, Helwig. 1894, vol 1: p 89.
  4. Thost A: Uber chronischen Pemphigus der Schleimhaute. Mschr Ohrenheilk 1896; 30: 165-174, 224- 231
  5. Thost A: Der chronische Schleimhautpemphigus der oberen Luftwege. Arch Laryng Rhinol 1911; 25:459-478
  6. Chan LS, Soong HK, Foster C S, Hammerberg C, Cooper KD: Ocular cicatricial pemphigoid occurring as a sequela of Stevens–Johnson syndrome. JAMA1991 Sept 18; 266(11): 1543 – 1546.
  7. Vassileva S: Drug-induced pemphigoid: bullous and cicatricial. Clin Dermatol1998; 16:379 – 387
  8. Nayar M, Wojnarowska F, Vemning V, Taylor CJ. Association of autoimmunity and cicatricial pemphigoid: is there an immunogenetic basis?? J Am Acad Dermatol 1991; 25: 1011-1015.
  9. Yunis JJ, Mobini N, Yunis EJ, Alper CA, Deulofeut R, Rodriguez A, Foster CS, Marcus-Bagley D, Good RA, Ahmed AR.Major histocompatibility complex class II markers in clinical variants of cicatricial pemphigoid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994; 91:7747-7751
  10. Delgado JC, Tarbay D, Yunis EJ et al. A common major histocompatibility complex class II allele HLA-DQB1*0301 is present in clinical variant of pemphigoid. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996; 93: 8569-8571.
  11. Shklar G: Desquamative gingivitis and oral mucous membrane diseases. In: ClinicalPeriodontology, 8th edn (Carranza FA, Newman GM, eds). Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1996; pp259 – 275
  12. Bernard R, Prost C, Leceref V, et al. Studies of cicatricial pemphigoid autoantibodies using direct immunoelectron microscopy and immunoblot analysis. J Inves Dermatol 1990; 94: 630-635
  13. Leenutaphong V, Von Kries R, Plewig G. Localised cicatricial pemphigoid (Brunsting-Perry): electron microscopic study. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989; 21: 1089-1093
  14. Chan LS, Majmudar AA, Tran HH, Meier F, et al. Laminin-6 and Laminin-5 are recognized by autoantibodies in a subset of cicatricial pemphigoid. J Invest Dermatol 1997; 108: 848-853
  15. Hasan S. Oral signs in muco-cutaneous disorders- Report of three cases and review of literature.  Recent Researches in Medicine and Medical Chemistry. 2012; 161-178
  16. Allbritton JI, Nousari HC, Anhalt GJ. Antiepiligrin (laminin-5) cicatricial pemphigoid. Br J Dermatol 1997; 137: 992-996
  17. Schifter M, Yeoh SC, Coleman H, Georgiou A. Oral mucosal diseases: the inflammatory dermatoses. Aust Dent J. 2010; 55: 23-38
  18. Bernard P, Vaillant L, Labibelle B, et al. Incidence and distribution of sub-epidermal autoimmune bullous skin diseases in 3  French regions. Arch Dermatol 1995; 131: 48-52.
  19. Daniels TE, Quadra-white C. Direct immunofluorescence in oral mucosal disease: a diagnostic analysis of 130 cases. Oral Med Oral Pathol 1981; 51: 38-54
  20. Helander SD, Rogers RS. The sensitivity and specificity of direct immunofluorescent testing in disorders of mucous membranes. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994; 30: 65-75
  21. Corrozzo M, Broccoletti R, Carbone M, Garzino-Demo P, Gandolfo S. Mucous membrane pemphigoid: clinical, histopathological, immunological aspects and therapeutic management. Minreva Stomatol 1996; 45: 455-463
  22. Ahmed AR, Kurgis BS, Rogers RSD. Cicatricial pemphigoid . J Am Acad Dermatol 1991; 24: 987-1001.
  23. Braun-Falco O, Plewig G, Wolff HH, Burgdorf WHC, eds. Dermatology. 2nd completely revised edition. Berlin: Springer-Verlag,2000
  24. Laskaris G, Sklavounou A, Stratigos J. Bullous pemphigoid, cicatricial pemphigoid and pemphigus vulgaris: A Comparative clinical survey of 278 cases. Oral Sur Oral Med Oral Path. 1982; 54: 656-662
  25. Shklar G, McCarthy PL. Oral lesions of mucous membrane pemphigoid. A study of 85 cases. Arch Otolaryngol1971; 3: 354-364
  26. Silverman S Jr., Gorsky M, Lozada-Nur F, Liu A. Oral mucous membrane pemphigoid. A study of sixty-five patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol1986; 61: 233-237
  27. Gallanger G, Shklar. Oral involvement in mucous membrane pemphigoid. Clin Dermatol. 1987; 5: 18-27
  28. Kurihara M, Nishimura F, Hashimoto T, et al.Immunopathological diagnosis of cicatricial pemphigoid withdesquamative gingivitis. A case report. J Periodontol2001;72:243-249.
  29. Sapp JP, Eversole LR, Wysocki GP. Contemporary oral and maxillofacial pathology. 2nd ed. St Louis : Mosby; 2004. pg 209-2013, 219-221, 262-274.
  30. Dayan S, Simmons RK, Ahmed AR. Contemporary issues in the diagnosis of oral pemphigoid. A selective review of the literature. Oral Sur Oral Med Oral Path Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 88(2): 424-430
  31. Weinberg MA, Insler MS, Campen RB. Mucocutaneous features ofautoimmune blistering diseases. Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997;84:517-34
  32. Hasan S, Kapoor B, Siddiqui A, Srivastava H, Fatima S, Akhtar Y. Mucous membrane pemphigoid with exclusive gingival involvement: Report of a case and review of literature. J Orofac Sci 2012;4:64-9
  33. Brydak-Godowska J, Moneta-Wielgos J, Pauk-Domanska M, Drobecka-Brydak E, Samsel A, Kecik M, Kowalewski C e al. Diagnostics and pharmacological treatment of OCP cicatricial pemphigoid. Klin Oczna 2005; 107: 725-727
  34. Talacko AA, Gordan AK, Aldred MJ. The patient with recurrent oral ulceration. Aust Dent J. 2010; 1: 14-22
  35. Scully C, Carrazzo M, Gandolofo S, Puialliu P, Montect R. Update on mucous membrane pemphigoid. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path Oral Radio Endo 1999; 88: 56-68
  36. Scully C, Muziob LL. Oral mucosal diseases: Mucous membrane pemphigoid. British journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2008; 46: 358-366.
  37. Lamey PJ, Rees TD, Binnie WH, Rankin KV. Mucousmembrane pemphigoid–Treatment experience at twoinstitutions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol1992;74:50-53.
  38. Rogers RS III, Seehafer JR, Perry HO. Treatment ofcicatricial (benign mucous membrane) pemphigoidwith dapsone. J Am Acad Dermatol1982;6:215-223.
  39. Ciarrocca KN, Greenberg MS. A retrospective studyof the management of oral mucous membrane pemphigoidwith dapsone. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral PatholOral Radiol Endod 1999;88:159-163.
  40. Rogers RS, Mehregan DA. Dapsone therapy of cicatricialpemphigoid. Semin Dermatol1988;7:201-205.
  41. 41.Lever WF. Pemphigus and pemphigoid. A review ofthe advances made since 1964. Am J Dermatopathol 1979;1:2-32.
  42. Gorlin RJ. Vesiculo-bullous lesions. Gerodontics1985;1:105-107.
  43. Lu SY, Chen WJ, Eng HL. Response to levamisoleand low-dose prednisolone in 41 patients with chronicoral ulcers: A 3-year open clinical trial and follow-upstudy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral RadiolEndod1998;86:438-445.
  44. Thornfeldt CR, Menkes AW. Bullous pemphigoid controlledby tetracycline. J Am Acad Dermatol 1987;16:305-310.
  45. Kreyden OP, Borradori L, Trueb RM, Burg G, Nestle FO.Successful therapy with tetracycline and nicotinamidein cicatricial pemphigoid. Hautarzt2001;52:247-250.
  46. Reiche L, Wojnarowska F, Mallon E. Combinationtherapy with nicotinamide and tetracyclines for cicatricialpemphigoid: Further support for its efficacy.Clin Exp Dermatol1998;23:254-257
  47. Damoulis PD, Gagari E. Combined treatment ofperiodontal disease and benign mucous membranepemphigoid. Case report with 8 years maintenance.J Periodontol2000;71:1620-1629.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

(Visited 22 times, 1 visits today)